The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Uplc hss t3 column

Manufactured by Agilent Technologies
Sourced in United States

The UPLC HSS T3 column is a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) column designed for the separation and analysis of a wide range of compounds. It features a sub-2 micron particle size and a C18 stationary phase, providing efficient and high-resolution separations.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

7 protocols using uplc hss t3 column

1

DNA Methylation Quantification Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
1 μg of genomic DNA was incubated with 5 U of DNA Degradase Plus (Zymo Research) at 37°C for 3 h and filtered through Amicon 10 kDa centrifugal filter units (Millipore). The concentrations of 2′-deoxycytidine, 5-methyl-2′-deoxycytidine and 5-hydroxymethyl-2′-deoxycytidine in the filtrate were determined using an AB Sciex Triple Quad 6500 mass spectrometer fitted with an Agilent Infinity 1290 LC system and an Acquity UPLC HSS T3 column. The global levels of mC and hmC were expressed as percentages over total 2′-deoxycytidines.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

DAN Characterization by UHPLC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The DAN was characterized by the following methods chemically: 20 mg sample was weighted into an EP tube accurately, and 1 mL extract solution (water:methanol:acetonitrile = 1:2:2) containing 1 μg/mL internal standard was added. The samples were homogenized at 35 Hz for 4 min and sonicated for 5 min with a 3 times repetition in an ice-water bath. Then all samples were incubated for 1 h and centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 15 min. The last supernatant fluid was transferred into a fresh glass vial for LC/MS analysis. The analysis was performed by a UHPLC system (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) with a UPLC HSS T3 column connected to a QE mass spectrometer (Santa Clara, CA, USA). The injection volume was 2 μL. The QE mass spectrometer was used because it can acquire MS/MS spectra in information-dependent acquisition (IDA) mode under the control of the acquisition software (Xcalibur 4.0.27, Thermo, Waltham, MA, USA). In this mode, the acquisition software continuously evaluates the full scan MS spectrum. The ESI source conditions were set as follows: Aux gas flow rate was 15Arb, sheath gas flow rate was 45 Arb, capillary temperature was 400 °C, MS/MS resolution was 17,500, full MS resolution was 70,000, spray voltage was 4.0 kV (positive) or −3.6 kV (negative), and collision energy was 20/40/60 in NCE mode, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Metabolomic analysis of serum and hippocampal tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A total of 50 μL of serum and approximately 10mg of hippocampal tissues (wet weight) were used for sample preparation following previously reported methods (51 (link), 52 (link)). Samples were analyzed using an Agilent 6550 iFunnel Q-TOF LC/MS system (Agilent) with an Acquity UPLC HSS T3 column (53 (link)). Raw data were converted to mzXML format by ProteoWizard 3.0 package and uploaded to XCMS online (54 (link)). Metabolites were identified against METLIN (55 (link)) and Human Metabolome Database (56 (link)). Multivariate analysis was performed with SIMCA 13.0 (Umetrics). VIP scores were assessed. Discriminated metabolites were defined with a VIP > 1.0 by partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA), P < 0.01, FDR-adjusted P < 0.05. Pathway enrichment analysis were analyzed using Metaboanalyst 4.0 (57 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Targeted Metabolomic Analysis of Liver Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Liver tissues (20 mg) were weighted and added into 200 μL cold methanol:water (2:1, LC/MS grade) for metabolite analysis. Purine was used as internal standard. Analyses of carnitines and fatty acids were conducted using an Agilent 6550 iFunnel HPLC Q-TOF MS system (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA), following the previous report for positive24 and negative mode.25 (link) Metabolite separation was performed on an ACQUITY UPLC HSS T3 column. Spectra were acquired over the mass range m/z 50–1000 at acquisition rate 3 spectra s-1. Reference ions for internal MS correction were introduced via the other sprayer and appear per spectra. Raw data were converted to mzXML format by ProteoWizard 3.0 package and uploaded to XCMS online (https://xcmsonline.scripps.edu/).26 (link) Metabolites were identified against METLIN (https://metlin.scripps.edu) and Human Metabolome Database (http://www.hmdb.ca/). Data were normalized with internal standard, QC samples, and log-transformed for statistical analysis. A partial least squares discriminant analysis was performed using SIMCA 13.0 (Umetrics, Umea, Sweden). A radar plot was visualized using SigmaPlot version 14.0 software (Systat Software San Jose, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Metabolomic Analysis of Serum, Liver, and Hippocampus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A total of 50 μL of serum, ~20 mg of liver, and ~10 mg of hippocampus tissues were used for sample preparation following previously reported methods [33 (link),34 (link)]. A total of 2 μL of extracts was injected to an Agilent 6550 iFunnel Q-TOF LC/MS instrument (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) with an Acquity UPLC HSS T3 column [35 (link)]. Ions were analyzed in positive ion mode. Raw Agilent data were transformed to mzXML file by ProteoWizard 3.0 and uploaded to XCMS online for analysis [36 (link)]. Compounds were identified with METLIN [37 (link)] and Human Metabolome Database [38 (link)]. Data normalization and statistical analysis, including partial least-squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) and variable importance in projection (VIP) analysis, were performed with Metaboanalyst 4.0 [39 (link)]. Discriminant metabolites were defined with FDR-adjusted p-value < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantitative Analysis of Urinary Metabolites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Participants collected all urine in the 24 h period prior to the first day of each treatment and for the 24 h period at the end of each treatment to the day 29 morning when blood samples were taken. They were provided with 2.5 L plastic urine collection bottles to which 1 g of ascorbic acid had been previously added as a preservative. Urine samples (1.0 mL) were subjected to solid phase extraction (SPE) using pre‐conditioned Strata‐X cartridges and then evaporated to approximately 200 µL volume. Evaporated extracts (100 µL) were then spiked with D9‐caffeine (200 µM; 10 µL) as a volume control marker. Extracts were further diluted with 1% formic acid in water (100 µL). Extracts were analyzed using LC‐MS/MS (Agilent 6490) using multiple reaction monitoring operated in positive mode and an ACQUITY UPLC HSS T3 column (2.1 × 100 mm; 1.8 µm). The mobile phase consisted of 5% formic acid in water (solvent A) and 5% formic acid in acetonitrile (solvent B). Extracts were eluted with the use of a gradient of increasing solvent B from solvent A as follows: 5% B at 1 min, 10% B at 5 min, 25% B at 30 min, 95% B at 40 min, 95% B at 41.1 min, and 5% B at 46 min. The flow rate was 0.4 mL min−1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

UPLC Separation of Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The separation was performed using an Agilent 1290 II UPLC system with an ACQUITY UPLC HSS T3 column (1.7 μm, 2.1 mm × 100 mm). The mobile phase was methanol and 10 % tetrabutyl ammonium hydroxide aqueous solution (70: 30). The flow rate was 0.2 mL/min and the column temperature was 30 °C. The injection volume was 2 μL. The detection wavelength was set at 283 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!