The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

4 protocols using glassy carbon gc

1

Characterization of MoS2 Crystals from Norway

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MoS 2 crystals were obtained from the Sçrumsaasen mine, Spikkestad, Drammen, Norway.
N,N-dimethylformamide, (DMF) and potassium sulfate were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, Singapore. Glassy carbon (GC) with a diameter of 3 mm was obtained from CH Instruments, USA. Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy (STEM) images were obtained by using Jeol 7600F SEM (Jeol, Japan) operating at 30 kV. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was performed with a monochromatic Mg X-ray radiation source and a Phoibos 100 spectrometer (SPECS, Germany). Raman spectroscopy analysis was performed using a confocal micro-Raman LabRam HR instrument (Horiba Scientific, Japan) in backscattering geometry with a CCD detector, a 633 nm HeNe laser and a 100x objective mounted on a Olympus optical microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Electrochemical Analysis of Carbon Nanotubes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All solutions were prepared with distilled/deionized water (18 MΩ resistivity, Darmstadt, Germany). Carbon nanotubes were obtained from NANOCYL®NC7000(Austin, TX, USA). Nitric acid (HNO3, 69.2 wt%) and hydrogen peroxide ( H2O2 30% v/v) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Darmstadt, Germany). Potassium phosphate monobasic ( KH2PO4 ) and sodium hydroxide (NaOH, 99.9% p/p) were purchased from Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA). Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS: KH2PO4 + K2HPO4 + KCl, at different pH values) was used as a supporting electrolyte. Potassium ferricyanide ( K3[Fe(CN)6] ), iron trichloride hexahydrated ( FeCI36H2O ), and potassium chloride (KCl) were obtained from BDH Chemicals (Philadelphia, PA, USA); hydrochloric acid (HCl, 37%) was from Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA); glassy carbon (GC, Φ=3mm , geometric area = 0.0706 cm2), silver/silver chloride reference electrode (Ag/AgCl), and graphite rod counter electrode were from CH Instruments (Austin, TX, USA); sulfuric acid ( H2SO4 , 98%) was from Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA); 1 μm, 0.3 µm, and 0.05 µm alumina powder were from CH Instruments (Austin, TX, USA); dimethylformamide (DMF) was from BDH Chemicals (Philadelphia, PA, USA); and poly (diallyldimethylammonium chloride) (PDDA, 4% w/w in water) was from Sigma.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Carbon Nanotube Electrochemical Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All solutions were prepared with distilled/deionized water (18 MΩ resistivity, Darmstadt, Germany). Carbon nanotubes were obtained from Material Science & Nanotechnology Laboratory (IVIC, Caracas, Venezuela). Nitric acid (HNO3, 69.2 wt.%) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2, 30%V/V) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Sigma, (Darmstadt, Germany). Potassium phosphate monobasic (KH2PO4) and sodium hydroxide (NaOH, 99.9% p/p) were purchased from Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA). Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, 20 mmol·L−1 KH2PO4 + 20 mmol·L−1 K2HPO4 + 0.1 mol·L−1 KCl, pH 6.8) was used as a supporting electrolyte. Potassium ferricyanide (K3[Fe(CN)6]), iron trichloride hexahydrated (FeCl3·6H2O), and potassium chloride (KCl) were from BDH Chemicals (Philadelphia, PA, USA), hydrochloric acid (HCl, 37%) was from Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA), glassy carbon (GC, diameter ( Φ=3 mm ), geometric area = 0.0706 cm2), silver/silver chloride reference electrode (Ag/AgCl), and graphite rod counter-electrode were from CH-Instruments (Austin, TX, USA), sulfuric acid (H2SO4, 98%) was from Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA), and 1 µm, 0.3 µm, and 0.05 µm alumina powder were from CH-Instruments (Austin, TX, USA), dimethylformamide (DMF) was from BDH Chemicals (Philadelphia, PA, USA), poly (diallyldimethylammonium chloride) (PDDA, 4% w/w in water) were from Sigma.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Electrodeposition of Reduced Graphene Oxide

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Glassy carbon (GC, 3 mm in diameter, Shanghai CH Instruments, China) surfaces were polished with 1.0, 0.3, and 0.05 μm alumina powder using pure water on polishing cloths until a mirror finish was obtained. The electrodes were sonicated for 5 min to remove the alumina residues followed by rinsing with pure water and acetone. After polishing, 15 consecutive cycles from 0.5 to −1.5 V (versus Ag/AgCl) were carried out on the GC electrodes in a 0.5 g L−1 graphene oxide dispersion solution containing 0.1 M KCl at a scan rate of 50 mV s−1 [35 (link), 36 (link)]. Thus, the electrodeposition of reduced graphene oxide-modified GC (ERGO/GC) electrodes was fabricated, and the working electrode was stored at 4°C in refrigerator prior to use. The surface morphologies of the modified electrodes were examined with scanning electron microscopy (SEM; Quonxe-2000, FEI).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!