The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Spss version 22.0 statistical package

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States

SPSS version 22.0 is a statistical software package developed by IBM. It is designed to assist with the analysis and management of data. The software provides a range of statistical tools and techniques for data processing, modeling, and reporting.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

10 protocols using spss version 22.0 statistical package

1

Strain Analysis for Diastolic Dysfunction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 22.0 statistical package (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Distribution of variables was evaluated by visual inspection of frequency histograms and normality was tested using the Shapiro Wilk Test. Continuous variables were presented as mean (standard deviation). Comparisons among groups were performed using analysis of variance (ANOVA). The post hoc Bonferroni correction was used to account for multiple testing.
The correlation of variables was calculated by linear regression analyses with determination of the Pearson’s correlation coefficient.
The ability of atrial strain and strain rate values to discriminate diastolic dysfunction in children with CM was assessed using ROC Curve (Receiver Operating Characteristics Curve) with 95% confidence interval. We used the value of Area Under the Curve (AUC) = 1.0 to characterize the perfect discrimination [27 (link)]. In order to decrease the inflation of the Type 1 error rate due to multiple testing, the statistical significance was defined as two-sided p value < 0.01.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Genetic Variants and Renal Cell Carcinoma

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We performed a two-sided Chi-squared test to examine Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) in case and control groups. All of the minor alleles were deemed as a risk allele for RCC susceptibility. The differences in frequency distributions of alleles were compared between cases and controls by two-sided Chi-squared test. Odds ratios (ORs), 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and p-value were used for crude logistic regression analysis and logistic regression analysis adjusted by gender, age and BMI. We used the Haploview software package (version 4.2) and the SHEsi software platform to analyze the linkage disequilibrium and SNP haplotypes [41 (link), 42 (link)]. SPSS version 22.0 statistical package (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA) and Microsoft Excel were used for all statistical analyses. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Statistical Analysis of Continuous Variables

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Continuous variables are expressed as means (standard deviation). The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used to analyze the distribution of the continuous variables. In the case of normally distributed variables, the analysis of variance t-test was applied. In the case of non-normally distributed variables, the groups were compared using the Mann–Whitney U-test (two groups) or the Kruskal–Wallis test (more than two groups). A p < 0.05 was considered significant. All analyses were performed using the SPSS version 22.0 statistical package (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Genetic Variants Associated with Ankylosing Spondylitis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The differences of gender and age between 2 groups were analyzed by 2-sided Chi-squared test and independent samples t test, respectively. We performed an exact test to examine Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) in case and control groups. Minor alleles of SNPs were seemed as risk alleles for AS susceptibility. The differences in frequency distributions of alleles were compared between cases and controls by Pearson Chi-squared test. Odds ratios (ORs), 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and P-value were used for logistic regression analysis and we performed the Wald test by unconditional logistic regression analysis so that the adjustment for age and sex were done for the dominant, recessive, codominant, and log-additive models. We used the Haploview software package (version 4.2) and the SHEsi software platform to analyze the linkage disequilibrium and SNP haplotypes.[30 (link),31 (link)] A logistic regression analysis was performed to assess haplotype association with response. SPSS version 22.0 statistical package (SPSS, Chicago, IL) and Microsoft Excel were used for all statistical analyses. P < .05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Statistical Analysis of Continuous Variables

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Continuous variables are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to analyze the distribution of continuous variables. In the case of parametric variables, the analysis of variance (ANOVA) t-test was applied. In the case of nonparametric variables, groups were compared using the Mann-Whitney U-test (two groups) or the Kruskal–Wallis test (more than two groups). P < 0.05 was considered significant. All analyses were performed using the SPSS version 22.0 statistical package (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Statistical Analysis of Research Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Descriptive statistical analysis presented continuous variables in terms of mean and standard deviation (SD). Sample normality was evaluated using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. The parametric variables were analyzed using a t-test in the case of two groups and analysis of variance (ANOVA) for more than two. Meanwhile, non-parametric variables were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test for two groups and the Kruskal-Wallis test in the case of more than two groups. A confidence interval of 95% (p < 0.05) was considered to conclude significant differences between variables. Finally, the statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS version 22.0 statistical package (SPSS, Chicago, IL, United States).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Statistical Analysis of Continuous Variables

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Continuous variables were expressed as the mean (standard deviation). The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used to analyze the distribution of continuous variables. As for normally distributed variables, the analysis of variance t-test was applied. In the case of non-normally distributed variables, the groups were compared using the Mann–Whitney U-test (two groups) or the Kruskal–Wallis test (more than two groups). A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant. All analyses were performed using the SPSS version 22.0 statistical package (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Epidemiology of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in South America

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We designed a retrospective cohort study that aimed to identify the demographics and risk factors associated with HCC in South America. Overall, 14 medical centers from 6 countries in South America participated. Each center was responsible for adhering to their respective institutional review policies. Participating centers completed a standardized retrospective chart review of patient characteristics at the time of HCC diagnosis. Data then were de-identified and placed into a composite database. The HCC diagnosis was made radiographically or histologically for all cases as defined by institutional standards. Continuous variables were summarized as means or as medians (interquartile range) according to their homogeneity. Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS version 22.0 statistical package (Armonk, NY).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comparing Postural Changes in PI Measurements

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A pilot study revealed a PI mean of 2.79 ± 1.93 for supine position. Using this value, and a 25% increase in this value for each position (accepting type I error of 0.05 and a power of 0.80), a total of 61 patients were required to find a statistically significant difference between each position.
The descriptive characteristics were expressed as numbers and percentages in the categorical variables and as means, standard deviations, and medians. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was employed to test the normality of the data’s distribution. Measurements were compared with repeated measures ANOVA test. The chi square test was used to compare categorical data. Data analysis was performed with the IBM SPSS version 22.0 statistical package (Chicago, IL, USA). A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Neuropsychological assessment in DAI

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All neuropsychological and CE data were analyzed using the SPSS version 22.0 Statistical package (SPSS, IBM Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) with two-tailed tests and a 5% level of significance. Shapiro–Wilk tests were used to verify continuous variables for normal distribution, and Wilcoxon tests were used to compare the right and left hemispheres in the DAI group.
For inferential analysis, all subjects from DAI group were matched by age and gender to healthy subjects from a normative database of CE (17 (link)), and a Mann–Whitney U-test was performed. The Spearman test was performed to analyze correlation between neuropsychological and CE data results.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!