The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

22 protocols using guppy v 3

1

Nanopore Sequencing Data Processing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The fast5 files generated during sequencing were submitted to the pipeline defined by Black and colleagues [25 (link)] with minor modifications. In brief, the sequencing data were basecalled on the high-accuracy model performed by Guppy v.3.4.4 (Oxford Nanopore Technologies, UK). The basecalled fastq files with a minimum Q score of 7 were selected for the subsequent demultiplex process using Guppy v.3.4.4 (Oxford Nanopore Technologies, UK). A re-demultiplex process, trimming adapters, and chimeras were performed by Porechop v.0.2.4 (https://github.com/rrwick/Porechop, accessed on 29 September 2022). Furthermore, the assembly was performed by Burrows–Wheeler Aligner (BWA) v.0.7.17-r1188 [26 (link)] using NCBI Genbank accession number KJ776791.1 as genome reference. The primer sequences were trimmed with align_trim.py. The assembly was then polished, and the variant calling was performed by nanopolish v.0.11.3 (https://github.com/jts/nanopolish, accessed on 29 September 2022). The consensus sequences were then masked with “N” at regions with coverage depth <20, and the variant candidates were incorporated into the consensus genome using VCFtools v.0.1.16 [27 (link)]. The assembly statistics were calculated with SAMtools v.1.10 (using HTSlib 1.10.2) [28 (link)] and Seqtk v.1.3-r106 (https://github.com/lh3/seqtk, accessed on 29 September 2022).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Nanopore Sequencing Protocol with Modifications

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nanopore sequencing was carried out essentially as already described [27, 28 (link)]. Briefly, sequencing reactions were carried out in 1.5 ml LoBind tubes (Sarstedt) using wide bore (∅1.2 mm) tips for DNA manipulation to reduce physical shearing. Genomic DNA was size selected with 0.5 volumes of AMPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Two micrograms of size-selected DNA was employed for library construction using the SQK-LSK 108 kit (Oxford Nanopore Technologies). Library preparation was performed following the manufacturer’s protocol with modifications: (i) incubation on rotator mix for 15 min; and (ii) the Library Loading Beads were not added. Finally, 1 µg of DNA library was loaded onto a R9.4 flow cell (FLO-MIN106) (Oxford Nanopore Technologies). A 21 h sequencing run was performed on a GridION device (Oxford Nanopore Technologies). Real-time base calling was performed with Guppy v3.2.6 (Oxford Nanopore Technologies), filtering out reads with a quality cut-off https://github.com/wdecoster/NanoPlot). Nanopore read properties are reported in Table S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Nanopore Sequencing Library Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nanopore sequencing was carried out essentially as already described [24 (link),26 (link)]. Briefly, sequencing libraries were prepared in 1.5 mL LoBind tubes (Sarstedt, Nümbrecht, Germany) using wide bore (Φ 1.2 mm) tips for DNA manipulation to reduce physical shearing. The DNA size selection of the genomic DNA was obtained with 0.5 volumes of AMPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter, Milano, Italy) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Then, 2.5 µg of size-selected DNA was employed for library construction by using the SQK-LSK 108 kit (Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Oxford, UK). Library preparation was performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol with the following modifications: (i) incubation on rotator mix for 15 min; (ii) the Library Loading Beads (LLB) were not added. Finally, 1 µg of DNA library was loaded onto a R9.4 flow cell (FLO-MIN106) (Oxford Nanopore Technologies). A 25 h sequencing run was performed on a GridION device (Oxford Nanopore Technologies). Real-time base-calling was performed with Guppy v3.2.6 (Oxford Nanopore Technologies), filtering out reads with a quality cut-off of https://github.com/wdecoster/NanoPlot).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Nanopore-based Bacterial Genome Assembly

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Raw nanopore data were base-called using Guppy v3.2.2 (Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Oxford, UK). After quality filtering using NanoFilt (De Coster et al., 2018 (link)) and residual adapter removal using Porechop,2 the obtained dataset was quality checked using NanoPlot (De Coster et al., 2018 (link)). Long nanopore reads were then assembled in hybrid mode using Unicycler (Wick et al., 2017 (link)). The remaining ambiguities in the genome assemblies were verified by PCR amplification of DNA fragments, followed by Sanger sequencing with an ABI3730xl Genetic Analyzer (Life Technologies) using BigDye Terminator Mix v. 3.1 chemistry (Life Technologies). All of the possible sequence errors and mis-assemblies were manually corrected using Seqman software (DNAStar) to obtain the complete nucleotide sequence of bacterial genomes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Nanopore Assembly and Polishing Pipeline

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Raw nanopore data was basecalled using Guppy v3.2.2 (Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Oxford, UK). After quality filtering using NanoFilt [50 (link)] and residual adapter removal using Porechop (https://github.com/rrwick/Porechop), the obtained dataset was quality checked using NanoPlot [50 (link)]. Long nanopore reads were then assembled using Flye v2.6 [51 (link)]. Flye assembled contigs were further polished using Illumina sequencing reads and Unicycler_polish pipeline (https://github.com/rrwick/Unicycler).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Nanopore sequencing and assembly of Oenococcus oeni genomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Libraries for nanopore sequencing were prepared using the SQK-LSK109 ligation kit and loaded into a FLO-MIN106 R9 flow cell. Fast5 files were base called, demultiplexed, and adapter trimmed using Guppy v3.2.1 (Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Oxford, UK) with the high-accuracy model and a minimum quality score of 7, obtaining a final approximate coverage of 245× per strain.
The genomes of O. oeni strains AWRIB429, AWRIB787, and ATCC BAA-1163 were assembled and circularized using Unicycler v.0.4.8 (70 (link)) and then polished with long reads using Racon v.1.4.13. A final polish was performed in the genome sequence of strain AWRIB429 with Pilon v.1.23 (71 (link)) using 2 × 150-bp synthetic Illumina reads obtained from the genome assembly of this strain available in NCBI (assembly accession GCA_00017535). Gene and functional annotations were performed with PROKKA v.1.14.16 (72 (link)), including the gene models and functional annotations of O. oeni PSU-1 (assembly accession GCF_000014385). Further functional protein annotations were performed with KEGG (73 (link)) and InterProScan 5 (74 (link)). The prediction of temperate bacteriophages was performed using PHASTER (75 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Nanopore sequencing and assembly of Oenococcus oeni genomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Libraries for nanopore sequencing were prepared using the SQK-LSK109 ligation kit and loaded into a FLO-MIN106 R9 flow cell. Fast5 files were base called, demultiplexed, and adapter trimmed using Guppy v3.2.1 (Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Oxford, UK) with the high-accuracy model and a minimum quality score of 7, obtaining a final approximate coverage of 245× per strain.
The genomes of O. oeni strains AWRIB429, AWRIB787, and ATCC BAA-1163 were assembled and circularized using Unicycler v.0.4.8 (70 (link)) and then polished with long reads using Racon v.1.4.13. A final polish was performed in the genome sequence of strain AWRIB429 with Pilon v.1.23 (71 (link)) using 2 × 150-bp synthetic Illumina reads obtained from the genome assembly of this strain available in NCBI (assembly accession GCA_00017535). Gene and functional annotations were performed with PROKKA v.1.14.16 (72 (link)), including the gene models and functional annotations of O. oeni PSU-1 (assembly accession GCF_000014385). Further functional protein annotations were performed with KEGG (73 (link)) and InterProScan 5 (74 (link)). The prediction of temperate bacteriophages was performed using PHASTER (75 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Long-read sequencing of OPDM individuals

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LRS was first carried out on the four unrelated OPDM individuals (Patients F1-III8,
F2-II4, F3-II1 and S1), using a PromethION sequencer (Oxford Nanopore Technologies) as in
a previous study.3 (link) The mean
aligned coverage reached 14.07× to 19.74×. Library preparation was carried out using a 1D
Genomic DNA ligation kit (SQKLSK109) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. For each
individual, one PRO-002 (R9.4.1) flow cell was used. PromethION database calling was
performed using guppy v3.3.0 (Oxford Nanopore Technologies), and only pass reads (qscore ≥
7) were used for subsequent analysis. Subsequently, Patient S3, and an additional six
members of Family 1 (Subjects F1-II2, F1-II3, F1-II5, F1-II7, F1-II8 and F1-III10),
parents of Patient S2, and mother of Patient S3 were also sequenced using LRS on the same
platform.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Nanopore and PacBio Sequencing of OPDM Patients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA samples of affected individuals with OPDM and healthy individuals were sequenced using PromethION sequencer (Oxford Nanopore Technologies). Library preparation was carried out using a 1D Genomic DNA ligation kit (SQKLSK109) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. For each individual, one PRO-002 (R9.4.1) flowcell was used. Data analysis was followed by the pipeline in our previous work [18 (link)]. Briefly, PromethION data base-calling was performed using guppy v.3.3.0 (Oxford Nanopore Technologies), and only pass reads (qscore ≥ 7) were used for subsequent analysis. Long reads were aligned to reference genome (GRCh37/hg19) by minimap2 [19 (link)]. To validate the accuracy of ONT, we also performed PacBio Single Molecule, Real-Time (SMRT) DNA sequencing for patients FIII-39. HQRF (High quality Region Finder) were used to identify the longest region of singly-loaded enzyme activity. low-quality areas were filtered by Signal Noise Ratio (SNR). Subreads were obtained after the basic filtrations as previous reported. Circular Consensus Sequence (CCS) reads were retained using CCS tools and then aligned to the reference genome (GRCh37/hg19) using PBmm2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Nanopore Sequencing of Pu Promoter

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
One colony of the PuBamA strain was inoculated into 20 ml of LB medium containing 50 μg/ml kanamycin and supplemented with 10 μl of toluene in a 100-ml flask with a butyl rubber cap (original culture). After a 24-h incubation at 28°C with shaking, 50 μl of the culture was inoculated into 5 ml of LB medium containing 50 μg/ml kanamycin in a 50-ml conical tube (first-passage culture). This passage was repeated twice (second- and third-passage cultures). Plasmid DNA (pPuBamA) was extracted from each culture using a typical alkaline lysis method and used as a PCR template. A DNA fragment containing the Pu promoter of the pPuBamA plasmid was amplified by PCR using the primer set IS-P-Check_F/IS-P-Check_R. The resulting amplicon from the third-passage culture was purified using the Wizard SV gel and PCR clean-up kit (Promega, Madison, WI). A sequencing library was prepared using 268 ng of the purified amplicon and a ligation sequencing kit (catalog no. SQK-LSK109; Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Oxford, UK). MinION sequencing was performed using R9.4.1 flow cells (FLO-MIN106; Oxford Nanopore Technologies). MINKNOW software v3.6.3 (Oxford Nanopore Technologies) was used for data acquisition. Real-time base calling was performed with MinIT (Oxford Nanopore Technologies) and the integrated Guppy v3.2.9 software (Oxford Nanopore Technologies) to produce fast5 and fastq files.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!