The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Glass beads

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

Glass beads are small, spherical particles made of glass material. They are commonly used in various laboratory applications as a tool for mixing, stirring, or agitating liquids or suspensions. Glass beads provide a physical surface for these processes without introducing additional chemical components into the sample.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

21 protocols using glass beads

1

Isolation and Purification of Capsular Polysaccharides

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Capsular polysaccharides were isolated as described, with some modifications [5 (link), 18 (link)]. Briefly, cells were pelleted from cultures at 3,450 x g for 15 min at 4°C. Five mg of glass beads (4 mm, Fisher) per g of cells were added and the mixture was gently shaken by vortex for 1 min. A volume of 50 ml of distilled water was added per g of disrupted cells and centrifuged at 8000 x g for 10 min at 4°C. The supernatant was recovered, clarified in a 0.22 μm filter unit (Millipore) and lyophilized. To separate the capsular arabinomannan (AM) from the rest of capsular polysaccharides, the capsule residue was resuspended in 4 ml of distilled water and subjected to a chloroform:methanol:water extraction (1:1:0.9). The upper phase was recovered and incubated in a rotavapor at 40°C overnight. Proteinase K (Sigma) was added at 10 mg/ml in a 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 10 mM CaCl2 buffer and incubated overnight at 37°C. The deproteinated solution was dialyzed for 3 d at 4°C in distilled water, lyophilized and chromatographed on a column (90 cm x 1.8 cm) of Bio-Gel P-10 (Bio-Rad) using 0.1 M NaCl in 0.1% acetic acid. Collected fractions of 4 ml were assayed for carbohydrate content by the phenol-sulfuric acid assay. Pooled fractions were dialyzed in water and lyophilized. The concentration of protein was determined on each isolation step by Bradford.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comparative Diagnostic Accuracy of Sputum Tests

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For each participant, one investigational assay and one Xpert MTB/RIF test were performed directly on the same sputum specimen; in addition, one smear microscopy test, one mycobacterial liquid culture, and one solid culture were performed after digestion and decontamination of sputum. Participants provided up to two expectorated sputum specimens 1 hour to 4 days apart. If the volume of the first specimen exceeded 3.5 ml, it was homogenized with glass beads (Fisher Scientific) and split into two portions: 1.5 ml for the investigational assay and Xpert MTB/RIF and the remainder for smear and cultures. If the volume of the first specimen was between 1.5 and 3.5 ml, it was used for the investigational assay and Xpert MTB/RIF, and the second sputum specimen was used for smear and culture. Full details of the study design and procedures are provided in the protocol.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Activated Charcoal-Based EPR Spectroscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Analytical grade chemicals nitrone spin trap phenyl-N-tert-butylnitrone (PBN), tert-butylbenzene, (2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-piperidin-1-yl)oxyl (TEMPO), and 1-λ1-oxidanyl-2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-piperidin-4-ol (TEMPOL) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, U.S.). Different types of activated charcoal (A = anasorb 747, B = CSC, and C = JXC (SKC Inc., Eighty Four, PA, U.S., material characteristics provided in Supporting Information Table S1)), Suprasil EPR tubes (4 mm o.d.; Wilmad-Labglass,Vineland, NJ, U.S.), Schlenk line (Chemglass Life Sciences, Vineland, NJ, U.S.), 500–750 μm glass beads (Fisher Scientific, PA, U.S.), and Cambridge filters pads (CFP, Performance Systematix Inc., Grand Rapids, MI, U.S.) were used as supplied. Cigarette holders (Hleeduo ZB-033) were purchased online from Amazon.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Yeast Viability Reduction Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Following wiping, samples were incubated for 1 h at 25 °C in 2 mL DE with 100 µg/mL proteinase K (Fisher Bioreagents™, Fisher Scientific, Loughborough, UK) and 1 g of glass beads (Fisher Scientific, Loughborough, UK). After incubation, samples were vortexed for 2 min and then serially diluted, and 3 × 10 µL2 drops of each dilution was plated onto tryptone soya agar (TSA; Oxoid, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Newport, UK). Reduction in yeast viability, expressed as a log10 reduction, was calculated as the difference between the number of yeasts recovered from untreated (control) and treated samples.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Fetal and Maternal Tissue Harvesting

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At necropsy, fetal and maternal tissues were surgically removed. All necropsies were performed by a board-certified pathologist and two technicians. Hysterotomy was performed on the pregnant macaques under inhalation anesthesia, and the fetus, placenta, fetal membranes, umbilical cord, and amniotic fluid were collected for detailed tissue dissection post-fetal euthanasia with an overdose of sodium pentobarbital (≥120 mg/kg). Shortly after, the mother was euthanized with an overdose of sodium pentobarbital (≥120 mg/kg). Each tissue was grossly evaluated in situ, and then excised, with further dissection with separate forceps and razor blades for each tissue to minimize risks for cross-contamination. Tissues were collected snap-frozen in Dulbecco’s minimum essential medium (DMEM) and RNAlater and homogenized to a liquid state20 (link) with glass beads (Fisher Scientific) or a 5 mm steel ball (Qiagen). If tissue remained after snap freezing and RNAlater archival, tissues were preserved in 10% neutral-buffered formalin and routinely paraffin-embedded and processed with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) or as noted below.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Stool Sample Collection for Microbiome Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Participants collected stool samples at the beginning and end of each intervention period into RNAlater for bacterial measures using a fecal collection tube with a scoop in the lid (Sarstedt, Numbrecht, Germany) containing 5 mL preservation solution and 8–10 glass beads (3 mm; Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA) [15 (link)]. They were instructed to collect 2 pea-sized aliquots of stool and immediately, at the time of defecation, place the stool into the collection tube and mix well by shaking. The samples were delivered to the laboratory within 24 h and stored at −80 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

RT-qPCR Detection of MERS-CoV

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A previously published RT‐qPCR protocol was used to detect MERS‐CoV genome (Vergara‐Alert et al., 2017). Briefly, lymphoid samples (cervical and mediastinal lymph nodes, tonsil and thymus) were placed in tubes containing 500 μl Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium (DMEM) supplemented with 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 mg/ml streptomycin, 2 mmol/L glutamine and 2 mm glass beads (Fisher Scientific, USA), individually homogenized at 30 Hz for 2 min by using a TissueLyser II (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) and stored at −70°C until use. Viral RNA was extracted by using a NucleoSpin RNA virus kit (Macherey‐Nagel, Düren, Germany) following the manufacturer's recommendations. The extraction products were tested by RT‐qPCR, which was performed by using AgPath‐ID One‐Step RT‐PCR reagents (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The amplification was conducted on a 7,500 Fast Real‐Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, USA) programmed under the following conditions: 50°C for 5 min, 95°C for 20 s and 45 cycles at 95°C for 3 s and 60°C for 30 s. Samples with a cycle threshold <40 were considered positive for MERS‐CoV RNA (Vergara‐Alert et al., 2017).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Genomic DNA Extraction from Bulk Leaf Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For linkage map analysis, 10 young leaves were bulk harvested for each of the 87 F4:5 lines of POP1 and 59 F4:5 lines of POP2. For genotyping an additional 26 lines of POP1 and 29 lines of POP2, 6 young leaves of each line were bulk harvested at F4:7 generation. Genomic DNA of each line was then extracted using a modified CTAB method (Wen et al. 2014 (link)). Briefly, the bulked leaf tissue was first frozen at -80° for at least 24 hr, freeze-dried, ground with glass beads (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA), and DNA concentration of each sample was measured with an ND-1000 Spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, Inc., Wilmington, DE, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantification of Fecal IgA and Calprotectin

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For IgA quantification, frozen fecal samples were thawed and 0.2 g aliquots of feces were diluted in 2 mL PBS. After homogenization with 0.10 to 0.25 mm diameter glass beads (Fisher Scientific) using a Precellys Evolution homogenizer (Bertin Technologies, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France) for 40 s at 6400 rpm, suspensions were centrifuged for 5 min at 13,000× g at 4 °C. Supernatants were collected and stored frozen at −80 °C prior to ELISA analyses following the manufacturer’s instructions (Canine IgA, FineTest, Wuhan, China). For calprotectin quantification, fecal extracts were prepared as previously described [36 (link)]. Briefly, frozen fecal samples were thawed and 1.3 g aliquots of feces were diluted 1:5 in fecal extraction buffer (20 mM CH3CO2Na and 3 mM CaCl2 [pH 7.6]) containing a protease inhibitor cocktail (1 tablet/25 mL, Roche, Basel, Switzerland). After homogenization by vigorous shaking for 30 min at room temperature, the suspensions were centrifuged for 20 min at 2100× g at 4 °C. The supernatants were collected and centrifuged for 30 min at 10,600× g at 4 °C. The final supernatants (fecal extracts) were stored frozen at −80 °C prior to ELISA analyses following the manufacturer’s instructions (Canine Calprotectin, MyBiosource, San Diego, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Phenolic Extraction and Quantification in Potatoes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The method of extraction was adapted from Shakya and Navarre (2006) . Phenolic compounds were extracted in four replicates taken from freeze dried raw and cooked potatoes. Freeze-dried powder (200 mg) was mixed with 1.5 mL of extraction buffer (50% MeOH, 2.5% metaphosphoric acid, 1 mM EDTA, chilled to 4 o C) and 500 mg of glass beads (1.0 mm in diameter; Fisher Scientific). Tubes were shaken with a vortex for 10 min at room temperature and then sonicated at 10 °C for 10 min. After sonication, tubes were shaken again with a vortex for 10 min. Tubes were centrifuged at 2500 g at 4 o C for 10 minutes and the supernatant was transferred to a clean tube. Extractions were repeated three times and supernatants combined.
Samples were kept chilled at all times and not exposed to light. TPC of potato was measured by Folin-Ciocalteau method (Singleton and Rossi, 1965) . Potato extract (50µL) was mixed with Folin-Ciocalteau reagent (50 µL, 1 N), sodium carbonate (150 µL, 20% w/v) and distilled water (750 µL). After shaking by vortex, the mixture was incubated in the dark at room temperature for 45 min. Absorbance was measured at 765 nm using a spectrophotometer (Cecil, CE 7200 Double Beam UV/VIS Spectrophotometer). Different concentrations of 5-CQA (10-300 µg mL -1 ) were used to generate a standard curve.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!