The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Dnase digestion

Manufactured by Merck Group
Sourced in United States

DNase digestion is a laboratory technique used to remove DNA from a sample. It involves the use of the enzyme DNase, which cleaves the phosphodiester bonds in DNA molecules, effectively breaking them down. This process is often used in various molecular biology and biochemistry applications to eliminate unwanted DNA and prepare samples for further analysis or experimentation.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

6 protocols using dnase digestion

1

Quantitative RT-PCR Analysis of Embryos

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from embryos using Trizol (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer´s protocol. For one biological replicate 20 ul embryos were collected. A total of 1 ug from each RNA sample was subjected to DNase digestion (Sigma) and cDNA synthesis (Applied Biosystems) according to the manufacturer´s protocol. Samples were confirmed for quality and quantity using agarose gel electorphoresis and Nanodrop. Out of 200 μl (10x diluted) total cDNA, 2 μl was subsequently used for RT-qPCR in a total volume of 20 μl using CFX96 (BioRad instruments, Sweden) with EvaGreen supermix (Solis BioDyne). Resulting Ct-values were converted into raw quantities with the ΔCt method using Genorm, which were used to calculate the geometric mean of four reference genes ß-tubulin, RpL32 28SrRNA and GAPDH, serving as normalization factors for each cDNA sample. The stability measure M [55 (link)], for the mean of the reference genes was below 1.5 for all the conditions tested. Relative expression levels were calculated where expression in control embryos derived from mothers with only the TubGal4 transgene was set to 100%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comprehensive Immune Cell Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lung cells were isolated by collagenase and DNase digestion (Sigma Aldrich). Splenocytes were mashed through 100 µm nylon cell strainers and erythrocytes were lysed in ACK buffer. Lung cells were washed with Hank’s Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS) and splenocytes were washed with PBS. Lung cells and splenocytes were pre-incubated with the 2.4 G2 antibody to block Fc receptor binding, followed by incubation with various cell surface Abs: CD3 (17-A2), NK1.1 (PK136), B220 (RA3-6B2), F4/80 (BM8), MHCII (M5/114.15.2), (eBioscience, San Diego, CA), Siglec F (E50-2440), CD11c (N418), CD11b (M1/70), Gr-1 (RB6-8C5) and Ly6G (1A8) (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA). Cells were fixed with BD Cytofix and analysed on BD LSRII.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Transcriptome Profiling of Leaf Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Leaf tissue samples (100 mg) for RNA isolation were collected from each genotype at 0, 24 and 48 h post inoculation (hpi). Total RNA was isolated as described in Spectrum™ Plant Total RNA kit protocol with on-column DNase digestion (Sigma-Aldrich, USA). RNA samples were purified using RNA clean and concentration TM-25 (ZYMO RESEARCH) and the quality was determined both by NanoDrop and Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer. A total RNA (~ 3 μg) for each sample was used to prepare mRNA-seq library according to TrueSeq RNA Sample Prep Kit protocol (Illumina). Library quality control and quantification were performed with an Experion DNA 1 K Chip (Bio-Rad) and a Qubit fluorometer (Invitrogen), respectively. For each library, more than 100 million, 100-bp paired-end sequences were generated (Table 1) using an Illumina HiSeq 2500.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

BrdU labeling of proliferating cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice were injected intraperitoneally with a single dose of BrdU (100 mg/kg body weight) and maintained on 1 mg BrdU/mL drinking water for 2 days. Mice were then euthanized and marrow and spleen cells isolated as described above. Cells were stained with fluorescent antibodies specific for cell surface markers, followed by fixation and permeabilization using the Cytofix/Cytoperm kit (BD Biosciences), DNase digestion (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), and an anti-BrdU antibody (Clone 3D4, Biolegend) staining to analyze BrdU incorporation as previously described (Castiglione et al., 2021 (link); Lee et al., 2022 ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

BrdU Incorporation in Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice were injected intraperitoneally with a single dose of 5-bromo-2’-deoxyuridine (BrdU; 100 mg/kg body weight) and maintained on 1mg BrdU/ml drinking water for two days. Mice were then euthanized and marrow cells isolated. For analysis of HSPC proliferation, Lineageneg (Lin) cells were first enriched using the Lineage Cell Depletion Kit (Miltenyi Biotec) before staining with fluorescent antibodies specific for cell surface HSPC markers, followed by fixation and permeabilization using the Cytofix/Cytoperm kit (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA), DNase digestion (Sigma, St. Louis, MO), and anti-BrdU antibody (Biolegend, San Diego, CA) staining to analyze BrdU incorporation. For analysis of more abundant cell populations, marrow cells were stained with cell surface antibodies, then fixed and stained with anti-BrdU antibody for BrdU incorporation analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Measuring HSC Proliferation with BrdU

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice were injected intraperitoneally with a single dose of 5-bromo-2′-deoxyuridine (BrdU; 100 mg/kg body weight) and maintained on 1mg BrdU/ml drinking water for two days. Mice were then euthanized and marrow cells isolated as described above. For analysis of HSC (Lin-cKit+Sca1+CD150+CD48-) proliferation, Lin- cells were first enriched using the Lineage Cell Depletion Kit (Miltenyi Biotec) before staining with fluorescent antibodies specific for cell surface HSC markers, followed by fixation and permeabilization using the Cytofix/Cytoperm kit (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA), DNase digestion (Sigma, St. Louis, MO), and anti-BrdU antibody (Biolegend, San Diego, CA) staining to analyze BrdU incorporation (31 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!