The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

108 protocols using living image

1

Measuring Inflammation Induced by MSU Crystals

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
10–12 week-old age and gender matched WT and CD68-POP3 mice were randomly i.p. injected with either PBS (0.5 mL/mouse) or MSU crystals in PBS (10 mg in 0.5 mL PBS/mouse). 5 hrs after MSU injection, mice were i.p. administered the luminescent Xenolight Rediject Inflammation probe (200 mg/kg, PerkinElmer)56 (link). Images were exposed for 5 min (IVIS Spectrum, PerkinElmer) and luminescence quantified with Living Image (PerkinElmer). Mice were also euthanized 7 hrs after MSU injection and peritoneal cavities were flushed with 2 mL of ice-cold PBS/10% FBS, clarified by centrifugation, and analyzed for IL-1β by ELISA.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Bioluminescence Imaging in Pancreatic Tumors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Depending on the experiment, bioluminescence imaging was conducted either on isolated organs (ex vivo) in long-term orthotopic pancreatic tumour experiments, or in anaesthetized mice (in vivo) in short-term models (below) on the In ViVo Imaging System spectrum (Perkin Elmer). Quantification of bioluminescence images was performed using LivingImage (v.2.60.1; Perkin Elmer). Photoradiance was measured as photons s−1 cm−2 sr−1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Bioluminescence Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
NRGL mice were infected with 106 PFU of rSARS-CoV-2 NL virus via direct fLX inoculation. For imaging, mice were injected with 5 μg (0.25 mg/kg) furimazine substrate (MedChemExpress, Monmouth Junction, NJ, USA) via tail-vein intravenous injection. Mice were then imaged using a 3D-imaging mirror gantry isolation chamber (InVivo Analytics, New York, NY, USA) and an IVIS Spectrum imager (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA). Briefly, mice were anesthetized using isoflurane (2.5%), placed into a body conforming animal mold (BCAM) (InVivo Analytics) and imaged within 5 min of injection. Mice were imaged using a sequence imaging file as follows: 60 s open filter, 240 s 600 nM, 60 s open, 240 s 620 nm, 60 s open, 240 s 640 nm, 60 s open, 240 s 660 nm, 60 s open, 240 s 680 nm, 60 s open using an IVIS Spectrum imager (PerkinElmer). Data analysis of planar imaging was conducted using LivingImage (PerkinElmer). 3D reconstitution of bioluminescence signals was conducted manually by InVivo Analytics.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying MMP2-Activated Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cy5.5-labeled nanoparticles that were either preincubated with hMMP2 as described earlier or untreated were added to a streptavidin-coated 96 well plate for 1 h at room temperature. After incubation, the plate was washed three times with water, and the fluorescence from the wells was measured using a near-infrared imaging system (IVIS system, PerkinElmer) with excitation and emission wavelengths set at 640 and 700 nm, respectively. The Living Image (PerkinElmer) software was used for the analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

In-Vivo Imaging of Tumor-Bearing Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice were imaged using an IVIS Spectrum CT Pre-clinical in-vivo imaging system (PerkinElmer, MA, USA) with the following parameters: CT was set to 50ms, total projections were 720, voltage was set to 50kV while the current to 1mA the binning was determined to 2 and the X-ray filter was set to 440 A1. Hounsfield calibration was performed in air-0.004168 and water-0.5513. Two groups of tumors bearing mice (n=5 each) were divided to control and test group. The mice were weighed weekly and tumor progression was monitored by weekly IVIS scans (PerkinElmer). Epi-fluoresce scans were acquired under the following parameters: excitation 570nm, emission 620nm, at 3 seconds exposure. Therapeutic treatment began four weeks after the initial tumor cells injection. The test group received 300μl dose of collagozomes for two consecutive days, while the control group remained untreated. On the third day, both groups received a single dose of 10 mg/kg micellar paclitaxel.19 (link) Tumor dimensions were assessed using the ROI tool in the IVIS imaging software (Living Image, PerkinElmer).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantifying Fluorescent Bisphosphonate Levels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mandible, radius, ulna, vertebra (3rd lumbar, L3), distal
femur, and proximal tibia were assessed for whole bone fluorescence using
reflectance epi-fluorescence imaging (IVIS SpectralCT, PerkinElmer). Our lab and
others have previously used this method as an assay to measure
fluorescently-tagged bisphosphonate levels in tissues [17 (link),25 (link),27 (link),28 (link)]. Mandible, radius, and ulna were scanned whole whereas,
vertebrae processes were removed, and distal femur and proximal tibiae were cut
to 10 mm standard length sections. For each skeletal site, a bone from each
animal was run on a single plate to assume uniform scan setting. While this
allows comparison across animals within bone site, the optimization of settings
to accommodate for the size differences among bone sites restricts the ability
to compare levels across bone sites. Exposure time was approximately one second
per sample plate using broad emission spectral excitation and emission ranging
of 430–465nm and 500–540nm, respectively. FAM-ZOL signal was
distinguished from auto fluorescence and calcein blue signals by spectrally
unmixing the image series (Living Image, PerkinElmer). In all cases, bone
fluorescence levels are reported as average radiant efficiency
([photons/second]/[μW/cm2]).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantifying Antigen Localization in Lymph Nodes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total antigen signal within LNs from the antigen tracking study was measured in two ways. First, by IVIS (PerkinElmer) fluorescence imaging of whole tissues within clear plastic 24-well plates, using excitation at 570 nm and emission at 620 nm (for trimer-AF568) and excitation at 640 nm and emission at 680 nm (for RM19R-AF647). Alternatively, fluorescence was measured by placing the tissues directly on the glass scanning surface of a Typhoon FLA 9500 biomolecular imager (GE Healthcare Life Sciences) and using either a 535-nm excitation laser with a >575-nm long-pass filter, or a 635-nm excitation laser and a ≥665-nm long-pass filter. The integrated signal density corresponding to labeled antigen or antibody in each LN was calculated using LivingImage (PerkinElmer) or ImageJ software and plotted using GraphPad Prism 8. For comparing trimer to nanoparticle in Fig. 5b, the difference in degree of labeling between soluble trimer and the nanoparticle was used to normalize the signal on a per-trimer basis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

AML Treatment with CAR-T and Decitabine

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The animal experiments was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, Zhejiang University. Six-week old female NOD.Cg-Prkdcscid IL2rgtm1Wjl/SzJ (NSG) mice were purchased from Biocytogen (Beijing, China). Luciferase-expressing THP1 cells (1 × 106) were inoculated intravenously (i.v) to construct AML model. After successful leukemia engraftment that was confirmed by a non-invasive in vivo bioluminescent imaging (BLI) system, mice were randomized to three treatment groups (n = 4), given CD123 CAR-T cells (2.5 × 106) with or without DAC (1 mg/kg for 5 days), DAC (1 mg/kg for 5 days) and the control group (n = 4). In these studies, all test CAR-T cells and DAC were administered by i.v. route. Anesthetized mice were imaged using IVIS® Lumina LT instrument (PerkinElmer, Walthan, Massachusetts, USA) on day 9, day 12, and day 19 to observe changes in tumor burden. Photons from Luc+ tumor xenografts were quantified using the software program Living Image (PerkinElmer).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantitative Assessment of Cellular Responses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Experimental results were recorded and depicted by their mean and corresponding standard deviation. For proliferation and migration assays, all results were given in percent of the untreated control.
For animal experiments, the bioluminescence imaging (BLI) data were evaluated using the program ‘Living Image’ (PerkinElmer GmbH, Germany) and the intensity of the emitted photons flux was given by the respective units (photons/s/cm2/steradian). This program also converted the numerical values into a pseudo‐colour graphic for visualization of the tumour burden.
Differences between control and treated groups were assessed by the distribution‐independent Kruskal‐Wallis test, which compares rank sums from the respective experimental groups. P values ≤ 0.05 were considered significant. Differences in ratios were evaluated by Pearson's chi‐squared test (χ2).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Multimodal In Vivo Imaging of Nanoparticle Delivery

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
hVNs/organs were imaged ex vivo with IVIS (Lumina Series III, PerkinElmer, MA) using the following settings: excitation 580–660 nm, emission 670–710 nm (NP-[CPP]-Alexa); excitation 480–560 nm, emission 620 nm (NP-[CPP]-Doxo). The fluorescence signal was analyzed using LivingImage (PerkinElmer, MA) and divided by the fluorescent signal obtained following saline injection. Animals were fed an AP Verified 75 IF Irradiated 5 V75 diet (ScottPharma, Marlborough, MA) prior to experimentation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!