The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

79 protocols using fcs express v3

1

Histopathology and APC Maturation Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At 12 weeks of age, 3 mice for each treatment group were randomly removed from the study, sacrificed and organs (spleen, pancreas) excised for analyses at this time point. Histopathology: Pancreata were fixed with formalin, embedded using paraffin, sectioned, mounted and stained with Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E). Stained sections were blind scored for Islet infiltration using the following grading system: 0 = healthy islet, 1 = peri-insulitis, 2 = >25% leukocytic infiltration of islet area, and 3 = >75% leukocytic infiltration of islet area. At least 50 islets were examined for each group. APC Maturation and Differentiation: Using the cell surface staining protocol described above, splenocytes (1 × 106 cells from each mouse) were stained with antibodies against mouse CD11c (clone N418, IgG), CD11b (M1/70, IgG2b, κ) (eBiosciences) and Gr-1 (clone RB6-8C5, IgG2b, κ). Cells were analyzed using the FCS express V3 software (De Novo Software, Los Angeles, CA). Treg Analysis: Splenocytes (1 × 106 cells from each mouse) were immunofluorescently stained using antibodies against CD4 (clone RM4-5, IgG2a, κ) (BD Pharmingen), and FoxP3(clone FJK-16s, IgG2a, κ) (eBioscience). Cells were analyzed using the FCS express V3 software (De Novo Software, Los Angeles, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Analyzing Surface Expression of GlyRa2 and Flavocytochrome b558 in Neutrophils

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To analyze the surface expression of GlyRα2, neutrophils (3 × 106/ml) were stimulated with E. coli for 5 min in RPMI-1640. Then, the neutrophils were fixed with Cytofix (BD Pharmingen) for 5 min. After washing with Pharmingen Stain buffer (bovine serum albumin, BSA) (BD Pharmingen), the neutrophils were stained with Alexa Fluor 488 carboxylic acid succinimidyl ester-conjugated anti-GlyRα2 for 30 min at room temperature. Anti-GlyRα2 antibody was conjugated with Alexa Fluor 488 carboxylic acid succinimidyl ester, in accordance with the manufacturer’s protocol. Neutrophils were washed in Pharmingen Stain buffer (BSA) (BD Pharmingen) and acquired on Guava Easycyte (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA). Analysis was performed using FCS Express V3 (De Novo Software, Los Angeles, CA, USA). Alexa 488-conjugated mouse IgG1 (BD Pharmingen) was used as an isotype control. To analyze the surface expression of flavocytochrome b558, neutrophils (3 × 106/ml) were stimulated with E. coli at a ratio of 1:10 for 20 min in RPMI-1640. Then, the neutrophils were washed with Pharmingen Stain buffer (BSA) (BD Pharmingen) and stained with PE-labeled anti-flavocytochrome b558 (MBL International, Woburn, MA, USA) for 1 h, and acquired on Guava Easycyte (GE Healthcare). Analysis was performed using FCS Express V3 (De Novo Software).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Mesenchymal Stem Cell Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Flow cytometry is one of stemness confirmation methods for determining the mesenchymal markers such as CD105, CD73 and non-mesenchymal marker such as CD45. Isolated ASCs (passage 4) were washed with flow cytometry (FCM) buffer [PBS containing 0.5% bovine serumalbumin (BSA)] two times. The purity of MSCs was determined using anti-CD105-FITC, anti-CD73-PE and anti-CD45-FITC. Then, MSCs were incubated with 10 μL of each antibody or isotype antibody for 45 min at 4C. The cells were subsequently washed three times with FCM buffer, fixed with 1% paraformaldehyde and subjected to FCM (FACS Calibur, Beckman Dickinson, San Jose, CA). Data of FCM were analyzed by FCS Express V3 Software (De Novo Software, Los Angeles, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Flow Cytometry Analysis of GAF-FP Transfection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Flow cytometry analysis was performed using a BD LSRII flow cytometer. To detect live HeLa cells transfected with the pGAF-FP-sfGFP-N1 plasmid, a 488 nm Ar gas laser line, a 640 nm solid-state laser, and the 530/40 nm and 670 nm long pass emission filters were used. To quantify the NIR fluorescence brightness of the transiently transfected cells, the mean NIR fluorescence signal was normalized to the absorbance spectra and the extinction coefficients of GAF-FP and to the transmission of the 670 nm long pass emission filter. The histograms of cell populations and mean NIR fluorescence intensities of the analyzed cells were obtained using the FCS express v.3 software (DeNovo Software).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Apoptosis and Viability Assays for Imatinib

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell apoptosis assay was performed using KeyGEN Annexin V-APC/propidium iodide (PI) Apoptosis Detection kit (KeyGEN BioTECH, Nanjing, China) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, cells were treated with 5 µM or 10 µM imatinib for the indicated times. The samples were washed with ice cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and stained with 2.5 µg/ml Annexin V-APC and 1 µg/ml propidium iodide. The samples were then examined by fluorescence-activated cell sorter (BD Bioscience, San Jose, CA, USA) as previously described [5] (link), [29] . For cell viability assay, cells were treated with 10 µM imatinib for indicated time, washed with ice cold PBS, stained with 1 µg/ml of propidium iodide, and examined by fluorescence-activated cell sorter as described previously [5] (link), [29] . All the data were analyzed by FCS Express V3 Software (De Novo Software, Thornhill, Ontario, Canada).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantitative Apoptosis Assay Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Apoptosis assay was performed as previously described [4 (link), 5 (link)]. Briefly, cells were cultured with certain inhibitors for indicated time. Then cells were stained with 2.5 μg/ml Annexin V-FITC and 1 μg/ml PI. For cells overexpressing or silencing given genes, samples were stained with 2.5 μg/ml Annexin V-APC and 1 μg/ml 7-AAD. Samples were examined by fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS) (BD Bioscience) as previously described [5 (link)] and data were analyzed by FCS Express V3 Software (De Novo Software). For experiments using combined treatment, the synergism was evaluated by the combination index (CI) which was calculated using Chou-Talalay method by CompuSyn software (ComboSyn, Inc.) [49 (link), 50 (link)]. Briefly, CI value < 1 represents synergistic effect, CI values = 1 additive effect, and CIs > 1 antagonistic effect.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Flow Cytometry Analysis of Cell Populations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After cell treatment, the cells were detached from the plates with trypsin and resuspended for live cell analysis or fixed for 5 min with cold (−20 °C) methanol. Fixed cells were washed with DPBS (Lonza) before resuspending in DPBS for analysis. About 10,000 cells were analyzed for each condition. The flow cytometry experiments were conducted with a BD Fortessa Cell Analyzer (BD Biosciences) and data were analyzed using the FCS Express v3 software (De Novo Software). The Students’ t-test was used to compare the mean fluorescence values of different conditions and in addition the effect size was calculated using formula d = (M1-M2)/SD where d is Cohen’s effect size index, M1-M2 is the difference between the group means and SD is the standard deviation of either group. The effect sizes were classified to very small (<0.2), small (0.2–0.4), medium (0.5–0.7), large (0.8–1.2) and very large (>1.3)64 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Flow Cytometric Analysis of CD71 and HER2/neu Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
2F7 cells (2.5 x105) were incubated for 30 minutes on ice with either phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated mouse IgG2a isotype control or PE-conjugated mouse anti-human CD71 (TfR1) monoclonal antibodies (both from BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) according to the instructions of the manufacturer. For ch128.1 binding, 2 μg of ch128.1 or a humanized anti-human HER2/neu IgG3/kappa (previously described 16 (link) and used as an isotype control) were incubated with the cells (2 × 105) on ice for 1 hour. An anti-human kappa-PE antibody (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used for detection. After staining, all cells were washed, fixed, and analyzed on a BD FACS/Scan Analytical Flow Cytometer. Ten thousand events were collected per sample. The FCS Express V3 software (De Novo Software, Los Angeles, CA) was used to create the histograms.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantifying Microbial Abundances by Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After 384 days of incubation, subsamples (1 mL) were taken from each dialysis bag to determine viral and host abundances. They were fixed with glutaraldehyde (0.5% final concentration) and incubated at 4°C for 15 min in the dark. After flash-freezing in liquid nitrogen, the samples were stored at –80°C before analysis. By analyzing flow cytometry (Epics Altra II, Beckman Coulter) scatter plots for side scatter versus red fluorescence and for orange fluorescence versus red fluorescence, the Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus abundances could be directly determined (83 (link)). After cells were stained with 1.0 × 10–4 SYBR Green I (vol/vol, final concentration of the stock solution, Molecular Probes) and then incubated for 15 min in the dark, heterotrophic bacterial abundance was determined by flow cytometry with scatter diagrams of side scatter versus green fluorescence (83 (link)). In addition, subsamples were diluted with Tris-EDTA buffer (pH 8.0; Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), stained with 5.0 × 10–5 SYBR Green I (vol/vol, final concentration of the stock solution), and incubated at 80°C for 10 min. Then viral abundance was determined by flow cytometry with a scatter diagram of side scatter versus green fluorescence (81 (link), 82 (link)). Finally, all data analysis was performed with FCS Express V3 software (De Novo Software, Los Angeles, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Lysosomal Damage Evaluation in Macrophages

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lysosomal damage by DSS challenge was evaluated by acridine orange stain as described elsewhere [17 (link)]. Briefly, macrophages were plated into 24-well culture dishes overnight and introduced to apoptotic cells (1:8) for 2 h. Macrophages were then washed, primed with LPS, and stimulated for 24 h with DSS. Cells were then washed and incubated with 0.25μg/mL acridine orange for 15 min for lysosome stain. Lysosomal damage was determined as loss of fluorescence intensity emission at 600–650 nm with an LSRII (BD Biosciences). Data analysis was performed using FCS express v3 software (De Novo Software).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!