The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Micro bio spin chromatography column

Manufactured by Bio-Rad
Sourced in Germany, United States

The Micro Bio-Spin Chromatography Columns are designed for fast and efficient separation of molecules based on size or affinity. These single-use disposable columns feature a resin bed packed in a micro-centrifuge tube format, allowing for easy and convenient sample processing. The columns can be used for a variety of applications, including purification of proteins, nucleic acids, and other biomolecules.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

44 protocols using micro bio spin chromatography column

1

High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All complexes were analyzed using SYNAPT G2-Si High Definition Mass Spectrometer (Waters, Manchester, U.K.). For the analysis, all protein solutions were buffer exchanged into 200 mM ammonium acetate (pH 7.5) using Micro Bio-Spin chromatography columns (Bio-Rad). Aliquots (∼2 μL) were introduced into the mass spectrometer via nanoflow capillaries using the following conditions: capillary voltage 1.2 kV, sampling cone 120 V, source offset 20 V. The source temperature was set up for 25 °C. The collision voltage was adjusted for the optimal signal level. Maximum entropy (MaxEnt, Waters) deconvolution was applied to electrospray data to recalculate the gas phase existing masses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Purification of MinE, MinD, and Mutants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The mixture of 9 µM MinE-mCherry-His, 3 µM His-sfGFP-MinD, or 6 µM MinD mutant treated by thrombin (MinDD40AΔ10), and 3 µM BSA were applied to cOmplete His-Tag purification resin and incubated in RE buffer for 30 min at room temperature. Each mixture with resin was loaded into Micro Bio-Spin chromatography columns (Bio-Rad). Then, flow-thorough fraction was separated and collected by a tabletop centrifuge. After washing the resin by 500 µL RE buffer with 20 mM imidazole for 3–5 times, elution fraction was obtained by 50 µL RE buffer with 250 mM imidazole. Proteins in each fraction were separated by SDS-PAGE and visualized by CBB staining.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Crystallization of Minerva C139A Protease

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Purified Minerva C139A protease was buffer exchanged from gel filtration buffer to 20 mM MES pH 6 using Micro Bio Spin Chromatography Columns (Bio Rad) and subsequently concentrated using Ultrafree-MC concentrators (Millipore, 10kD) to 20 mg/mL. Glycerol (5% v/v) was added to the protein samples prior to crystallization screens. Crystals were produced using the sitting drop method by mixing 1:1 volume ratio of 20 mg/mL MVpro and reservoir solution (100 mM Tris pH 8.9, 16% PEG 8K, 600 mM Li2SO4) and incubated at 20 °C. Full sized crystals were harvested after one month. Crystals showing a hexagonal morphology were transferred into cryoprotectant consisting of mother liquor and 20% (v/v) glycerol then directly flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen. Samples were shipped to the Advanced Photon Source (APS) at Argonne National Laboratory for X-ray data collection.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

TDP-43 Aggregation Modulation by DDX3X/Y

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Firstly, 0, 0.25, or 0.5 μM MBP-TEV-DDX3X or MBP-TEV-DDX3Y in buffer (200 mM NaCl, 25 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0) was incubated in TDP-43 assay buffer (150 mM NaCl, 20 mM HEPES-NaOH pH 7.0, 1mM DTT) with 0.5 μg TEV protease for 30 minutes at room temperature. Turbidity was assessed by measuring absorbance at 395 nm in a Tecan plate reader. TDP-43 was buffer exchanged into TDP-43 assay buffer (Bio-Rad Micro Bio-Spin Chromatography Columns, following manufacturer’s instructions) and concentration was determined via NanoDrop. Turbidity measurements were paused after 30 minutes in order to add 4.0 μM TDP-43 (or an equal volume of TDP-43 assay buffer) to the reaction. Then, turbidity measurements were resumed for an additional 16 hours. The data was standardized by subtracting out the initial reading at t = 1 min. from each respective condition. Values from conditions with DDX3X or DDX3Y alone were then subtracted from the appropriate conditions with TDP-43. Area under the curve analysis was used to compare the extent of aggregation for each condition. The t1/2 of aggregation was determined by performing a nonlinear regression (asymmetric sigmoidal) on the data starting after TDP-43 addition (t = 31 min.) (GraphPad Prism).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

DNA and RNA Substrate Preparation and Electrophoresis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The assay was conducted according to our published protocol (Longerich et al., 2009 (link)). Nuclei acid substrates used in this study are reported in Table S1. Duplex DNA, R-loop and D-loop substrates were prepared by annealing of DNA and/or RNA oligos (IDT). Following electrophoresis in a native 12% acrylamid (29:1) TBE gel at room temperature in 1X TBE buffer, substrates were eluted from gel slices by dialysis and concentrated by centrifugation using Micro Bio-Spin Chromatography Columns (Bio-Rad). All the reactions contain 10 nM 32P-labeled substrates. The RNase inhibitor RNaseOUT (Thermo Fisher) was added to reactions (0.16 units/ul, 1:250) containing RNA substrates. Reactions were run on native 5% acrylamid (29:1) TBE gels at 4°C. The gels were dried onto Whatman DE81 paper and analyzed in a Personal Molecular Imager FX PhosphorImager (Bio-Rad). GelQuant.NET (http://biochemlabsolutions.com/GelQuantNET.html) software was used to quantify non-shifted substrate in each lane for calculation of the percentage of substrate bound.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Purification of FANCD2/FANCI Complex

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Recombinant proteins were expressed and purified from Sf9 insect cells as indicated above. 4 μg of Flag-HA-FANCD2/His-FANCI and 1 μg Flag-HA-FANCL were mixed in the reaction buffer containing 100 μg/ml BSA (NEB), 20mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 100mM KCl, 5% glycerol, 2mM β-mercaptoethanol and 0.2mM PMSF. The mixture was first incubated at 30°C for 1h for protein complex formation. Ni2-NTA (30310, QIAGEN) beads were added subsequently, and the mixture was incubated at 4°C with gentle mixing for 30 minutes. The mixture was then transferred to Micro Bio-Spin Chromatography Columns (Bio-Rad), and washed with the reaction buffer supplemented with 0.1% Tween-20. The proteins were eluted in SDS-DTT buffer at 37°C and run on an SDS-PAGE gel.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Protein Oxidation and Reduction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Oxidation and reduction was performed by incubation of 700 μM of the respective protein with varying ratios of HOCl, monochloramine, DTT or ascorbic acid for incubation times indicated at 30 and 37 °C, respectively. Removal of stressors was carried out with Micro Bio-Spin Chromatography Columns according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Bio-Rad, München, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Preparation of Zebrafish mcr1 and mcr4 Riboprobes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
pGEM-T easy plasmids containing the full coding regions of the zebrafish mcr1 and mcr4 genes [4 (link)] were linearized with SalI or ApaI and used to prepare antisense and sense riboprobes by in vitro transcription using T7 or SP6 RNA polymerase (Promega, Spain), respectively and digoxigenin (DIG)-labelled UTPs (Roche Diagnostics GmbH). Synthetized probes were treated with RQ1-DNAse-RNAse free (Promega, Spain) for 15 min at 37 °C to remove the DNA template. Ultimately, the probes were purified using Micro Bio-Spin Chromatography Columns (BioRad, Spain) and quantified in a Nanodrop 2000c spectrophotometer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Affinity Purification and Mass Spectrometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Materials used included iodoacetamide, dithiothreitol, 1 M triethylammonium bicarbonate (TEAB), protease inhibitor cocktail, HA antibody conjugated agarose, Polybrene (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO); trypsin (Promega Corp., Madison, WI); formic acid (HCOOH) (MERCK, Darmstadt, Germany); Strep-Tactin sepharose (IBA TAGnologies, Gottingen, Germany); D-biotin (Alfa Aesar, Karlsruhe, Germany); micro Bio-Spin chromatography columns (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA); Gateway LR Clonase II Enzyme Mix Kit, fetal bovine serum, and Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Glycan Microarray Immunofluorescence Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To perform analyses on glycochip, the following synthetic glycans with aminospacers were used: Tn, SiaTn, TF, LeC, LeY, SiaLeA, and Manβ1‐4GlcNAcβ (Lectinity Holdings, Moscow, Russia). Rabbit antibodies against human IgG, IgM, and IgA (RAH‐Iss) and their biotinylated conjugates (RAH‐Iss‐biot) were purchased from Imtek LLC (Moscow, Russia). Streptavidin and fluorescent dye Cy5 were purchased from GE Healthcare Bio‐Sciences (Pittsburgh, PA).
Hydrogel biochips were manufactured on glass micro slides Corning 2947 (Corning Inc., Corning, NY). Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), MW 50 kD; polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP), MW 360 kDa; Tween‐20; and G‐25 Sefadex® coarse were purchased from Sigma‐Aldrich (St. Louis, MO); Bind Silane – from GE Healthcare Bio‐Sciences; and Micro Bio‐Spin chromatography columns – from Bio‐Rad Laboratories (Hercules, CA).
Immunofluorescence assays on microchips were carried out in plastic chamber with a volume of 120 μL securely attached to glass supporting plate.
The following solutions were used: PBS (0.01mol/L Na‐phosphate buffer, pH 7.2, 0.15mol/L NaCl); washing solution PBST (PBS with 0.01% Tween‐20); blocking solution PBSP (PBS with 1% PVA), dilution buffer for immunoassays DB (PBS with 0.15% PVA and 0.15% PVP).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!