The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Symmetry c18 trap column

Manufactured by Waters Corporation
Sourced in United States

The Symmetry C18 trap column is a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) column designed for sample enrichment and online desalting. It features a C18 stationary phase packed into a stainless steel column. The Symmetry C18 trap column is suitable for a variety of sample preparation applications in analytical workflows.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

19 protocols using symmetry c18 trap column

1

Shotgun Proteomics on QExactive

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were resuspended in 0.1% FA and transferred into a full recovery autosampler vial (Waters). Chromatographic separation was achieved on a UPLC system (nanoAcquity, Waters) with a two buffer system (buffer A: 0.1% FA in water, buffer B: 0.1% FA in ACN). Attached to the UPLC was a C18 trap column (Symmetry C18 Trap Column, 100 Å, 5 μm, 180 μm × 20 mm, Waters) for online desalting and sample purification followed by an C18 separation column (BEH130 C18 column, 75 μm × 25 cm, 130 Å pore size, 1.7 μm particle size, Waters). Peptides were separated using a 60 min gradient with increasing ACN concentration from 2 to 30% ACN. The eluting peptides were analyzed on a quadrupole orbitrap mass spectrometer (QExactive, Thermo Fisher Scientific) in data dependent acquisition mode.
For LC-MS/MS analysis on the QExactive, the 15 most intense ions per precursor scan (1 × 106 ions, 70,000 Resolution, 100 ms fill time) were analyzed by MS/MS (HCD at 25 normalized collision energy, 2 × 105 ions, 17,500 Resolution, 50 ms fill time) in a range of 400 to 1200 m/z. A dynamic precursor exclusion of 20 s was used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Proteomic Analysis of Trypsin-Digested Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The procedure has small modifications from the previous protocol 55. The purified proteins were trypsin digested by a standard in‐gel digestion protocol, and analyzed by LC‐MS/MS on an LTQ Orbitrap XL (Thermo Fisher Scientific) equipped with a nanoACQUITY UPLC system (Waters, Milford, MA, USA). A Symmetry C18 trap column (180 μm × 20 mm; Waters) and a nanoACQUITY UPLC column (1.7 μm, 100 μm × 250 mm, 35 °C) were used for peptide separation. Trapping was done at 15 μL·min−1, 99% buffer A (0.1% formic acid) for 1 min. Peptide separation was performed at 300 nL·min−1 with buffer A and buffer B (CH3CN containing 0.1% formic acid). The linear gradient was from 5% buffer B to 50% buffer B at 50 min, and to 85% B at 51 min. MS data were acquired in the Orbitrap with one microscan, and a maximum inject time of 900 ms followed by data‐dependent MS/MS acquisitions in the ion trap (through collision‐induced dissociation). The mascot search algorithm was used to search for the appropriate non‐canonical substitution (Matrix Science, Boston, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Gilthead Seabream Skin Mucus Proteome

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Spots from SYPRO-stained gilthead seabream skin mucus 2-DE gels (n = 6) were picked, excised and subjected to in-gel reduction, alkylation, and tryptic digestion using 2–10 ng/μl trypsin (V511A; Promega) as described elsewhere [66 (link)]. Peptide mixtures containing 0.1% formic acid were loaded onto a nanoACQUITY UltraPerformance LC (Waters), containing a 5 μm Symmetry C18 Trap column (180 μm × 20 mm; Waters) in front of a 1.7 μm BEH130 C18 analytical column (100 μm × 100 mm; Waters). Peptides were separated with a gradient of 5–95% acetonitrile, 0.1% formic acid, with a flow of 0.4 μl min−1 eluted to a Q-TOF Ultima mass spectrometer (Micromass/Waters). The samples were run in data dependent tandem mass spectrophotometry (MC/MC) mode. Peak lists were generated from MS/MS by Mascot Distiller Workstation and submitted to MASCOT search engine (version 2.5.1) and searched against NCBInr with the following parameters: maximum one missed cleavage by trypsin, peptide mass tolerance 100 ppm, MS/MS ion tolerance set to 0.1 Da, carbamidomethylation of cysteine selected as fixed modification and methionine oxidation as variable modification. Protein hits not satisfying a significance threshold (p < 0.05) or with low sequence coverage were further searched against Swissprot and vertebrate EST (expressed sequence tags) databases, taxonomy Actinopterygii.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

LC-MS/MS Peptide Identification Workflow

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The resulting peptides were analyzed using a nanoAcquity liquid chromatography (Waters) coupled with a Q Exactive HF-X (Thermo fisher scientific). Samples were analyzed randomly, loaded on a Symmetry C18 trap column (20 mm × 0.18 mm, 5 µm, Waters), and resolved on an HSS T3 (250 mm × 0.075 mm, 1.8 um, Waters) analytical column at 350 nl/min, using a gradient of 4–27%B (MeCN, 0.1% formic acid) for 155 min. MS1 acquisition was performed at m/z range of 375–1650 m/z at 120,000 resolution (@400 m/z), allowing Automatic Gain Control (AGC) target of 106 with a maximum Injection Time (IT) of 60 ms. MS2 acquisition was performed on the Top10 ions at Data-Dependent Acquisition (DDA) using Higher-energy Collisional Dissociation (HCD) fragmentation set at 27 Normalized Collision Energy (NCE) acquired at 15,000 resolution (@200 m/z). IT was set to 60 ms and AGC to 1e5. Dynamic exclusion was set to 30 s with a counter of 1. The resulting data was processed with MaxQuant (v1.6.6.0). The data were searched with the Andromeda search engine against the Human proteome database (SwissProt Nov20) appended with common lab protein contaminants. The following modifications were allowed: fixed carbamidomethylation on C, variable protein N-terminal acetylation, variable deamidation on NQ and variable oxidation on M. The quantification was based on the LFQ method, based on unique peptides.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Purified Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The purified proteins were analyzed by LC-MS/MS. The proteins were trypsin digested by a standard in-gel digestion protocol, and analyzed by LC-MS/MS on an LTQ Orbitrap XL (Thermo Scientific) equipped with a nanoACQUITY UPLC system (Waters). A Symmetry C18 trap column (180 μm x 20 mm; Waters) and a nanoACQUITY UPLC column (1.7 μm, 100 μm x 250 mm, 35°C) were used for peptide separation. Trapping was done at 15 μl min−1, 99% buffer A (water with formic acid (0.1%)) for 1 min. Peptide separation was performed at 300 nl min−1 with buffer A and buffer B (CH3CN containing 0.1% formic acid). The linear gradient was from 5% buffer B to 50% B at 50 min, to 85% B at 51 min. MS data were acquired in the Orbitrap with one microscan, and a maximum inject time of 900 ms followed by data-dependent MS/MS acquisitions in the ion trap (through collision induced dissociation, CID). The Mascot search algorithm was used to search for the appropriate noncanonical substitution (Matrix Science, Boston, MA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Proteomic Identification of Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The predominant bands at ∼23 kDa and 38 kDa from a Coomassie-stained gel were excised and sent to the Keck MS Proteomics Resource at Yale University School of Medicine where they were digested and analyzed to identify peptides and their corresponding proteins. Briefly, the gel slices were first washed with 50% acetonitrile/50% water followed by 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate/50% acetonitrile/50% water. It was then dried, rehydrated with trypsin in 10 mM ammonium bicarbonate, and digested at 37 °C for 16 h. The resultant peptides were separated using a Waters Symmetry C18 trap column and a nanoAcquity UPLC separating column.Elution was performed with a 52-min linear gradient of 5 to 50% acetonitrile in 0.05% formic acid. The LC MS/MS mass spectral data obtained from an LTQ-Orbitrap Elite mass spectrometer system were searched for analogy to known peptides/protein using the Mascot algorithm (version 2.20) for uninterpreted MS/MS spectra and searching the NCBInr database. The significance score relied on a probability-based protein/peptide identification score through searching known databases with a peptide score cutoff of 95% confidence in identification (Fig. S1, A and B). The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE (77 (link)) partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD027875.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Mass Spectrometry-based Peptide Separation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In-gel and SCX fractions were analyzed using a Q Exactive or Orbitrap Elite mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific), respectively. Samples were injected using a nanoAcquity HPLC system (Waters, Milford, MA) and initially trapped on a Symmetry C18 Trap Column (5 µm, 180 µm x 20 mm) for 4 or 5 minutes in 99% Solvent A (Water/0.1% FA)/1% Solvent B (acetonitrile/0.1% FA) at a flow rate of 10 µl/min. Peptides were separated on an ACQUITY Peptide BEH C18 Column (130Å, 1.7µm, 75µm X 250mm) at a flow rate of 300 nL/min maintained at 35°C. The LC-MS gradient for in-gel digests consisted of 1% to 7% B over 1 minute and 7% to 37.5% B over 79 minutes. SCX fractions were separated using gradient consisting of 7.5% B over 1 minute, 25% B over 179 minutes, 32.5% B over 40 minutes and 60% B over 20 minutes. Column washing and re-equilibration was performed following each run and settings for data acquisition are outlined in Supplementary Table S9.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Optimized Proteomic Identification Workflow

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein identification was conducted in the same way as described in [8 ]. Measurements were performed using a nanoAcquity UltraPerformance LC system connected to an auto-sampler equipped with a HSS T3 analytical column (1.8-µm particle, 75 µm × 150 mm) kept at 45 °C, and a Symmetry C18 trap column (5-µm particle, 180 µm × 20 mm), all Waters, USA. This setup was connected to an LTQ Orbitrap Elite. A 180-min gradient was used: (0–5 min: 99% buffer A and 1% buffer B, 5–10 min 99–94% A, 10–161 min: 94–60% A, 161–161.5 min: 60–14% A, 161.5–166.5 min: 14–4% A, 166.5–167.1 min: 99% A, 167.1–180 min: 99% A). To optimize the method for small cell numbers, the MS/MS max ion inject time was increased to 400 ms.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Trypsin Digestion and LC-MS/MS Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The proteins were trypsin digested by a standard in-gel digestion protocol, and analyzed by LC-MS/MS on an LTQ Orbitrap XL (Thermo Scientific) equipped with a nanoACQUITY UPLC system (Waters). A Symmetry C18 trap column (180 μm × 20 mm; Waters) and a nanoACQUITY UPLC column (1.7 μm, 100 μm × 250 mm, 35°C) were used for peptide separation. Trapping was done at 15 μL min−1, 99% buffer A (water with 0.1% formic acid) for 1 min. Peptide separation was performed at 300 nL min−1 with buffer A and buffer B (CH3CN containing 0.1% formic acid). The linear gradient (51 min) was from 5% buffer B to 50% B at 50 min, to 85% B at 51 min. MS data were acquired in the Orbitrap with one microscan, and a maximum inject time of 900 ms followed by data-dependent MS/MS acquisitions in the ion trap (through collision induced dissociation, CID). The Mascot search algorithm was used to search for the appropriate noncanonical substitution (Matrix Science, Boston, MA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry of Biomolecules

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were analyzed as previously described using an Acquity M-class UPLC system (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) coupled to a Q Exactive HF-X Hybrid Quadrupole-Orbitrap mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) equipped with a Nanospray Flex source operated positive polarity mode [56 (link)]. Injections (4 μL) were made to a Symmetry C18 trap column (100 Å, 5 μm, 180 μm × 20 mm; Waters) and then separated on a HSS T3 C18 column (100 Å, 1.8 μm, 75 μm × 250 mm; Waters) resulting in an average peak width of 30 s. Data was acquired using a top 20 data-dependent acquisition mode with an isolation window of 1.5 m/z. Survey scans were collected with a scan range of 350–2000 m/z, 120,000 resolving power, an AGC target of 1 × 106, and maximum injection time of 50 ms. Precursor ions were selected (isolation window of 1.5 m/z) for higher-energy collisional dissociation (HCD) collecting spectra with a scan range of 200–2000 m/z, resolving power of 30,000, AGC target of 3 × 105 and a maximum injection time of 100 ms. The total duty cycle of this method is 2.05 s producing approximately 15 survey scans across a chromatographic peak.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!