The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

96 protocols using vimentin

1

Protein Expression Analysis in Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunoblot and immunofluorescence analysis were performed as previously described18 (link). Primary antibodies used were: SOX9 (AB5535, Millipore), phospho-SOX9 (ab59252, abcam), BMI1 (05-637, Millipore), E-cadherin (BD610181, BD Transduction Laboratories), Vimentin (M7020, DAKO), N-Cadherin (BD610920, BD Transduction Laboratories), phospho-S6 Ribosomal protein (Cell Signaling Technology®, #4858) and β-actin (AC-15, Sigma). For Western blot detection of primary antibodies, we used HRP-linked antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and detection was performed by chemiluminescence using NOVEX ECL Chemi Substrate (ThermoFisher). For immunofluorescence, secondary antibodies conjugated with fluorochromes were used and nuclear DNA was stained with Hoechst 33342 (Sigma). Images were obtained at a 40x magnification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multi-Lineage Differentiation Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell staining and image acquisition were conducted as described previously [27 (link), 28 (link)] to detect Oct-4 (1:150; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), Sox-2 (1:150; Chemicon International Inc., Billerica, MA, USA), Nanog (1:150; Abcam), Nestin (1:100; Millipore), vimentin (1:100; Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (1:100; Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Inc., Heidelberg, Germany), CD31 (1:50; Dako), smooth muscle actin (1:50; Dako), alpha sarcomeric actin (1:100; Sigma) and c-Kit (1:30; Dako). The accumulation of lipid droplets indicating adipogenic differentiation was detected staining the cells in a solution of 0.5% Oil Red-O (Sigma-Aldrich).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Western Blot Analysis of EMT Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell lysates were prepared in RIPA buffer (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA) supplemented with protease inhibitors. Protein samples were separated by 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes. The membranes were blocked and probed with primary antibody against LOXL2 (Origene; Rockville, MD, USA), Snail (Cell Signaling; Danvers, MA, USA), pFAK and FAK (Santa Cruz, CA, USA), pSRC (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA), SRC (Santa Cruz, CA, USA), CDH1 (BD Biosciences; Sparks, MD), L1CAM (Novus Biologicals, Littleton, CO, USA), N-cadherin (Invitrogen, CA, USA), Vimentin (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) and β-actin (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA). The intensity of the western blotss was quantified by densitometric scanning with ImageJ (NIH) and normalized to β-actin.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Imaging of PTP1B inhibitor effects

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PTP1B inhibitor50 (link) was purchased from Calbiochem; EMD Millipore brand, Billerica, MA, USA (#539741) and CPT from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA) (#C9911). PTP1B rabbit polyclonal antibody was purchased from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN, USA) and PTP1B mouse IgG1 antibody was purchased from BD Bioscience (Fisher Scientific brand, Waltham, MA, USA), Src (phospho Y529), actin, GAPDH and K14 antibodies were purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, UK). K18 and vimentin were purchased from DAKO (Agilent brand, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and β4-integrin was from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). F-actin was stained with conjugated phalloidin (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Isotype-specific secondary antibodies were from Invitrogen as well as TOPRO-3 nuclear counterstain. Specimens were visualized on a Zeiss LSM 5 Pascal laser-scanning microscope (Carl Zeiss, Germany) and Olympus FluoView 1200 (Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Evaluating Cell Viability and Protein Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
On day 0, 1.0 × 103 cells per well were seeded in 96-well plates. At the indicated hours, sulforhodamine B (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA) assay was used to obtain relative estimates of viable cell number as previously described in Piro et al.21 (link) Western blot analyses were carried out as described previously in Melisi et al.22 (link) Briefly, cell lines were washed twice with cold phosphate-buffered saline and lysed at 4 °C into RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Nonidet P-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate and 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate) plus protease inhibitor mix (Sigma-Aldrich). Each lysate was separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and probed with antibodies against E-cadherin, β-catenin (Abcam, Cambridge, UK), receptor tyrosine kinase-like orphan receptor 2 (ROR2), Histone H3, glycogen synthase kinase 3α/β (GSK3α/β) and p-GSK3β-(S9) (Cell Signaling Technology, Boston, MA, USA), vimentin (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and γ-tubulin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA). Immunoreactive proteins were detected using an enhanced-chemiluminescence reagent (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Images were captured by LAS4000 Digital Image Scanning System (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Histological and Epigenetic Analysis of Oral Lichen Planus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We reassess the histopathological slides of the 42 patients that received diagnosis of OLP based on the criteria proposed by the WHO.22 (link) Histological signs of dysplasia were exclusion criteria. Immunofluorescence was performed as previously reported5 (link) using a double staining with anti acetyl-histone H3 (cell signaling) and vimentin (DAKO, Carpinteria, CA) and anti phospho-histone H2A.X (Millipore, Billerica, CA) as primary antibodies followed by FITC or TRITC-conjugated secondary antibody (Covance, Berkeley, CA). DNA was stained using Hoechst 33342. Images of 4 to 10 fields of each case were captured at 400× magnification using a QImaging-ExiAqua monochrome digital camera attached to a Nikon Microscope (Nikon, Melville, NY) and visualized with QCapturePro 7 software (Surrey, BC, Canada). We performed morphometric image analysis for γH2AX using the software ImageJ (Version 1.38s; NIH, Bethesda, MD). All positive and negative cells were counted in each field and the percentage of total number of cells in each case was calculated. For ac.H3K9ac staining intensity analysis, all cases were classified as negative (0), weak (+), moderate (++), or strong (+++). The intensity of H3K9ac was graduated independently by 3 oral pathologists.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Skin Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
GE were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and processed for paraffin embedment. After rehydration, tissue sections (5 μm) were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) for histological examination or processed for immunohistochemistry (IHC) to study expression of specific proteins. For IHC, after antigen retrieval, sections were incubated for 1 h with mouse antibodies against human involucrin (Novocastra), K10 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), K13 (Monosan), vimentin (Dako), or Ki-67 (Dako) as previously described.3 (link),4 (link) Collagen type IV (Monosan) and laminin 5 (Dako) IHC were performed on cryosections without antigen retrieval. Hereafter, the sections were washed in PBS and incubated for 30 min with Envision (Dako), except for K13, which was incubated with PowerVision Poly-HRP (Leica Biosystems) for one hour. Next, the sections were incubated with AEC substrate for 10 minutes followed by hematoxylin staining. The microscopic slides were visualized and recorded with a Nikon Eclipse 80i. Contrast enhancement and quantification of reepithelialization on H&E sections were done with NIS-Elements software (Nikon Instruments Europe B.V.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comprehensive Protein Expression Analysis in EMT

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Akt2 (5B5), p-AKT (S473; 736E11), p44/42 MAPK (Erk1/2; 137F5), p-p44/42 MAPK (T202/Y204, D13.14.4E), p-Smad2 (S465/467; 138D4), Smad4, SNAI2, ZEB1 (all Cell Signaling Technology); AGR2 (K-31, in-house); AGR2 (1C3, Abnova); vimentin (V9, Dako); E-cadherin (NCH38, Dako; HECD1, Abcam; Cell Signaling); N-cadherin (3B9, Invitrogen); β-actin (C4, Santa Cruz Biotech); Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-mouse IgG, Alexa Fluor 532 goat anti-rabbit IgG (both Abcam); α-tubulin (AA13, Sigma); HRP-conjugated swine anti-rabbit and HRP-conjugated rabbit anti-mouse (both Dako).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comprehensive Immunohistochemical Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Diaminobenzidine (DAB) brightfield staining was performed according to standard protocols on 5 μm paraffin sections [55 (link)]. Antigens were retrieved using heat and 10 mM sodium citrate buffer (pH 6.0). The following primary antibodies were utilized: S100 (DAKO, 1:1000 dilution), vimentin (DAKO, 1:400), EMA (DAKO, 1:200), galectin-3 (Fitzgerald Industries, 1:100), chromogranin (Thermo Scientific, 1:4000), GFAP (DAKO, 1:2,000), TTF-1 (DAKO, 1:300), CD68 (DAKO, 1:1000), p-ERK (Cell Signaling, 1:200), p-AKT (Cell Signaling, 1:50), p-S6 (Cell Signaling, 1:50), and MIB-1 (Ki-67) (Leica, 1:200). Counterstaining for nuclei was performed using Mayer's hematoxylin stain, and cover slips were mounted using Permount (Fisher Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Immunofluorescence Analysis of Tumor Cell Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tumor cells were cultured in 96-well black, clear-bottom plates (Greiner Bio-One). Following fixation with 3% paraformaldehyde (Electron Microscopy sciences), permeabilization with 0.05% TritonX, and blockade in 1X PBS supplemented with 1% BSA and 10% goat serum, cells were stained using antibodies reactive against vimentin (Dako), fibronectin, ZO1 (BD Biosciences), and brachyury (MAb 54-1), and Alexa Fluor 488 anti-mouse or anti-rabbit secondary antibodies. Nuclei were stained using DAPI (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and images were acquired using a Celigo S Cell Imaging Cytometer (Nexcelom Bioscience). For silencing of brachyury expression, control and brachyury-targeting ON-TARGETplus SMARTpool siRNAs were purchased from Dharmacon and used according to the manufacturer's instructions (GE Lifesciences). Cells were incubated for 72 hours in antibiotic-free medium prior to use for analysis of various markers by immunofluorescence.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!