The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

140 protocols using labram hr

1

Raman Spectroscopy of Cultured Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells maintained in tissue culture Petri dishes were analyzed with Raman spectroscopy daily. Cells were first seeded on gridmarked glass-coated gold mirrors (Thorlabs) for 2 h, rinsed with PBS, then carefully resuspended in phenol-red free RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FBS, 1% Pen/Strep, and 2.5% HEPES buffer for Raman spectral acquisition. Raman spectra were acquired at room temperature using a Horiba LabRAM HR confocal Raman microscope (Horiba Scientific) equipped with a Horiba Synapse back-illuminated, deep-depletion CCD camera. A 785 nm laser (15 mW power at the sample, theoretical spot diameter of 958 nm) was focused on the center of each cell for 40 s through an Olympus 60× water-dipping objective (2 mm working distance). The grating was set to 300 grooves/mm, and the pinhole and slit sizes were set to 500 and 100 μm, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Nanocomposite Structure Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The complementary information on the structure of nanocomposites was obtained using Raman spectrometer Horiba LabRAM HR equipped with 532 nm laser source, and Olympus Plan M NA09 lens. Spectra were collected within range of 50 to 4000 cm−1, with integration time of 10 s, and resolution of 0.39 cm−1. Four spectra were collected for each sample, and calculated parameters were averaged.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Graphene-PEDOT:PSS Ink Synthesis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The ink was purchased from the Innophene Company Limited, Thailand, and it was synthesized using the electrolytic exfoliation of graphite32 (link)33 . The electrolytic exfoliation method used two graphite rods placed in an electrolytic cell with a liquid PEDOT:PSS electrolyte. When a constant potential was applied between the graphite electrodes, the positive electrode started corroding and a black precipitate was gradually formed in the electrolysis cell. The exfoliation process continued for several hours to obtain a suitable graphene concentration dispersed in the liquid PEDOT:PSS electrolyte. The dispersed graphene-PEDOT:PSS solution, which was used as ink, was taken from the electrolysis cell and was centrifuged at a low speed to filter out the large agglomerates. Finally, the spectral features of the graphene-PEDOT:PSS sheets were observed using the micro-Raman system (LabRAM HR, Horiba Jobin Yvon) with an excitation energy of 2.33 eV (Laser 532 nm).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Protein Secondary Structure Analysis by FTIR and Raman

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The FTIR spectra were collected on a Bruker ATR-FTIR spectrophotometer (Tensor II, Germany) at 25 °C in the range of 1742 to 1550 cm−1, with a resolution of 4 cm−1 and an accumulation of 256 scans. For secondary structural analysis, the amide I band (1700–1610 cm−1) was chosen and analyzed using Grams/AI™ 9.2 software. The software fitted Gaussian functions to five peak areas corresponding to secondary structure types: 1610–1642 cm−1 (β-sheet), 1643–1650 cm−1 (random coil), 1650–1659 cm−1 (α-helix), and 1660–1699 cm−1 (β-turn)41 (link),42 (link). Moreover, Raman spectra were obtained in the range of 1800 to 600 cm−1 using a Raman spectrometer Lab Ram HR (Horiba, Japan) equipped with a confocal microscope. A 532 nm red laser excitation (600 g/mm grating), with a power of 17 mW, and 50 magnification (Numerical Aperture = 0.5) and 240 s scanning integration was used. Peak fitting in the Raman spectra was performed using the Gaussian function in Grams/AI™ 9.2 software. This analysis aimed to quantify the areas corresponding to specific secondary structures: β-sheet (1620–1648 cm−1), α-helix (1649–1660 cm−1), random coil (1660–1665 cm−1) and β-turn (1665–1699 cm−1)41 (link),42 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Characterization of SWNT-EDC Composites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Briefly, pristine SWNTs, purified SWNTs, EDC, and different ratios of SWNTs/EDC composite suspensions were dropwise added onto glass slides and then air-dried. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to examine the surface morphology of these specimens. AFM (SPM-9600, Japan) was utilized to measure the surface properties of the coatings, including morphology and roughness (Ra and Rz). Measurements were conducted in ambient air using an AFM scanner in tapping mode at a scanning rate of 0.7016 Hz and a scanning area of 10 μm × 10 µm. The coatings were measured in five different areas for statistical analysis. Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy and Raman spectroscopy were used to demonstrate the grafting of EDC onto SWNTs. The FTIR analysis was investigated using a Nicolet 6700 (Thermo Nicolet Corp., Madison, WI, United States). An 532 nm Nd:YAG laser was used as the excitation source for the Raman spectra collected with a LabRAM HR (HORIBA Jobin Yvon SAS, Longjumeau, France).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Raman Spectroscopy of Nanoconjugate-Treated Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Raw 264.7 cells were seeded onto 20 mm glass coverslips in a 6-well plate (Corning, 3516) at a certain density of 1 × 105 cells/well and allowed to grow for 48 h. The medium was then replaced with 2 mL of a medium containing HAuNFs or HAuNFs-containing nanoconjugates at the concentration of 50 μg Au/mL. After incubation for 12 h and the removal of the culture medium, the cells on the coverslip was washed with DPBS twice, fixed with DPBS containing 4% paraformaldehyde, and then repeatedly washed with DPBS. The fixed coverslips were sealed onto glass slides, without being mounted, to exclude the possible interference of a Raman signal from the mounting glue (Mowiol® 4-88). Raman spectra were taken on a Horiba-Jobin-Yvon LabRam HR, with 633 nm excitation. All measurements were conducted using a 100× objective, and a laser power of 0.18 mW (on the sample) with an integration time of 30 s.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Advanced Material Characterization Techniques

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To observe the morphology and structures of our samples, we used Hitachi S-4800 field-emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM, Chiyoda, Tokyo, Japan) with an acceleration voltage of 10.0 kV and JEM-2100HR transmission electron microscope operating at 200 kV (TEM, JEOL Ltd., Akishima, Tokyo, Japan). X-Ray diffraction (XRD) data were recorded on Bruker AXS D8 Advance device (Billerica, MA, Cu-Kα λ = 1.5418 Å) working at 40 kV and 40 mA (2θ = 0.02° per step). X-Ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, Thermo Scientific ESCALAB 250Xi spectrometer Al-Kα, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA) was obtained to analyze the composition and existing status of elements. In order to investigate the structures more detailedly, Fourier Transform Infrared spectra (FTIR, Nicolet Avatar 360, Nicolet, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA, KBr pellets) and Raman spectroscopy (LABRAM HR, Horiba, Kyoto, Japan) data were also collected. Thermo Gravimetric Analysis (TGA) was performed on Pysis 1 (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA) system in air with a heating rate of ∼10 °C min−1. The Mott–Schottky curve measurements were performed in a typical three-electrode electrochemical system (CHI 760e, Chenhua, Shanghai, China) at room temperature using Pt wire as the counter electrode and SCE as the reference electrode.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

SERS Detection of Pymetrozine Adsorption on Au@AgNPs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Adsorption orientation of pymetrozine on Au@AgNPs surface in different electrolyte solutions was explored by the results of SERS detection. Briefly, 200 μL of 0.75 mg/L pymetrozine standard solution and 200 μL of Au@AgNPs were added to a 2 mL centrifuge tube and vortexed for 5 s. Then, 10 μL of different electrolyte solution (1 M), including KOH, NaOH, NaNO3, NaCl, KCl, HCl and HNO3 solutions, was added to the tube and vortexed for 20 s each. Finally, the above solution was drawn into a capillary and analyzed by a laser confocal microscopic Raman system (LabRAM HR, Horiba France SAS, Villeneuve, France) equipped with a 633 nm laser and a grating of 600 grooves/mm. The exposure time for each spectrum was 30 s with 2 accumulations. Each sample was measured in five replicates, and the average value was taken for analysis. Two preprocessing methods (baseline correction and denoising) were applied to minimize the interference of fluorescence and improve the signal-to-noise ratio.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Characterization of Amorphous Silicon Nitride

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Photoluminescence (PL) spectra were performed with a spectrometer (LabRAM HR, Jobin Yvon), and transmission and reflection measurement were using a UV-Visible spectrophotometer (U-4100, Hitachi High-Tech. Corp.). The PA-ABD a-Si3N4/Si (111) with pretreatment at high temperature and PECVD a-SiNx are not resist to KOH, and thus not able to perform the transmission experiment on these samples. The optical band gap was determined from the expression given by Tauc for amorphous materials:48

where α is the absorption coefficient given by α = 2.303 × log(T/d) (d is the thickness of PA-ABD a-Si3N4), hv is incident photon energy, and Eg the optical band gap.
Scanning photoelectron spectroscopy/microscopy characterization:
The SPEM/S system used here utilizes a combination of a Fresnel zone plate and an order-sorting aperture to focus the monochromatic (380 eV) soft x-ray with a beam size of about 100–200 nm. By setting the electron collecting energy window of the multiple-channel hemispherical electron energy analyzer while scanning the a-Si3N4/Si(111) heterojunction, a two-dimensional distribution of that particular core-level can be mapped. After acquiring the SPEM images, the focused beam was moved to specific locations to perform high-energy-resolution (~50 meV), microscopic-area photoelectron spectroscopy (μ-PES).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Raman Spectroscopy of Peptide-Treated P. aeruginosa

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The P. aeruginosa 6294 cells were processed in a similar way to the zeta potential sample preparation and treated with the peptide at 1x and 2x MIC concentrations. The cell suspensions were then drop-casted onto clean aluminum foil mounted on the glass slide.16 (link) Raman spectra were obtained in backscattering geometry using a LabRAM HR - Jobin Yvon (Horiba, Kyoto, Japan) spectrometer equipped with a Peltier-cooled CCD.16 (link) A diode laser of wavelength 785 nm was used as an excitation source, and the light was focused on the sample using a 50× objective. All data were recorded within a wavenumber range from 800 to 1800 cm−1.
For curve fitting, the Origin program was used. First, the baseline of the Raman spectra was processed by asymmetric least squares (ALS) method. The parameter for the asymmetric factor was kept 0.001, while keeping the threshold, smoothing factor and number of iterations at 0.05, 4 and 10, respectively. To reduce the noise and to get a clearer picture of the Raman shifts, further smoothening of the data was done by using Savitzky-Golay methods where the points of window were kept to 25 and the polynomial order was set at 5 without any boundary condition. The specific and significant Raman shifts of the different chemical groups and bonds were matched with a previously reported article by GB Jung et al.17 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!