The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

10 protocols using α amylase solution

1

Evaluating Probiotic Gut Survival

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The digestive stability of LAB strains was assessed by measuring their viability under simulated human gastrointestinal conditions. This experiment was performed with slight modifications to a previously described method (Kim et al., 2022 ). First, each strain suspended in saline (1.0 × 109 CFU/mL) was poured into a 50-mL conical tube, and 26 μL of 0.3 M CaCl2 solution (Sigma-Aldrich) and 4 mL of 6.55 mg/mL α-amylase solution (Sigma-Aldrich) were added. The suspension was then adjusted to pH 7.0 with 1 M NaOH (Sigma-Aldrich) and incubated at 37 °C for 5 min to simulate oral conditions. To simulate gastrointestinal conditions, 6 μL of 0.3 M CaCl2, 694 μL of distilled water, and 9.1 mL of 0.07 mg/mL pepsin were added. The pH was adjusted to 3 with 1 M HCl (Sigma-Aldrich) and the mixture was incubated at 37 °C for 1 h. Finally, intestinal conditions were simulated by adding 40 mL of 0.3 M CaCl2, 1.31 mL of distilled water, 2.5 mL of 160 mM bile extract, and 16 mL of 22 mg/mL pancreatic solution to the mixture, followed by incubation at 37 °C for 2 h. The survival rate of the strains at each digestion step was determined by measuring the number of viable cells on the MRS plate after aliquoting the mixture of each step.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Phenolic Characterization and Enzyme Inhibition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All of the solvents were analytical grade, of high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS) quality (>99%) and were obtained from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Deionized water (DIW) was used for the extractions and was of Milli-Q quality for liquid chromatography (LC) and UV-VIS spectrophotometric measurements. The delphinidin-3-O-rutinoside was purchased from Phytolab (Vestenbergsgreuth, Germany). The phenolic acid standards (protocatechuic acid, p-hydroxybenzoic acid, gallic acid, gentisic acid, vanillic acid, salicylic acid, syringic acid, caffeic acid, p-coumaric acid, m-coumaric acid, ferulic acid, o-coumaric acid and chlorogenic acid) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Poole, Dorset, UK). The acarbose was purchased from J&K (Beijing, China), α-Amylase solution from Sigma Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany), 3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) from Fluorochem (Hadfield, UK) and Na-K tartrate tetrahydrate (p. A.) from Chemsolute (Roskilde, Denmark). All of these pure standards were used for identification and quantification purposes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Isolation and Purification of Peptidoglycan

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PGN was isolated essentially following a published procedure [29 ]. Briefly, biomass was harvested from 1 l of culture grown to the stationary phase by centrifugation (5000 g, 30 min, 4 °C), resuspended in 60 ml distilled water and transferred drop-wise into 65 ml of boiling 8% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS; Sigma) under constant stirring to lyse cells. The suspension was further boiled for 1 h, reduced to the former volume using a rotary evaporator, and stirred overnight. SDS was removed by several washing steps with distilled water, 60 ml, each, using an Optima L-100XP ultracentrifuge from Beckman Coulter (rotor Ti70, 35,000 rpm, 30 min, 40 °C) followed by dialysis against distilled water for 4 days at room temperature. For the total volume of 12 ml of that PGN solution, 200 μl of an α-amylase solution (24 mg ml− 1; Sigma) were added and the mixture was incubated at 37 °C for 2 h under constant shaking. Further, 320 μl of pre-incubated Pronase E solution (10 mg ml− 1 in 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5; Sigma) was added and incubated at 60 °C for 1.5 h. Preparations were washed, boiled for 1 h, washed again, and dried in a Speed Vac vacuum centrifuge (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Vienna, Austria).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Analyzing Qimen Black Tea Composition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Qimen black tea was obtained from the Shenbao Huacheng Company (Shenzhen, China). The moisture content of the black tea leaves was 5.2 ± 0.2%. Gallic acid, α- Amylase solution, protease and glucosidase solution were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Other chemicals (all analytical-grade purity) used in the study were purchased from the Beijing Chemical Plant (Beijing, China).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

α-Amylase Inhibitory Activity Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The α-amylase inhibitory activity was assayed based on the starch-iodine method [54 (link)]. α-Amylase solution (2 mg/mL) from porcine pancreas (type VI-B, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and TDB extracts were dissolved in 0.2 M phosphate buffer saline (pH 6.9). Iodine (0.25 mM) and soluble starch (0.5%) solutions were prepared in deionized water. Firstly, 20 µL of α-amylase was mixed and incubated with 20 µL of the test sample at 37 °C in 10 min. After that, 30 µL of starch solution was added and then incubated for 8 min. The reaction was suspended by adding 20 µL of 1 M HCl, followed by 100 µL of iodine solution. The resulting mixture was measured at a wavelength of 565 nm by a microplate reader. The inhibition percentage and IC50 value were calculated as described previously [54 (link)]. Acarbose was used as a positive reference.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantitative Assay for α-Amylase Inhibition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The α-amylase inhibition was determined by 96-well microtiter plate method based on calorimetric assay as previously described by Balasubramaniam et al. [24 (link)]. Equal volume of test samples (5 mg mL−1) and α-amylase solution (0.5 mg mL−1, Sigma) prepared in 30 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) was pre- incubated at 37 °C for 10 min. 50 μL of 0.5% starch solution was added and incubated for 10 min at 37 °C. 120 μL of DNS reagent (Sigma) was added to stop the reaction. The reaction mixture was incubated at 95 °C for 5 min, cooled to room temperature. Absorbance was measured at 540 nm in a microplate reader. Acarbose at the concentration 2 mg mL−1 was taken as positive control. The inhibition percentage of amylase was determined by the formula reported in the previous paragraph.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Evaluation of Antioxidant and Digestive Enzyme Inhibition Activities

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ABTS (2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid)), Trolox (6-hydroxyl-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchroman-2-carboxylic acid), DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl), TFA (trifluoroacetic acid), gallic acid, Folin–Ciocalteu reagent (FC), pepsin from porcine gastric mucosa-lyophilized powder, α-amylase and pancreatin from porcine pancreas, heat-stable α-amylase solution, protease, amyloglucosidase solution, 2-(N-Morpholino) ethanesulfonic acid (MES), and Tris (hydroxymethyl) aminomethane (TRIS) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA). Technical grades of methanol (MeOH) (>98.5%), ethanol (C2H5OH) (93%), sodium hydroxide (NaOH) (97%), sodium chloride (NaCl) (97%), potassium persulfate (K2S2O8) (100%), sodium carbonate (Na2CO3) (>99%), nitric acid (HNO3) (>99%), sulfuric acid (H2SO4) (>97%), hydrochloric acid (HCl) (37.2% w/w), petroleum ether (C6H14) (30–60 °C, A.R), Kjeldahl tablet (CuH10O9S), potassium chloride (KCl) (> 99%), sodium hydrogen carbonate (NaHCO3) (>99%), sodium chloride (NaCl) (97%), magnesium chloride (MgCl2) (99%), ammonium chloride (NH4Cl) (100%), calcium chloride (CaCl2) (>93%), monopotassium phosphate (KH2PO4), and indicators (tashiro and phenolphthalein) were purchased from VWR International (Leuven, Belgium). Inductively coupled plasma (ICP) multi-element standard solution IV was procured from Merck KGak (Darmstadt, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

α-Amylase Inhibition Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The inhibition assay for α-amylase was performed as reported by Meng et al. [45 (link)] with minor modifications. Briefly, 100 μL of extract evaporated in a rotavapor under reduced pressure to eliminate ethanol at different dilutions, was mixed with α-amylase solution (100 μL, 1.0 U/mL) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) in phosphate buffer (pH 6.9) and 250 μL of 1% starch solution. The incubation was carried out for 5 min at 37 °C. The enzyme reaction was stopped by adding dinitrosalicylic acid reagent (Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany) (250 μL) and incubation was carried out for 15 min in boiling water. For dilution, 2 mL distilled water was added to the final reaction mixture. The absorbance was read at 540 nm. The inhibitory effect was calculated by Equation (1). The results were expressed as IC50 (mg GAE/mL). Acarbose (Supelco, Laramie, WY, USA) was used as positive control in order to compare the inhibitory effects.

where the Abscontrol-1 is the result of reaction without adding enzyme, which was replaced for buffer solution, while the mixture of enzyme and starch solution without extract was Abscontrol-2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

α-Amylase Inhibitory Assay of Cleistocalyx nervosum

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
α-Amylase inhibitory activity was assayed according to the procedure described by Odeyemi et al. [18 ] with a slight modification. α-Amylase activity was determined using soluble starch (1%) as a substrate in 0.02 mol/l sodium phosphate buffer (pH 6.9) (Sigma-Aldrich, Inc., Darmstadt, Germany). Cleistocalyx nervosum var. paniala extracts with concentration 0.1 mg/mL, 0.25 mg/mL, 0.5 mg/mL, and 1 mg/mL were mixed with substrate solution made up to a total volume of 150 µL; 10 μL of α-amylase solution (1 unit/mL/min) (Sigma-Aldrich, Inc., Darmstadt, Germany) was added. After incubation at 25 °C for 30 min, 30 μL of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent (Sigma-Aldrich, Inc., Germany) was added and incubated at 90 °C for 5 min. The absorbance was measured at 540 nm. Acarbose (α-amylase inhibitor) (Bio Basic Inc., Markham, ON, Canada) was used as a positive control. The assay was performed in triplicate. The percentage of inhibition was calculated using the following formula:
where A is the absorbance reading measured at 540 nm.
The IC50 value was defined as the concentration of the compound required to inhibit 50% of the α-Amylase activity under the assay conditions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

α-Amylase Inhibition Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The infusions that presented better results for TPC, TFC and antioxidant capacity were subjected to the inhibition assay for α-amylase, performed as reported by Meng et al. [53 (link)] with minor modifications. Briefly, 100 μL of extract was mixed with an α-amylase solution (100 μL, 1.0 U/mL) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) in a phosphate buffer (pH 6.9) and 250 μL of a 1% starch solution. The incubation was carried out for 5 min at 37 °C. The enzyme reaction was stopped by adding dinitrosalicylic acid reagent (250 μL) (Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany), and incubation was carried out for 15 min in boiling water. For the dilution, 2 mL of distilled water was added to the final reaction mixture. The absorbance was measured at 540 nm. The inhibitory effect was calculated according to Equation (1), where Abscontrol-1 results from the reaction without adding the enzyme, which was replaced by the buffer solution, while the mixture of the enzyme and starch solution without extract was Abscontrol-2. The results were expressed as IC50 (mg RE/mL). Acarbose (Supelco, Laramie, WY, USA) was used as a positive control to compare the inhibitory effects.

+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!