The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

8 protocols using acclaim pepmap100 c18 pre column

1

LC-MS Analysis of Biomolecules

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The LC–MS analysis was performed on a Q Exactive™ Hybrid Quadrupole-Orbitrap™ Mass Spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, San Jose, CA), coupled online to an Ultimate 3000 ultra-high performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) instrument (Thermo Scientific, San Jose, CA). The UHPLC system was equipped with an Easy Spray Pepmap RSLC C18 column (2 µm particle, 100 Å pore size, and dimensions: 50 µm × 15 cm, Thermo Scientific, San Jose, CA). Before sample separation on the analytical column, the lyophilized sample was resuspended in 16 µL solution containing 2% (v/v) CH3CN and 0.1% (v/v) FA solution. Next, 5 µL sample was injected and loaded on an Acclaim Pepmap 100 C18 precolumn (3 µm particle size, 100 Å pore size, nanoviper, and dimensions: 75 µm × 2 cm, Thermo Scientific, San Jose, CA) at a flow rate of 5 μL/min. Sample separation was performed using a 95 min gradient. Mobile phase A consisted of 99.9% H2O and 0.1% (v/v) FA and mobile phase B of 19.92% H2O, 80% (w/v) CH3CN and 0.08% (v/v) FA. Mobile phase B increased from 4 to 10% in 5 min, 10–25% in 50 min, 25–45% in 18 min followed by a steep increase to 95% in 1 min. A flow rate of 300 nL/min was used. An inherent rinse step (10 min gradient, from 4–95% in 5 min) was applied after every 95 min separation gradient.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Acetonitrile-Based LC-MS/MS Proteomics Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Acetonitrile, LC/MS grade (Fluka, #14261-1 L) and formic acid for mass spectrometry (Fluka, #94318-50ML-F) were used for preparation of buffers A and B for liquid chromatography. Buffer A: 0.1% formic acid; Buffer B: 90% acetonitrile/10% H2O/0.1% formic acid. The LC–MS/MS analysis was conducted with a nanoflow HPLC system (Thermo Dionex Ultimate 3000, Thermo Scientific) equipped with Acclaim PepMap100 C18 pre-column (5 mm × 300 µm; 5 µm particles; Thermo Scientific, #160454) and Acclaim Pep-Map RSLC column (15 cm × 75 µm, C18, 2 µm, 100 Å particles; Thermo Scientific, #164534). The Dionex UltiMate 3000 RSLCnano System was coupled to an Impact II QTOF tandem mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics) via a CaptiveSpray nanoBooster ion source. Acetonitrile (R Chromasolv) for liquid chromatography (Sigma–Aldrich, #34881-2.5 L) was used with the CaptiveSpray nanoBooster system. Raw data were inspected and analyzed with the Bruker Compass DataAnalysis (version 4.3) software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Peptide Separation and Mass Spectrometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The samples, 3 µL, were analyzed on hybrid mass spectrometer Exploris 480 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) coupled with an Ultimate 3000 UHPLC system (Thermo Fisher Scientific). A two-column setup was used on the HPLC system and peptides were loaded into an Acclaim PepMap 100 C18 precolumn (75 μm × 2 cm, Thermo Scientific) and then separated on an EASY spray column (75 μm × 50 cm, nanoViper, C18, 2 μm, 100 Å) with the flow rate of 300 nL/min. The column temperature was set to 60°C. Solvent A (0.1% FA in water) and solvent B (0.1% FA in 80% ACN) were used to create gradient, and 120-minute linear gradient from 3 to 38% of solvent B in solvent A was used to elute the peptides.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

LC-MS/MS Analysis of Peptides

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Acetonitrile (ACN), LC/MS-grade (Carlo Erba, Val-de-Reuil Cedex, France #412342), and formic acid (FA) for mass spectrometry (Fluka, Steinheim, Germany, #94318-50ML-F) were used for the preparation of buffer A and buffer B as eluents during liquid chromatography. Buffer A: 0.1% FA; buffer B 90% ACN/10% in water, in 0.1% FA. The LC–MS/MS analysis was conducted with a nanoflow HPLC system (Thermo Dionex Ultimate 3000, ThermoScientific, Bremen, Germany) with an Acclaim PepMap100 C18 pre-column, 5 mm × 300 µm, 5 µm particles (Thermo Scientific, #160454), and an Acclaim Pep-Map RSLC column, 15 cm × 75 µm, 2 µm particles (Thermo Scientific, #164534). The MS/MS analysis utilized a QTOF Impact II mass spectrometer (Bruker, Bremen, Germany). Raw LC–MS/MS data were interpreted with the Bruker Compass Data Analysis (version 4.3) software (Bruker Daltonik GmbH, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Nano-LC–MS/MS Proteomic Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were analyzed by nano-LC–MS/MS
on a Q Exactive Plus, coupled to an Easy-nLC 1200 (both Thermo Fisher
Scientific). The LC system was equipped with an AcclaimPepMap 100
C18 precolumn (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 3 μm particle size,
75 μm inner diameter × 2 cm length) and a nanoscale analytical
column (Thermo Fisher Scientific, AcclaimPepMap 100 C18 main column,
2 μm particle size, 75 μm inner diameter × 25 cm
length). Samples were separated using a binary gradient (solvent A:
0.1% formic acid, solvent B: 0.1% formic acid and 84% acetonitrile)
ranging from 0 to 40% in 30 min at a flow rate of 300 nL/min. MS scans
were acquired from m/z 350 to 1500
at a resolution of 70,000 with an automatic gain control (AGC) of
1e6 and a maximum injection time of 50 ms. The seven most intense
parent ions with charge states of +2 to +4 were isolated with a window
of m/z 1.2, an AGC of 5e4, and a
maximum injection time of 220 ms and fragmented with a normalized
collision energy of 28 using a dynamic exclusion of 5 s.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Nano-LC-MS/MS Proteomics Workflow

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tryptic peptides were separated by nano-Liquid chromatography (nLC, Dionex ultimate 3000) coupled to mass spectrometry (MS, LTQ-Orbitrap Velos; Thermo scientific) on LC analytical columns with an Acclaim PepMap 100 C18 pre-column (Thermo scientific, 100 μm x 2 cm nano Viper, 100 Å, 5 μm, P/N 164564) followed by PepMap RSLC C18 peptide separating column (Thermo scientific, 75 μm x 15 cm, 100 Å, 3 μm, P/N ES800) with 120 min gradient using buffer A (0.1% formic acid, 3%DMSO (v/v)) and 1 to 35% of buffer B (80% acetonitrile, 3% DMSO, 0.08% formic acid (v/v)). A parent ion scan was performed in the Orbitrap, using a resolving power of 60000. CID was performed with collision energy 35% and activation time of 10 ms and the top 20 most intense peptides were selected for MS/MS.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantitative LC-MS/MS Analysis of Biotinylated and Propionylated Peptides

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell culture, transient transfection, and sample preparation steps were described earlier [28 (link),34 (link)].
The peptide mixtures were analyzed using two LC-MS/MS systems:

Nanoflow HPLC system (Thermo Dionex Ultimate 3000, ThermoScientific) with Acclaim PepMap100 C18 pre-column, 5 mm × 300 μm; 5 μm particles (Thermo Scientific, #160454) and Acclaim Pep-Map RSLC column 15 cm × 75μm, 2 μm particles (Thermo Scientific, #164534) coupled via CaptiveSpray to the QTOF Impact II mass spectrometer (Bruker). Raw LC-MS/MS data were interpreted with the Bruker Compass DataAnalysis (version 4.3) software. The separation gradient was 48 min from 2% to 50% acetonitrile. Flow rates—300 nL/min.

Nano-HPLC (Agilent Technologies 1200) was coupled to an ion-trap mass spectrometer (Bruker 6300 series) equipped with a nanoelectrospray source via protein HPLC Chip (Agilent Technologies, G4240-62001) with 40 nL trap 75 um × 43 mm 5 um 300SB-C18-ZX and analytical column packed with ZORBAX 300SB-C18, 5 µm particle size. The separation gradient was 7 min from 5% to 90% acetonitrile. Flow rates—300 nL/min.

The LC-MS/MS instruments were set to monitor transitions of biotinylated (m/z 648.8, collision energy 33.0 eV) and propionylated (m/z 563.2, collision energy 27.0 eV) forms of BAP peptide in samples.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Plasma Proteome Analysis by LC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The plasma samples were analyzed on Hybrid mass spectrometer Q Exactive HF-X (Thermo Fischer Scientific) coupled with an Ultimate 3000 UHPLC system (Thermo Fischer Scientific). Two-column setup was used on the HPLC system, and peptides were loaded into an Acclaim PepMap 100 C18 precolumn (75 μm × 2 cm; Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA) and then separated on an EASY spray column (75 μm × 50 cm, nanoViper, C18, 2 μm, 100 Å) with the flow rate of 300 nL·min−1. The column temperature was set to 60°C. Solvent A (0.1% FA in water) and solvent B (0.1% FA in 80% ACN) were used to create a gradient, and a 90-min linear gradient from 4% to 38% of solvent B in solvent A was used to elute the peptides.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!