The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

81 protocols using a0452

1

Immunohistochemical Staining of Sterna

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sternal sections were decalcified with 5.5% EDTA solution containing 10% formaldehyde for 7–8 days. Decalcified sterna were embedded in paraffin and sections cut at 2.5 µm and fixed onto microscopy slides. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed with anti-MPO antibody (Dako Agilent A0398) at dilution 1:3000 or anti-CD3 (Dako Agilent A0452) antibody at dilution 1:100. Tissue sections were dewaxed in xylene and descending alcohols and rehydrated in distilled water; endogenous peroxidase was quenched by immersion in 3% hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) in PBS for 5 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Histopathological Analysis of HIFU Therapy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pre-HIFU therapy tumor biopsy samples and post-HIFU resected tumor samples were processed within 20 min of excision. Resected tumor sections were evaluated by a board-certified pathologist (SCO) for definitive diagnosis, margin assessment, and identification of the ablated tissue. The treatment site and overlying skin were grossly evaluated prior to formalin fixation. Sections of the treated and untreated tumor were collected and microscopically evaluated. Sections of overlying skin were assessed microscopically when evidence of potential thermal injury was grossly visible. All sections for microscopy were routinely processed and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Immunohistochemistry for CD3 (rabbit polyclonal, anti-human; A0452; Agilent/Dako, Santa Clara, California), IBA-1 (rabbit polyclonal, anti-human; NC9288364; Wako Chemicals, USA), and CD79a (mouse monoclonal, anti-human; sc-20064; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) was performed. All antibodies were validated and run on a Ventana Benchmark XP automated stainer (Roche Ventana, Oro Valley, Arizona) using the Discovery Universal secondary antibody (760-4205; Roche, Basel, Switzerland), ultraView Universal Alkaline Phosphatase Red Detection Kit (Roche), and hematoxylin counterstain. All antibodies were verified to work in canine tissue before use in research samples.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunohistochemistry for Immune Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for CD3 and CD8 was performed in a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments–accredited laboratory using a polyclonal rabbit antibody for CD3 (A0452; Dako/Agilent, Santa Clara, CA) and a mouse monoclonal for CD8 (clone C8/C8144B, 760-4250; Cell Marque, Rocklin, CA) on the Ventana Benchmark immunostaining system (Ventana/Roche, Tucson, AZ). IHC for FOXP3 used a rat monoclonal antibody (FJK-16s; Invitrogen/Thermo Fisher, Carlsbad, CA) on the Ventana Discovery Ultra (Ventana/Roche). FOXP3 IHC was unevaluable in a subset of the European American tumors from the matched-race TMA set because of a faulty batch of charged slides, which were incompatible with the Ventana immunostainer. Thus, these data are not included.
p53 IHC was performed on the Ventana Benchmark autostaining system using a mouse monoclonal antibody (BP53-11) after antigen retrieval in CC1 buffer followed by detection with the iView HRP system (Roche/Ventana Medical Systems, Oro Valley, AZ). This protocol was previously validated for detection of TP53 mutations in prostate cancer [9 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunohistochemical Profiling of Tumor Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemistry was performed on 4–5 μm standard tumor tissue sections of formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded TMAs. All slides were dewaxed with xylene/ethanol before antigen retrieval in a pressure cooker (Decloaking Chamber Plus, Biocare Medical, Concord, CA, USA), or in a microwave, in Target Retrieval Solution (TRS) buffer (pH 9) (S2367; DAKO/Agilent). An endogenous block was applied prior to incubation with the primary antibodies to block for endogenous enzymatic activity. The slides were then incubated for 1 h with mouse monoclonal CD3, CD4, CD8, CD45, and FOXP3 antibodies (A0452 [Dako/Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA], 104‐R15 [Cell Marque, Darmstadt, Germany], M7103 [Dako], M0701 [Dako], and M560044 [BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA], respectively) followed by incubation with an appropriate HRP‐En Vision (Dako), EnVision Mouse hrp, K4001 for CD8 and FOXP3, EnVision rabbit HRP, and K4003 for CD3 and CD4. Primary antibodies were omitted for the negative controls. Tissue from differentiated breast cancer types were used as positive controls.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunohistochemistry of Pancreatic Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pancreas tissue and cell pellets were fixed overnight at room temperature in 10% neutral-buffered formalin (KliniPath, Olen, Belgium). Next, samples were washed twice with PBS, dehydrated, and embedded in paraffin. Sections of 4 µm thickness were cut. Automated stainings were performed on the Leica Bond RX™. Primary antibodies used are: anti-EVI-1 (1/1000, C50E12, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), anti-cleaved caspase 3 (1/200, 9661, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-CD3 (1/50, A0452, Agilent), anti-Krt19 (1/100, TromaIII, Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, Iowa City, IA, USA), anti-F4/80 (1/100, APC clone BM8.1, Sigma-Aldrich), anti-CD142 (1/100, AF2419, Bio-techne, Minneapolis, MN, USA), anti-Krt19 (1/20, M0888, Agilent, Santa-Clara, CA, USA), anti-CD19 (1/500, ab245235, Abcam), anti-collagen IV (1/500, 1340-01, Southern Biotechnology Associates) Trichrome Masson’s staining was performed automated at the Pathology Department of UZ Brussel, Brussels, Belgium. DNA staining was performed with DAPI (Agilent) or Hoechst.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Histopathological Analysis of HIFU Therapy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pre-HIFU therapy tumor biopsy samples and post-HIFU resected tumor samples were processed within 20 min of excision. Resected tumor sections were evaluated by a board-certified pathologist (SCO) for definitive diagnosis, margin assessment, and identification of the ablated tissue. The treatment site and overlying skin were grossly evaluated prior to formalin fixation. Sections of the treated and untreated tumor were collected and microscopically evaluated. Sections of overlying skin were assessed microscopically when evidence of potential thermal injury was grossly visible. All sections for microscopy were routinely processed and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Immunohistochemistry for CD3 (rabbit polyclonal, anti-human; A0452; Agilent/Dako, Santa Clara, California), IBA-1 (rabbit polyclonal, anti-human; NC9288364; Wako Chemicals, USA), and CD79a (mouse monoclonal, anti-human; sc-20064; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) was performed. All antibodies were validated and run on a Ventana Benchmark XP automated stainer (Roche Ventana, Oro Valley, Arizona) using the Discovery Universal secondary antibody (760-4205; Roche, Basel, Switzerland), ultraView Universal Alkaline Phosphatase Red Detection Kit (Roche), and hematoxylin counterstain. All antibodies were verified to work in canine tissue before use in research samples.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comprehensive H&E Staining and IHC Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For H&E staining, 5‐micron‐thick FFPE slides 5‐micron were washed twice for 5 min each in xylene, 100% ethanol, and 95% ethanol, followed by a brief rinse in water and a 15‐min incubation in hematoxylin. After a brief water rinse post‐incubation, slides were dipped in 0.25% hydrochloric acid‐ethanol, followed by brief dip in 1% lithium carbonate, a water rinse, and a 5‐min incubation in eosin Y. Slides were then briefly rinsed twice each with 95% ethanol, 100% ethanol, and xylene and were cover‐slipped.
IHC for CD3 and CD20 was performed on 5‐micron‐thick formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded whole tissue sections using the following antibodies (clone, catalog number, dilution, vendor): CD3 (polyclonal, A0452, 1:400, Dako, Agilent Technologies; Santa Clara, California, USA) and CD20 (monoclonal/L26, M0755, 1:140, Dako, Agilent Technologies; Santa Clara, California, USA), each using DIVA retrieval in the decloaker (Biocare Medical; Pacheco, California, USA) and a polymer detection system (Dako, Agilent Technologies; Santa Clara, California, USA), with counterstains using dab and hematoxylin.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Mouse and Patient Tumors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mouse tumors were fixed in 10% phosphate-buffered formalin, embedded in paraffin, and sectioned by the Research Histology Core Laboratory at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. Patient tumors were isolated and processed according to the phase I trial protocol8,10 and obtained from MD Anderson. Immunohistochemistry was performed with either rat anti-mouse CD31 mAb (SZ31, Dianova, Hamburg, Germany) or rabbit anti-human CD3 pAb (A0452, Dako [Agilent], Santa Clara, CA) followed by rabbit anti-rat HRP- or goat anti-rabbit HRP-conjugated secondary antibody, respectively (Bio-rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) and the DAB peroxidase substrate kit (Vector Laboratories, Inc. Burlingame, CA). Sections were then counterstained with hematoxylin. Tissue sections were blindly quantified by manual counting. Representative areas2,3 from each CD31 stained section (n = 12 in total) with most intensive microvessel density was captured under the light microscope at 200x (Leica). MVD per tumor section was calculated from the average count of CD31+ vessels per representative area, averaging total number from n = 3 tumors per treatment group. Total image length is 384 µm. Immunofluorescence was performed using rat mAb CD4 (GK1.5, Abcam, Cambridge, MA) and rabbit pAb CD8 antibodies (ab4055, Abcam). Sections were examined with a Nikon microscope and camera and processed in ImageJ.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantification of T Cells in Stroke Infarcts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Histochemical and immunohistochemical staining was performed on sections cut to 6 µm from paraffin-embedded tissue blocks. Randomly chosen sections of every patient were deparaffinated and rehydrated and subsequently stained with H&E. Immunohistochemistry for CD3 (polyclonal rabbit anti-human CD3, diluted 1:50, A0452; Dako) was performed on sections adjacent to H&E-stained sections with the Ventana Benchmark GX automated staining system using a CC1 (Roche) pretreatment and the iView DAB Detection Kit (Roche). Sections were counterstained with hematoxylin and coverslipped with Entellan (Merck) as mounting medium. Age of infarcts was estimated by two experienced and independent neuropathologists (T. Arzberger and P.T. Nelson) on H&E sections according to published criteria (Mena et al., 2004 (link)). CD3 stains were scanned with Zeiss Axio Scan Z1 using a 20× objective. The infarct area was demarcated, and the absolute numbers and coordinates of intra- and extralesional CD3+ T cells were assessed manually using Qupath (version 0.2.2). Cell density was calculated as number of cells per cm2 of defined lesion area. The R index for quantification of cell clustering per area was calculated as described above in R (version 3.6.0). Intralesional cell density was correlated with time after stroke onset for each sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Immune Markers in Tissue Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following antibodies were used: polyclonal rabbit antibody against human myeloperoxidase (MPO) (A0398, Dakocytomation, Glostrup, Denmark) and cluster of differentiation 3 (CD3 (A0452, Dakocytomation, Glostrup, Denmark), monoclonal rabbit antibody against human fork head box P3 (FoxP3) (clone eBio7979, 14-7979-82, eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA), ovine interleukin-6 (IL-6) (MAB1004, Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany), and ovine IL-8 (MAB1044 Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany). Antibodies against intestinal fatty acid binding protein (I-FABP) were kindly provided by the Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, the Netherlands. Secondary antibodies were the following: biotin-conjugated rabbit antimouse (E0413, DakoCytomation, Glostrup, Denmark), swine antirabbit (E0353, DakoCytomation, Glostrup, Denmark), and peroxidase-conjugated goat antirabbit (111-035-045, Jackson, West Grove, PA, USA). Detection antibodies against IL-6 (AB1839, Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany) and IL-8 (AB1840, Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany) were used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!