The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Ox 42

Manufactured by Merck Group
Sourced in United States

OX-42 is a laboratory instrument designed for the measurement and analysis of oxygen levels in various samples. It operates on the principle of electrochemical detection, providing accurate and reliable oxygen concentration data. The core function of OX-42 is to facilitate precise oxygen monitoring, which is essential for various scientific and industrial applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

8 protocols using ox 42

1

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Brain Sections

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After behavior test, animals were intracardially perfused with PBS followed by 4% PFA as previously described37 (link),38 (link). Briefly, the brain sections were cut and incubated at room temperature in PBS with 0.01% Triton X-100 for 30 min and followed by blocking with 3% bovine serum albumin for 1 h. For immunolabeling, brain slices were probed with primary antibody overnight at 4 °C. Antibodies included phospho-CaMKII (Thr286) (1:200)39 (link),40 (link), laminin, GFAP, OX-42, and S100β (1:500, Millipore, U.S.A), Nuclei were stained with DAPI (4, 6-diamidino-2- phenylindole) (Sigma-Aldrich, U.S.A). After washing, the sections were incubated with Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG and Alexa Fluor 594-conjugated anti-mouse IgG (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Signals were visualized by using a Zeiss LSM 510 confocal microscope. The relative fluorescence intensity of immunostaining was quantified by using Image J software (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Isolation and Culture of Microglial Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Wistar rats were bred in the INBIOMED animal housing facility, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina. Rats were kept in a 12 h light-dark cycle at 22°C ± 1°C with access to food and water ad libitum. 1–2 day-old Wistar rat pups were decapitated and their brains removed and freed from meninges. Cells were mechanically dispersed and seeded in previously poly-L-lysine-coated culture flasks, and held in DMEM/F-12 supplemented with 10% FBS, 50 μg/ml streptomycin and 50U penicillin, at 37°C in 5% CO2. Medium was replaced twice a week. After 11–14 days, microglial cells were detached from astrocytes by shaking for 1–2 h at 110 rpm, at 33°C in a Thermo Scientific Orbital Shaker (Thermo Fischer Scientific, Germany). Supernatants were collected and centrifuged, and microglia was seeded in uncoated plates in supplemented DMEM containing 10% FBS and 2 mM L-glutamine and left to stabilize overnight at 37°C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere before adding the drugs in fresh supplemented DMEM containing 2% FBS and 2 mM L-glutamine. Cells were stained with a microglial marker (anti-rat CD11b monoclonal antibody, OX-42, Millipore) to assess their purity, which was routinely close to 98%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunocytochemical detection of immune markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were washed in PBS and fixed in 4% PBS–PFA for 10–15 minutes at RT. For p65 and c-Rel immunocytochemistry cells were incubated in ice cold methanol for 10 minutes at -20°C. For HMGB1 staining slides were incubated in Citrate buffer and subjected to microwave heating at 350 W for 5 minutes, then left to reach RT for 20 minutes and washed in PBS. Slides were incubated in blocking solution containing 10% donkey serum or 10% goat serum (depending on the source of the secondary antibody) in PBS for 1 hour at RT. Subsequently, cells were incubated overnight at 4°C with the following primary antibodies: anti-CD11b 1:100 (OX-42, Millipore), anti-p65 1:30 (BD Biosciences), anti-c-Rel 1:50 (sc-70, Santa Cruz), anti-HMGB1 1:100 (ab79823, Abcam). After rinsing, slides were incubated with the appropriate secondary antibodies for 1 hour at RT. Cells were washed in PBS and mounted in mounting medium Vectashield (Vector Laboratories). Negative control slides were incubated with blocking solution instead of the primary antibodies. Staining was visualized in a fluorescence microscope (Axiophot; Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany). Quantification of fluorescence intensity was done with ImageJ Software (NIH, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Cortical Protein Expression Analysis in Embolic Stroke

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cortex was dissected from control and embolic stroke rats according to Spijker [27 ]. Cortical tissues were lysed by RIPA buffer (Cell Signaling Technologies, USA) supplemented with a protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche, Mannheim, Germany). Total protein was determined by the Bradford protein assay (Bio-Rad, CA, USA). Proteins were separated by 10% SDS/PAGE, transferred onto a PVDF membrane (Amersham Biosciences, UK) and then blocked with 10% non-fat milk. The membrane was then incubated with antibodies against 5-LOX (1:1000, BD Bioscience), GFAP (1:5000, Chemicon, Merck, USA, Cat. No. MAB3402), ED-1 (1:1000, Chemicon, Merck, Germany, Cat. No. MAB1435), OX-42 (1:1000, Chemicon, Merck, Germany, Cat. No. CBL1512), or β-actin (Cell Signaling Technologies, USA, Cat. No. mAb#4970) at 4 °C overnight, then washed and incubated in HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit or mouse IgG at room temperature for 1 h. Visualization was carried out using Luminata Forte or Crescendo Western HRP substrate (Millipore Corporation, USA) and chemiluminescence signals were detected using UVIchemi (UVItec, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Spinal Cord Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemistry was performed as previously described [22 (link)]. Briefly, animals were anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital (50 mg/kg, i.p.), and cardiac perfusion were performed using 0.9% physiological saline, followed by 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS. Next, L4–L6 spinal cord tissues were removed and postfixed in the same fixative overnight and then dehydrated with 30% sucrose. Cryostat sections (16 μm thick) were cut and processed for immunofluorescent staining with primary antibodies for SIRT1 (1:400, Santa Cruz, USA), NALP1 (1:50, Novus Biologicals, USA), phosphorylated STAT3 (1:100, Abcam, UK), NeuN (1:500, Chemicon, USA), GFAP (1:800, Chemicon, USA), or OX42 (1:250, Chemicon, USA). After incubation overnight at 4 °C, the sections were then incubated with cy3-conjugated and fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated secondary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature. Isotype IgG was applied in separated sections as control, which did not yield detectable immunosignal. The stained sections were then examined with a Leica (Leica, Germany) fluorescence microscope, and images were captured with a Leica DFC350 FX camera.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunofluorescence Imaging of Microglial Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Primary microglial cells or BV2 microglial cells were plated onto poly-L-lysine coated cover slips in a 24-well plate. For immunofluorescence, the cells subjected to different treatments were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in phosphate buffer for 30 min at room temperature (n = 3). Following incubation in normal goat serum, all coverslips with adherent cells were incubated in a mixture of antibodies containing OX-42 (1∶200, Chemicon, USA) with anti-Runx1t1 (1∶100, Cat.No.sc-28693, Santa Cruz, USA), or anti-LAT2 (1∶100, Cat No. sc-133726, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, USA), or anti-H3acetylated(Lys9/14) (1∶100, Cat No. 17–615, Millipore, USA) at 4°C overnight. The coverslips were washed and incubated with FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (1∶100, Chemicon, USA), or Cy3-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (1∶100, Chemicon, USA) for 1 h at room temperature. Cell nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (1 µg/mL) for 2 min. The coverslips were then washed and mounted with a fluorescent mounting medium (DAKO Cytomation, Glostrup, Denmark). All images were captured under a confocal microscope (LSM FV1000; Olympus Company Pte. Ltd, Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunocytochemical Staining of Neural Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cultures were fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde and stained with antibodies against GFAP (Dako 1:500), β-III tubulin (Chemicon MAB1637 1:500), GalC (galactocerebroside—in house production), and Ox42 (Chemicon 1:250). 0.2% Triton was used for permeabilization. Nuclei were visualized using DAPI (4′,6-diamidino-2- phenylindole).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Spinal Cord

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The rats were anesthetized using sodium pentobarbital (50 mg/kg, i.p.) and perfused with 4% paraformaldehyde through the ascending aorta.
The L6-S1spinal cord were removed and post-fixed in the same fixative overnight and transferred to 30% sucrose overnight. Cryostat sections (14 µm) were cut and processed for immunohistochemistry using primary antibodies against GFAP (1:500, Chemicon), OX42 (1:200, Chemicon), Iba1(1:500; Abcam), NeuN (1:1000, Chemicon), IL-1β (1:300, Endogen), P-ser896 NR1 (1:500, Millipore), and IL-1RI (1:600, R&D Systems). Following incubation overnight at 4℃, the sections were incubated in Cy3-conjugated (Chemicon) and FITC-conjugated secondary antibodies (Chemicon) for 1 h at room temperature. Five rats were included in each group for immunohistochemical quantification, and five spinal cord tissue sections per animal were randomly selected for analysis. The stained sections were examined with an Olympus IX71 (Olympus Optical) fluorescence microscope, and images were captured with a CCD spot camera.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!