The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Orbitrap mass analyzer

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

The Orbitrap mass analyzer is a type of mass spectrometer that uses an electrostatic field to trap and analyze ions. It provides high-resolution, high-mass accuracy mass measurements for a wide range of analytes.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

29 protocols using orbitrap mass analyzer

1

Quantifying Collagen Crosslinks in Bovine Bone

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To quantify the different collagen crosslinks in bone powder samples from affected and control cows, three biological replicates were used, with each biological replicate being tested for extraction efficiency using three technical replicates. Before crosslink separation and quantification, samples of the prepared bone powder were rehydrated in 1000 µL of water and 200 µL of this was inserted into a 1.5 mL short thread vial (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Separation of collagen crosslinks was performed, as previously reported, by liquid chromatography (LC) using a Dionex UltiMateTM 3000 system with an autosampler and a LPG-3400RS Rapid Separation Quaternary Pump, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) with a Cogent Diamond Hydride™ HPLC column (2.2 µm, 100Å, 150 mm × 2.1 mm ID, PM Separations, Capalaba, Queensland, Australia) [17 (link)]. The LC system was coupled to a Q ExactiveTM Focus mass spectrometer equipped with a high-energy collision-induced dissociation collision cell, an Orbitrap mass analyzer, and a HESI-II ion source (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) for crosslink quantification. Parallel reaction monitoring using tandem mass spectrometry acquisition with an inclusion list of ions was used to detect and quantitate the relevant ions for each crosslink. Details for the chromatographic and mass spectrometry settings are listed in Supplementary Tables S1–S3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantitative Proteomics by LC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LC-MS/MS analysis was performed using Orbitrap Mass Analyzer (Thermo Fisher Scientific), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, each sample of digested peptides was reconstituted in 20 μL of 0.1% formic acid. Peptides were first separated by the nanoflow HPLC on Agilent 1100 (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) using C18 column (Agilent Technologies) with a flow rate of 0.4 μL/min, and were ionized after passing through the nanospray tip (New Objective, Woburn, MA, USA). LC gradient for the LC-MS/MS system ramped from 2–40% ACN in 120 min, and the system was set up for automated data-dependent acquisition, with a mode of 200–2000 m/z full scan for the maximum three most intense peaks from each Orbitrap MS scan. Peptides with +2 or +3 charge were further subjected to CID. Spectra were obtained in raw data files with Xcalibur (version 2.0 SR2). Protein identification was accomplished by TurboSEQUEST (Thermo Fisher Scientific) using the UniProt database. A protein was confirmed once three peptides with Xcorr >2.5 were matched in sequencing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Metabolomic Analysis of Organic Anion Transporters

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Individual, unpooled samples were measured by the Metabolon analytical system (Metabolon, Inc., Durham, NC)60 (link), 61 (link). Samples were prepared and subjected to ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectroscopy (UPLC-MS/MS) utilizing an ACQUITY ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) (Waters, Milford, MA) and a Q-Exactive high resolution/accurate mass spectrometer interfaced with a heated electrospray ionization (HESI-II) source and Orbitrap mass analyzer operated at 35,000 mass resolution (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA). Raw data was extracted, peak-identified and QC processed using Metabolon’s hardware and software60 (link), 61 (link). Two-way ANOVA testing was used to calculate the p-values and the metabolites that were selected for display in figures and tables had either: (1) a fold change ≥1.2 with a p-value ≤ 0.05; or (2) a fold change ≥2.0 with a p-value ≤ 0.1 in at least one of the various comparisons (e.g., Oat1KO vs WT; Oat3KO vs WT; Oat3KO + probenecid vs Oat3KO). The separability of the uremic toxins/retention solutes in the wildtype, Oat3KO, and probenecid-treated Oat3KO plasma samples was assessed by partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) using Metaboanalyst 3.0 (http://www.metaboanalyst.ca/)62 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

SILAC-based Proteomics Workflow

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HEK cells were SILAC-labeled in medium containing l-arginine and l-lysine or l-arginine-U-13C6-15N4 and l-lysine-U-13C6-15N2 (Cambridge Isotope Laboratories, Tewksbury, MA, USA) as previously described [52 (link)]. Peptides were analyzed on a quadrupole Orbitrap mass spectrometer (Q-Exactive plus, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) equipped with a nanoflow HPLC system (Thermo Scientific), as previously described [53 (link)]. Peptides were loaded onto C18 reversed phase columns (15 cm length, 75 μm inner diameter) and eluted with a linear gradient from 8–40% acetonitrile containing 0.5% acetic acid. The mass spectrometer was operated in a data-dependent mode, automatically switching between MS and MS/MS acquisition. Survey full scan MS spectra (m/z 300–1 750) were acquired in the Orbitrap. The 10 most intense ions were sequentially isolated and fragmented by higher-energy C-trap dissociation (HCD [54 (link)). An ion selection threshold of 50 000 counts was used. Peptides with unassigned charge states, as well as with charge state less than +2 were excluded from fragmentation. Fragment spectra were acquired in the Orbitrap mass analyzer (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Untargeted Fecal Metabolomic Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Untargeted fecal metabolomic analysis was performed by Metabolon, Inc. (Durham, NC) as previously described63 (link)–65 (link). Metabolites were extracted from lyophilized and homogenized samples using methanol extraction. Extracts were analyzed by an ACQUITY ultra-performance liquid chromatographer (Waters, Milford, CA) and a ThermoFisher Scientific Q-Exactive high resolution mass spectrometer interfaced with a heated electrospray ionization (HESI-II) source and Orbitrap mass analyzer (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts) operated at 35,000 mass resolution. The scan range covered 70–1000 m/z. Metabolite identification was performed by automated comparison of the ion features in the experimental samples to a reference library. Chemical standard entries included retention time, molecular weight (m/z), preferred adducts, and in-source fragments as well as associated MS spectra, and were curated by visual inspection for quality control using software developed at Metabolon. Peaks were quantified using the area-under-the-curve. Compounds were corrected for inter-day variation by registering the medians to equal 1.00 and normalizing each data point proportionally. Missing values were imputed with the observed minimum for each compound.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comprehensive Metabolomics Analysis of Fungal Mycelia

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Collected and ground mycelia tissues were used for global, unbiased metabolomics by Metabolon (Morrisville, NC, USA) as described by Yang et al. [15 (link)] and Lin et al. [70 (link)]. Briefly, 50 mg of tissue from each sample were prepared using an automated MicroLab STAR system (Hamilton, Reno, NV, USA) during which QC standards were added for downstream normalization. Metabolites and proteins were extracted in methanol in a GenoGrinder 2000 (Glen Mills, Clifton, NJ, USA) followed by centrifugation for metabolite isolation and protein separation. Each extract was then divided into 5 fractions and used for reverse phase (RP)/ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC)-tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) with positive ion mode electrospray ionization (ESI), RP/UPLC-MS/MS with negative ion mode ESI, and HILIC/UPLC-MS/MS with negative ion mode ESI. One fraction from each extract was reserved as a backup. All methods employed either an ACQUITY UPLC (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) or a Q-Exactive High Resolution/Accuracy Mass Spectrometer with a heated electrospray ionization (HESI-II) source and an Orbitrap Mass Analyzer (ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA). A detailed description of methods and procedure for data acquisition, metabolite acquisition, quantitation, and data analysis can be found in Additional file 6.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Untargeted Metabolite Profiling by UPLC-HRMS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An Acquity UPLC system (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA) combined with a Q-Exactive high-resolution mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA) with an Orbitrap mass analyzer was used. Samples (5 μL) were injected onto an ACQUITY UPLC BEH Shield RP18 column (150 × 2.1 mm, particle size 1.7 μm) (Waters, Manchester, MA, USA), with a flow rate of 0.35 μL min−1 at 50 °C. Mobile phases contained 0.1% (v/v) formic acid in water (A) (LC-MS grade, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and acetonitrile (B) (LC–MS grade, Merck). A multi-step linear gradient was as follows: 5% B—1.5 min, 80% B—10.5 min, 98% B—11.5 min, 5% B—13 min.
Mass spectrometry analysis was performed using heated electrospray ionization (H-ESI) in positive and negative modes. A 3.5 kV and 2.5 kV ion spray voltage was applied for positive and negative ionization, respectively. Ion source temperature was 320 °C. Data were acquired in Full MS/data-dependent MS2 mode in the 100–1500 m/z range. The resolution of Full MS was 70,000 and of ddMS2 17,500. Normalized collision energy in the ddMS2 experiment was set to 30%. Xcalibur software (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was used for system operation, data acquisition, and data analysis [58 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comprehensive Metabolome Profiling by UPLC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Obtained extracts were split into equal portions, dried and reconstituted in solvents suitable for four different UPLC-MS/MS methods: 1) reverse phase (RP) UPLC-MS/MS with positive ion conditions, optimized for hydrophilic compounds; 2) (RP) UPLC-MS/MS with positive ion conditions, optimized for hydrophobic compounds; 3) (RP) UPLC-MS/MS method with negative ion conditions, and 4) hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC)/ UPLC-MS/MS with negative ion conditions. A Waters ACQUITY UPLC system supplied with either C18 (Waters UPLC BEH C18-2.1x100mm, 1.7μm) or HILIC (Waters UPLC BEH Amide 2.1x150mm, 1.7μm) columns was utilized. The extracts were eluted with: water and methanol, both containing 0.05% per fluoropentanoic acid (PFPA) and 0.1% formic acid (FA) (method 1); methanol, acetonitrile and water with 0.05% PFPA and 0.01% FA (method 2); water and methanol with 6.5mM ammonium bicarbonate (pH8.0) (method 3), and water and acetonitrile containing 10mM ammonium formate (pH 10.8) (method 4). Mass spectrometry was performed using a Thermo Scientific Q-Exactive high resolution/accurate mass spectrometer interfaced with a heated electrospray ionization source and Orbitrap mass analyzer operated at 35,000 mass resolution. The scans alternated between MS and data-dependent MSn scans and covered the range 70–1000 m/z.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantitative LC-MS/MS Proteomics Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Acetonitrile, formic acid (1 mL ampules, Fisher Optima grade, 99.9%), and MS-grade water (Thermo Fisher Scientific) were used to prepare mobile phase solvents. Solvent A was 99.9% water/0.1% formic acid and solvent B was 90% acetonitrile/10% water with 0.1% formic acid added (v/v). The elution program consisted of isocratic flow at 10% B for 4 min, a linear gradient to 45% B over 9 min, isocratic flow at 100% B for one min, isocratic flow at 10% B for one min, a linear gradient to 45% B over one min, isocratic flow at 100% B for one min, and then isocratic flow at 10% B for 3 min, at a flow rate of 20 mL/min. Full-scan mass spectra were acquired in the positive ion mode over the range m/z = 400–2000 using the Orbitrap mass analyzer, with a mass resolution setting of 70,000, AGC target of 1.00e6, and maximum IT set to 50 s. We also ran three tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) experiments for each sample with the same full MS settings as described above, and dd-MS2 settings as follows: resolution 17,500, AGC target 1e5, maximum IT 100 ms, loop count 6, isolation window 2.0 m/z, NCE 28, charge state 1 and ≥7 excluded, dynamic exclusion of 20 s. Data acquisition was controlled using Xcalibur software (version 4.1, Thermo Fisher Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Untargeted Metabolomics of Urine and Plasma

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Untargeted metabolomics from urine and plasma samples collected at 26 months were performed by Metabolon (Raleigh, NC) as previously described [24 (link)]. In brief, all experiments used a Waters ACQUITY ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) and a Thermo Scientific Q-Exactive high resolution/accurate mass spectrometer interfaced with a heated electrospray ionization (HESI-II) source and Orbitrap mass analyzer operated at 35,000 mass resolution. The scan range varied slightly between methods but covered 70-1000 m/z. Raw data were extracted, peak- identified, and processed for quality control using Metabolon’s hardware and software. Compounds were identified by comparison to library entries of purified standards or recurrent unknown entities. Peaks were quantified using area-under-the-curve. The informatics consisted of the Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS), the data extraction and peak-identification software, data processing tools for quality control and compound identification, and a collection of information interpretation and visualization tools for use by data analysts. The hardware and software foundations for these components were the LAN backbone, and a database server running Oracle 10.2.1.1 Enterprise Edition. Values were then log transformed, and missing values, if any, were imputed with the minimum observed value for each compound.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!