The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Lsr 2 cytofluorometer

Manufactured by BD

The LSR II cytofluorometer is a flow cytometer designed for cell analysis. It is capable of detecting and analyzing multiple cellular parameters simultaneously, including size, granularity, and the expression of specific proteins or markers on the cell surface or within the cell. The LSR II cytofluorometer uses laser technology to excite fluorescent dyes or tags attached to cells, and the emitted light is detected and quantified to provide information about the cellular properties.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

9 protocols using lsr 2 cytofluorometer

1

Flow Cytometric Analysis of Macrophages

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Flow cytometric analysis was performed as previously described [19 (link)]. Briefly, harvested BMDM were incubated in 1 μg/mL of anti-mouse Fc receptor antibody in 100 mL PBS containing 0.5% BSA plus 0.02% NaN3 (FACS buffer) for 15 min on ice. Subsequently, single-cell suspensions were stained for 15 min at 4°C with blue-fluorescent reactive dye, L23105 (Life Technologies) to discriminate dead cells. After washing, 1-3 × 106 cells were surface-stained in FACS buffer for 15 min at 4°C with antibodies recognizing CD11b (Alexa Fluor 700, BioLegend), F4/80 (Brilliant Violet 785, BioLegend), CD86 (Brilliant Violet 421, BioLegend), PD-L1 (PE-Cy7, BioLegend), and PD-L2 (PE, BioLegend). Surface-stained cells were washed three times with FACS buffer and treated with Fix/Perm reagent according to the protocol of the cytofix/cytoperm kit (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA). The cells were intracellularly stained in FACS buffer containing anti-Nos2 (PE, eBiosciences) and anti-h/m arginase 1 (APC, R&D systems) for 30 min at 4°C and further collected on an LSR II cytofluorometer (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ). Stained cells were gated according to size (SSC-A) and forward scatter (FSC-A) to eliminate debris. Doublets were excluded from the analysis by using forward scatter height (FSC-H) and FSC-A. Data analysis was performed using FlowJo Software (FlowJo, LLC).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Bladder Immune Cell Isolation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Female IRflox and IRKO bladders were harvested 24 h after transurethral UTI. Bladder tissues were minced and dissociated in DMEM/F-12 supplemented with 100 mg/mL Collagenase I and 10 mM HEPES. After enzymatic dissociation, single cell suspensions were incubated with an anti-mouse Fc receptor antibody to block non-specific antibody binding. Cells were then stained with blue-fluorescent reactive dye (L23105, Life Technologies) for 20 min at room temperature to remove dead cells from the analysis. After washing, 1–3 × 106 cells were stained for cell surface receptors in FACS buffer for 15 min at 4°C with fluorescent monoclonal antibody combinations as previously published (Key Resource table).80 (link) Stained cells were collected on an LSR II cytofluorometer (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ) and data analyzed using the Flowjo software (Treestar, Ashland, TN). Absolute cell numbers were calculated using countBright absolute counting beads (Thermo Fisher).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Isolation and Analysis of Abdominal Aortic Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We isolated the abdominal aortic cells as described previously15 (link). Harvested cells were counted per mouse and incubated in saturated doses of anti-mouse Fc receptor in 100 μl of ice-cold FACS buffer (1% bovine serum albumin/0.01% NaN3 in PBS) for 15 min. After washing, 2 × 106 cells were stained with various combinations of antibodies in ice-cold FACS buffer for 15 min, and further collected on a LSR II cytofluorometer (BD Biosciences). Gating strategies are shown in Supplementary Fig. 8. Data were analyzed with FlowJo software (Tree Star).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Flow Cytometry Analysis of Undifferentiated and Differentiated Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Undifferentiated STHdh and MEFHdh cells were recorded using a flow cytometry LSR II cytofluorometer (BD Bioscience). A total of 200,000 ungated events were analysed with the flow cytometry-DIVA software version 6.1.3 (BD Bioscience) and overlays were processed with FCS Express software version 4.0.230 (De Novo Software). Differentiated STHdh cells were recorded with a CyAn™ ADP flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter). A total of 20,000 ungated events were analysed with Summit V4.3.01 software (Dako Colorado, Inc.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Isolation and Immunophenotyping of Peritoneal Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Single-cell suspensions were obtained from peritoneal exudate cells (PECs) by peritoneal wash with 5 mL ice-cold PBS. PECs pellets were washed twice with complete RPMI 1640 media and filtered with 70 μm Nylon Mesh (Fisher Scientific). Two milliliters of ACK lysing buffer (GIBCO, Life Technologies) was added to lyse red blood cells. Harvested cells were incubated in saturated doses of anti-mouse Fc receptor in 100 μL of ice-cold FACS buffer (1% bovine serum albumin/0.01% NaN3 in PBS) for 15 min. After washing, 3 × 106 cells were stained with various combinations of antibodies in ice-cold FACS buffer for 15 min and further collected on a LSR II cytofluorometer (Becton Dickinson, BD). Cells were gated according to size (SSC-A) and forward scatter (FSC-A). Blue-fluorescent reactive dye L23105 (Life Technologies) was used to discard dead cells. Absolute cell numbers were calculated with the total cell count multiplied successively by the percentages for the appropriate gates obtained through flow cytometry.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Multiparametric Analysis of Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples collected from the left ears were gently centrifuged and cell-free supernatants were snap frozen and stored. Cells were then resuspended in sterile saline and treated with DNAse and collagenase for 1 h and subsequently filtered with a 70 μM mesh, enumerated and divided for cell specific analysis. Washed cells were stained with the antibodies Alexa Fluor 700 anti-mouse/human CD11b clone M1/70 (Biolegend), biotin anti-human CD15 clone HI98 (Biolegend), BV 421 anti-human HLADR clone G46-6 (BD Horizon), FITC anti-mouse/human CD45R/B220 clone RA3-6B2 (Biolegend), APC-streptavidin (Biolegend), and incubated in ice-cold FACS buffer for 15 min, and analyzed on an LSR II cytofluorometer (Becton Dickinson, BD). Cells were gated according to size (SSC-A) and forward scatter (FSC-A) to obtain cell singlets and blue-fluorescent reactive dye L23105 (Life Technologies) was used to discard dead cells. Absolute cell numbers were calculated with the total cell count multiplied successively by the percentages for the appropriate gates obtained through flow cytometry.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Isolation and Characterization of Peritoneal Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Single-cell suspensions were obtained from peritoneal exudate cells (PECs) by peritoneal wash with 5-mL ice-cold phosphate buffer solution (PBS). PECs pellet were washed twice with complete Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) 1640 media and filtered with 70 μm nylon mesh (Fisher Scientific). ACK (Ammonium-Chloride-Potassium) Lysing Buffer (2-mL; GIBCO, Life technologies) was added to lyse red blood cells. Harvested cells were incubated in saturated doses of anti-mouse Fc receptor in 100-μl ice-cold FACS buffer (1% bovine serum albumin/0.01% sodium azide (NaN3) in PBS) for 15 min. After washing, 3 × 106 cells were stained with various combinations of antibodies in ice-cold FACS buffer for 15 min, and further collected on a LSR II cytofluorometer (Becton Dickinson, BD). Cells were gated according to size (SSC-A) and forward scatter (FSC-A). Blue-fluorescent reactive dye L23105 (Life Technologies) was used to discard dead cells. Absolute cell numbers were calculated with the total cell count multiplied successively by the percentages for the appropriate gates obtained through analysis in FlowJo Software (FlowJo, LLC).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantifying Cytokine Levels in BAL Fluid

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cytokine concentrations in cell-free BAL fluid supernatants were measured via cytokine bead array. All samples were assayed with the LEGENDplex predefined mouse inflammation panel (BioLegend), according to manufacturer directions and analyzed on an LSR II cytofluorometer (Becton, Dickinson, BD) or AURORA spectral cytometer (Cytek). Data were processed with the LEGENDplex online data analysis software suite to determine individual analyte concentrations. Concentrations were multiplied by total BAL fluid volume collected to obtain total picogram (pg) of protein.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid Immune Cell Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bronchoalveolar lavage fluids were gently centrifuged and cell-free supernatants were snap-frozen and stored. Cells were suspended in Dulbecco’s Phosphate Buffered Saline (DPBS) with 0.1 mM EDTA, enumerated, and divided for cell specific analysis. Washed cells were stained with Zombie Green to identify dead cells and then labeled with a cocktail of the following antibodies: BV421 antimouse/human CD11b clone M1/70 (Biolegend), BV570 antimouse CD11c clone N418 (Biolegend), APC antimouse Ly-6G clone 1A8 (Biolegend), PE antimouse F4/80 clone BM8 (Biolegend), and PE-Cy7 antimouse CD45 clone QA17A26 (Biolegend). Labeled cells were analyzed on an LSR II cytofluorometer (Becton, Dickinson, BD) or AURORA spectral cytometer (Cytek). Cells were gated according to size (SSC-A) and forward scatter (FSC-A/W) to obtain cell singlets and Zombie Green (Biolegend) was used to remove dead cells. Data were analyzed with FlowJo v10.8 software (BD) and absolute cell numbers were calculated with the total cell count multiplied successively by the percentages for the appropriate gates obtained through flow cytometry.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!