The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

410 protocols using ligprep

1

Molecular Docking of Ligand Conformations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The modeled structure of hNKA was used as the receptor, and the conformations of 111 generated by LigPrep (Schrödinger Release 2018-2: LigPrep, Schrödinger, LLC., New York, NY, USA) were used in molecular docking against the receptor by AutoDock Vina, following our previous procedure [14 (link)]. In brief, the 3D structures of 111 were built in Maestro (Schrödinger Release 2018-2: Maestro, Schrödinger, LLC., New York, NY, USA) and prepared by LigPrep from Schrodinger Suite 2018-2 (Schrödinger Release 2018-2: LigPrep, Schrödinger, LLC., New York, NY, USA). The geometric optimization was performed using the OPLS3 force field with all possible ionization states at pH 7.4 ± 0.1 created by Epik.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Preparing Ligands for Simulation Studies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The LigPrep module from Schrodinger suite was employed to prepare all the downloaded ligands for simulation studies (Schrodinger 2017: LigPrep, Schrodinger, LLC). This is an efficient module and prepares one ligand in approximately one second for downstream computational processes. The PubChem compound identity of all the downloaded ligands (DEHP, DINCH, ATBC, and DEHA) are mentioned in Table 1. This module produces energy-minimized, accurate three-dimensional structures for the ligands and also applies filters to remove those compounds which fail to meet the user-specified criteria. The LigPrep module eliminate mistakes in ligands and corrects Lewis structures. Furthermore, it also produces structural and chemical diversity, such as various stereoisomers, ring conformations, tautomeric and ionization states, etc. from a given input ligand structure. The two-dimensional structures of all the indicated ligands are presented in Figure 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Docking of AI-2 to TqsA Protein

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Substrate docking of AI‐2 to the TqsA structure was performed with Glide (Friesner et al, 2004 (link)). The initial coordinates of AI‐2 were taken in the cyclic form from the LsrB structure (PDB ID 6DSP) and an ensemble of conformations was generated using Ligprep (Schrödinger Release 2020‐1: Ligprep, Schrödinger, LLC, New York, NY, 2020). Docking was carried out over a search space of the entire protein volume with 75 runs. In each run, a box size of 15 × 15 × 15 Å for the inner box and 45 × 45 × 45 Å for the outer box were used. All the binding poses obtained from all docking runs (n = 3,950) were pooled together and then clustered using the cluster module of Gromacs program (v2020.2) with the Jarvis–Patrick method and a cut‐off of 4 Å (Abraham et al, 2015 (link)). Clustering resulted in 23 clusters and the most populated cluster comprises of more than 25% of all the binding poses (n = 1,091). This cluster is describing the binding modes near HP1, H5, and H6 in the protomer and has been discussed in the text and the representative binding pose is shown in Fig 5A. The second (n = 635) and third (n = 553) most populated clusters are located near the loop between H6 and HP2 and the space H6 and HP1, respectively (not shown in the manuscript).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Compound Characterization and Antiviral Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Compound properties are reported in Tables 14. Structures were optimized using LigPrep (LigPrep, Schrodinger, LLC, New York, NY, 2018). Pharmaceutically relevant properties including logP (water / octanol partition coefficient) and logS (aqueous solubility) were calculated using QikProp (QikProp, Schrodinger, LLC, New York, NY, 2018). Inhibition constants for HP-binding (KI) were measured in a competitive inhibition fluorescence experiment[23 (link)] by concentration-dependent displacement of fluorescently labeled HP-binding C- peptide from the NHR binding site. Concentrations that yielded 50% inhibition of biological activity (IC50) were obtained using cell-cell fusion (IC50CCF) and viral infectivity (virus-cell fusion; IC50VCF) assays as previously described.[2 (link)] Antiviral assays were run using lab-adapted viral strains Ba-L and IIIB. Details are in the Supplementary Data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Identifying RORγt Inverse Agonists

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RORγt inverse agonists used in the NIB model training with BR-NiB were acquired from the ChEMBL database [46 (link)] (obtained 10 June 2019; http://dude.docking.org). Only those full orthosteric inverse agonists with reported IC50 values of traceable data origin were included. If several activity measurements existed for the same compound, the most potent IC50 value was selected. The set comprised 191 active compounds. The SPECS 10 mg compound library, consisting of approximately 170,000 compounds (SPECS, The Netherlands; www.specs.net; obtained 28 June 2019), was used as decoy compounds in VS model optimization (25%) and in actual VS to identify RORγt inverse agonists (100%). This SPECS library was selected for VS due to its suitable size for testing various methods, reasonable pricing, and variability of chemistry. Both ChEMBL and SPECS molecules were processed with LIGPREP (Schrödinger Release 2018-2: LIGPREP, Schrödinger, LLC, New York, NY, 2018) to generate possible tautomers and enantiomers with OPLS3 charges [54 (link)] at pH 7.4 ± 0.0.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Ligand Preparation for Molecular Docking

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ligands were generated using the Carbohydrate Builder within MOE 2019.0101, and transferred to Discovery Studio 4.5 (Dassault Systémes, San Diego, CA), where they were assigned the CHARMm force field and MMFF94 atom types. We then performed full minimization, using steepest descent with RMSD 0.01 for a maximum of 200 steps. Subsequently, ligands were imported to Maestro 10.3 and prepared using LigPrep (Schrödinger Release 2021-3: LigPrep, Schrödinger, LLC, New York, NY, 2021). Ionization and tautomeric states were assigned at physiological pH with Epik.17 (link) All other settings were kept as default, and up to 32 stereoisomers were generated per ligand. For each ligand, one low-energy conformation was selected based on Epik’s state penalty, proper bond angles, and correct stereochemistry.18 (link) Each selected conformation was added to the compound library used for subsequent docking experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Optimizing Antiviral Molecule Structures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In this study, antiviral, anti-inflammatory, and immunomodulatory molecules were selected from the literature based on their mechanism of action, as provided in Table 1. The ligands’ structures were downloaded and incorporated into Maestro. The ligands were then optimized using the LigPrep tool of Schrödinger (LigPrep, Schrödinger, LLC, NY, USA, 2020) to obtain appropriate geometry-optimized stable structures with the lowest energy at neutral pH 7.0 [20 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Molecular Docking of J. adhatoda Phytochemicals

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The list of phytochemicals present in J. adhatoda was prepared from the LC-QTOF-MS data. A total of 81 compounds were identified, and from them, 5 most active compounds were selected for docking study. The three-dimensional (3D) conformers of these compounds were downloaded from the PubChem database in SDF format. Similarly, the 3D structure of protein NF-κB (PDB ID: 1LE5) was acquired from the protein data bank (https://www.rcsb.org/, (accessed on 15 June 2022)). The 3D structures of the ligands were optimized with LigPrep (Schrödinger Release 2022-2: LigPrep, Schrödinger, LLC, New York, NY, USA, 2021), and receptor structure was optimized and prepared for docking using Protein Preparation Wizard. The active site of the proteins was evaluated by SiteMap, and the grid was generated through the Receptor Grid generator. Further, the optimized ligand and the receptor were docked using Ligand Docking in Glide-V9.2. The probable poses were observed through Pose Viewer. The Docking analysis was performed in Schrödinger Release 2022-2: Maestro, Schrödinger, LLC, New York, NY, USA, 2021.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Protein and Ligand Preparation for Docking

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Preparation of the compounds for docking included the generation of tautomeric and ionisation states at pH 6–8 and the creation of 3D structures using LigPrep (Schrödinger Release 2021–3: LigPrep, Schrödinger, LLC, New York, NY, 2021). Proteins were prepared by adding H-atoms, protonating side chains at pH = 7, and refining H-bond network with the default settings of Protein Preparation Wizard (Schrödinger Release 2021–3: Protein Preparation Wizard, Schrödinger, LLC, New York, NY, 2021). Ser460 was mutated to Gly for noncovalent docking performed by Glide (Schrödinger Release 2021–3: Glide, Schrödinger, LLC, New York, NY, 2021). Covalent docking was performed by CovDock46 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Ursolic acid and uvaol docking

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The structures of ursolic acid and uvaol were obtained from PubChem [71 ] (entries 64945 and 92802, respectively) and prepared with LigPrep on Maestro (LigPrep, version 2.9, Schrödinger, LLC, 2014), selecting the minimized structure for docking studies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!