The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Stainless steel grid shock floor

Manufactured by Harvard Apparatus
Sourced in United States

The stainless steel grid shock floor is a laboratory equipment designed to provide a controlled electrical stimulus to small animals in a research setting. It consists of a stainless steel grid that can be connected to an electrical source, allowing for the delivery of a mild shock. The core function of this product is to facilitate the study of animal behavior and physiological responses in a controlled environment.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

5 protocols using stainless steel grid shock floor

1

Inescapable Stress Induces Behavioral Changes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Rats were placed in a 30.5 × 25.4 × 30.5 cm3 square conditioning chamber with metal walls and a stainless-steel grid shock floor (Coulbourn Instruments, Whitehall, PA, USA). Rats randomly assigned to the stress group received a two-day inescapable shock treatment, where each day they received 60 × 15 s 0.8 mA foot shocks with an inter-trial interval (ITI) of 30 s with a 25% deviation (+/− 7.5 s). Control rats were handled daily but not exposed to conditioning chambers. Electrophysiological experiments and PPI assays were conducted 24 h following inescapable stress. MK-801 induced locomotor response assays were conducted 48 h following inescapable stress.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Fear Conditioning in Rats: Tone Pre-exposure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Female MAM- and saline-treated rats were placed into a 30.5 × 25.4 × 30.5 cm3 square conditioning chamber with metal walls and a stainless steel grid shock floor (Coulbourn Instruments, Whitehall, PA, USA). Rats were randomly assigned into two groups: tone pre-exposed and non-exposed. Pre-exposed rats were presented with a 20 second tone over 16 trials with a pseudo-random ITI averaging 2 minutes. Immediately following tone exposure, rats underwent an established fear conditioning procedure in which a 20 second tone co-terminated with a mild (0.8 mA, 0.5 sec) foot shock. The tone-shock pairing was presented 4 times with a pseudo-random ITI averaging 2 minutes. Twenty-four hours after conditioning, rats were returned to the conditioning chamber and re-exposed to the 20 second tone over 4 trials. Behavior was video recorded at each stage and freezing behavior was analyzed off-line using FreezeFrame and FreezeView software (Coulbourn Instruments). Freezing was defined as behavior below a motion index threshold of 10 lasting at least 1 second.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Latent Inhibition Test for Schizophrenia

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The latent inhibition test was used to model a positive symptom of schizophrenia. Briefly, rats were placed into a 30.5×25.4×30.5 cm3 square conditioning chamber with metal walls and a stainless steel grid shock floor (Coulbourn Instruments) and randomly assigned to two groups: tone pre-exposed and non-exposed. Pre-exposed rats were presented with a 20 sec tone over 16 trials with a pseudorandom intertrial interval averaging 2 min. Immediately following tone exposure, rats underwent an established fear conditioning procedure in which the 20 sec tone co-terminated with a mild (0.8 mA, 0.5 sec) footshock. The tone-shock pairing was presented 4 times with a pseudorandom intertrial interval averaging 2 min. Twenty-four hours after conditioning, rats were returned to the conditioning chamber and re-exposed to the 20 sec tone over 4 trials. Behavior was video-recorded at each stage and freezing behavior was analyzed off-line using FreezeFrame and FreezeView software (Coulbourn Instruments). Freezing was defined as behavior below a motion index threshold of 10 lasting at least 1 sec. The percentage of latent inhibition was determined using the following formula: % LI = 100 − NoTone/Tone x 100.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Latent Inhibition Test for Schizophrenia

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The latent inhibition test was used to model a positive symptom of schizophrenia. Briefly, rats were placed into a 30.5×25.4×30.5 cm3 square conditioning chamber with metal walls and a stainless steel grid shock floor (Coulbourn Instruments) and randomly assigned to two groups: tone pre-exposed and non-exposed. Pre-exposed rats were presented with a 20 sec tone over 16 trials with a pseudorandom intertrial interval averaging 2 min. Immediately following tone exposure, rats underwent an established fear conditioning procedure in which the 20 sec tone co-terminated with a mild (0.8 mA, 0.5 sec) footshock. The tone-shock pairing was presented 4 times with a pseudorandom intertrial interval averaging 2 min. Twenty-four hours after conditioning, rats were returned to the conditioning chamber and re-exposed to the 20 sec tone over 4 trials. Behavior was video-recorded at each stage and freezing behavior was analyzed off-line using FreezeFrame and FreezeView software (Coulbourn Instruments). Freezing was defined as behavior below a motion index threshold of 10 lasting at least 1 sec. The percentage of latent inhibition was determined using the following formula: % LI = 100 − NoTone/Tone x 100.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Inescapable Foot Shock Stress in Rats

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Adult rats were randomly assigned to control (no shock) or shock groups who received 2 consecutive days of inescapable foot shock stress. The 2-day IS paradigm consists of rats placed in a 30.5 × 25.4 × 30.5 cm3 square conditioning chamber with a stainless-steel grid shock floor (Coulbourn Instruments, Whitehall, PA, USA). One session of IS consisted of 60 × 15-second, 0.8-mA foot shocks with an average inter-trial interval of 30 seconds with a 25% deviation (±7.5 seconds) and lasts approximately 40 minutes. Control rats were handled daily but not exposed to conditioning chambers. Rats were further assigned to specific treatment groups (n = 5–6 electrophysiology, n = 8–12 PPI). Electrophysiology and behavioral experiments were conducted 24–48 hours after the last day of IS.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!