The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Vivaspin

Manufactured by Merck Group
Sourced in Germany, United States

Vivaspin is a centrifugal concentrator device used for the rapid concentration and desalting of macromolecular solutions. It operates on the principle of tangential flow filtration to efficiently concentrate and purify samples.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

14 protocols using vivaspin

1

Osteoclast-Derived EVs Internalized by DRG

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Osteoclast-derived EV (or PBS as negative control) were labelled with PKH26 0.5 μM dye (Sigma-Aldrich), for 5 min at RT, and washed in VivaSpin® centrifugal columns (10 kDa cut-off). Labelled EV were added to the axonal compartment of DRG in microfluidic devices, at the same concentration present in the total osteoclast secretome (1011 EV/mL). Internalization was followed live for 120 min at laser scanning confocal microscopy (Leica TCS-SP5 AOBS) with controlled environment (temperature and CO2). Samples were fixed and analyzed after 24 h exposure.
DRG exposed to osteoclast-derived EV were stained against calcitonin-gene related peptide (CGRP). Briefly, after fixation, permeabilization and blocking as previous mentioned, cells were incubated with the primary antibody directed against CGRP (Sigma-Aldrich) diluted 1:8000, in blocking solution, overnight at 4 °C. Afterward, cells were washed and incubated for 1 h at RT with the secondary antibody (Alexa Fluor 488, Invitrogen) diluted 1:1000, in blocking solution. Images were acquired at laser scanning confocal microscopy (Leica TCS-SP5 AOBS). To quantify the percentage of EV internalization, neurites were semi-automatically traced with simple neurite tracer plug in for Image J software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Protein Extraction and Analysis from Astrocytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total protein from astrocytes cell culture supernatant was extracted and concentrated using Vivaspin (Sigma Aldrich, Germany) centrifugal concentrator according to the producer’s advice. WB was performed according to standard procedures as described [19 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantifying Extracellular Vesicle Uptake by Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DC-derived EV were labelled with PKH26 0.5 μM dye (Sigma-Aldrich), for 5 min, at 37 °C, and free dye washed in VivaSpin® centrifugal columns (10 kDa cut-off). Labelled EV were co-cultured with MSC (1.5 × 103 cell/mL). Pellets of cell-free EV producing media ultracentrifuged as above, and PBS were labelled with PKH26 and used as negative controls. At different timepoints, cells were fixed with paraformaldehyde 2%(w/v), stained with FITC-conjugated phalloidin (Life Technologies), and mounted on slides with fluoroshield with DAPI. Images were acquired by laser scanning confocal microscopy (Leica TCS SP2) using the same settings for all conditions tested, and Z-stack images analysed using Fiji software. For internalization quantification, cells were defined as ROI according to phalloidin staining (green channel) and then fluorescence intensity PKH26 (red channel) determined on Fiji software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Labeling and Purifying hMSC-Derived Extracellular Vesicles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For labeling hMSC-EVs with PKH26 (Sigma), we followed the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, ~40 × 109 EVs in 100 μl of PBS were mixed with 1 ml of diluent C containing 4 μl of PKH26 dye. Following 20 minutes of incubation at 37 degrees C in a shaker, the free dye was removed from the bound dye through ultrafiltration using 10 kDa MWCO filter columns (Vivaspin, Sigma). In parallel, 100 μl of PBS mixed with 1 ml of diluent C containing 4 μl of PKH26 dye was processed with identical incubation and filtration steps as the PKH26-labeled EVs. This solution was employed in neuronal cell culture studies to determine any free dye presence. No red particles (free PKH26 particles) were seen in human neuronal cultures incubated with PKH26 dye solution undergoing the identical incubation and filtration steps as the PKH26-labeled EVs. See supplemental figure 1. IN administration of hMSC-EVs was performed bilaterally, as described in our recent reports (Upadhya et al., 2020 (link); Kodali et al., 2020 ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Urinary HMGB1 Quantification Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The urine samples of patients and controls were concentrated 60 times using Vivaspin (Millipore Corporation, Massachusetts, USA). Urinary levels of HMGB1 were tested using commercially available ELISA kits (Shino-TEST). The assay was conducted according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Urinary HMGB1 was expressed as HMGB1/Cr ratio (mg/μmolCr) to correct for differences in dilution.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Protein Expression and Purification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The lectin CCL2 was expressed using a pET22b vector as described earlier (Schubert et al. 2012 (link)). Either Luria broth (Thermo Fisher Scientific) or M9 minimal medium (Sambrook 2001 ) with or without 13C and 15N isotope-labeling was used as culture medium. After affinity chromatography purification the buffer was exchanged to 50 mM KH2PO4/K2HPO4 pH 5.8, 150 mM NaCl by dialysis (3.5 kDa cutoff, Spectra/Por) and the proteins were concentrated with ultrafiltration devices (3 kDa cutoff, Amicon/Millipore or Vivaspin/Satorius). Most CCL2 spectra were recorded without ligand, but few were in complex with the trisaccharide GlcNAcβ1,4[Fucα1,3]GlcNAcβO(CH2)5COONa at pH 4.7. The individual domains of the RNA-binding protein hnRNP A1 were expressed and purified as described previously (Barraud and Allain 2013 (link)). Both domains were individually studied in complex with RNA, the RNA-recognition motif 1 (RRM1) in complex with the RNA UUAGGUC and RRM2 with the RNA UCAGUU in 10 mM NaH2PO4/Na2HPO4 pH 6.5 as described earlier (Beusch et al. 2017 (link)). The tandem zinc-knuckles of Lin28 (amino acids 124–186) were expressed, purified and complexed with AGGAGAU RNA from pre-miRNA let-7 as described (Loughlin et al. 2012 (link)). Spectra of the Lin28-RNA complex were measured in 10 mM sodium acetate pH 5.6, 1.5 mM β-mercaptoethanol and 0.15 mM ZnCl2 at 303 K.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Formulation and Preparation of KGF-2 Protein

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
KGF-2 was simultaneously dialyzed and concentrated into 2mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 6.2 to 10 mg/mL in centrifugal concentrators (Vivaspin®, Millipore) at 10°C. Formulation excipients and their percent weight masses used for preparing formulations of KGF-2 are listed in Table. 1. Each of the initial aqueous solution formulations of KGF-2 was prepared by weighing excipients into a 50 ml container followed by addition of 5 ml of the dialyzed and concentrated 10mg/mL concentrated KGF-2 solution. 2 mM sodium phosphate buffer was added to obtain a final volume of 50 ml and a final protein concentration of 1mg/mL. Aliquots of 1ml solution were pipetted into 5 cc glass vials (13 mm FNT BB LYO). Vial filling took place in a cold room at approximately 2–8°C. The vials were then partially stoppered using double vent Fluorotec rubber stoppers (Daikyo Fluorotec stoppers, West Pharmaceutical, Lititz, PA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Functionalized Gold Nanoparticle Synthesis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
10 nm amino-PEG functionalized GNPs were synthesized according to reference [24 (link)]. Briefly, HAuCl4 (Sigma Aldrich, Overijse, Belgium) and TA-PEG550-OCH3 (Biochempeg Scientific Inc., Watertown, MA, USA) were mixed at a 2000:1 Au: PEG molar ratio in deionized water and stirred at room temperature for 1 h. NaBH4 (Sigma Aldrich) was then added to the mixture under vigorous stirring and the solution was left stirring for 3 h. Then, TA-PEG400-NH2 (Biochempeg Scientific Inc., Watertown, MA, USA) was added to the solution for extra passivation. After 3 h of stirring, the colloidal suspension was purified using a membrane filtration device (Vivaspin, Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany).
GNPs were lyophilized with a freeze-drying system (Alpha 2-4 LD Plus; Analis, Rhisnes, Belgium) and stored at 4 °C for further use. In all experiments, cells were incubated with 50 µg of gold per mL of medium, which corresponds to 8.22 nM of GNPs.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Generation and Characterization of HCV Particles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In vitro transcription and RNA electroporation were performed as previously described [48 (link)]. Approximately 3 × 106 Huh7.5.1 cells were electroporated with in vitro-transcribed RNAs derived from JC1 or JFH1-ad34-5A-Rluc containing the cell culture adapted mutations in the E2 and p7 proteins [45 (link)]. The culture supernatants were collected at 3–5 days after electroporation, and naïve Huh7.5.1 cells were infected with the generated viruses. The cell culture media of infected cells were collected at 3–5 days after infection. The HCV-containing supernatants were then filtered through with a 0.45 μm filter, and the filtrate was concentrated with a Vivaspin (100-kD cut-off; Millipore). The concentrated HCV culture medium was loaded onto a 20% sucrose cushion, and HCV particles were collected by ultracentrifugation at 4°C for 4 h at 36,000 rpm (SW41 rotor; Beckman). The viral pellets were resuspended with complete medium. Regarding the transient replication assay, in vitro transcripts of HCV subgenomic replicons were generated, purified, and electroporated into Huh7-Lunet/T7 cells. Firefly luciferase activities in cell lysates were measured as previously described [49 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Liposome Preparation by Sonication

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Liposomes were prepared using the sonication method, as previously reported24 (link). Briefly, a lipid film was prepared by evaporating a chloroform solution containing the corresponding lipids in the desired proportion (Supplementary Table 1). The resulting film was hydrated with PBS (typically 10 ml) and sonicated for 25 min using a 150 V/T Ultrasonic Homogenizer (Biologics, Inc., Ramsey, NJ) working at 30% power output. After quick centrifugation, size and Z-potential measurements were performed on a NanoSeries Z-Sizer (Malvern Instruments, Malvern, UK) and a Zeta PALS analyser (Brookhaven Instruments Corporation, Holtsville, NY), respectively. Liposomes containing DSPE-DFO were concentrated using a 100-kDa VivaSpin (Millipore, Billerica, MA) tube and washed twice with PBS.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!