The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Gene pulser

Manufactured by Bio-Rad
Sourced in United States, Germany, United Kingdom, France, Canada

The Gene Pulser is a laboratory equipment designed for electroporation, a technique used to introduce genetic material into cells. It generates an electrical pulse that temporarily increases the permeability of cell membranes, allowing for the uptake of DNA, RNA, or other molecules. The core function of the Gene Pulser is to facilitate this electroporation process in a controlled and reliable manner.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

533 protocols using gene pulser

1

Bacterial Transformation Protocols for Diverse Species

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Escherichia coli transformation was performed by chemical transformation. Transformation of L. plantarum by electroporation was performed as previous described [38 (link)]. Briefly, L. plantarum cells cultured to mid-exponential phase (OD600 ~ 0.4–0.6) were collected, washed twice with SM buffer (952 mM sucrose supplemented with 3.5 mM MgCl2) and resuspended in SM buffer. Plasmid DNA ( ~ 1 μg) was added to 100 μL prepared competent cells. The resulting cell mixture were incubated on ice for 10 min. Cell mixture were electroporated using 2 mm electroporation cuvette and Gene Pulser (BioRad) under following condition: 2000 V, 25 μF, 400 Ω. Cells was recovered in SMRS broth (MRS broth supplemented with 0.5 M sucrose and 0.1 M MgCl2) at 37 °C for 3 h before spreading on MRS agar plates containing erythromycin.
Transformation of P. putida by electroporation following previously published protocol [39 (link)]. P. putida cells cultured to mid- exponential phase (OD600 ~ 0.2–0.4) were collected, washed twice with 300 mM sucrose solution and resuspended in 300 mM sucrose. After 10 min incubation on ice, the mixture of competent cells and DNA ( ~ 1 μg) was electroporated using 2 mm electroporation cuvette and Gene Pulser (BioRad) under following condition: 2500 V, 25 μF, 400 Ω. Cells was recovered in LB broth at 30 °C for 2 h before spreading on LB agar plates containing kanamycin.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Cloning Candidate Genes in Serratia marcescens

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Candidate genes were amplified from wt S. marcescens VA using primers indicated Supplementary Table 2 and cloned into pBBR1MCS-2 (kind gift from Kenneth Peterson – Addgene plasmid #85168; Kovach et al., 1995 (link)) in E. coli. Plasmid sequences were verified by Sanger sequencing. Each recombinant plasmid was then electroporated with a GenePulser (Bio-Rad) in electrocompetent S. marcescens C3 cells, prepared with the GenePulser according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For each gene, bacteria were plated on LB supplemented with kanamycin (50 μg/mL) to select those carrying the plasmid.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Electro-competent Cell Transformation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Electro-competent cells were prepared following a standard protocol [35 (link)]. Plasmid DNA or Gibson assembly reactions (~100 ng) was used to transform of E. coli competent cells (~109 cells in 50 μl 10% v/v glycerol in water). Electroporation of E. coli was performed with a Bio-Rad gene pulser with a setting of 200 Ω, 25 μF, and 1.75 kV in a 0.1 cm cuvette. Immediately after electroporation, SOC medium (1 mL) was added and cells were incubated (37°C for 1 h); the recovered cells (100 μL)were then spread on LB agar containing appropriate antibiotic for selection and the plates were incubated (37°C overnight).
For Z. mobilis transformation, plasmid DNA (~1 μg) was used to transform cells (~109 cells in 50 μl 10% v/v glycerol in water). Type 1 restriction inhibitor (1 μL; Epicentre) was added to the plasmid DNA prior to mixing with competent cells. Electroporation of Z. mobilis was performed with a Bio-Rad gene pulser with a setting of 200 Ω, 25 μF, and 1.6 kV in a 0.1 cm cuvette. Immediately after electroporation, recovery broth (1 mL; 5 g glucose/L, 10 g yeast extract/L, 5 g tryptone/L, 2.5 g (NH4)2SO4/L, 0.2 g KH2PO4/L, and 0.25 g MgSO4•7H2O/L) was added and the cells were incubated (2–3 h at 30°C). The recovered cells were spread on RMG-agar containing the appropriate antibiotic for selection and the plates were incubated (30°C for 2–4 d) to obtain transformed colonies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Targeted and Random Integration of Transgenes in DT40 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For targeted integration of scFv into the DT40 Igλ locus, 2 × 107 wild-type DT40 cells were transfected with 30–50 µg of NdeI-linearized pHypermut2-scFv–HEL–TM. Electroporation was performed using a 4-mm electroporation cuvette (Bio-Rad) and a Bio-Rad Gene Pulser set to 550V and 25 µF. Selection with 1.0 μg/ml of puromycin was applied at 24 h and the cells distributed into 96-well plates. For random integration of hAID variants into DT40, 2 × 107 Tomlinson 817 DT40 clones were transfected with 30–50 μg of either the pEAK8 empty vector or the pEAK8-hAID constructs in a 4 mm electroporation cuvette (Bio-Rad). Electroporation was performed using the Bio-Rad Gene Pulser set to 250V and 950 µF. All subsequent steps were similar to the protocol described earlier, with selection at 2 mg/ml G418.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

WNV Replicon Transfection in Hepatoma and Mosquito Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Human hepatoma cells (Huh7) were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM; Gibco) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS; PAN-Biotech, Aidenbach, Germany), 1% penicillin/streptomycin, 0.1% D-biotin, and 0.1% hypoxanthine. Approximately 0.4 × 106 Huh7 cells were transfected with 1 µg WNVRluc replicon RNA using the Bio-Rad Gene Pulser (1 pulse without controller at 0.2 kV and 950 µF, resistance ∞, and 4 mm gap cuvettes). The C6/36 cells (ATCC) and U4.4 cells (kindly provided by Ronald van Rij) were cultured in Leibovitz’s L-15 medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS; PAN-Biotech), 1% penicillin/streptomycin, 1% NEAA (non-essential amino acids), 2% tryptose phosphate. Approximately 2.4 × 107 C6/36 cells were transfected with 3 µg WNVRluc replicon RNA using the Bio-Rad Gene Pulser (1 pulse without controller at 0.3 kV and 300 µF, resistance ∞, and 4 mm gap cuvettes). A luciferase assay kit was used to quantify the activity of the replicon encoded Renilla luciferase (Promega, Walldorf, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Inhibition of B. divergens Merozoite Invasion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
With slight adjustments, the in vitro invasion inhibition assay was carried out as previously described (26 (link)). B. divergens merozoites were collected from B. divergens-iRBCs at maximum parasitemia in 4-mm cuvettes using a Bio-Rad Gene Pulser with pulse controller with five intermittent high-voltage pulses (1.25 kV, 300, and 25F) with 10 s in ice between pulses using a Bio-Rad Gene Pulser with pulse controller (Bio-Rad, Laboratories, USA). In an RPMI 1640 medium, the recovered merozoites were combined with 2 mg/ml anti-rBdp0 IgG or anti-GST IgG. Cultures without antibodies were prepared as controls. Following that, 100 μl of the mixture, containing ~1 × 106 free merozoites, was put into 96-well plates (Nunc) and incubated for 6 h at 37°C in a humidified multi-gas water-jacketed incubator. After 3 and 6 h, about 3,000 RBCs in Giemsa-stained smears were counted to determine parasitemia (maximum 1% after 6 h). For each antiserum concentration, two separate experiments were conducted in duplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Generation of Stable GluA1o-γ4 and GCaMP6s Cell Lines

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A clonal cell line designated 293F.GluA1o-γ4 was generated by electroporation (Gene Pulser, BioRad, Hercules, CA) of the GluA1o-γ4 expression construct into 293-F cells and selection using geneticin, followed by FACS isolation (MoFlo Astrios Cell Sorter, Beckman Coulter Life Science) of single cells. This cell line was subsequently transfected by electroporation using GCaMP6s-P2A-Bsr, followed by selection using 10 µg/mL blasticidin (Invivogen). A clonal cell line designated 293F.GluA1o-g4.GCaMP6sBlast was isolated by FACS.
A third clonal cell line designated 293F.GCaMP6s.blast was generated by electroporation (Gene Pulser, BioRad, Hercules, CA) of the GCaMP6s-P2A-Bsr expression construct into 293-F cells and selection using 10 µg/mL blasticidin, followed by FACS isolation (MoFlo Astrios Cell Sorter, Beckman Coulter Life Science) of single cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Transient Transfection of Undifferentiated mESCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For transient transfection of confluent undifferentiated mESCs cultured as mentioned in Section 4.2.1, plasmids containing either Wt1(−KTS) or Wt1(+KTS) expression vectors (Wt1 cDNA in pCB6+ plasmid), or empty vector as a control were used. For each group, 1 µg of plasmid was incubated with 3 × 106 mESCs in 0.8 mL PBS 30 min on ice. Following the incubation, the electroporation was performed (400 V, 250 µF) using the Bio-Rad Gene pulser (Bio-Rad, Richmond, CA, USA). Once the electroporation was conducted, cells were quickly resuspended in ESC medium, plated on fresh feeder layers and incubated for 24 h to enable plasmid baseline expression prior to hanging drop culture, described in Section 4.2.2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

RNA Interference via Electroporation in C. elegans

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An aliquot of the synchronized worms was spun down at 500 rcf for 2 min to provide approximately 250 worms (unless otherwise specified) in a volume of 5 μl after the centrifugation. Then 5 μl of worms were mixed with 40 μl of electroporation buffer (Gene Pulser Electroporation buffer, Biorad, Cat. No. 1652676) in 1.5 mL tubes, and allowed to incubate on ice for 5 min. An aliquot of 5 μl of purified dsRNA (10 μg/μl) was added to the worms just before the electroporation, mixed by pipetting, and transferred to 0.2 cm pre-chilled electroporation cuvettes (Biorad, Cat. No. 1652082). Animals were electroporated at 300 V for 10 ms (unless otherwise specified) by square-wave single pulse using a Bio-Rad Gene Pulser (BioRad, Cat. No. 1652660). Immediately after the electroporation, worms were washed with 1 mL of pre-chilled M9 buffer, transferred into 1.5 mL tubes and centrifuged for 2 min at 500 rcf. Supernatants were discarded and animals were then transferred to E. coli OP50 seeded plates and cultured at 20° for 48 h.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Genetic Manipulation of Lactococcus lactis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA markers, T4 DNA ligase, restriction enzymes, and DNA gel extraction kit were purchased from Takara (Dalian, China). PCR product purification kit, First-strand cDNA synthesis kit, and SYBR Green RT-qPCR kit were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, USA). The commercial nisin was purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, USA). L. lactis plasmid DNA, chromosomal DNA, and total RNA were isolated using a Qiaprep spin kit (small scale) following the manufacturer’s instructions. PCRs were performed with the Phusion enzyme (Finnzymes, Espoo, Finland). Primers used in this study are listed in the Additional file 1: Table S2. Primers were purchased from BGI (Beijing, China). Recombinant plasmids were introduced into L. lactis by electrotransformation as previously described [40 (link)]. Electrotransformation was performed using a Bio-Rad Gene Pulser (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Richmond, USA). E. coli DH5α was transformed through the CaCl2 procedure [41 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!