The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Anti ha rat monoclonal antibody

Manufactured by Roche
Sourced in Switzerland

The Anti-HA rat monoclonal antibody is a laboratory reagent used to detect and purify proteins that have been engineered to contain a specific epitope tag, the HA tag. This antibody specifically binds to the HA tag, allowing for the identification and isolation of HA-tagged proteins from complex samples.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

20 protocols using anti ha rat monoclonal antibody

1

Western Blot Analysis of Parasite Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Parasites were harvested by treatment with 0.15% saponin/0.1% BSA/PBS for 10 minutes on ice. Parasites were then pelleted by centrifugation, washed with PBS and lysed in reducing sample buffer (2% β-mercaptoethanol/NUPAGE LDS Sample Buffer; Life Technologies) before being boiled for 5 minutes. Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE [38 (link)] and transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane (Amersham). To visualise HA-containing fragments, the membrane was blocked in western blocking buffer (5% skim milk powder/TTBS) for at least 1 hour and incubated in a monoclonal rat anti-HA antibody (Roche) diluted 1:250 in blocking buffer for 1 hour. For detection of Hsp60, anti-Hsp60 (kind gift from T. Lithgow and R. Waller) was used at a 1:1000 dilution. The membrane was then washed several times with TTBS before incubating for 45 minutes in rabbit anti-rat horseradish peroxidase-conjugated antibody (DAKO) diluted 1:1000 in blocking buffer. After repeating the wash steps, protein bands were detected on X-ray film or on a ChemiDoc (BioRad) using SuperSignal West Pico Chemiluminescent Substrate (Thermo Scientific), according to the manufacturer’s protocol.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunofluorescence Labeling of GluA2, HA, and RIM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the GluA2, HA-tagged proteins and RIM, primary neuronal cultures were co-incubated with monoclonal mouse anti-GluA2 antibody (Nair et al., 2013 (link)), monoclonal rat anti-HA antibody (Roche, France), RIM 1/2 antibody (synaptic systems, Gottingen, Germany) or for 5–7 min at 37°C and then fixed with 4% PFA. A preliminary permeabilization step with triton is used for the RIM labelling.
Then cells were washed three times for 5 min in 1x PBS. PFA was quenched with NH4Cl 50 mM for 30 min. Unspecific staining was blocked by incubating coverslips in 1% BSA for 1 hr at room temperature. Primary antibodies were revealed with Alexa 532 coupled anti-mouse IgG secondary antibodies and Alexa 647 coupled anti-rat secondary antibodies (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Cell Surface Detection of Tagged Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Detection of the HA-and Flag-tagged constructs at the cell surface by ELISA was performed, as previously described (47) . Twenty-four hours after transfection, HEK-293 or drosophila S2 cells were seeded into 96-well microplates. Cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, blocked with 10% FBS.
HA-tagged constructs were detected with a monoclonal rat anti-HA antibody coupled to horseradish peroxidase (Roche). Flag-tagged constructs were detected with a monoclonal mouse anti-FLAG antibody coupled to horseradish peroxidase (Sigma-Aldrich). Bound antibodies were detected by chemoluminescence using SuperSignal substrate (Pierce) and a 2103 EnVision TM Multilabel Plate Reader (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Antibody Characterization and Validation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following antibodies were used: mouse monoclonal anti-β-actin (cat. no. A1978, 1:10,000; Sigma-Aldrich), rabbit polyclonal anti-FLAG (cat. no. 2368, 1:1000; Cell Signaling), mouse monoclonal anti-PARP-1 (sc8007, 1:1000; Santa Cruz), rabbit polyclonal anti-calnexin (sc11397, 1:1000; Santa Cruz), mouse monoclonal anti-V5 antibody (R960-25, 1:4000; Invitrogen), rat monoclonal anti-HA antibody (12158167001, 1:4000; Roche), rabbit polyclonal anti-HA antibody (71-5500, 1:1000 Invitrogen), goat polyclonal anti-calnexin (sc-6465, 1:200; Santa Cruz), sheep anti-TGN46 (AHP500, 1:200 AbD Serotec) and mouse monoclonal anti-GM130 antibody (610823, 1:200; BD Biosciences). Goat anti-mouse (cat. no. 31430, 1:5,000) and goat anti-rabbit IgG conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (31460, 1:5,000) were from Thermo Fischer Scientific. The following secondary antibodies were used for indirect immuno-fluorescence: FITC-conjugated donkey anti-sheep/goat (STAR88F, 1:200; AbD Serotec), Cy3-conjugated donkey anti-mouse IgG (715-165-150, 1:200; Jackson ImmunoResearch), Cy5-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit IgG (711-175-152, 1:200; Jackson ImmunoResearch), Cy2-conjugated donkey anti-mouse IgG (715-225-150, 1:200; Jackson ImmunoResearch), Cy5-conjugated donkey anti-goat IgG (705-175-147, 1:200; Jackson ImmunoResearch), Cy3-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit IgG (711-165-152, 1:200; Jackson ImmunoResearch).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Antibody Characterization for Protein Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Rabbit polyclonal anti-DYKDDDD antibody and mouse anti-GFP antibody were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA) and Nacalai Tesque (Kyoto, Japan), respectively. Rabbit polyclonal anti-Cullin2 (CUL2) and anti-TDP-43 antibodies were purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, UK) and Proteintech (Chicago, IL), respectively. Rat monoclonal anti-HA antibody was obtained from Roche (Basel, Switzerland). Mouse monoclonal antibodies against actin (C4), elongin B (D-5), and elongin C (56) were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). Mouse monoclonal anti-FLAG antibody (M2) was obtained from Sigma. Rabbit anti-ubiquitin, Lys48-specific antibody was obtained from EMD Millipore (Billerica, MA). Mouse anti-Hsc70/Hsp70 antibody was purchased from StressGen (Victoria, BC). Mouse anti-HIF1α antibody was obtained from Abcam. Goat anti-mouse IgG Alexa fluor488 and fluor405 were purchased from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA), and goat anti-rabbit IgG CF568 was from BIOTIM (Hayward, CA). Mouse monoclonal anti-human VHL was generated as previously described31 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunofluorescence Analysis of Pfcyp19b-OE Lines

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Thin smears made from the synchronous culture of Pfcyp19b-OE lines were fixed using paraformaldehyde (Sigma) (4%) and glutaraldehyde (Sigma) (0.0075%) in 1xPBS (1st Base) for 15 min, permeabilized in Triton X-100 (Sigma) (0.1%) for 10 min and then blocked with bovine serum albumin (BSA, Sigma) (3%) with glycine supplementation (1st Base) (22.52mg/ml) in PBS-T for 1 hour. Subsequently they were incubated with 1:200 rat monoclonal anti-HA antibody (Roche) and 1:200 rabbit polyclonal anti-PfBiP (BEI Resources) followed by incubation for 30 minutes with 1:2000 Alexa Fluor 594 goat highly cross-absorbed anti-rat (Jackson Immunoresearch) and 1:2000 Alexa Fluor 488 goat highly cross-absorbed anti-rabbit secondary antibodies (Jackson Immunoresearch). Nuclear counterstain was done with DAPI (Thermo Scientific) (1 ng/μl) for 10 min. All steps were performed at room temperature. Slides were mounted with ProLong Gold Antifade (Thermo Scientific). Images were captured with Zeiss LSM710 confocal microscope equipped with an Airyscan detector using a Plan-Apochromat 100x/1.46 oil objective and processed using Zen (Blue edition) imaging software (Zeiss). Images were analyzed using ImageJ. All antibodies have been tested for cross-reactivity and corresponding empty Vector control strain at the same generation and developmental stage was used parallelly as a negative control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

ABCA3 Protein Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A549 cells were lysed in radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer [0.15 mol/L sodium chloride, 1% Triton‐X 100, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% sodium dodecylsulfate, 5 mmol/L ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA), 50 mmol/L Tris (pH 8)] (Sigma, EDTA from GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK, Tris from Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany), supplemented with complete protease inhibitor (Roche, Mannheim, Germany). Protein concentrations were measured using the Pierce BCA protein assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA) and 15 µg protein was separated on NuPage Mini 3‐8% Tris‐Acetate gels (Invitrogen, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA) and subsequently transferred to a polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane (Merck Millipore). For probing of ABCA3‐HA, rat anti‐HA monoclonal antibody (Roche) and rabbit anti‐rat IgG (H + L) HRP secondary antibody (Southern Biotechs, Birmingham, AL) were used. β‐Actin (Santa Cruz, Dallas, TX) probing served as a loading control. SuperSignal® West Femto Maximum Sensitivity Substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used for detection. Densitometric analysis was performed with Image J software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Mitochondrial Substrate Assay Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All reagents and enzymes were from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Zymolyase was from ICN (Abingdon, UK) and Bacto Yeast Extract and Bacto Peptone were from Difco (Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). Mitochondrial substrates were used as TRIS salts at pH 7.0. Solvents and salts used for HPLC were from J. T. Baker (Center Valley, PA, USA). Rat anti-HA monoclonal antibody and peroxidase-conjugated anti-rat IgG secondary antibody were obtained from Roche (Basel, Switzerland) and Jackson Immunoresearch (West Grove, PA, USA), respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Cotransfection and Viral Particle Isolation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HEK293T cells were cotransfected with pNL4-3 plasmids harboring the CA mutations along with the pCEP4 mammalian expression vector, encoding HA-tagged human CypA, as described previously with slight modifications (40 (link)). Cells were cultured in the presence of 2 μM CsA when described. Reverse transcriptase-normalized viruses in 900 μl of culture medium were layered onto 500 μl of 20% sucrose in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and centrifuged at 20,000 × g for 2 h at 4°C. Pelleted virions were resuspended in 1× NuPAGE LDS sample buffer (Thermo) containing 2% β-mercaptoethanol, and the lysed virions were subjected to Western blotting. The HA-tagged CypA and p24 CA proteins were probed with a rat anti-HA monoclonal antibody (Roche Diagnostics) and mouse anti-p24 antibody (Abcam), respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Western Blot Analysis of MxB and HA-Tagged Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pelleted cells were resuspended in 1 × NuPAGE LDS sample buffer (Thermo) containing 2% β-mercaptoethanol. Expression of endogenous MxB in IFN-β-treated cells was evaluated with Western blot using goat anti-MxB polyclonal antibody (SantaCruz Biotech) followed by HRP-conjugated donkey anti-goat IgG antibody (SantaCruz Biotech). Expression of HA-tagged host factors in SeV-infected MT4 cells was confirmed by Western blot using rat anti-HA monoclonal antibody (Roche Diagnostics) followed by HRP-conjugated goat anti-rat IgG antibody (American Qualex). The membranes were probed with rabbit anti-β-actin polyclonal antibody (Thermo) as a loading control. Chemiluminescence was detected using Chemi-Lumi One Ultra reagent (Nacalai Tesque) according to manufacturer's instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!