The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Model 1200 hplc uv

Manufactured by Agilent Technologies

The Agilent 1200 HPLC-UV is a high-performance liquid chromatography system equipped with a UV-Visible detector. It is designed for the separation, identification, and quantification of chemical compounds in complex mixtures. The system features automated sample handling, precise solvent delivery, and advanced data analysis capabilities.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

6 protocols using model 1200 hplc uv

1

Solubility Determination of Compound 80

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Hydrochloride salts of compound 80 were added to distilled water (1.0 mL). After shaking for 1.0 h at 25 °C and then centrifuging at 3000 rpm for 10 min, the saturated supernatants were measured the volume and then lyophilized to determine the concentration dissolved in water. For compound 80, the saturated supernatants were transferred to other vials for analysis by HPLC-UV. Each sample was performed in triplicate. For quantification, a model 1200 HPLC-UV (Agilent) system was used with an Agilent TC-C18 column (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm) and elution of 2 mM HCO2NH4/methanol-water (95:5). The flow rate was 1.0 mL/min and injection volume was 10 μL with the detection wavelength at 254 nm. Aqueous concentration was determined by comparison of the peak area of the saturated solution with a standard curve plotted peak area versus known concentrations, which were prepared by solutions of test compound in methanol at 135.0, 45.0, 15.0, 5.0, and 2.5 μg/mL.
In vivo toxicity, In vitro and In vivo pharmacokinetic, and Compounds protecting hA3G from Vif-mediated degradation assessment methods. See supporting information. All in vivo studies were in accordance with the Animal Care and Use Committee of People's Republic of China.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Solubility Determination of Test Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Solubility was measured at pH 7.4 by using an HPLC–UV method. Test compounds were initially dissolved in DMSO at a concentration of 1.0 mg/mL. Ten microliters of this stock solution was added to pH 7.4 phosphate buffer (1.0 mL), with the final DMSO concentration being 1%. The mixture was stirred for 4 h at rt and then centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 min. The saturated supernatants were transferred to other vials for analysis by HPLC–UV. Each sample was performed in triplicate. For quantification, a model 1200 HPLC–UV (Agilent) system was used with an Agilent Eclipse XDB-C18 column (150 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm), and elution was with 50–80% ACN in water. The flow rate was 0.8 mL/min, and the injection volume was 20 μL. Aqueous concentration was determined by comparison of the peak area of the saturated solution with a standard curve plotted for the peak area versus known concentrations, which was prepared by solutions of test compound in ACN at 50, 12.5, 3.13, 0.78, and 0.20 μg/mL.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Solubility Determination by HPLC-UV

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Solubility was measured
at pH 7.4 by using an HPLC–UV method. Test compounds were initially
dissolved in DMSO at a concentration of 1.0 mg/mL. Ten microliters
of this stock solution was added to pH 7.4 phosphate buffer (1.0 mL),
with the final DMSO concentration being 1%. The mixture was stirred
for 4 h at rt and then centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 min. The saturated
supernatants were transferred to other vials for analysis by HPLC–UV.
Each sample was performed in triplicate. For quantification, a model
1200 HPLC–UV (Agilent) system was used with an Agilent Eclipse
XDB-C18 column (150 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm), and elution was with
50–80% ACN in water. The flow rate was 0.8 mL/min, and the
injection volume was 20 μL. Aqueous concentration was determined
by comparison of the peak area of the saturated solution with a standard
curve plotted for the peak area versus known concentrations, which
was prepared by solutions of test compound in ACN at 50, 12.5, 3.13,
0.78, and 0.20 μg/mL.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Solubility Determination by HPLC-UV

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Solubility was measured separately at pH 7.4 by using an HPLC-UV method. Test compounds were initially dissolved in DMSO at 10 mg/mL. Ten microliters of this stock solution were spiked into either pH 7.4 phosphate buffer (1.0 mL) with the final DMSO concentration being 1%. The mixture was stirred for 4 h at room temperature, and then concentrated at 10,000 rpm for 5 min. The saturated supernatants were transferred to other vials for analysis by HPLC-UV and detected at 254 nm. Each sample was performed in triplicate. For quantification, a model 1200 HPLC-UV (Agilent) system was used with an Agilent Eclipse XDB-C18 column (150 × 4.6 mm, 5 m) and gradient elution of methanol (MeOH) in water, starting with 60% of MeOH, which was linearly increased up to 80% over 10 min, then slowly increased up to 90% over 15 min. The flow rate was 1.0 mL/min, and injection volume was 15 µL. Aqueous concentration was determined by comparison of the peak area of the saturated solution with a standard curve plotted as peak area versus known concentrations, which were prepared by solutions of test compound in acetonitrile (ACN) at 50 µg/mL, 25 µg/mL, 12.5 µg/mL, 3.13 µg/mL, 0.78 µg/mL, and 0.20 µg/mL.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Solubility Determination at pH 7.4 and 2.0

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Solubility was measured separately at pH 7.4 and 2.0 by using an HPLC-UV method. Test compounds were initially dissolved in DMSO at a concentration of 10 mg/mL. Ten microliters of this stock solution was spiked into either pH 7.4 phosphate buffer (1.0 mL) or 0.01 M HCl (approximately pH 2.0, 1.0 mL) with the final DMSO concentration being 1%. The mixture was stirred for 4 h at room temperature and then concentrated at 10000 rpm for 5 min. The saturated supernatants were transferred to other vials for analysis by HPLC-UV and detected at 254 nm. Each sample was analyzed in triplicate. For quantification, a model 1200 HPLC-UV (Agilent) system was used with an Agilent Eclipse XDB-C18 column (150 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm) and gradient elution of methanol (MeOH) in water, starting with 60% MeOH, which was linearly increased to 80% over 10 min and then slowly increased to 90% over 15 min. The flow rate was 1.0 mL/min, and the injection volume was 15 µL. The aqueous concentration was determined by comparison of the peak area of the saturated solution with a standard curve plotted as peak area versus known concentrations, which were prepared by solutions of the test compound in acetonitrile (ACN) at 50, 25, 12.5, 3.13, 0.78, and 0.20 µg/mL.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Solubility Determination by HPLC-UV

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Solubility was measured at pH 7.4 by using an HPLC−UV method. Test compounds were initially dissolved in DMSO at a concentration of 1.0 mg/mL. Ten microliters of this stock solution was added to phosphate buffer (1.0 mL, pH 7.4). The mixture was stirred for 4 h at rt and then centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 min. The saturated supernatants were transferred to other vials for analysis by HPLC−UV. Each sample was performed in triplicate. For quantification, a model 1200 HPLC−UV (Agilent) system was used with an Agilent Eclipse XDB-C18 column (150 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 μm), and elution was with 50%−80% ACN in water. The flow rate was 0.8 mL/min, and injection volume was 20 μL. Aqueous concentration was determined by comparison of the peak area of the saturated solution with a standard curve plotted peak area versus known concentrations, which were prepared by solutions of test compound in ACN at 50, 12.5, 3.13, 0.78, and 0.20 μg/mL.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!