The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Prepman ultra

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom, Australia

PrepMan Ultra is a sample preparation reagent used in DNA extraction and purification procedures. It is designed to facilitate the release of DNA from a variety of sample types, including tissue, cells, and bacteria. The product simplifies the sample preparation process, making it suitable for use in various genomic and molecular biology applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

44 protocols using prepman ultra

1

Rapid Fungal DNA Extraction Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA samples were extracted from the mycelium for all the isolated fungi using PrepMan Ultra (Applied Biosystems, UK) and following the manufacturer’s instructions. Mycelium (~100 mg) was scraped from the edge of the colony for each isolate using a sterile pipette tip and transferred into a sterile 1.5 mL tube containing 100 μL of the PrepMan Ultra (Applied Biosystems, UK) preparation reagent. Mycelial suspensions were vortexed for 30 s and incubated at 95 °C in a heat block for 10 min. The tubes were centrifuged for 2 min at 3220× g and 50 μL of the supernatant was transferred to a new sterile 1.5 mL tube and stored at −20 °C until required for PCR.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Optimized DNA Extraction and qPCR Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA was extracted from swab samples using the protocol described by Franklinos et al.13 (link); however, whilst for cotton swab tips, 60 µl of PrepMan Ultra (Applied Biosystems) was added to the sample, for skin lesion tissues only 50 µl of PrepMan Ultra was used31 (link). The collected supernatant was then diluted to a 1 in 10 solution, using PCR-grade water. For negative extraction controls, sterile MW-100 swabs were used.
The Oo qPCR was conducted on a StepOnePlus™ Real-Time PCR Machine (ThermoFisher Scientific) as per Bohuski et al.32 (link) running 60 cycles (instead of 40) and using the primers Oo-rt-ITS-F and Oo-rt-ITS-R in a 20 µl reaction with 5 µl of the 1:10 template DNA31 (link). Each DNA extract was run in duplicate, and ambiguous results were repeated until consistent results were obtained: samples which generated ambiguous results after three separate runs were considered inconclusive and excluded from further analyses. Samples were considered positive if one or both of the duplicate skin swabs tested Oo qPCR positive with a cycle threshold (Ct) value of ≤ 3632 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Determination of β-Lactamase Types

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To determine each control and test isolate’s β-lactamase type, nucleic acids were extracted from isolates for nucleic acid testing using PrepMan Ultra (Applied Biosystems). The blaZ gene was amplified with forward primer 5′-CAAAGATGATATAGTTGCTTATTC-3′ and reverse primer 5′-CATATGTTATTGCTTGCACCAC-3′ to produce a 355-bp product as previously published (9 (link)). Sanger sequencing was performed by the Australian Genome Research Facility (AGRF) using capillary electrophoresis. Sequences were analyzed using R 3.4.0 (packages sangerseqR 1.12.0 and DECIPHER 2.4.0). Chromatograms were developed for forward and reverse sequences, and primary and secondary base calls were made. Consensus sequences were determined for each strain. A programmatic function was developed to characterize sequence types. Nucleotide substitutions at positions 128 and 216 were analyzed to determine if the resultant amino acids were concordant with published structures for β-lactamase types A, B, C, and D. Threonine at position 128 and serine at position 216 predict TAPSA, lysine at position 128 and asparagine at position 216 predict TBPSA, threonine at position 128 and asparagine at position 216 predict TCPSA, and alanine at position 128 and serine at position 216 predict TDPSA (9 (link), 48 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Standardized Bd Infection Swabbing and qPCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We tested for Bd infection by using skin swabs and a qPCR assay [24 (link)]. The swabbing protocol was standardized by performing 45 strokes on the venter and limbs with a sterile rayon-tipped swab (MW-113, Medical Wire & Equipment, Wiltshire, United Kingdom). Genomic DNA was extracted from the swabs using the Prepman Ultra (Applied Biosystems®, Life Technologies Pty Ltd, Carlsbad, California, USA) and a bead beater to break the fungal cell walls for two minutes, and then the extract was diluted 3:47 in PCR water. Extracted DNA was then analysed using quantitative real time PCR following Boyle et al. [24 (link)]. We conducted the analysis in singlicate to maximise both cost efficiency and test accuracy [25 (link),26 ] including a positive and negative control and a series of dilution standards (to estimate infection load in zoospore equivalents, ZE).
To test for inhibition of the swab DNA, a subset of 20 samples was haphazardly selected and an internal positive control (VICTM IPC, Applied Biosystems®, Life Technologies Pty Ltd, Carlsbad, California, USA) was added to the qPCR reaction. No inhibition was detected in those samples. Because many samples returned high (>1000ZE) infection loads and prevalence was high, we concluded that inhibition due to high zoospore loads was unimportant. We prioritized resources to increase sample size rather than including IPC’s in every reaction.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Pathogenicity Confirmation of P. cinnamomi

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Phytophthora cinnamomi isolates were obtained from declining avocado orchards in Tzaneen, Limpopo, South Africa. Permission to collect isolates was obtained from individual farmers and from Westfalia Technological Services. Pathogenicity of isolates was confirmed by infecting avocado plants in a pre-trial and assessing disease development. See supplementary material for details on individual infection trials. Infection was confirmed by re-isolation of the pathogen and subsequent DNA extraction using Prepman™ Ultra (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Isolates were confirmed as P. cinnamomi by use of the species specific LPV3 primers (LPV3 F 5′-GTG CAG ACT GTC GAT GTG-3′, LPV3 R 5′-GAA CCA CAA CAG GCA CGT-3′) [73] in a polymerase chain reaction (PCR).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantifying Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis Infection in Frogs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
During fieldwork in 2018, 2019 and 2021, we swabbed live frogs of the new species with a synthetic dry swab (Medical Wire & Equipment #113) to quantify infection by Batrachochytriumdendrobatidis (Bd). We stroked swabs across the skin of juveniles and adults a total of 30 times per individual: five strokes on each side of the abdominal mid-line, five strokes on the inner thighs of each hind leg and five strokes on the foot webbing of each hind leg. We used a standard quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR) assay using DNA extracted from swabs to quantify the level of infection (Boyle et al. 2004 (link)). Following the protocol of Boyle et al. (2004) (link) and Hyatt et al. (2007) (link), we extracted DNA from swabs using 40 µl of PrepMan Ultra (Applied Biosystems). We analysed each extract once with a QuantStudio 3 qPCR system (ThermoFisher Scientific). We calculated the number of zoospore equivalents (ZE) (i.e. the genomic equivalent for Bd zoospores) by comparing the sample results with a serial dilution of standards (gBlock synthetic standards, IDT DNA, Iowa, USA). We considered any sample with ZE > 1 to be infected or Bd-positive.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantifying Bd Infection in Amphibians

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Following animal death and preservation, we used quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) to quantify Bd-infection intensity of all individuals in the Bd-exposure treatments. Additionally, we investigated Bd-infection status in two unexposed individuals per species per trial as well as every unexposed individual that died during the trials. To sample the individuals for Bd, we used a sterile, fine-tipped, dry swab (Medical Wire and Equipment, Corsham, Wiltshire, England) and swabbed the right ventral surface of individual frogs 10 times including the feet, legs, and drink patch. Individual swabs were placed into sterile screw-capped vials. Bd-DNA was extracted by adding 60 μL of Prepman Ultra (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, California), heating the vial for 10 min at 100° C, cooling the vials for 2 min, obtaining the supernatant, then diluting it to a 10% solution. We conducted qPCR using an ABI PRISM 7500 sequencer (Applied Biosystems) according to the methods of Boyle et al. [46 (link)]. All samples were run in triplicate and averaged. If a sample tested positive for Bd-DNA in only one replicate we reanalyzed the sample. If a second analysis was required, we re-swabbed the individual on their left side and analyzed the sample from the second swabbing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Polymorphism Analysis of ITS Region

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Polymorphism analysis of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of the 16S-23S ribosomal DNA sequence was performed according to the method of Daffonchio et al. [23 (link)]. The template DNA was prepared from each of the strains using Prepman Ultra (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA). PCR was done with TaKaRa ExTaq Hot Start Version (Takara Bio, Shiga, Japan), template DNA, and the primers in a reaction volume of 50 μL. The PCR conditions were initial denaturation at 94°C for 2 min, then 30 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 1 min, annealing at 55°C for 1 min, and extension at 72°C for 1 min, and final extension at 72°C for 2 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Yeast Genomic DNA Extraction and Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was extracted from yeast cells cultivated on YM agar
medium for 3-4 d at 25 °C and harvested using a loop. DNA was
isolated using PrepMan Ultra (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA,
USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
To sequence the LSU rDNA D1/D2 and TEF1 genes,
these DNA fragments were amplified by polymerase chain reaction
(PCR) using EX Taq kits (Takara Bio Inc., Kusatsu, Shiga, Japan) and
a Mastercycler Ep Gradient S Thermal Cycler (Eppendorf, Hamburg,
Germany). The standard primer pairs used for amplification and
sequencing were NL1 and NL4 for LSU rDNA (O'Donnell, 1993 ), and EF1-983F and EF1-2218R for
TEF1 (Rehner &
Buckley, 2005
; Kurtzman et
al., 2007
). The PCR products were purified using the
Agencourt AMPure purification system (Beckman Coulter Inc., Brea,
CA, USA), and sequencing was performed using BigDye Terminator v3.1
Cycle Sequencing Kits (Applied Biosystems). DNA fragments generated
from the sequencing reactions were purified using the Agencourt
CleanSEQ system (Beckman Coulter) and analyzed using either an ABI
PRISM 3130 or 3730xl Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems),
according to the manufacturers' instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Simple DNA Extraction Method

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fifty μL of either RNA-free water (Qiagen Sciences Inc., Germantown, MD) or Prepman Ultra (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) were added to thawed pellets. Samples were then placed in a dry bath at 99°C for 15 minutes, allowed to cool, and centrifuged for 3 min at 13,000 rpm (15,682 × g). The supernatant was transferred to a sterile 1.7 mL micro-centrifuge tube. Assay volume for calculations ~ 50 μL.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!