The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Hummer sputtering system

Manufactured by Anatech
Sourced in United States

The Hummer Sputtering System is a laboratory instrument designed for the deposition of thin films. It utilizes the sputtering technique, a physical vapor deposition process, to coat substrates with a wide range of materials. The system is capable of depositing various materials, including metals, ceramics, and compounds, onto a variety of surfaces. The core function of the Hummer Sputtering System is to provide a controlled environment and precise deposition parameters for the creation of thin film coatings.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

9 protocols using hummer sputtering system

1

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Film Surfaces

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The surface morphology of the films was evaluated using SEM analysis. The samples were mounted on adhesive carbon pads placed on aluminum and sputter coated with gold using a Hummer sputtering system (Anatech Ltd, Springfield, VA, USA) in a high vacuum evaporator. A JEOL JSM-5600 SEM operating at an accelerating voltage of 10 kV was used for imaging.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Tissue Preparation for SEM Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For scanning electron microscopy, tissue was placed in 1.2% glutaraldehyde in 0.025M phosphate buffer (sodium phosphate, pH 6.8), vacuum was applied for 10 min, and tissue was fixed overnight at 4°C. Tissue was then rinsed twice with 0.025M phosphate buffer for 1 h, postfixed with 0.5% osmium tetroxide in 0.025Mphosphate buffer for 24 h at room temperature, and moved through an increasing ethanol series (20% increments), each increment lasting a minimum of 1 h and ending with two exchanges of 100% ethanol. Ethanol was removed by critical point drying with a critical point drier (SAMDRI), and tissue was mounted to stubs with double-sided adhesive tape and sputter coated with gold-palladium alloy using a Hummer Sputtering System (Anatech). Samples were examined with a Hitachi 4700 scanning electron microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Tissue Preparation for SEM Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For scanning electron microscopy, tissue was placed in 1.2% glutaraldehyde in 0.025M phosphate buffer (sodium phosphate, pH 6.8), vacuum was applied for 10 min, and tissue was fixed overnight at 4°C. Tissue was then rinsed twice with 0.025M phosphate buffer for 1 h, postfixed with 0.5% osmium tetroxide in 0.025Mphosphate buffer for 24 h at room temperature, and moved through an increasing ethanol series (20% increments), each increment lasting a minimum of 1 h and ending with two exchanges of 100% ethanol. Ethanol was removed by critical point drying with a critical point drier (SAMDRI), and tissue was mounted to stubs with double-sided adhesive tape and sputter coated with gold-palladium alloy using a Hummer Sputtering System (Anatech). Samples were examined with a Hitachi 4700 scanning electron microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Phage Clearance Zones

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Spot assays were performed as described above by spotting 5 µL fresh full-length Gp047 in PBS at 0.91 mg/mL. Following overnight growth of lawns, agar squares were excised using a sterile scalpel from either inside, outside or at the interface of the clearance zone. Slabs were then trimmed to leave the top layer (approximately 2 mm) intact and incubated in scanning electron microscopy (SEM) fixative (2.5% glutaraldehyde; 2% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer) overnight at 4 °C. Slabs were then prepared for microscopy using methods described by Bozzola and Russell [29 ]. Briefly, slabs were washed three times in 0.1 M phosphate buffer for 10 min each and then dehydrated by incubating 15 min each in a series of alternating ethanol and hexamethyldisialazane (HMDS) washes. The washes were done as follows: 50% ethanol, 70% ethanol, 90% ethanol, 100% ethanol, ethanol:HMDS 75:25, ethanol:HMDS 50:50, ethanol:HMDS 25:75 and 100% HMDS. Slabs were incubated in just enough HMDS to cover the slab surface, which was left to evaporate overnight. Once fully dried, slabs were mounted onto SEM stubs, sputter-coated with gold using the Hummer sputtering system (Anatech Ltd., Battle Creek, MI, USA) and imaged using the Philips/FEI (XL30) scanning electron microscope (Philips/FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA) with an electron beam energy of 20 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Microscopy Analysis of PCL Extruded Tubes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Surface features of the extruded tubes comprising PCL homopolymers and binary blends were visualized by scanning electron microscopy (Quanta 200; FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA) at an accelerating voltage of 20 kV and a spot size of 2.5 under high vacuum at various magnifications. Samples were prepared for imaging by slicing the extruded tubes and flattening them onto a carbon adhesive substrate mounted to an aluminum sample holder sputter coated with Au/Pt (Hummer Sputtering System, Anatech Ltd., Union City, CA, USA) under argon for 120 s. The surface morphology of the PCL extruded tubes was also characterized using an Olympus SZ61 stereomicroscope (zoom range 0.67× to 4.5×). The microscope is equipped with an Olympus SC30 camera that allowed sample photography. Similarly, the extruded tubes were sliced open and flattened to adhere to glass slides.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Spray-Dried Powder Particle Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Spray dried powders were deposited on an aluminum stub topped with double-sided carbon or copper tape. The stubs and powder were sputter coated with Au/Pd (Hummer Sputtering System, Anatech Ltd., Union City, CA) for 2 mins. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were captured using a Quanta 200 SEM (FEI, Hillsborough, OR). Geometric diameters were determined from these images by averaging ImageJ software measurements of individual particles (n = 200).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Emitter Coating and SEM Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Emitter tips were gold coated using a Hummer sputtering system (Anatech USA, Union City, CA, USA). SEM images were obtained using a FEI-MLA (Hillsboro, OR, USA) Quanta 650 Field Emission Gun-Environmental SEM.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

SEM Imaging of Clearance Zones

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Following a clearance assay with CTB on C. jejuni HS:19 as described above, agar squares were excised from inside, outside or at the interface of the clearance zones and prepared using the following established protocol58 (link). The squares were excised using a scalpel and trimmed to leave only the top layer of agar (about 2 mm) and then incubated in scanning electron microscopy (SEM) fixative (2.5% glutaraldehyde; 2% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer) overnight at 4 °C. Excised squares were then washed in 0.1 M phosphate buffer three times for 10 min and dehydrated using a series of 15 min washes: 50% ethanol, 70% ethanol, 90% ethanol, 100% ethanol, ethanol: hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS) 75:25, ethanol:HMDS 50:50, ethanol:HMDS 25:75 and 100% HMDS. After leaving HMDS to evaporate overnight, the excised squares were mounted onto SEM stubs and sputter-coated with the Hummer sputtering system (Anatech Ltd.). The squares were then imaged using the Phillips/FEI (XL30) scanning electron microscope (Philips/FEI) with an electron beam energy of 20 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Spray-Dried Powder

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scanning electron micrographs (Quanta 200, FEI, Hillsboro, OR) were obtained after sampling spray dried powder onto carbon adhesive mounted on an aluminum stub. Samples were sputter coated with gold/palladium (Hummer Sputtering System, Anatech Ltd., Union City, CA) for a period of 120 s. Particles were imaged at various magnifications with an accelerating voltage of 15 kV and a spot size of 3.0.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!