Following an approximate 4-h fast, body weight was measured to the nearest 0.01 kg on a digital scale with minimal clothing. Height was measured using a stadiometer for estimations of the body mass index. Body fat and fat-free mass were measured using the InBody 770 Body Composition Analyzer (InBody CO., Cerritos, CA, USA). Waist circumference was obtained 2 cm above the umbilicus twice using a plastic tape measure and averaged. The VO2peak was used to assess aerobic fitness and was determined using a continuous progressive exercise test on a cycle ergometer with indirect calorimetry (Carefusion, Vmax CART, Yorba Linda, CA, USA).
770 body composition analyzer
Manufactured by InBody
Sourced in United States
The InBody 770 Body Composition Analyzer is a medical-grade device that measures an individual's body composition. It utilizes bioelectrical impedance analysis to assess parameters such as body fat percentage, muscle mass, and water content, providing detailed data on the user's overall health and fitness status.
Automatically generated - may contain errors
12 protocols using 770 body composition analyzer
1
Comprehensive Body Composition and Fitness Assessment
2
Metabolic Effects of Dietary Intervention
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
The primary endpoint was the degree of change in HbA1c between the two groups during the 12-week study period. The secondary endpoints were changes in glycated albumin and 1,5-anhydroglucitol (1,5-AG), body weight, waist circumference, body composition, and basal energy expenditure. Blood samples were collected at random times (before meals or after meals) at every visit (weeks 0, 4, 8, and 12). Glycated albumin, 1,5-AG, and ketone levels were measured at weeks 0 and 12. Body fat, muscle, and basal energy expenditure were measured using an Inbody 770 body composition analyzer (Inbody, Seoul, Korea) at weeks 0 and 12. Other factors, including HbA1c, lipid profile, waist circumference, and body weight were measured at each visit (weeks 0, 4, 8, and 12) (Fig. 1 ).
3
Physical Factors Influence on HRQOL
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
To analyze the effects of physical factors on HRQOL, we performed physical measurements. Handgrip strength was measured using a hand dynamometer (TL110; TOEI LIGHT CO., LTD., Saitama, Japan). Appendicular skeletal muscle index (ASMI) was measured by bio-impedance analysis using an Inbody770 body composition analyzer (Inbody, Seoul, Korea). Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured at the lumbar spine (L2-L4) using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (GE Healthcare, Madison, WI, USA). Clinical and demographic data were collected from patient records at each clinic.
4
Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis for Skeletal Muscle
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) was used to examine impedance for each
segment, including the four limbs and trunk, using the InBody 770 body
composition analyzer (InBody, Seoul, Korea). Multi-frequency measurements were
performed to estimate appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASM). In this study,
skeletal muscle index (SMI, %) was calculated using the following equation:
ASM/body weight (kg).
segment, including the four limbs and trunk, using the InBody 770 body
composition analyzer (InBody, Seoul, Korea). Multi-frequency measurements were
performed to estimate appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASM). In this study,
skeletal muscle index (SMI, %) was calculated using the following equation:
ASM/body weight (kg).
5
Comprehensive Body Composition Analysis
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
Body composition was measured using the Inbody 770 body composition analyzer (Inbody, Seoul, Korea) and a tape measure at the top and bottom of the light. Participants fasted for more than 8 h the day before the test and restricted their active physical activity for 48 h. Each participant was barefoot and metal material attached to the body was removed before the measurement. Height, body weight, BMI, fat-free mass (FFM), fat mass (FM), skeletal muscle mass (SMM), and percentage body fat (%BF) were measured.
The waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) was measured using a tape measure to determine waist and hip circumferences. Waist circumference was measured by asking the subject to stand upright with their arms crossed over their chest and then measuring the waist, the thinnest part between the ribs and long bones of the subject. The tape measure was placed on a horizontal plane and the circumference measured twice during the last stage of normal expiration, and a good score was recorded in units of 0.1 cm. The hip circumference was measured at the widest part of the back of the subject’s buttocks after the subject crossed over arms over their chest and stood upright. The tape measure was placed on a horizontal plane and the circumference measured twice; a good score was recorded in units of 0.1 cm. WHR was calculated using the waist/hip circumference formula.
The waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) was measured using a tape measure to determine waist and hip circumferences. Waist circumference was measured by asking the subject to stand upright with their arms crossed over their chest and then measuring the waist, the thinnest part between the ribs and long bones of the subject. The tape measure was placed on a horizontal plane and the circumference measured twice during the last stage of normal expiration, and a good score was recorded in units of 0.1 cm. The hip circumference was measured at the widest part of the back of the subject’s buttocks after the subject crossed over arms over their chest and stood upright. The tape measure was placed on a horizontal plane and the circumference measured twice; a good score was recorded in units of 0.1 cm. WHR was calculated using the waist/hip circumference formula.
6
Comprehensive Body Composition Analysis
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
Body composition was analyzed with an Inbody 770 body composition analyzer (Inbody Japan, Tokyo, Japan). Body water, percent body fat, body fat mass, lean body mass, skeletal muscle mass, trunk fat mass, and bone mineral mass were measured.
7
Bioimpedance Analysis for Body Composition
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
Body composition measurements were obtained through direct segmental multi-frequency bioelectrical impendence analysis (BIA) technique method (InBody 770 body composition analyzer, InBody Co., Ltd, Seoul, Korea), by the same technician throughout the study. Measurements included body weight (BW), total and segmental (both legs, trunk, and both arms) skeletal muscle mass, fat mass and % body fat. The In-Body 770 is a valid tool for the assessment of total body and segmental body composition [31 (link)]. Height was measured electronically to the nearest 0.1 cm, and body mass index (BMI) was calculated. Waist circumference (WC) was measured using a designated tape measure. ASMI was calculated by adding the sum skeletal masses of both arms and legs divided by height squared using the BIA technique [31 (link)]. Low muscle mass was defined according to the EWGSOP2 as ASMI < 7.0 kg/m2 in men and < 5.5 kg/m2 in women [16 (link)].
8
Comprehensive Body Composition Assessment in CSII Therapy
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
Body composition parameters, including skeletal muscle mass (SMM), soft lean mass (SLM), body fat mass (BFM), and skeletal muscle index (SMI), were tested using multifrequency BIA (InBody 770 body composition analyzer; InBody, Seoul, South Korea). In brief, within the first 24 h of CSII therapy, the assessment was performed on the morning before breakfast of second day after admission to avoid interference with food mass, and after voiding urine and excrement to avoid interference with weight measurement. Participants were asked to remove all accessories, socks, and jewelry before testing. SMI was calculated using the following formula: SMI = SMM of the upper and lower limbs (kg)/height (m)2. HGS was measured using a dynamometer (JAMAR Hand dynameter 5030JO; Sammons Preston, Bolingbrook, IL, USA). The maximum reading of at least two trials in a maximum-effort isometric contraction was obtained from each hand, and the average value (kg) between the right and left hands was used for subsequent analysis. Gait speed was measured using the shortest time in seconds to complete a walk along a straight line of 6 m. A warm-up period of <5 min was followed by two walks, and the shorter time was recorded.
9
Body Composition Measurement Protocol
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
Following an approximate 4‐h fast, body weight was measured to the nearest 0.01 kg on a digital scale with minimal clothing and without shoes. Subjects were instructed to wipe their hands and feet with an anti‐bacterial cloth prior to measurement to enhance electrical conductivity. Percent body fat and fat‐free mass were measured using InBody 770 Body Composition Analyzer (InBody CO, Cerritos, CA) (Faria et al. 2014 ). Waist circumference was measured 2 cm above the umbilicus (Malin et al. 2012 ).
10
Body Composition and Anthropometric Measurements
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
After an approximate 4-h fast, body weight was measured to the nearest 0.01 kg on a digital scale with minimal clothing and without shoes, and height was measured with a stadiometer to assess body mass index. Fat mass and fat-free mass were measured using the InBody 770 Body Composition Analyzer (InBody Co., Cerritos, CA). Waist circumference was measured 2 cm above the umbilicus using a tape measure.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!