The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

10 protocols using anti twist2

1

Western Blot Analysis of Protein Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Western blots were performed as previously described [11] (link). Briefly, as soon as the harvested cells were lysed and the supernatant was collected, 60 µg protein was loaded onto SDS-PAGE and transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (PVDF). Membranes were blocked with 5% skimmed milk for 1 hour and incubated overnight with one of the following primary antibodies: anti-PSMD10 (diluted at 1∶1,000; Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), anti-Twist2 (diluted at 1∶200; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), anti-Vimentin (diluted at 1∶500; Cell Signaling Technology, Beverley, MA, USA), anti-β-catenin (diluted at 1∶500; Cell Signaling Technology), anti-E-cadherin (diluted at 1∶500; Cell Signaling Technology) and anti-cyclin D1(diluted at 1∶500; Cell Signaling Technology) rabbit monoclonal antibody, followed by 1 hour of incubation with the appropriate secondary antibody (1∶5,000). The anti-GAPDH (Epitomics) rabbit monoclonal antibody was diluted to 1∶1,000 for use as a sample loading control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunohistochemical Analysis of HIF-2α, E-cadherin, Twist1, and Twist2

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Serial sections (4 μm) subjected to immunohistological staining were fixed with freshly prepared 3 % H2O2 with 0.1 % sodium azide to quench endogenous peroxidase and then treated with antigen retrieval solution for 15 min. After placing in blocking reagent for 15 min, the sections were incubated in primary anti-HFI-2α (1:500, Abcam), anti-E-cadherin (1:1000, Abcam), anti-Twist1 (1:500, Abcam) and anti-Twist2 (1:350, Abcam) monoclonal antibody overnight at 4 °C, followed by incubation with the secondary antibody and Extravidin-conjugated horseradish peroxidase. The staining intensity was scored as: 0 (<10 %), 1 (10–50 %), 2 (>50 %). The final score was calculated by multiplication of the intensity score the quantity score. A score ≥ 2 was considered to represent positive expression.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Western Blot Analysis of EMT Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell lysates were prepared as described previously22 (link). A total of 50 μg of protein was separated by 10% sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and subsequently transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes. The membranes were blocked with 5% bovine serum albumin for 1 h before being incubated overnight at 4 °C with the primary antibody, including anti-E-cadherin (Epitomics Biotechnology, 1:1000), anti-N-cadherin (Epitomics Biotechnology, 1:500), anti-Vimentin (Epitomics Biotechnology, 1:400), anti-TWIST2 (Abcam, 1:400), and anti-THBS2 (Novus Biotechnology, 1:800). β-actin (Abcam, 1:1000) was used as an internal control for protein loading and analysis. The membranes were washed three times with PBST (PBS buffer containing 0.1% Tween-20) and then incubated with HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies for 1 h. After the final wash with PBST, the antibody staining intensities were detected using ECL chemiluminescence reagents (Pierce).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Protein Expression Analysis in Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were collected and lysed in lysis buffer on ice. Total proteins were separated by 10 % SDS-PAGE and blotted on PVDF membrane. Membranes were blocked with 10 % non-fat milk powder at room temperature for 2 h and incubated with primary antibodies: anti-HIF2α (1:200), anti-VE-cadherin (1:1000), anti-MMP2 (1:1000), anti-MMP9 (1:5000), anti-Twist1 (1:200), anti-Twist2 (1:50) (all from Abcam, Cambridge, UK) and anti-GAPDH (1:1000, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, CA, USA), at 4̊C overnight. After three washes, the membranes were incubated with a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (1:2000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Reactive bands were detected using ECL western blotting detection reagent (GE Healthcare, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Western Blot Analysis of Protein Targets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total cell lysates were prepared in RIPA buffer supplemented with protease and phosphatase inhibitors, then resolved on 8–15% SDS-PAGE gels and electroblotted onto PVDF membrane. The membranes were blocked with a rapid blocking solution (Beyotime, Wuhan, China) and then incubated in primary antibodies prepared in a blocking buffer Beyotime). The membranes were blocked before incubating with anti-PGR (1:1000, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-KLF15 (1:1000, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-TWIST2 (1:1000, Abcam), anti-E-cadherin (1:1000, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-vimentin (1:1500, Proteintech), and anti-GAPDH (1:2000, Proteintech) antibodies overnight at 4°C. On the second day, membranes were washed with PBST, followed by incubating with TBST for 2 h. Then they were incubated with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibodies for 1 h, and blots were developed with an Enhanced ECL chemiluminescence detection kit (Vazyme, Nanjing, China) and imaged using the Tanon 5200 ECL chemiluminescence imaging system. Densitometry was performed using ImageJ.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Western Blot Analysis of Protein Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total protein was isolated from cell lysates or tumor tissues using RIPA buffer, and quantified using a BCA protein assay kit (Beyotime, Shanghai, China). Proteins were resolved on 10% SDS-PAGE and then transferred to PVDF (Bio-Rad) membranes. After blocking, the membranes were incubated first with primary antibodies at 4°C overnight and then with secondary anti-rabbit antibody (Abcam; 1:5000) at room temperature for 1 h. Membranes were scanned using an Odyssey Imaging System and analyzed using Odyssey v2.0 software (LICOR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE, USA). The primary antibodies were anti-Akt (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA; 1:1000), anti-ERK (Abcam; 1:1000), anti-NID1 (Abcam; 1:1000), anti-E-cadherin (Abcam; 1:1000), anti-Twist2 (Abcam; 1:1000), anti-Vimentin (Abcam; 1:1000) and anti-β-actin (Abcam; 1:1000). β-actin served as an internal control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Signaling Pathways in Metastatic Regulation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Recombinant (CXCL12) SDF-1α was purchased from Pepro Tech (USA). The CXCR4 antagonist AMD3100, PHA-665752 and Nystatin were obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). Stattic was obtained from Selleck. Anti-CXCR4 antibodies were obtained from ABCAM. Anti–E-cadherin, anti-Vimentin, anti-ZEB1, anti-STAT3, anti–phosphor-STAT3, and antibodies to c-MET and phospho-c-MET (Tyr1234/1235) were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA). Anti-Snail and anti-Twist2 were purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, MA). Anti–Cav-1 and anti–phospho-Cav-1-1 (Tyr14) antibodies were obtained from BD Technology Co. (USA). All the other antibodies were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Western Blotting of EMT Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Western blotting was performed as described previously [14 (link)], using anti-MACC1 (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), anti-TWIST1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), anti-TWIST2 (Abcam), anti-VE-cadherin, anti-VEGFR2 and anti-E-cadherin antibodies (Cell Signaling Technology). For subcellular localization of proteins, total cell extracts and nuclear extracts were prepared using an extraction kit (Beyotime). GAPDH (KangCheng, Shanghai, China) and lamin (Cell Signaling Technology) served as the loading controls.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Western Blot Analysis of Epithelial Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein extracts were prepared by standard protocols and proteins were detected by western blot analysis as described.24 (link) Antibodies were mouse monoclonal anti-EpCAM (HEA125),48 (link) anti-Twist2 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK), anti-Nanog and anti-β-actin (Sigma-Aldrich) and rabbit monoclonal anti-E-cadherin (24E10, Cell Signalling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Protein Expression Analysis via Western Blot

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Whole cell extracts were prepared using radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) lysis buffer (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). A volume of 30 ng of the protein was blotted onto nitrocellulose filters after sodium dodecyl sulfatepolyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). Then, the membranes were incubated with anti-twist1, anti-twist2, anti-EMP3, or anti-β-actin (Abcam, Cambridge, UK). After that the membranes were further incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody. After washing, the protein bands were visualized using the enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) system (Amersham Biosciences, San Francisco, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!