The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

231 protocols using statistica v 12

1

Comparative Analysis of Cell Viability

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All results are expressed as means ± standard error of mean (SEM). All statistics were performed using Statistica v. 12 software (StatSoft, France). Normality of population was tested using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Adapted tests were then performed (Kruskal-Wallis, Mann and Whitney U test, two-way analyses of variance (ANOVA) and ANOVA for repeated measures). ANOVA were followed by a post-hoc test (HSD for n different). Significant differences (p < 0.05) between groups were mentioned by different letters (a, b, c…) in the tables and figures.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Transcriptomic Analysis of mRNA Levels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All results are given as means ± standard error of the mean (SEM). All statistics were performed using Statistica v.12 software (StatSoft, Paris, France). Normality of distributions was tested using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Adapted tests were then performed (Kruskal-Wallis, one-way analyses of variance (ANOVA), two-way ANOVA or ANOVA for repeated measures). Kruskal-Wallis, ANOVA and two-way ANOVA were followed by Mann and Whitney, Tukey and Bonferroni post-hoc tests, respectively. The significance threshold was set at p < 0.05 and differences between groups indicated on the figures by different letters (a and b) or by symbols.
A principal component analysis (PCA) was performed on levels of all mRNAs using R software and the FactoMineR package.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Statistical Analysis of Survival Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistica v.12 software (StatSoft, USA) was used for statistical analysis. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to verify the normality of distribution of continuous variables. Differences between the groups were assessed using Student’s t-test for normally distributed variables, which are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. A chi-square test, followed by Fisher’s exact test as appropriate, was used for comparisons of categorical data, which are expressed as counts and frequencies. 30-day survival was compared using the Kaplan-Meier method and the Mantel-Cox test was used to test survival differences between the study groups. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Bacterial Survival Evaluation by PCA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The mean values were compared using Tukey HSD’s ANOVA at a statistical significance set at p < 0.05 (Statgraphics Centurion XV, Statpoint Technologies Inc., USA). To assess the possibility of sample classification based on the survival of bacteria in samples during storage, Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was performed. The statistical analyses were conducted with Statistica v.12 software (StatSoft Inc., USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Multivariate Analysis of Salix Bioactives

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed with Statistica v. 12 software (Stat Soft Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA). The samples (bark and leaves of different Salix species) represented the cases, while the detected amounts of bioactive compounds were the variables. All data were standardized prior to calculation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Diabetes Impact on Spirometry Parameters

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was performed with the use of Statistica v12 software (StatSoft, Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA). The normality of distribution was assessed using a Shapiro-Wilk test.
Due to the lack of normal distribution, further analyses were based on the Mann-Whitney U or Kruskall-Wallis test. Chi-square test was used for qualitative data. Qualitative variables were expressed as percentage (%). Logistic regression models were used to determine odds ratios and confidence intervals. Three individual models for diabetes were used to characterize the relationships between diabetes and the spirometry parameters FVC, FEV1.0, and PEF. Three subsequent models showing the relationship between diabetes and spirometry parameters were adjusted for gender, age, BMI, and cigarette smoking. Discriminant analysis was used. The significance level was set at p ≤ 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Longitudinal Health Changes After Disaster

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Continuous variables were evaluated using analysis of variance ANOVA and Tukey's honest significant difference test to identify differences due to ageing. Significance was defined as a p value <0.05. Statistica V.12 software (StatSoft, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA) was used.
As the health data from 2008 to 2013 included the same participants repeatedly, the sample was considered non-independent and generalised estimating equation modelling was used.19 (link) The predisaster time period (2008–2010) was categorised for comparison to the postdisaster 2012 and 2013. The presence or absence of lifestyle-related disease was treated as dependent, with medical examination consultation year, age at time of visit and gender independent, with adjustment for both age and gender. An unstructured correlation structure was used to account for correlation among repeated measures on the same participants. The least-squares means and OR, adjusted for age and gender, were used for repeated measure logistic regression analysis. Significance was set to a level of 0.05. SAS V.9.3 (SAS Institute , Cary, North Carolina, USA) was used for analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Quantitative data were compared by Student’s t-test or Mann–Whitney U test. For multiple comparisons, ANOVA or ANOVA Kruskal–Wallis were used; p < 0.05 was considered significant. All calculations were performed with Statistica v. 12 software (StatSoft Polska, Cracow, Poland).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Triplicate Experimental Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The whole experiment was carried out in three replications. The analyses were performed in triplicates. The data were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) using Statistica v12 software (StatSoft, Tulsa, USA). The differences between the mean values were evaluated using the Duncan test at the significance level of P < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Correlating miRNA and mRNA Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Correlations between miRNA fold-change values and mRNA-expression values were determined using the R statistical software 3.11.1 package in Bioconductor (Release 3.0). The Student's t-test was used to determine statistical differences between pairs of groups. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to evaluate the statistical significance for comparisons within groups. P < 0.05 (two sided) was considered as statistically significant. P-values obtained were adjusted for false discovery rate due to multiple testing correction (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995 ). For generation of correlation graphs and statistical analysis, Statistica v12 software (StatSoft, Inc.) and GraphPad Prism software package (version 6.0) were used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!