The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Signa 750

Manufactured by GE Healthcare
Sourced in United States

The SIGNA 750 is a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system developed by GE Healthcare. It is designed to provide high-quality imaging capabilities for healthcare professionals. The SIGNA 750 utilizes advanced technology to capture detailed images of the body's internal structures, enabling medical professionals to make informed diagnoses and treatment decisions.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

11 protocols using signa 750

1

Gradient Defocusing for Artifact Avoidance

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The MASTER sequence was implemented on a 3T GE Signa 750 scanner using developmental builds SpinBench and RTHawk (HeartVista, Inc. Menlo Park, CA USA) [27 (link)]. A single-channel GE head coil was used for transmit and receive in the initial validation experiment, and the body coil was used for the subsequent comparison experiments. All analysis was performed using MATLAB (The Mathworks, Inc. Natick, MA USA).
As an estimate of the minimum necessary gradient defocusing area to avoid inter-slice interference, a simple GRE sequence was used to image a GE grid phantom with different amounts of kz offset. At a kz offset of 6.66 cycles/cm, measurements at a kx offset of 5 cycles/cm were similar in magnitude to the noise floor. A conservative minimum diffusion offset of 7.5 cycles/cm in kz and 15 cycles/cm in kx or ky was used in all of the work presented here.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

PiB-PET and MRI Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For PET scans, [11C]PiB scans were acquired on Siemens ECAT HR + PET scanners at both sites using a nominal dose of 15 mCi of radiotracer. Preprocessing of dynamic [11C]PiB data was performed in AIR, version 3.0 [26] . Dynamic PET data were corrected for inter frame motion and averaged over 50–70 min after injection. Parametric SUVR images were generated using a cerebellar gray matter ROI. For MRI scans, T1-weighted MRIs were acquired on a 3.0 T GE SIGNA 750 at the University of Wisconsin-Madison site and on a 3.0 T Siemens Magnetom Trio at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center site. The SIGNA 750 acquisition used high-resolution volumetric spoiled gradient sequence (TI/TE/TR = 450/3.2/8.2 ms, flip angle = 12°, slice thickness = 1 mm no gap, matrix size = 256 × 256 × 156), whereas the Magnetom Trio acquisition used a magnetization prepared rapid acquisition gradient echo sequence (TI/TE/TR = 900/2.98/2300 ms, flip angle = 9°, slice thickness = 1.2 mm, matrix size = 160 × 240 × 256).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Multimodal Imaging and Amyloid Burden

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A subset of participants (N = 285) underwent T1‐weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI; 3T GE Signa 750) as well as Aβ (11C‐Pittsburgh compound B [PiB]) positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. Detailed methods for radioligand synthesis and PET and MRI acquisition, processing and quantification, and analysis were implemented as reported previously.29, 30 Aβ burden was assessed as a global cortical average PiB distribution volume ratio (DVR),29 and a previously established threshold of DVR >1.19 was used to determine Aβ positivity.31 Age of Aβ onset and Aβ duration (age at visit – estimated age Aβ+), defined as the approximate number of years that an individual has had suprathreshold Aβ positivity, were estimated using a combination of group‐based trajectory modeling and Bayes’ theorem.6
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Neuroimaging of Face-Emotion and Visual Search

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Neuroimaging data were collected on two 3T General Electric Signa 750 scanners each using a 32‐channel head coil with identical acquisition sequences. After a sagittal localizer scan, an automated shim calibrated the magnetic field to reduce signal dropout due to susceptibility artifact. BOLD signal was measured by T2*‐weighted echo‐planar imaging at a voxel resolution of 2.5 × 2.5 × 3.0 mm (repetition time = 2,300 ms, field of view = 24.0 mm, frequency × phase: 96 × 96; face‐emotion labeling: 179 volumes, flip angle = 70°, echo time = 30 ms, visual search: 151 volumes, flip angle = 75°, echo time = 25 ms). To reach longitudinal magnetization equilibrium, the four initial images from each run were discarded. A structural MPRAGE scan (echo time = min full; inversion time = 425; field of view = 25.6; frequency × phase = 256 × 256; flip angle = 7°; 1 mm isotropic voxels) was acquired for co‐registration with the functional data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Multimodal MRI Acquisition and Preprocessing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
T1 weighted 3.0 T MRI scans were acquired on a GE SIGNA 750 (UW-Madison) or a Siemens Magnetom Trio (UPMC). The SIGNA 750 acquired data using a high resolution volumetric spoiled gradient sequence (TI/TE/TR = 450/3.2/8.2 ms, flip angle = 12°, slice thickness = 1 mm no gap, matrix size = 256x256x156). The Magnetom Trio acquired data using a magnetization prepared rapid acquisition gradient echo sequence (MPRAGE; TI/TE/TR = 900/2.98/2300 ms, flip angle = 9°, slice thickness = 1.2 mm, matrix size = 160x240x256). In the 68 available baseline T1 MRI images, 8 (12%) were flagged at UPMC during preprocessing as containing “severe motion” or “significant motion”, leaving 60 T1 MRIs suitable for tissue type segmentation.
T2 weighted MRIs were also acquired on a 3.0 T GE SIGNA 750 (TE/TR = 85/9000 ms, slice thickness = 2 mm no gap, matrix size = 256x256x96) at UW-Madison. T2 weighted MRIs acquired at UPMC were not available for this analysis. Of the 40 available baseline T2 MRI images, 3 (7.5%) were flagged at UPMC during preprocessing as containing “severe motion” or “significant motion”, leaving 37 T2 MRIs suitable for tissue type segmentation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

MRI Protocol for PET-MRI Registration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were conducted on 3.0T MRI scanners; specifically, a GE SIGNA 750 with an 8-channel head coil (University of Wisconsin-Madison site) and Siemens Magnetom Prisma scanner with a 64-channel head coil (University of Pittsburgh site). MRI data were used for PET-MRI registration, region definition, and magnetic resonance-guided correction of PET Aβ and tau data. At Wisconsin, T1-weighted MRI brain images were acquired in the sagital plane with a high resolution volumetric-spoiled gradient sequence (inversion time/echo time/repetition time = 400/3.0/7.4 ms, flip angle = 11°, slice thickness = 1.2 mm no gap, and matrix size = 256 × 256 × 196). At Pittsburgh, T1-weighted MRI brain images were acquired in the sagittal plane with a Magnetization Prepared Rapid Gradient Echo sequence (inversion time/echo time/repetition time = 900/2.95/2300 ms, flip angle = 9.0°, slice thickness = 1.2 mm, and matrix size = 240 x 256 x 176).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Multimodal MRI Acquisition and Quality Control

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
T1 weighted 3.0 T MRI scans were acquired on a GE SIGNA 750 (UW-Madison) or a Siemens Magnetom Trio (UPMC). The SIGNA 750 acquired data using a high resolution volumetric spoiled gradient sequence (TI/TE/TR = 450/3.2/8.2 ms, flip angle = 12°, slice thickness = 1 mm no gap, matrix size = 256×256×156). The Magnetom Trio acquired data using a magnetization prepared rapid acquisition gradient echo sequence (MPRAGE; TI/TE/TR = 900/2.98/2300 ms, flip angle = 9°, slice thickness = 1.2 mm, matrix size = 160×240×256). In the 68 available baseline T1 MRI images, 8 (12%) were flagged at UPMC during preprocessing as containing “severe motion” or “significant motion”, leaving 60 T1 MRIs suitable for tissue type segmentation.
T2 weighted MRIs were also acquired on a 3.0 T GE SIGNA 750 (TE/TR= 85/9000 ms, slice thickness = 2 mm no gap, matrix size = 256×256×96) at UW-Madison. T2 weighted MRIs acquired at UPMC were not available for this analysis. Of the 40 available baseline T2 MRI images, 3 (7.5%) were flagged at UPMC during preprocessing as containing “severe motion” or “significant motion”, leaving 37 T2 MRIs suitable for tissue type segmentation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

3T MRI Acquisition Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
T1-weighted MRIs were acquired on a 3T GE SIGNA 750 at the University of Wisconsin-Madison site and on a 3T Siemens Magnetom Trio at the University of Pittsburgh site. The SIGNA 750 acquisition used high resolution volumetric spoiled gradient sequence (TI/TE/TR=450/3.2/8.2ms, flip angle=12°, slice thickness=1mm no gap, matrix size=256×256×156), while the Magnetom Trio acquisition used a magnetization prepared rapid acquisition gradient echo (MPRAGE) sequence (TI/TE/TR=900/2.98/2300ms, flip angle=9°, slice thickness=1.2 mm, matrix size=160×240×256).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

High-resolution 3T MRI brain imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
T1-weighted 3.0 T MRI scans were acquired on a SIGNA 750 (General Electric) for image coregistration and region of interest (ROI) definition. The SIGNA 750 acquisition used a high resolution volumetric spoiled gradient sequence (TI/TE/TR:450/3.2/8.2 ms, flip angle:12°, slice thickness:1 mm no gap, FOV:256, matrix size:256 × 256 × 156).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Cardiac MRI Assessment Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CMR assessments were performed either on a 1.5-T scanner at the UMCG (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany, SUMC and LPCG; Signa TwinSpeed, Signa 450-w) or a 3 T MR scanner at SUMC (Signa 750, GE Healthcare, Wisconsin, the United States). A retrospectively gated steady-state freeprecession (SSFP) sequence was used to obtain ECG-gated cine loop images with breath holding. The four-chamber view was used for long-axis slices and short-axis slices were subsequently acquired covering both ventricles from base to apex. To help define positions of the tricuspid and mitral valves, additional SSFP cine images were taken in the long axis planes. All non-sedated patients were instructed to hold their breath during the examinations, and the images were acquired during end-expiratory breath holds. Two-dimensional velocity encoded CMR flow measurements, perpendicular and ± 1.5 cm cranial to the pulmonary valve, were performed using 2-D gradient echo Fast Low Angle SHot (FLASH), acquired during normal respiration with retrospective cardiac gating.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!