The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Nanodrop one uv vis spectrophotometer

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

The NanoDrop™ One UV-Vis spectrophotometer is a compact, easy-to-use instrument designed for the quantification and purity assessment of nucleic acids and proteins. It utilizes a sample retention system that requires only 1-2 μL of sample to perform measurements.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

98 protocols using nanodrop one uv vis spectrophotometer

1

Genomic analysis of Cyanobacterium caeruleus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was extracted from C. caeruleus T094 that was grown on ISP2 for 7 days. DNA quality was confirmed using gel electrophoresis, a NanoDrop One UV-Vis spectrophotometer, and a Qubit fluorometer (Invitrogen Qubit DNA-HS assay kit, Q32851). Genomic DNA was run through the UCB QB3 PacBio Sequel II sequencing pipeline. Raw reads were assembled de novo using the Flye assembler (version 2.7.1) (93 (link)) into one scaffold with an average 993× coverage. The draft genome was annotated using the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) (94 (link)).
For natural product biosynthetic gene cluster prediction, the C. caeruleus T094 and DSM43634 genomes were submitted to antiSMASH version 6.0.1 (95 (link)) using relaxed conditions. Default “extra features” selected included KnownClusterBlast, ActiveSiteFinder, SubClusterBlast, and RREFinder. For global metabolic gene analysis, the C. caeruleus T094 genome was submitted to BlastKOALA (96 (link)) for K-number assignment and visualization of metabolic pathways in KEGG. For comparative analysis of the dynaplanin biosynthetic gene cluster, sequences were manually uploaded to the Gene Graphics (97 (link)) web application for comparison of gene organization.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

De Novo Genome Assembly of Paraburkholderia kirstenboschensis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was extracted from P. kirstenboschensis F3 that was grown in ISP2 for 18 h, using a modified phenol/chloroform extraction, where RNase A was added during the lysozyme incubation step [67 (link)]. DNA quality was confirmed using gel electrophoresis, Bioanalyzer, a NanoDrop One UV–Vis spectrophotometer, and a Qubit fluorometer (Invitrogen Qubit DNA-HS assay kit, Q32851). Genomic DNA was run through the UCB QB3 PacBio Sequel II sequencing pipeline. Raw reads were partitioned using seqtk, and the genome was assembled de novo with Flye into three contigs at 989x coverage. The draft genome was annotated using the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline [68 (link)].
Species identification was determined by ANI analysis using the Kostas lab ANI calculator [69 ] in comparison to the NCBI reference genome for P. kirstenboschensis (GenBank accession number GCA_904848585.1). P. kirstenboschensis was among a list of Paraburkholderia species that had a > 97% identity match from BLAST searches using 16S rRNA, gyrB, recA, rpoB, and trpB DNA sequences from strain F3. Only P. kirstenboschensis had an ANI of >95%, an acceptable cutoff for bacterial species identification [70 (link)], with a resulting 96.83% ANI.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Genome sequencing of Arthrobacter resistance mutants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNAs of Arthrobacter globiformis wild type and spontaneous resistance mutants (K, M, O, P, Q, R, Y, and BB) were extracted by using a Qiagen DNeasy blood and tissue kit with optimized cell lysis for Gram-positive bacteria. DNA quality was confirmed by using gel electrophoresis, a NanoDrop One UV-Vis spectrophotometer, and a Qubit fluorometer (Invitrogen Qubit DNA-HS assay kit, catalog no. Q32851). Library preparation and sequencing were performed by UCB QB3 with Illumina NovaSeq 150-bp, paired-end reads. SNPs and indels were identified in mutants and the wild type by aligning raw, paired-end reads to the A. globiformis reference genome NBRC12137 (NCBI accession NZ_BAEG01000085) individually using Snippy (version 4.5.0; https://github.com/tseemann/snippy) with standard parameters. Snippy analyses were run on the Galaxy (99 (link)) computing cluster. SNPs/indels with 150 raw reads or fewer were excluded from the analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Genomic DNA Extraction from Han Chinese Family

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A family consisting of seven individuals from three generations from Hubei, China, was recruited, and matched the following criteria: (1) five upward tracing generations were Han Chinese; (2) each individual has a normal phenotype and no genetic diseases; (3) the third generation is a male. The whole blood was collected from a family residing in southern China, consisting of the mother, father, and the son CN1, under the approval number IACUC-RE-2021-10-003 from the Ethics Committee of the Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences. All participates provided informed consent for sample collection. High-molecular-weight genomic DNA was isolated using the CTAB method, followed by purification with the QIAGEN Genomic kit (Cat#13343, QIAGEN) according to the manufacturer’s protocol for sequencing. The quality of the extracted DNA samples was assessed by analyzing degradation and contamination on 1% agarose gels. The purity of DNA was evaluated using NanoDropTM One UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA), with an OD260/280 ratio ranging from 1.8 to 2.0 and OD260/230 ratio between 2.0 and 2.2. The concentration of DNA was further quantified using the Qubit 4.0 Fluorometer (Invitrogen, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Transcriptome Profiling of A. edgeworthii

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The total RNA of tissues from A. edgeworthii, including leaves, aerial flowers, aerial seeds, subterranean flowers, subterranean seeds, and roots, were extracted with Trizol as described previously (Cui et al., 2018). The quality of RNA was detected by 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis, and the concentration was detected by the NanoDropTM One UV‐Vis Spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). The paired‐end sequencing with 150‐bp was conducted on the BGISEQ‐500 sequencer (BGI, Shenzhen, China). The clean data was generated by removing reads containing poly‐N, adapters or low‐quality reads from the raw data. Mixed RNA from all samples was sequenced to generate de novo transcriptome for genome annotation using Trinity (Haas et al., 2013). For gene expression quantification in tissues, fragments per kilobyte of exon model per million reads mapped (FPKM) values were calculated using the HISAT2 (v2.1.0) and Cufflinks (v2.2.1) (Kim et al., 2015; Trapnell et al., 2010).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Genomic DNA and RNA Extraction from Ligusticum chuanxiong

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
High–molecular weight genomic DNA was extracted from 3 g of fresh leaves of L. chuanxiong stored at −80°C using CTAB method and purified with a QIAGEN Genomic kit (QIAGEN, Germany). The DNA integrity and purity were monitored on 1% agarose gels and by NanoDropTM One UVVis spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). DNA concentration was further measured using the Qubit 4.0 Fluorometer (Invitrogen, USA).
Total RNA was extracted from each tissue (rhizome, stem, petiole, and leaf) of L. chuanxiong using the RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Omega, USA). The first-strand cDNAs were synthesized by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (PCR) from the total RNA samples as templates using the SuperScript III First-Strand Synthesis System with the oligo(dT) 20 primer (Thermos Fisher Scientific, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Osteogenic Differentiation of ADMSCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TRIzol® reagent was used to isolate total RNA from ADMSCs 3, 7, 14, and 21 days after inducing osteogenesis with electrical stimulation. RNA was quantified by measuring absorbance at 260 nm (NanodropTM One UV-Vis spectrophotometer; Thermo Scientific, MA, USA). Then, cDNA was synthesized from total RNA using a ReverTra Ace qPCR RT kit. Real-time PCR was performed using SYBRTM green PCR master Mix and analyzed on a StepOnePlus system (Applied Biosystems, Warrington, UK). GAPDH was selected as a housekeeping gene. All primer sequences are shown in Table 2. Relative expression levels are expressed using the 2−ΔΔCt method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Total RNA Isolation using TRI Reagent

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was isolated using TRI® reagent (Merck KGaA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. In brief, 3E6 cells were harvested on day 2 post transfection, spun down (400 × g, 6 min) and resuspended in 1 ml TRI® reagent. 200 µl of Chloroform were added, the samples were mixed and centrifuged at 4 °C for phase separation. 500 µl 2-Propanol were added to the upper, aqueous phase, and samples were centrifuged for RNA precipitation and pelleting. The pellets were washed with 75% Ethanol, air-dried, resuspended in 30 µl nuclease-free water and incubated at 65 °C for 10 min. Quality and quantity of RNA was determined by a NanoDropTM One UV-Vis Spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Only RNA samples with a 260/280 and a 260/230 ratio above 1.8 were used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Cultivation and DNA/RNA Extraction of Ganoderma lucidum

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The G. lucidum monokaryon strain yw-1-5 was derived from the dikaryotic strain yw-1 by protoplasting. The strain yw-1-5 was preserved in Guangdong Microbial Culture Collection Center (GDMCC), Institute of Microbiology, Guangdong Academy of Science. The vegetative mycelium of strain yw-1-5, cultured on potato dextrose agar (PDA) medium (200 g potato, 20 g glucose, 20 g agar, 1.5 g KH2PO4, 1.5 g MgSO4, 10 g peptone, 100 mL water) with cellophane for 7 days at 28 °C in darkness, was harvested. The mycelium were then frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C.
Genomic DNA was extracted by QIAGENVR Genomic DNA extraction kit. The concentration and purity of extracted DNA was evaluated by NanoDropTM One UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and then QubitVR 3.0 Fluorometer (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) was applied to quantify DNA accuracy. Total RNA was extracted from vegetative mycelium of strain yw-1-5. The concentration and purity of total RNA were evaluated by Nanodrop2000. Agilent2100 was then used to determine the RNA integrity number (RIN) value.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

RNA Extraction from Frozen Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the analysis of MIF mRNA levels, RNA was extracted from frozen tissues using a TRIzol TMbased protocol. First, tissue was homogenized in 1 ml of TRIzol TM reagent (ThermoFisher Scientific) using stainless steel beads (5 mm mean diameter) and a TissueLyser LT adapter (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) for 5 min at 50 Hz. Afterwards, tissue lysates were incubated for 5 min to permit complete dissociation of nucleoprotein complexes. After adding 200 µl of chloroform and incubation for 3 min, the solution was centrifugation for 15 min at 12000 x g and 4°C. The RNA-containing fraction was mixed with 250 µl isopropanol and incubated for 10 min. Next, the samples were centrifuged at 10000 x g and 4°C for 10 min and the RNA pellets resuspended in 75% ethanol. After centrifugation for 5 min at 7500 x g and 4°C, the RNA pellets were air-dried and the RNA dissolved in nuclease-free water. The RNA concentration was measured using a NanoDrop TM One UV/Vis spectrophotometer (ThermoFisher Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!