The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

U133a microarray

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific

The U133A microarray is a gene expression analysis tool produced by Thermo Fisher Scientific. It is designed to measure the expression levels of over 22,000 human genes and transcripts. The U133A microarray utilizes probe sets to detect and quantify RNA transcripts in a sample, providing a comprehensive view of the transcriptome.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

16 protocols using u133a microarray

1

Bladder Cancer Transcriptional Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Dyrskjot et al. published a dataset in which 14 normal bladder, 5 carcinoma in situ (CIS), 28 superficial bladder cancer, and 13 invasive bladder cancer samples were analyzed using Affymetrix U133A microarrays [49 (link)]. Array data were obtained from the NCBI Gene expression omnibus (GEO; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) database with the accession number GSE3167. RMA log expression units were calculated using ‘affy’ package for the R statistical programming language. The default RMA settings were used to background correct, normalize and summarize all expression values. Second dataset was published by Sanchez-Carbayo et al., in which 81 infiltrating bladder urothelial carcinoma, 28 superficial bladder cancer, and 48 normal bladder samples were analyzed on Affymetrix U133A microarrays [50 (link)]. The gene expression level of CSNK1D was obtained from this study, and log2 expression level was used for statistical analysis. A 2-tailed Student’s t-test was then applied for the calculation of the p value between two different groups.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Transcriptomic Profiling of Melanoma Biopsies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In silico analysis of the expression profiles of biopsies from patients with melanoma using bulk microarray sequencing. As described previously19 (link), samples from 45 cutaneous melanomas and 18 benign melanocytic skin nevus biopsies (around 5–20 μm) were collected and amplified, and their transcriptomes were profiled using Affymetrix U133A microarrays. Data were downloaded from the Oncomine database (https://www.oncomine.com/) as log2-transformed (median centred intensity) and genes of interest were shown as heat maps. Experimental details and cell clustering have been defined before19 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Correlating HSP Genes with Breast Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The correlation between the mRNA expression of HSP members and different clinical-pathological parameters, such as ER/PR/HER receptor status and lymph node (N) involvement, were evaluated using the Breast cancer Gene-Expression Miner v4.5 database (bcGenExMiner v4.5) [23 (link)], an on-line statistical mining tool (http://bcgenex.ico.unicancer.fr, accessed date 26 February 2021) of published annotated BC transcriptomic data (DNA microarrays [n = 10,716] and RNA-seq [n = 4712]). bcGenExMiner offers the possibility to explore gene expression, prognostic and correlation analyses, providing various kinds of plots. The association between HSP members and grading (G1/G2/G3) was performed by Gene expression-based Outcome for Breast cancer Online (GOBO database) [24 (link)]. GOBO (http://co.bmc.lu.se/gobo, accessed date 26 February 2021) enables a rapid assessment of gene expression levels, the identification of co-expressed genes and association with the outcome for single genes, gene sets, or gene signatures in an 1881-sample breast cancer data set, generated on Affymetrix U133A microarrays.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Gene Expression Analysis of Hormone-Receptor Positive Breast Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Gene expression data and clinical information of the MD Anderson Cancer Center cohort [18 (link)] (Affymetrix U133A microarrays) was downloaded from the GEO repository (GSE25066). A total of 320 tumors were HR+/HER2− and patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant endocrine treatment if HR+. HR positivity was defined as any number of stained cells. We applied an additional filter based on gene expression of ESR1 (probeset 205225_at) based on its bimodal distribution (> 10.45). In total, 267 patients met these criteria. Additional file 3: Table S2 lists the patient characteristics. HLA-A, HLA-B, and HLA-C metagenes were calculated as mean expression of the respective probesets (HLA-A: 215313_x_at, 213932_x_at; HLA-B: 211911_x_at, 209140_x_at, 208729_x_at, HLA-C: 208812_x_at, 216526_x_at, 214459_x_at, 211799_x_at). Unsupervised cut-offs were chosen by assigning the same fraction of cases to the groups with high (60%) and low (40%) expression as in the GeparTrio dataset (HLA-A > 14.24, HLA-B > 13.63, and HLA-C > 13.69). Probesets 205225_at (estrogen receptor 1) and 208079_s_at (Aurora kinase A) were used to evaluate their association with HLA-A. Immune cell metagenes were calculated as the mean expression of cell-type-specific genes [16 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

IFN-induced IP-10 expression in PD-L1+ tumors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PD-L1 positive tumor cells were treated with different IFN fusions for 72h, and IP-10 expression from MC38, LL/2, GEO and NCI-H747 cells was determined using Meso-Scale technology (V-PLEX ELISA based assay). Expression of IP-10 and CD3D in tumor clinical specimen were downloaded from Oncomine Powertool by pooling multiple published datasets using Affymetrix U133p2 or U133A microarrays, all data sets were log-transformed and median-centered per array, and standard deviations were normalized to one per array.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Gene Expression Profiling by Microarray

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
From each culture we isolated total RNA that was then reverse transcribed, quality verified, labeled, fragmented, and applied to Affymetrix U133A microarrays (assay for 14 500 well characterized genes and 18 400 transcripts/variants). To minimize possible batch effects, all samples for gene expression were profiled in a single batch at the University of Minnesota Microarray Core facility. As previously described,4, 5 we used the robust multi‐array average method to background‐adjust, quantile‐normalize, and summarize expression using median polish algorithm, as implemented in the software Genedata Expressionist Pro3.1PP (Basel, Switzerland). Our analysis applied the R function “t test” for the Welch t test (we report uncorrected P values) and the R package “samr” for Significance Analysis of Microarrays that reports false discovery rate (FDR) with 500 permutations and a delta value of 0.71916, 17; the code used is provided in Data S1. We thus used the permutation‐based Significance Analysis of Microarrays method and its associated FDR q‐values as the primary criteria for statistical inference, while using the parametric, yet robust, Welch test18 as secondary evidence of statistical significance.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

GOBO Database Gene Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The GOBO database is a web-based tool that enables a variety of analyzes of gene expression data in a merged 1881-sample breast tumor data set of 11 different publicly available datasets, all generated on Affymetrix U133A microarrays [40 (link)]. Four TFPI specific probe sets (one for total TFPI (α + β), two for TFPIα, one for TFPIβ) and one probe set for TF gene expression were identified (Additional file 4: Table S3).
Using the Gene Set Analysis application, the TFPI and TF gene expressions were dichotomized to levels above the median (high expression) or below the median (low expression) before Kaplan-Meier plots were created and univariate analyzes (log-rank) were performed to predict 10-year censored overall and relapse free survival. This was conducted in the complete 1881-sample merged clinical data set (hereafter termed “all tumors”) as well as in clinical subgroups. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyzes were carried out to account for possible survival effects of the following covariates; tumor size, age, histological tumor grade, lymph node status and ER-status. In addition, GOBO was used to assess the distribution of TFPI and TF gene expressions across clinical subgroups.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Transcriptional profiling of post-AMI heart failure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A workflow for this study was presented in Figure 1. The datasets of GSE59867, GSE1869, and GSE42955 were obtained from the GEO database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/). In the GSE59867 dataset (Maciejak et al., 2015 (link)), details on the development of HF during the 6-month follow-up were recorded for 65 samples obtained from 17 patients with AMI. The transcriptional profiling of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) in these 17 patients, which were performed at admission, discharge (4–6 days), 1 month, and 6 months after AMI, were selected for further analysis. There were no significant differences observed in the baseline demographic and clinical characteristics between HF (n = 9) and non-HF (n = 8) patients. This data were sequenced using the GPL6244 platform [Affymetrix Human Gene 1.0 ST Array, transcript (gene) version]. The GSE1869 dataset included 10 patients with HF post-AMI and 6 non-HF patients, and was performed using the platform GPL96 (Affymetrix U133A microarray) (Kittleson et al., 2005 (link)). The GSE42955 dataset included 12 patients with HF post-AMI and 5 non-HF patients, and was performed using the platform GPL6244 (Molina-Navarro et al., 2013 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Breast Cancer Microarray Meta-analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A total of 1460 breast cancer profiles from eight breast cancer datasets that were uniformly profiled on the Affymetrix U133A microarray were obtained form the Gene Expression Omnibus (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/). Because of partial overlap in several of these datasets, the selected unique samples from each GEO dataset are provided in Additional file 3: (Affy_sample_info1460.txt). A summary of the combined data set is given in Table 2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Retrospective Breast Cancer Genomics Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We performed an observational retrospective cohort analysis of women with breast cancer with publicly available clinical and primary tumor mRNA expression and mutation data from the METABRIC study. Data was retrieved using the cBioPortal implementation in R, package CGDS-R [25 (link), 26 (link), 70 (link)]. The METABRIC study included over 2,000 fresh-frozen breast cancer specimens and a subset of normal breast tissue from tumor banks in the UK and Canada. The METABRIC study reported 2,136 primary tumors with expression array (Affymetrix U133A microarray) data and 2,433 primary tumors with somatic mutation testing by sequencing for 173 genes. We also analyzed RNA sequencing data for mRNA expression from 1,100 primary breast cancer tumors from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) to validate our results for differentially expressed genes from the METABRIC study [27 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!