The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

17 protocols using meropenem

1

Antibiotic Susceptibility Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibiotic susceptibility was determined on Mueller–Hinton agar using the standard disk diffusion method, as described by the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) 2017 and also using the Phoenix system. Seventeen antibiotics (bioMérieux, Marcy L’Etoile, France) were tested, namely, amoxicillin (AMX), amoxicillin/clavulanate (AMC), piperacillin/tazobactam (PTZ), cephalothin (CEF), ceftriaxone (CRO), cefepime (CPM), ertapenem (ETP), imipenem (IMP), amikacin (AMK), gentamicin (GEN), ciprofloxacin (CIP), Fosfomycin (FOS), nitrofurantoin (NIT), doxycycline (DCI), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (SXT) and colistin (CS). Sensitivity to imipenem, ertapenem, meropenem (MEM) and colistin was confirmed by the antimicrobial gradient method Etest (bioMérieux, Marcy L’Etoile, France) in collected isolates.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Carbapenem-resistant bacteria surveillance

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Surveillance cultures were collected on sterile stuart transport medium (Pipe star Kft, Budapest, Hungary). After transportation to the microbiology laboratory, rectal swabs were inoculated on chromogenic agar supplemented with 1 mg/L meropenem (HiCrome, Himedia, India). After 18–24 h inoculation at 37 °C, dark-blue colonies were identified at species level by conventional biochemical methods. Antibiotic susuceptibility testing was perfomed by utilizing agar disk diffusion method (Becton, Dickenson & Company, USA) in accordance with the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute breakpoints.18 Carbapenem resistance was confirmed by detection of MIC values for carbapenems (imipenem, meropenem, ertapenem) via E-test method (bioMérieux, France).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Antibiotic Susceptibility Profiling of A. baumannii

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibiotic sensitivity assays were performed in cation‐adjusted Mueller‐Hinton pH 7.4 medium (CAMH, Sigma‐Aldrich; CaCl2 2 mM, MgSO4 1 mM). Overnight cultures of A. baumannii AB5075 were diluted to 0.5 McFarland units in CAMH broth and spread on CAMH agar plates supplemented with ace‐K 2.2 or 2.4% (or a mock treatment) with a sterile swab. For inhibition zone measurement, polymyxin B (300 U), gentamicin (10 μg), doripenem (10 μg), imipenem (10 μg) or meropenem (10 μg) discs (Oxoid) were placed in the middle of the CAMH agar plate. For MIC measurement, doripenem, imipenem or meropenem Etest strips (bioMérieux) were placed in the middle of the plate. Plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 h before measuring the diameter of the inhibition zone or reading the MIC values.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined by disk diffusion on Mueller-Hinton agar plates at 35°C and incubated for 16–18 h according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines.13 Antibiotic discs included were piperacillin/tazobactam (TZP), ceftazidime, cefotaxime, meropenem, imipenem, ciprofloxacin, sulphamethoxazole/trimethoprim, gentamicin tetracycline and doxycycline (Oxoid, UK). The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for TZP, ceftazidime, cefotaxime, meropenem, imipenem, ciprofloxacin, sulphamethoxazole/trimethoprim, gentamicin tetracycline and doxycycline were determined by E-test (bioMérieux, Marcy-I´Etoile, France) following CLSI guidelines.
The MIC of colistin was determined by broth microdilution in cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth according to CLSI guidelines.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing with E-Test

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Because the disk diffusion method allows to analysis of the impact of a single concentration of an antibiotic/disk, in this experiment E-test strips with exponentially decreasing antibiotic gradient were applied. In this investigation line, the antibiotics were selected whose application, coupled with exposure to RMF, caused the largest and the smallest differences in the zones of growth inhibition in the disc diffusion method (compared to unexposed controls). The E-tests containing cefoxitin, amoxicillin, imipenem, ceftriaxone, cefuroxime, ceftazidime and cefepime were obtained from Liofilchem (Roseto degli Abruzzi, Italy), whereas the E-test containing meropenem was purchased from BioMérieux (Craponne, France).
Similarly, as in the case of the disc diffusion method, the optimal RMF frequency and exposure time, as well as unexposed controls were used. The analyses were performed on M-H agar in accordance with the E-test manufacturer’s recommendations.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antimicrobial susceptibilities were determined at the time of isolation by the modified Bauer–Kirby disc diffusion method, as recommended by the CLSI guidelines (CLSI, 2012 ). The antimicrobials tested were piperacillin/tazobactam (100/10 μg), imipenem (10 μg), meropenem (10 μg), amikacin (30 μg), ceftriaxone (30 μg), ceftazidime (30 μg), ticarcillin/clavulanic acid (75/10 μg), cefepime (30 μg), levofloxacin (5 μg) and co-trimoxazole (1.25/23.75 μg). Mueller–Hinton agar and antimicrobial discs were purchased from Oxoid. For colistin, meropenem, imipenem, ceftazidime and ceftriaxone, MICs were determined by E-test based on the manufacturer's recommendations (bioMérieux). The results were interpreted as resistant or sensitive according to current CLSI guidelines (CLSI, 2012 ). Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 was used as the control for these assays. For isolates that had an MIC above the range of the E-test, MICs were determined by the broth dilution method (Wiegand et al., 2008 (link)). Briefly, 5 × 105 c.f.u. (ml bacteria)− 1 were inoculated into a series of Mueller–Hinton broths containing two-fold dilutions of the antimicrobial agent. Following inoculation, the broth was incubated at 37 °C for 18–24 h. The MIC was defined as the lowest concentration of antimicrobial that inhibited the growth of bacteria.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The clinical samples reviewed in this study were blood cultues, general cultues and rectal swabs for screening received by the Clinical Microbiology Laboratory in The Chaim Sheba Medical Center in Israel during 2013. General cultures include synovial, pericardial, pleural and peritoneal fluids, peritoneal dialysate, brain abscess, lung biopsy/tissue, pericardial fluid/tissue, heart valve, bone, joint, internal organs tissues, biopsies, heart valves, electrodes, catheters and wounds. All cultures suspected to be CRE were tested by Modified Hodge test, MBL E-test and by E-tests for imipenem, meropenem and ertapenem (bioMérieux, France) following CLSI guidelines [30 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Evaluating Synergistic Effects of Chelators and Meropenem

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Interactions were determined by preliminary qualitative double-disk diffusion test, followed by quantitative checkerboard and time-kill assays. All tests were performed in triplicate.
Double-disk diffusion tests were performed with disks placed at 10, 15, and 20 mm center-to-center for each combination chelator-meropenem (Fig. 2A). Standard 0.5 McF inoculums for each isolate were plated on MHA. Ten microliters of concentrated solution of each chelator (5 g/L) was placed on blank disks on MHA. Disks of meropenem (10 mg; bioMe ´rieux) have been used. Synergy was defined as the presence of alterations in disk's inhibition rings.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Susceptibility of BFG Isolates to Antimicrobials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Clinical BFG isolates were evaluated by gradient diffusion method for susceptibility to antimicrobial agents piperacillin-tazobactam (LiofilChem), ertapenem, meropenem, and metronidazole (bioMérieux). BFG isolates cultured on PRAS Brucella blood agar for 24 to 28 h were used to make 1 McFarland standard organism suspension in Brucella broth (BD BBL™) which was then lawn-struck onto PRAS Brucella blood agar plates. Gradient diffusion strips were placed on inoculated plates and incubated at 35°C in EZ Anaerobe Gas-pack systems (BD) for up to 72 h. MICs were read at 72h. Species-specific differences in MIC were investigated using Tukey’s multiple-comparison test with ordinary one-way ANOVA (GraphPad Prism v9.0.0) to detect significant differences between the geometric mean of each species group (defined as an adjusted P value <0.05).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Antimicrobial Susceptibility of K. pneumoniae

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antimicrobial susceptibility testing of K. pneumoniae was examined using Vitex II cards (AST-N292) (bioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France) according to the manufacturer’s guidelines. The following antimicrobial agents were tested: amikacin (AK), ampicillin (AMP), amoxicillin/clavulanate (AMC), aztreonam (ATM), ceftriaxone (CRO), cefepime (CFPM), cefuroxime (CXM), ciprofloxacin (CIP), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (SXT), colistin (CST), gentamicin (GN), imipenem (IPM), meropenem (MEM), piperacillin/tazobactam (TZP), and tigecycline (TGC) (bioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France). Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) recommendations were used to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and breakpoints [13 ]. MDR K. pneumoniae was defined as non-susceptibility to at least one agent in three or more antimicrobial categories [14 (link)]. K pneumoniae ATCC 700603 and E. coli ATCC 25922 were used as quality control strains. The isolates were immediately stored in brain heart infusion broth containing 20% glycerol at −86 °C for further genetic analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!