The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

20 protocols using aggrecan

1

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Tissue Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were washed with PBS three times and then blocked with 5% BSA solution for 30 min, followed by incubation with the primary antibodies diluted in 5% BSA solution overnight at 4 °C: eNOS (ab5589, Abcam), alpha smooth muscle actin antibody (αSMA, ab7817, Abcam), CD68 (MCA341GA, BioRad), Cyclin D1 (A19038, ABclonal), Aggrecan (13880-1-AP, Proteintech), and CD206 (ab64693, Abcam). After that, samples were washed with PBS three times and incubated with goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody or goat anti-mouse antibody for 1 h at room temperature. Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. Tissue sections without primary antibody incubation were used as negative controls. The stained samples were observed with an inverted microscope (IX73, Olympus, Japan). Five different tissue sections (n = 5) from five different rats for each group were quantified. Specifically, for CD68+ and CD206+ cell quantification, two different tissue sections from the same sample were stained with CD68 and CD206 antibodies, respectively. The numbers of the CD68+ and CD206+ cells and the ratio of CD206+ cells to CD68+ were then quantified. Five sets of tissues sections (n = 5) from five different rats for each group were quantified.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Protein Expression Analysis in Mechanically Stressed Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The collected NP tissues was ground to powder in liquid nitrogen. The cells at 24 h after treated with mechanical stress or above tissues powder were placed in RIPA lysis buffer (Beyotime, China) supplemented with 1 mM PMSF (Beyotime, China) on ice for 30 min. The collected liquid was centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 15 min at 4 ℃. The protein concentration was detected with a BCA protein assay kit (PC0020, Solarbio). The protein samples from each group were separated in 8%, 10%, or 12% SDS–polyacrylamide gels (SDS-PAGE) and then transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane (Millipore, USA). After blocking with QuickBlockTM Blocking Buffer (Beyotime, China) for 20 min at room temperature, the membranes were incubated with rabbit primary antibodies against ACSL4 (1:2000, Proteintech), Bip (1:2000, Proteintech), Piezo1 (1:1000, Proteintech), Calnexin (1:5000, Proteintech), GPX4 (1:1000, Proteintech), ATF6 (1:2000, Proteintech), PERK (1:1000, Proteintech), Aggrecan (1:1000, Proteintech), Col-2 (1:1000, Novus), ADAMTS-5 (1:1000, Abcam), MMP-13 (1:1000, Proteintech), SelK (1:500, Proteintech), GAPDH (1:5000, Proteintech) overnight at 4 ℃. Then, the membranes were incubated for 90 min at room temperature with secondary antibody. The bands were visualized using an Amersham Imager 600, and the density was quantified using ImageJ software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Chondrocyte Protein Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Rat chondrocytes were lysed in ice-cold RIPA with 1 mM PMSF (Phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride, Beyotime). Protein concentrations of samples were measured by the BCA protein assay kit (Beyotime). Proteins of chondrocytes was separated on sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and were transfferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Millipore, USA) followed by blocking with 5% nonfat milk. After that, the bands were probed with primary antibodies specific to SIRT3 (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology), MMP-3 (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology), MMP-13 (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology), ADAMTS-5 (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology), aggrecan (1:1000, Proteintech), collagen II (1:1000, Proteintech), p-AMPK (1:500, Sigma), AMPK (1:1000, Sigma), PGC-1α (1:1000, Abcam), MFN2 (1:1000, Abcam), BNIP3 (1:1000, Abcam), NIX (1:1000, Santa cruz), LC3 (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology), DRP1 (1:1000, Abcam) , FIS1 (1:1000, Genetex) and β-actin (1:1000, Abcam) overnight at 4°C, before incubated with respective secondary antibodies. Last, the intensity of these bands was quantified using Image Lab 3.0 software (Bio-Rad).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Western Blot Analysis of Cellular Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein was extracted from ATDC5 cells using the Protein Extraction Solution (MDL) supplemented with protease inhibitor (MDL). A BCA protein analysis kit (MDL) was used to quantify protein concentration. Protein was separated by 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (0.22 μm; Millipore, Bedford, USA). After blocking non-specific interactions, the membranes were incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibody against β-actin (MDL), Aggrecan, Bax, Bcl-2, LC3 (Proteintech), and COL2A1(Santa Cruz). Next, the membranes were incubated for 1 h with corresponding HRP*Polyclonal Goat Anti-Rabbit IgG (H + L) (MDL) conjugated with horseradish peroxidase at room temperature. Finally, the proteins were stained and captured using Pierce ECL Western Blotting Substrate (Thermo Scientific) on the Bio-Rad ChemiDoc MP imaging system (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Protein Expression Analysis in Mechanically Stressed Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The collected NP tissues was ground to powder in liquid nitrogen. The cells at 24 h after treated with mechanical stress or above tissues powder were placed in RIPA lysis buffer (Beyotime, China) supplemented with 1 mM PMSF (Beyotime, China) on ice for 30 min. The collected liquid was centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 15 min at 4 ℃. The protein concentration was detected with a BCA protein assay kit (PC0020, Solarbio). The protein samples from each group were separated in 8%, 10%, or 12% SDS–polyacrylamide gels (SDS-PAGE) and then transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane (Millipore, USA). After blocking with QuickBlockTM Blocking Buffer (Beyotime, China) for 20 min at room temperature, the membranes were incubated with rabbit primary antibodies against ACSL4 (1:2000, Proteintech), Bip (1:2000, Proteintech), Piezo1 (1:1000, Proteintech), Calnexin (1:5000, Proteintech), GPX4 (1:1000, Proteintech), ATF6 (1:2000, Proteintech), PERK (1:1000, Proteintech), Aggrecan (1:1000, Proteintech), Col-2 (1:1000, Novus), ADAMTS-5 (1:1000, Abcam), MMP-13 (1:1000, Proteintech), SelK (1:500, Proteintech), GAPDH (1:5000, Proteintech) overnight at 4 ℃. Then, the membranes were incubated for 90 min at room temperature with secondary antibody. The bands were visualized using an Amersham Imager 600, and the density was quantified using ImageJ software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Histological Evaluation of Disc Degeneration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two weeks after the cell transplantation, the rats were sacrificed and their caudal disc tissues were assessed. These tissues were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, decalcified, and embedded in paraffin. For the immunohistochemistry analysis, the sections were incubated with Collagen-Ⅱ (1:200, 28459-1-AP, Proteintech) or Aggrecan (1:200, 13880-1-AP, Proteintech) antibodies. On the other hand, the sections were stained with hematoxylin–eosin (HE), saffron O-fast green (SO), and toluidine blue (TB). The images were then observed under the microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). The degree of disc degeneration was assessed based on the historical grading of the disc degeneration (Table 1) (Zhou et al., 2018 (link)). The control, Q-NPCSs, P-NPSCs and PBS groups each contained six samples and were scored by three independent observers.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Mesenchymal Stem Cell Chondrogenic Differentiation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ASA VI was purchased from Chengdu Must Bio-Technology Co. Ltd. (purity> 99%, China). Mesenchymal stem cell medium (MSCm) (7501), fetal bovine serum (FBS, 7552) and Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (DPBS, 0303) were purchased from ScienCell (USA). DMEM/F12 was purchased from Gibco (21,041,025, USA). BeyoClick EdU-488 was purchased from Beyotime Institute of Bio-Technology Co. Ltd. (Beyotime, C0071S, China). ProtoScript II cDNA was purchased from NEB (m3003L, USA). DAPI (D9542), dimethylmethylene blue (DMMB, 341088), glycine (410225), glacial acetic acid (S7653) and bovine chondroitin 4-sulfate as standard (C9819) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (USA). Primary antibodies for β-catenin (ab179467) and paxillin 1 (PAX1, ab32084) were purchased from Abcam (USA). Aggrecan was purchased from Proteintech (13880–1-AP, USA), and smad2/3 (8685 T), p-smad2/3 (8828S), ERK1/2 (4695 T), and p-ERK1/2 (4370 T) were purchased from Cell Signaling (USA). Anti-rabbit secondary antibodies were purchased from Abcam (ab150077, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Cartilage Repair Evaluation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were examined and photographed with a stereo-microscope (SZ61, Olympus, Japan) for macroscopic evaluation according to the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) macroscopic assessment scale (Table S1) [38 (link)]. As for histological assessment, samples were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, and then decalcified in 10% EDTA for 4 weeks under gentle shaking. The decalcified samples were embedded and sectioned. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and Safranine-O staining were performed for tissue morphological evaluation and GAG distribution analysis. Histological evaluation for the overall defect, the chondral (within the upper 1 mm of the defect) and subchondral (within the bottom 2 mm of the defect) regions was performed based on an established histological scoring system (Table S2) [39 (link)]. Immunohistochemical staining for Aggrecan (Proteintech, China), Collagen I (Proteintech, China) and CD44 (Proteintech, China) was performed to evaluate the expression of cartilage marker, fibrocartilage marker and BMSCs marker, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Protein Expression Analysis in hADSCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total protein separated from hADSCs using a protein extraction kit (Bio-Rad, USA), and the concentration of total protein was determined using BCA kit (Tianjin, China). Subsequently, the protein (50 μg) was separated by SDS-PAGE. Then, moved to PVDF (Millipo,USA), the membrane was incubated with blocking buffer at room temperature for 1 h. Then, incubate the first antibody GAPDH (Abcam), Aggrecan (Proteintech), SOX9 (Proteintech), COL2A1 (Proteintech), BMPR2 (Abcam) overnight, followed by secondary antibody at room temperature for 1 h. The GAPDH was used internal control. All western blot experiments were repeated at least three times.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Histological Analysis of Osteoarthritis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cartilage samples were fixed in 4% PFA and decalcified for paraffin embedding. The sections were stained with Safranin‐O/Fast green (Solarbio) or Alcian blue, and the severity of OA was quantified by two independent blinded observers using the OARSI grade. The detailed method was shown in Additional file 1.
For immunohistochemistry (IHC), the sections were incubated with primary antibodies for 12 h at 4°C. The primary antibodies used were as follows: Aggrecan (1:400, Proteintech, 13880‐1‐AP); Vimentin (1:3000, Proteintech, 10366‐1‐AP). Then, the sections were incubated with secondary antibodies at RT for 1 h. All positively stained cells along the joint surface of each sample were counted in the tibial plateau region. Quantitative analysis was performed using Image‐Pro Plus software (MEDIA CYBERNETICS).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!