The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

137 protocols using tecnai g20

1

Comprehensive Material Characterization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All prepared materials are characterized using X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) with energy dispersive analysis by X-ray (EDX) and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM). XRDs are recorded with Panlytical X’Pert using Cu-Kα radiation (λ = 1.540 Ǻ). The surface morphology is analyzed by HR-TEM (Tecnai G20, FEI, Netherland, 200 kV, LaB6 Gun) and FESEM with EDX (JEOL JSM-6360LA and Philips XL30). TEM measurements were performed on Tecnai G20, FEI, instrument, Netherland, 200 kV, LaB6 Gun. The particles size was calculated using Image J software. At least 500 particles were evaluated and collected from several shots for the same sample. The percentage of the particles was plotted against their size to generate particle size distribution curve.
XPS measurements are performed with a Perkin Elmer 5300 XPS system with a non-monochromatized Mg-Kα X-ray source. Calibration is performed using the C-1s component (binding energy of 284.6 eV). An Mg-Kα X-ray is used with 300 W applied to the anode. For the XPS peak deconvolution, the XPS Peak 4.1 software is used, while Shirley background is employed to subtract the background.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Synthesis and Characterization of Mesoporous Bioactive Glass

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MBG was prepared by a modified sol–gel method, as shown in Figure 1. In detail, cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (3.6 g) and trimethylamine (0.12 mL) were added into 100 mL of distilled water and stirred for 1 h at 50 °C. Subsequently, tetrahydrate calcium nitrate (3.39 g) was added to the above solution to obtain an aqueous solution. After mixing 5 mL of tetraethyl orthosilicate and 20 mL of cyclohexane by sonication, the mixture was slowly added to the obtained aqueous solution for 12 h under stirring. After centrifugation at 3000 rpm, a white precipitate was collected. Subsequently, the MBG was obtained by cleaning the white precipitate with distilled water, drying at 80 °C for 20 h and calcining at 650 °C for 3 h. All reagents were provided by Shanghai Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China).
The morphology and microstructure of the synthesized MBG were studied utilizing transmission electron microscopy (TEM, Tecnai G-20, FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA) equipped with an energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS, Oxford Inca Energy 350, Oxford Instruments, Abingdon, UK) at 200 kV. The phase structure analysis of MBG was conducted using an X-ray diffractometer (XRD, Bruker, D8 Advance, Berlin, Germany) with Cu Kα radiation and at a step size of 5°/min. The surface area and pore size distribution were evaluated using the nitrogen adsorption–desorption technique at 77 K.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Structural Characterization of Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were examined with a Hitachi S4800 field emission scanning electron microscope under 20 kV accelerating voltage. The morphology was determined by transmission electron microscopy (TEM, FEI Tecnai G20). The sample structure was determined by X-ray powder diffraction (XRD, Bruker D8). Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy was examined by a Shimadzu IR Prestige-21 spectrometer to collect the vibration modes of functional groups within 4000–400 cm−1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Morphological Characterization of Nano.Alg and MFS.Alg

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were performed to assess the morphological characteristics of Nano.Alg and MFS.Alg. For TEM, one drop of the sample was placed on a 300 mesh copper grid covered with FormVar film, contrasted with 2% phosphotungstic acid for 1 min and observed on the transmission electron microscope (Tecnai G20, FEI, Thermo Scientific, Hillsboro, Oregon, USA). For SEM, the glass coverslips were covered with poly-L-lysine for 30 min and rinsed before placing the samples on their surface. The samples were left at room temperature for 24 h for drying and metallized with platinum (10 nm) before analysis on the scanning electron microscope (Quanta 650 FEG, FEI, Thermo Scientific, Hillsboro, Oregon, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Characterization of Tb4O7 Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The hydrodynamic size and zeta potential of the Tb4O7 NPs were measured using a Zetasizer Nano-ZS (Malvern, UK). The morphology and size of the Tb4O7 NPs were characterized using a transmission electron microscopy (TEM, Tecnai G-20, FEI). The UV–vis absorption spectrum was recorded on a spectrophotometer (UV-3600, Shimadzu).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Characterization of Pd/alk-Ti3C2X2 Catalyst

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface areas were measured by nitrogen adsorption at 77 K on an ASAP-2020 adsorption apparatus. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was carried out using a JSM-6510 (Rigaku, Osaka, Japan) operating at an accelerating voltage of 20 kV. Morphology and microstructure of Pd/alk-Ti3C2X2 were characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM, Tecnai G20, FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA) operating at an accelerating voltage of 200 kV. X-ray diffraction (XRD) characterization data were collected on a PANalytical X’eprt diffractometer (Egham, Surrey, UK) with Cu Kα radiation (40 kV, 40 mA) from 5° to 50°. X-ray photoemission spectroscopy (XPS) was performed on a Thermo ESCALAB 250 Axis Ultra spectrometer (Thermo, Waltham, MA, USA) using a monochromatic Al Kα (hν = 1486.6 eV). ICP-OES analysis was carried out on SPECTRO ARCOS spectrometer (SPECTRO, Kleve, Germany). The removal efficiency of the catalyst for 4-CP was analyzed by gas chromatography (GC, Agilent 7890A, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) with a flame ionization detector (FID) detector and PEG-20 M capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm, 0.25 μm film) and nitrogen was used as a carrier gas.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Characterization of V2O5/Graphene Composites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The crystal phases were collected using a Rigaku D/max2500 with Cu-Kα radiation (λ = 1.54178 Å) using a step of 0.02o between 10° and 80° (2θ). The morphologies of the samples were studied by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, FEI Nova Nano SEM 230) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM, FEI Tecnai G20). The X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the samples were collected in the range between 10o and 80o with a step size of 0.02°. The weight percentages of graphene in the V2O5/graphene composites were determined by thermogravimetric (TG) analysis with a heating rate of 10 °C min−1. A spectrometer (Raman, LabRAM HR800) with a back-illuminated charge-coupled detector attachment was used to record the Raman spectra.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Electrochemical Characterization of Catalysts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All electrochemical experiments were performed in a three-electrode conventional glass cell using a Gamry Potentiostat/Galvanostat Reference 3000 setup with electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) unit. Glassy carbon electrode (GCE, diameter ~3 mm), SCE and spiral Pt electrodes served as working, reference and counter electrodes, respectively. The electrocatalytic activity of the as-prepared catalysts was investigated in 0.5 M H2SO4 containing 0.3 M formic acid. High resolution transmission electron microscope (HR-TEM, Tecnai G20, FEI, Netherland) and scanning electron microscope coupled with an energy dispersive X-ray spectrometer (SEM/EDS, HITACHI UHR FE-SEM SU8030) were used to evaluate the electrode morphology and composition. X-ray diffraction in transmission geometry (STOE STADI-P) operated with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.54 Å) and position sensitive detector was used to identify the change in the particle size and the crystallographic structure of the as-prepared catalysts. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, CLAM4 electron analyzer from Thermo VG scientific), using a Mg Kα X-ray source (1254 eV) was used to determine the samples chemical (surface) composition. For evaluation, a linear background was subtracted and peaks were fitted using Voigt functions with identical FWHM for each component of the same element.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Thermal Characterization of Paraffin-AP25/Composite PCM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In order to determine the temperature at different points, digital thermocouples were used and mounted in various places. Such thermocouples were mounted on the inlet and outlet of the heat exchanger to investigate the system efficiency. One thermocouple was inserted into the paraffin-AP25/composite PCM to measure the heat stored.
X-ray diffraction (XRD) was measured using an XRPhillipsX’pert (MPD3040) X-ray diffractometer supported by a monochromatic Cu Ka source (k = 1.5406°A) to characterize the prepared composite. The measurement was conducted in the step-scan mode and taken every 0.02° in the range from 20 to 80°. Transmission electron microscopy was conducted using a JEM-2100 instrument to investigate the morphology of the composite (type Tecnai G20, FEI). Further, samples were explored and imaged using a field-emission scanning electron microscope (SEM) (FE-SEM, Quanta FEG 250), and the main elements contained in the images of catalyst samples were assessed via examination of the energy-dispersive spectrum (EDX).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Characterization of BaTiO3 Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The phase structure of BaTiO3 nanoparticles were determined by X-ray diffractometry (XRD, Bruker D8) with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5406 Å, 2θ = 20°–60°). Microstructures were characterized by a field-emission scanning electron microscopy (SEM, ZEISS Merlin), a transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and a field-emission high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM, FEI Tecnai G20). The sample was dispersed in ethanol, and a drop of solution was deposited onto a Si (100) substrate to allow the ethanol solvent to evaporate. A piezoresponse force microscopy (PFM, MFP-3D) was used to characterize the piezoelectric performance of the materials. The optical absorption spectra of Indigo Carmine and RhB molecules in the centrifugate was measured to determine the concentration of dye solutions by a Shimadzu UV-3600 UV–VIS–NIR spectrophotometer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!