The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Oxford inca energy 350

Manufactured by Oxford Instruments
Sourced in Japan, United Kingdom

The Oxford Inca Energy 350 is an energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectrometer designed for materials analysis. It provides elemental identification and quantification capabilities for a wide range of samples. The system uses a silicon drift detector (SDD) to collect and analyze X-rays emitted from the sample, enabling rapid and accurate analysis.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

5 protocols using oxford inca energy 350

1

Synthesis and Characterization of Mesoporous Bioactive Glass

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MBG was prepared by a modified sol–gel method, as shown in Figure 1. In detail, cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (3.6 g) and trimethylamine (0.12 mL) were added into 100 mL of distilled water and stirred for 1 h at 50 °C. Subsequently, tetrahydrate calcium nitrate (3.39 g) was added to the above solution to obtain an aqueous solution. After mixing 5 mL of tetraethyl orthosilicate and 20 mL of cyclohexane by sonication, the mixture was slowly added to the obtained aqueous solution for 12 h under stirring. After centrifugation at 3000 rpm, a white precipitate was collected. Subsequently, the MBG was obtained by cleaning the white precipitate with distilled water, drying at 80 °C for 20 h and calcining at 650 °C for 3 h. All reagents were provided by Shanghai Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China).
The morphology and microstructure of the synthesized MBG were studied utilizing transmission electron microscopy (TEM, Tecnai G-20, FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA) equipped with an energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS, Oxford Inca Energy 350, Oxford Instruments, Abingdon, UK) at 200 kV. The phase structure analysis of MBG was conducted using an X-ray diffractometer (XRD, Bruker, D8 Advance, Berlin, Germany) with Cu Kα radiation and at a step size of 5°/min. The surface area and pore size distribution were evaluated using the nitrogen adsorption–desorption technique at 77 K.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Characterization of Ag-doped Carbon Nanotubes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SEM analysis (SEM; JSM-5200, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) was performed for Ag-doped CNT and both untreated (control) and treated specimens with a working distance of 10 mm, magnification of 2000× and 5000×, resolution of 3 nm, and an accelerating voltage of 30 kV. An additional SEM micrograph was taken for the powder with the magnification 20,000×.
Chemical analysis for the powder and the specimens was carried out, employing an environmental scanning electron microscope (SEM; JSM-5200, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX; Oxford Inca Energy 350, Oxford Instruments, Abingdon, UK), with a working distance of 10 mm, resolution of 3 nm, and an accelerating voltage of 30 kV. The automatic identification of elements and element quantification in both wt.% and atomic % were performed following the collection of EDX spectra. SEM images and associated EDX spectra were carefully recorded.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Microstructural Analysis of Rotary NiTi Instruments

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Observations of the rotary NiTi instruments were conducted with a scanning electron microscope (JSM-5200, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with EDX (Oxford Inca Energy 350, Oxford Instruments, Abingdon, UK) (n = 5). Specimens were prepared by cross-section cutting of the new files, then polishing it by silicon carbide sandpaper disc (400 to 2500 grit), under continuous running water. The chemical etching was done to reveal the metallographic features. The polished specimens were chemically etched in a solution of composed of 10 mL hydrofluoric acid, 45 mL nitric acid and 45 mL water and swabbed for 30 seconds according to ASTM E407-07 (Standard Practice for Micro-Etching Metals and Alloys) [12 ]. The analysis was performed along the cross-sectional area of the files; 5 mm from the tip of the file. Micrographs were taken at magnifications 400 X and 8000 X. The SEM micrographs and the EDX analysis were performed for both the bulk area and external surface of the different files to identify the microstructure and overall chemical composition respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Cryogenic SEM Analysis of BC and Composites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SEM analyses of the BC and BC composites were performed using a high-resolution Scanning Electron Microscope (JEOL JSM 6301F, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) with X-ray Microanalysis (Oxford INCA Energy 350, Oxford Instruments, Abingdon, England) and a CryoSEM (Gatan Alto 2500, Gatan, Pleasanton, CA, USA). The non-dried specimens were rapidly cooled (plunging it into sub-cooled nitrogen-slush nitrogen) and transferred under a vacuum to the cold stage of the preparation chamber. Then the samples were fractured, sublimated (‘etched’) for 120 s at −90 °C, and coated with Au/Pd by sputtering for 45 seconds with a 12 mA current. Afterward, the samples were transferred into the SEM chamber and analyzed at a temperature of −150 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Morphological Analysis of Degradable Scaffolds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We prepared hard tissue slices of the scaffolds dissected from the sacrificed rabbits as described in our previous work (18 ). Briefly, we collected the scaffolded arteries and embedded them in methyl methacrylate. We then prepared cross-sectional samples by cutting the embedded tissues into 1- to 1.5-mm-thick slices, successively grinding the slices with 1200, 2000, and 7000 grit SiC paper, and polishing them with a water-soluble 0.5-μm diamond slurry on microfiber. Thereafter, we observed the morphology of the strut cross section and the corresponding elemental distribution via SEM (JSM-6510, JEOL, Japan) and EDS (Oxford Inca Energy 350, Oxford Instruments, UK). Besides, we chose microstructures of the biodegradation products and representative areas for further identification via field emission gun TEM (JEM-2100F, JEOL, Japan) after sample preparation via focused ion beam (FIB; GAIA3, Tescan, Czech Republic).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!