The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

70 protocols using discovery dsc

1

Differential Scanning Calorimetry Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples for differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) measurements were weighed in an aluminium pan (∼10 mg). The pan was covered, and the measurement was carried out under a nitro­gen gas flow of 50 ml min−1. All measurements were performed on the TA Instruments Discovery DSC. The investigated temperatures ranged from 0 to 300°C at a heating rate of 10°C min−1 (amplitude = 0.8°C; period = 60 s).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Thermal Analysis of Polymer Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Differential scanning
calorimetry
(DSC) was performed on a Discovery DSC (TA Instruments, New Castle,
DE) equipped with a refrigerated cooling system. A dry N2 purge flowed through the cell at 50 mL min–1,
and samples were run in hermetically sealed TZero aluminum pans. Polymer
samples were dried under vacuum before DSC analysis; samples (2–10
mg) were heat–cool–heat cycled at 10 °C min–1 between −85 and 150 °C. Tg values were taken from the second heating scan. Spray-dried
dispersions were dried under vacuum before DSC analysis; samples (2–6
mg) were ramped at 5 °C min–1 from −85
to 140 °C; Tg values were taken from
the first heating scan.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

DSC Analysis of Diels-Alder Networks

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) analyses were conducted utilizing a TA Instruments Discovery DSC. The DSC was furnished with a refrigerated cooling system (RCS) that enabled cooling down to −90 °C. Purge gas, specifically nitrogen, was employed. The Diels–Alder network samples, weighing between 15 and 20 mg, were assessed in TA Instruments Tzero pans fitted with perforated Tzero hermetic lids to maintain an inert atmosphere over the sample. The thermal behavior was tested by subjecting the samples to a temperature ramp of 10 K min−1, ranging from −90 °C to 130 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Differential Scanning Calorimetry of Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DSC experiments were performed on a TA Instruments Discovery DSC with an RCS90 cooling accessory. Samples were loaded in an argon-filled glovebox and hermetically sealed in aluminum pans. Three heating/cooling cycles between −80 and 150 °C at 5 °C min−1 were used with a nitrogen atmosphere. Baseline calibration was conducted with sapphire disks, and temperature and cell constant calibrations were determined using an indium standard. The reported Tg was determined from the midpoint of the inflection in the third heating trace. The second and third heating were compared to ensure reproducibility upon heating.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Thermal Transition Analysis of Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The main thermal transition upon melting (Tm) and cooling (Tc) were determined by using a Discovery DSC differential scanning calorimeter (TA Instruments, Singapore, Singapore) at a rate of 2 °C/min from 10 to 60 °C and back to 10 °C. The chamber was kept under a nitrogen environment. The software Trios (TA Instruments) was used to calculate the enthalpy associated with the phase transitions (ΔHm and ΔHc). The enthalpy associated with a thermal transformation was determined by integrating the endothermic or exothermic peak areas.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Thermal Analysis of Freeze-Dried Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Thermal analysis was performed using a Discovery DSC (TA Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA). Approximately 7–10 mg of each sample was placed in an aluminum Tzero pan and sealed with an aluminum hermetic lid. The samples were cooled down to −30 °C, kept isothermal for two minutes and then heated to 100 °C with a heating rate of 3 °C/min with an underlying modulation amplitude of 1 °C and a period of 50 s. A constant nitrogen flow rate of 50 mL/min was applied. To determine the glass transition temperature (Tg), the data collected were analyzed using Trios software (TA instruments, New Castle, DE, USA). In addition to the mDSC, thermogravimetric analysis was carried out for each sample using the Discovery TGA (TA Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA) in order to determine the residual water content in the samples after freeze-drying. The data were analyzed using the Trios software as well.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Thermal Behavior of PMMA Composites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DSC (Discovery DSC, TA Instruments, Hertfordshire, UK) was used
to investigate the thermal behavior of neat PMMA and model BC–PMMA
composites in nitrogen atmosphere. Approximately 5 mg was used for
each sample in this measurement. A heat–cool–heat regime
was employed, whereby the sample was first heated from 20 to 200 °C
at a rate of 10 °C min–1, followed by cooling
to 20 °C at the same rate. The sample was then reheated to 200
°C at a rate of 10 °C min–1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Thermal Analysis of Lyophilized Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Thermal analyses of the starting ingredients and lyophiles were carried out using a Discovery DSC equipped with a refrigerated cooling accessory (TA Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA). Nitrogen (50 mL/min) was used as the purge gas. Samples were weighed (7–12 mg) and hermetically sealed into Tzero pans (TA Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA). To determine the Tg values of the samples, the samples were heated from −20 °C to a temperature 20–30 °C higher than the expected Tg at a rate of 20 °C/min. Samples were then cooled to −20 °C at 10 °C/min, followed by heating to 150 °C at a rate of 20 °C/min. The onset glass transition temperature of the second heating step was reported as Tg unless otherwise stated.
To determine onset Tg’ of the frozen samples prior to lyophilization (for determining effective primary drying temperature during lyophilization), approximately 25 μL of solutions were pipetted into Tzero pans and sealed. Solutions were first cooled to −80 °C and held for 5 min at this temperature before being heated to 0 °C at a rate of 10 °C/min. TRIOS software was used to determine the Tg or Tg’ from the scans (TA Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Characterization of Nanoparticle Properties

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were obtained on a field-emission scanning electron microscope (JEOL 6700F, USA) at an operating voltage of 2.5 kV. The samples were coated with a 5 nm gold/palladium layer for imaging. Differential Scanning Calorimetry was carried out on a TA Instruments Discovery DSC. Dynamic Light Scattering was carried out on DynaPro NanoStar (Wyatt Technology Corporation, Santa Barbara, CA). Contact angles were measured on an OTS coated silicon surface in the presence of air using a Ramé-Hart Model 500 Advanced Goniometer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Thermal Analysis of PEO-LiTFSI Electrolytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For DSC measurement, a Discovery DSC (TA Instruments) was used. Aluminum crucibles were filled with PEO powder and a mixture of PEO powder and LiTFSI powder and sealed under an inert atmosphere. To melt the polymer and to dissolve the LiTFSI in the polymer matrix, the components were first heated up to 120 °C with a heating ramp of 10 °C min−1, eliminating the thermal history. In a second heating run, from −80 to 180 °C with a heating ramp of 10 °C min−1, the thermal properties, glass transition temperature (Tg), melting temperature (Tm), and crystallinity (K) were determined for neat-PEO and (PEO)20LiTFSI electrolytes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!