The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

24 protocols using leo 912 ab omega

1

Retinal tissue preparation for TEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Electron microscopy was carried out as previously described (34 (link)). Briefly, eyecups were immersion fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde and 4% PFA in PB. Subsequently, the retinae were dissected and washed in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4) and thereafter incubated in 2% osmium tetroxide in cacodylate buffer and dehydrated in graded ethanol solutions (30, 50, 70, 90, and 2 × 100%). For contrasting, 2% uranyl acetate was added at the 70% ethanol dehydration step. After pre-incubation with propylene oxide and epon (1:1) for 30 min, the sample was incubated overnight in pure epon, then embedded in silicone, and dried at 60° for 2 days. Serial ultrathin vertical sections were cut at 60–80 nm using a microtome, collected onto formvar-coated copper grids and then stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate. Examination was performed with a LEO 912 AB Omega transmission electron microscope (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Nanoparticle Morphology by TEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology of NPs was examined by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (LEO 912 AB Omega, Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). A 50 μL volume of diluted NP dispersion (1:10) was placed onto the surface of a formvar/carbon coated 300 mesh grid and allowed to settle for 30 s. Excess sample was drained from the grid by touching the edge with a filter paper. A 5 μL volume of Nanovan® was then added to the sample and removed immediately afterward. The grids were left to dry and examined using TEM.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Ultrastructural Analysis of Cells and Extracellular Vesicles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For TEM analyses to evaluate cell morphologies and sub-organelle structures, drug-treated or control MDA-MB231 CD63-GFP fusion cells were pelleted by centrifugation, and pelleted cells were fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde in a 0.1 M phosphate buffer. After washing several times with 0.1 M carcodylate buffer, cells were dehydrated by gradient series of ethanol (50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90% ethanol for 20 min each step, 100% 20 min twice) followed by propylene oxide for twice. Afterwards, cells were infiltrated with progressively concentration Eponate 812, and then polymerized in fresh Eponate 812 for 2 days at 60 °C. Samples were sectioned using an Ultra microtome (Ultracut UCT; Leica) and stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate. Sections were examined with energy filtering TEM (LEO-912AB OMEGA; Carl Zeiss) at the Korean Basic Science Institute Chuncheon Center.
For TEM analyses to detect sEV, MDA-MB231 and MCF7 cells were pelleted by serial ultracentrifugation, and the pellets were deposited on pure carbon-coated EM grids. After staining with 1% uranyl acetate, the grids were dried at room temperature and viewed at ×12,000 magnification using a Biotransmission electron microscope (HT7700; Hitachi) operated at 120 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Structural Characterization of Au Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TEM images and small area electron diffraction (SAED) patterns were obtained on a transmission electron microscope LEO912 AB OMEGA (Carl Zeiss, Germany) operating at 100 kV. Samples were prepared by drying the sol droplets placed on copper grids coated by Formvar™ film. SAED patterns were obtained at accelerated voltage of 100 kV and drawtube length of 290 mm. Both SAED patterns and dark field images were used to confirm the crystallinity of Au nanoparticles. The length and diameter distributions of the nanorods and nanospheres were measured by ImageJ 1.50b open source software (Wayne Rasband, NIH, USA). SEM images were obtained on a scanning electron microscope JSM 7401F (JEOL, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Characterization of Plasma-Synthesized Metal Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Metal NPs were obtained in a plasma electric arc discharge as published previously [14 (link),28 (link)] using ethanol as a solvent. They were characterized by size using a transmission electron microscope LEO 912 AB OMEGA (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) with energy filter and Keller system; by size distribution and ζ-potential using dynamic light scattering on a Zetasizer Nano ZS (Malvern Instruments, Worcestershire, UK); by qualitative elemental composition using an atomic-emission spectrometer iCAP 6300 Radial View (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) with inductively coupled plasma.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Synthesis and Characterization of PEGylated Magnetic Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PEGylated silica-coated superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (IONP@Si@PEG) were chemically synthesized via a method previously described in Refs. [41 (link),42 ]. In brief, 2 g of FeCl3 (Merck, Germany) was added and completely mixed to an equal amount of FeSO4 (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) in 1-liter of ultra-distilled water at room temperature. The resulting solution was deoxygenated with perching of nitrogen into the reaction system [43 ] and then ammonium hydroxide was added. The precipitated particles were isolated by a magnet, washed with ethanol, and kept under oxygen-free conditions. Then, the particles were dispersed in deionized water and coated with silica by adding Tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) (Merck, Germany). Finally, the particles were PEGylated in a PEG-silane (Merck, Germany) solution. After synthesis, the resulting IONP@Si@PEG were characterized with Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS), Zeta-potential (SZ-100 Nanoparticle Analyzer – Horiba, Japan), X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) (Philips PW 1730, Germany), Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) (Thermo Nicolet AVATAR 370 FTIR) and Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) (Leo 912 Ab Omega, Zeiss) operated at 120 kV and the toxicity of IONP@Si@PEG evaluated in our pervious study [44 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

TEM Imaging of Cu-Chitosan Composites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TEM images were performed with a transmission electron microscope LEO 912AB OMEGA, Zeiss (Oberkochen, Germany) at an acceleration voltage of 100 kV. Cu-carrying chitosan composites for measurements were previously suspended in deionized water (resisting 18 MΩ) and sonicated in an ultrasonic bath for 15 min at RT. Then, a small drop of the suspension was dripped onto a copper grid (200 mesh) previously coated with formvar film. Then, the samples were dried at RT for 15 min and placed under the microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Characterization of NiO Nanopowders

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The phase composition and morphology of the nanopowders obtained were investigated by X-ray diffraction methods (XRD, DRON-3M (Russia) and XRD-6000 Shimadzu (Japan)), transmission electron microscopy (TEM, LEO 912 AB Omega Carl Zeiss and Philips EM-301) and diffusion aerosol spectrometry (DAS, model 2702, Aeronanotech). The specific surface area was determined using the BET method on a NOVA 2200 instrument. Elemental analysis for the presence of residual carbon and nitrogen was carried out using an inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometer (ICP-MS, Optima-5300). It was shown that the content of residual carbon and nitrogen in the powders did not exceed 0.08 and 0.07 wt %, respectively. The NiO nanopowder was characterized by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, PHI5500 Versa Probe II) with a monochromatic Al Kα X-ray source (hν = 1486.6 eV, 50 W).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Structural and Optical Characterization of SiNW

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Structural investigations of SiNW-based samples were carried out by using a field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM, Carl Zeiss ULTRA 55, Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) and a transmission electron microscope (TEM, LEO912 AB OMEGA, Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany). A Malvern Zetasizer Nano ZS instrument (Malvern Instruments Ltd., Malvern, England, UK) was used to determine the size and zeta potential (ζ) of SiNPs obtained from data of dynamic light scattering (DLS). The surface composition of nanoparticles was studied by using a Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometer Bruker IFS 66v/S, (Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany) with a germanium prism for attenuated total reflection. Before recording FTIR spectra, the suspensions were dried in air on the prism surface. The FTIR measurements were done at room temperature in vacuum at a residual pressure of 10−3 Torr.
Additionally, the suspensions of SiNPs were characterised by using PL spectroscopy by excitation with an Ar-ion laser (wavelength 364 nm, power 10 mW, spot diameter 1 mm, Spectra-Physics, Stahnsdorf, Germany). The PL signal was detected using a grating monochromator (MS750, SOLAR TII, Moscow, Russia) equipped with a CCD array. The measurements were carried out at room temperature in air.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Characterization of Silicon Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Structural analysis of the samples was carried out by Carl Zeiss ULTRA 55 scanning electron microscopy (SEM) for SiNW layers and by LEO912 AB OMEGA transmission electron microscopy (TEM) for SiNPs. The samples of NPs for TEM studies were prepared by deposition of the nanoparticle powder on the standard carbon-coated gold TEM-grids. TEM images were processed with ImageJ Software to obtain the silicon nanocrystals (nc-Si) size distribution. To determine the hydrodynamic size of the nanoparticles a Malvern Instruments Mastersizer 200 have been used. The specific surface area of the SiNPs as well as their pore sizes and pore volumes were determined with N2 adsorption/desorption (Micromeritics Tristar 3000). The pore area from the adsorption branch using BET theory (Brunauer, Emmett, and Teller), and the pore size was calculated from the desorption branch using BJH theory (Barrett, Joyner, and Halenda). Before measurements, the samples were dried by lyophilization. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra were measured by using Bruker spectrometer and attenuated total reflectance (ATR) addon.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!