The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

220 protocols using version 19

1

Diagnostic Performance Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The characteristics of included patients were compared, using Fisher's exact test for binary data and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for non-normally distributed continuous data. All tests were two-sided and P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. The above statistical analyses were performed using STATA/IC version 15.1 (StataCorp LLC). The Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were drawn by MedCalc version 19.0.4 (MedCalc Software). Then the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated separately, alongside 95% confidence intervals (CI). The cutoff value was determined by the best Youden index on ROC curves analyzed by MedCalc version 19.0.4. All the diagnostic outcomes were on patient-based analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Dry Eye Syndrome Statistical Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 26.0 statistical software. Values are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) or (range) or median (interquartile range [IQR]). The normality of all datasets was tested by using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. One-way Analysis of Variance or Kruskal–Wallis H test was used to compare differences between the 3 groups. The generalized estimating equation was used to adjust the age difference. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant. The correlations between UAS index and MG function parameters (i.e., OSDI, TBUT, and lid margin score) and meibograde were determined using Spearman’s correlation analysis. To evaluate the repeatability between two measurements at different time points, Bland–Altman analysis was obtained using MedCalc version 19.0.4 (MedCalc, Ostend, Belgium). The 95% limits of agreement (LoA) were calculated as the mean difference ± 1.96 SD.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Automated Quantification of Cardiac Chambers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Continuous variables are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD), or median and IQR, while categorical variables are presented as frequency (percentage). Shapiro–Wilk test was used to determine whether the data conforms to the normal distribution. Since these data were not normally distributed, the Friedman's analysis with Wilcoxon comparison was used to compare the results among the three groups. Spearman correlation analysis was used to assess the correlation of between variables. Bland–Altman analysis was used for the determination of bias and limit of agreement (LOA). For the agreement of categorization between 3DE with fully automated analysis and CMR, and between 3DE auto edit analysis and CMR, the weighted Kappa statistical analysis was used. Correlation coefficient was compared using MedCalc version 19.0.4 (MedCalc Software, Ostend, Belgium) for the RV measurements obtained from the automated software without or with manual editing against CMR imaging as a reference. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 22 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and GraphPad prism 8.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). A two-sided p < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Diagnostic Utility of PCT Cut-offs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analyses were performed using MedCalc version 19.0.4 (MedCalc Software, Ostend, Belgium) and SPSS Version 23.0 software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Quantitative data were presented as means±standard errors of the mean or as the median and interquartile range (i.e., 25th-75th percentiles), depending on the distribution of the data. Categorical data are summarized as ratios and percentages. Differences in means for continuous variables were compared using Student’s t-test (two groups) or analysis of variance (multiple groups); differences in proportions were tested using an R×C contingency table and Pearson’s chi-squared or Fisher’s exact test as appropriate. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and calculation of area under the curve (AUC) were conducted to determine the diagnostic utility of various PCT cut-offs and to assess the ability to predict mortality. Youden’s indices (sensitivity+specificity−1) were calculated to determine the ideal discriminatory cut-off values. All statistical analyses were performed with SPSS 23.0, except for the comparison of AUCs, which was performed using MedCalc. All analyses were exploratory; a two-tailed p-value<0.05 was considered as the cut-off for statistical significance.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Survival Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Date of TNBC diagnosis was defined as the date of the biopsy report confirming a TNBC tumor. Overall survival time was defined from the date of diagnosis to the date of last follow-up, or if a patient passed away, then the date of last follow-up was the day before the patient’s date of death.24 (link) Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves were created using “MedCalc version 19.0.4” (MedCalc Software Ltd, Ostend, Belgium), to assess the survival function between OS and different parameters. This included the TNBC study population, AR status, type of surgery and treatments. Median OS times with standard error were calculated from the KM curves in “MedCalc”. A 95% CI was included for the median OS time. One-, two- and three-year OS probabilities were derived from the KM curves. The “Log rank test” was used to find the statistical significance between OS and AR status, type of surgery and treatments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

NIPS for Detecting Fetal Trisomies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To evaluate the detective efficiency of NIPS in AMA women, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) for detecting trisomies 21, 18 and 13 were calculated.
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was performed to investigate the significance for true positive percentage of fetal trisomy 21. Youden index was performed to identify the optimal cut-off point for true positive percentage of fetal trisomy 21 in different age groups, the sum of sensitivity and specificity [17 (link)]. Statistic analyses were performed using MedCalc version 19.0.4 (MedCalc Software Ltd., Ostend, Belgium).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Evaluating CNN Model Performance

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the CNN model was calculated and compared using the DeLong test. In addition, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for a binary classification were calculated at the point having Youden’s J statistic maximized. Analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics version 24.0. (IBM Co., New York, USA) and MedCalc version 19.0.4 (MedCalc Software Ltd., Ostend, Belgium).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Diagnostic Performance of Hepatic Steatosis Indices

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Continuous variables were expressed as median (interquartile range) and categorical variables were presented as counts (percentages, %). Mann-Whitney U-test was used for continuous variables and the χ2 test for categorical variables. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve was used to determine diagnostic performance and calculate the optimal cutoffs, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV). The highest value of Youden’s index was used to determine optimal cutoffs. Pairwise comparisons between AUROC values of different steatosis indices were conducted by the DeLong method. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 22.0 and MedCalc version 19.0.4 software. A two-tailed P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Prognostic Value of Pulmonary Function

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Baseline characteristics were described as mean±SD for continuous variables and percentages for categorical variables. The Student t test was used to compare continuous variables, whereas the χ2 test was used to compare categorical variables. Linear regression analysis was used to evaluate the determinants of the pulmonary function indexes. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the independence of spirometric variables in the association with long‐term mortality, with further adjustment for the putative confounders by backwards selection in the multivariable analyses. For the optimal cutoff value for increased risk of all‐cause mortality, we performed receiver‐operating characteristic curve analysis and determined the cutoff value with a maximal Youden index. Kaplan‐Meier survival curve was used to assess the prognostic significance of the independent pulmonary function indexes. The median time to event was estimated in the subpopulations, who had a mortality rate of ≥0.5 during the follow‐up period. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 24.0 (SPSS Incorporation, Chicago, IL) and MedCalc Version 19.0.4 (MedCalc Software, Ostend, Belgium). All tests were 2‐sided, and P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Urinary Biomarker Performance Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The uNCR was calculated according to formula: uNCR (pg/mg) = uNGAL × 103/uCr × 112. The data were tested first by normality test. If the data conformed to a normal distribution, the statistical analysis was performed using the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) approach. Otherwise, the statistical analysis was performed using the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test with P<0.05 considered to be a significant difference. The urinary and plasma biomarker performance was ascertained using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis (26 (link)). Statistical software MedCalc version 19.0.4 (MedCalc Software Ltd., Ostend, Belgium) was used to analyse the ROC curve of the blood and urine concentration of each index to acquire the associated criterion determined by the maximum value of the Youden index, and the sensitivity and specificity of each index are listed (Appendix 1). The calculation formula of the Youden index was:
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!