The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Q exactive hf quadrupole orbitrap mass spectrometer

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in Germany, United States

The Q-Exactive HF quadrupole-Orbitrap mass spectrometer is a high-resolution, high-accuracy mass spectrometry instrument. It combines a quadrupole mass analyzer and an Orbitrap mass analyzer to provide high-performance mass analysis and quantitation capabilities.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

36 protocols using q exactive hf quadrupole orbitrap mass spectrometer

1

Native MS Analysis of GroEL Oligomer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
GroEL was first diluted to 2.5 mg/mL then buffer exchanged with 2
consecutive micro Bio-spin 6 columns (BioRad) into 0.2 M ammonium acetate (Sigma
Aldrich) to remove residual salts. Needles used for nano-electrospray ionization
were pulled in house using a P-1000-micropipette puller (Sutter Instruments).
Native mass spectrometry (MS) analysis was performed on a Q-Exactive HF
quadrupole-Orbitrap mass spectrometer equipped with Ultra-High Mass Range (UHMR)
research modifications (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bremen). Native MS parameters
for GroEL have been previously described [46 ]. Briefly, GroEL was analyzed with argon as the collision gas and
the gas pressure was set to 10. High m/z detector optimization and high m/z
transfer optics were used. The capillary temperature was set to 200°C,
and the spray voltage was set to 1100 V. The m/z range was set to
2,000–25,000 m/z. Collected mass spectra were then deconvolved using
UniDec to determine the intact mass [47 (link)]. For UniDec deconvolution, the charge range was set
from 40–100 and the mass range was set from 100–1,000 kDa. The m/z
FWHM was set to 1, the point smooth function was set to 1, and the Beta
parameter was set to 50 [48 (link), 49 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

PRMT5 Antibody Pulldown and SDMA Enrichment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MS data were acquired using a Q-Exactive HF Quadrupole-Orbitrap mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher) for the PRMT5 antibody pulldowns and an Orbitrap Fusion Lumos Tribrid mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher) for the SDMA enriched samples. Data were analyzed using Proteome Discoverer 2.4 and were searched using the human protein database from UniProt. Proteins were filtered for downstream analysis using a cutoff FDR <0.01 with at least two peptides being mapped.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Proteomics Analysis by nanoLC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mass spectrometry was performed as previously described with some modifications [37 (link)]. Purified peptides were lyophilized and resuspended in buffer A* (0.1% TFA) and analyzed by nanoflow liquid chromatography on an Ultimate 3000 LC system (Thermo Fisher Scientific) online coupled to QExactive HF quadrupole orbitrap mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). This includes a 5 mm μ-precolumn (Thermo Fisher Scientific) with 300 μm inner diameter filled with 5 μm C18 PepMap100 beads. Separation of peptides occurred on a 15 cm column with 75 μm inner diameter with 2 μm reverse-phase silica beads and directly electrosprayed into the mass spectrometer using a linear gradient from 4 to 30% ACN in 0.1% formic acid over 60 min at a constant flow of 300 nl/min. To clean the column, up to 95% ACN was used as washout following the linear gradient, and re-equilibrated to prepare the column for subsequent runs. The mass spectrometer was operated in data-dependent mode, switching automatically between one full scan and subsequent MS/MS scans of the fifteen most abundant peaks (Top15 method), with full scan (m/z 300–1650) acquired in the Oribtrap analyzer with a resolution of 60,000 at 100 m/z.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Urinary Proteome Analysis by Mass Spectrometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A total of 44 urinary proteins resuspended in the buffer solution were digested overnight with Trypsin (Promega, United States) at 37°C temperature, acidified with TFA, redissolved with acetonitrile (ACN, Sigma, United States), eluted using two solvent buffer (A: 99.9% water and 0.1% formic acid; B: 79.9% ACN, 20% water, and 0.1% formic acid), and analyzed by using a Q Exactive HF quadrupole-Orbitrap mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) coupled to UltiMate 3,000 HPLC and UHPLC Systems (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Differential proteins were identified and quantified against the complete human proteins in the Uniprot database (2020.07.02) using Proteome Discover 2.4 software (Thermo Fisher Scientific) with SEQUEST and Mascot search engine (version 2.3.01, Matrix Science, London, United Kingdom). Then bioinformatics and statistical analysis were essentially performed as described previously: (1) differentially abundant proteins from discovery proteomics were selected using t-test after log2 transformed ratio based on the following criteria: p < 0.05 and FC < 0.83 or > 1.20; (2) the demographic data were presented as mean ± SEM, and statistical analysis was performed by the two-tailed t-test and one-way ANOVA for the comparison between groups; p < 0.05 was statistically significant. All procedure has been reported in details in our prior study (Chen et al., 2021 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

High-Sensitivity LC-MS/MS Proteomics Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
BioID2 samples were resuspended with 20 μL 0.1% formic acid, 1 mL out of 20 mL was injected for LC-MS/MS analysis. Liquid chromatography was conducted using a home-made trap-column (5 cm × 200 mm inner diameter) and a home-made analytical column (50 cm × 50 mm inner diameter) packed with Reprosil-Pur 120 C18-AQ 5 μm particles (Dr Maisch), running a 3-hreversed-phase gradient at 70 nL/min on a Thermo Fisher Ultimate 3000 RSLCNano UPLC system coupled to a Thermo QExactive HF quadrupole-Orbitrap mass spectrometer. A parent ion scan was performed using a resolving power of 120,000 and then up to the 30 most intense peaks were selected for MS/MS (minimum ion counts of 1000 for activation), using higher energy collision-induced dissociation fragmentation. Dynamic exclusion was activated such that MS/MS of the same m/z (within a range of 10 ppm; exclusion list size = 500) detected twice within 5 s were excluded from analysis for 50 s.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Native Mass Spectrometry of Protein-Ligand Complexes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Prior to analysis, the protein was buffer exchanged into 0.2 M ammonium acetate (pH 6.8) and diluted to 10 μM. DTT was dissolved in water and prepared at a 400 mM stock. Each ligand was dissolved in ethanol and diluted to 10× stock concentrations. The final mixture was prepared by adding 4 μL protein, 0.5 μL DTT stock, and 0.5 μL ligand stock for final concentration of 4 mM DTT and 8 μM protein. Final ligand concentrations were used as annotated. The mixtures were then incubated for 10 min at room temperature prior to analysis. Each sample was mixed and analyzed in triplicate.
Native MS was performed using a Q-Exactive HF quadrupole-Orbitrap mass spectrometer with the Ultra-High Mass Range research modifications (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Samples were ionized using nano-electrospray ionization in positive ion mode using 1.0 kV capillary voltage at a 150 °C capillary temperature. The samples were all analyzed with a 1000–25,000 m/z range, the resolution set to 30,000, and a trapping gas pressure set to 3. Source fragmentation (10–50 V) was applied to all samples to aid in desolvation. Data were deconvolved and analyzed with UniDec.41 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Native MS Analysis of Protein-Ligand Complexes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Before MS analysis, the protein
was buffer exchanged using two Micro Bio-Spin columns (Bio-Rad) and
diluted into 0.2 M ammonium acetate to a concentration of 10 μM.
Each drug was diluted with 100% ethanol to concentrations of 100,
200, and 400 μM. Imidazole, a charge reducing reagent, was added
to each sample to stabilize the drug-bound state at a final concentration
of 40 mM. For each sample, 0.5 μL of ligand was added and dried
down in each tube prior to the addition of 0.5 μL of 40 mM DTT,
0.5 μL of 400 mM imidazole, and 4 μL of protein for a
final concentration of 4 mM DTT and 8 μM protein. Final ligand
concentrations were either 10, 20, or 40 μM.
Native mass
spectrometry (MS) was performed using a Q-Exactive HF quadrupole-Orbitrap
mass spectrometer with the Ultra-High Mass Range research modifications
(Thermo Fisher Scientific) as described in our previous publications.7 (link),8 (link) Data were deconvolved and analyzed with UniDec.21
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Histone Peptide Profiling by LC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lyophilized histone peptides were resuspended in 0.1% formic acid (FA) and analyzed on a Dionex U3000 ultra performance liquid chromatography system coupled to a Q-Exactive HF quadrupole orbitrap mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). A Waters BEH 300Å C18 reversed phase capillary column (150 mm × 75 μm, 1.7 μm) was used for separation. Water with 0.1% FA and acetonitrile with 0.1% FA were used as mobile phases A and B, respectively. The flow rate was set to 0.300 μl/min. About 2 μl of peptide sample was injected onto the column and separated over a 120-min gradient as follows: 0–1 min 3–10% B; 1–90 min 10–35% B; 90–92 min 35–95% B; 92–102 min 95% B; 102–105 min 95–3% B; 105–120 min 3% B. The data were acquired under data dependent acquisition mode (DDA, top 20). Mass spectrometric conditions were as follows: spray voltage of 2.8 kV, no sheath and auxiliary gas flow; heated capillary temperature of 275°C, normalized high-energy collision dissociation (HCD) collision energy of 33%, resolution of 120 000 for full scan, resolution of 60 000 for MS/MS scan, automatic gain control of 2e5, maximum ion injection time of 100 ms, isolation window of 1.6 and fixed first mass of 110 m/z.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Absolute Metabolite Quantification in Cell Lines

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HCT116 and HCTR cells were seeded at a density of 0.25 × 106 cells/mL in 1 mL medium in 12-well plates and left to recover overnight. The medium was replaced and the cells were treated with 100 µM BOLD-100 or the corresponding concentration of DMSO for 24 h. The cells were washed 3 times with PBS (pH 7.4), quenched with liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80 °C until further processing. The metabolomics experiments were carried out as described before [31 (link)]. In short, liquid chromatography high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC-MS) measurement with a Thermo Scientific Q Exactive HF quadrupole-Orbitrap mass spectrometer was utilized in full mass scan mode (both positive and negative ionization-mode) at a resolution of 120,000. External calibration with fully labelled 13C internal standards ISOtopic solutions (Vienna, Austria) was used for quantification. The obtained absolute metabolite amounts (pmol) were normalized to the total protein content in their respective well (µg) with the Thermo BCA kit, according to manufacturer’s instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Native MS Analysis of Nanodiscs and Peptides

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Native MS was performed using a Q-Exactive HF quadrupole-Orbitrap mass spectrometer with the Ultra-High Mass Range (UHMR) research modifications (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bremen). Instrumental parameters were used as previously described.12 (link),13 (link),15 (link),16 (link) Nano-electrospray ionization (ESI) was used to introduce the sample into the mass spectrometer with a capillary voltage of 1.1 kV and capillary temperature of 200 °C. Nanodiscs were analyzed from 2,000–25,000 m/z at a resolution setting of 15,000 and a trapping gas setting of 7. The source fragmentation was set to 50 V to aid in desolvation, and in-source trapping was set to 0 V. To analyze free peptides, the MS was operated from 500–5000 m/z with the resolution set to 120,000 and a trapping gas setting of 3. Source fragmentation was kept at 50 V to aid in desolvation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!