The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

39 protocols using mouse anti eea1

1

Investigating HPV16 Infection in HeLa Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
2.5 × 104 HeLa S3 cells were seeded on glass coverslips in 24-well plates and transfected 16 h later with 10 nM VPS35 or control siRNA. Forty-eight hours after transfection, cells were mock-infected or infected with wild-type HPV16 PsV at MOI of 150 or with DM mutant PsV containing the same number of encapsidated HcRed reporter plasmids. At 12 h.p.i., cells were fixed for 15 min at room temperature with 4% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized with 1% saponin for 30 min, and incubated with 1:400 anti-FLAG mouse antibody (Sigma, F3165), 1:100 anti-EEA1 mouse (BD, 610457) or rabbit (CST, 2411) antibody, 1:75 anti-TBC1D5 rabbit (Abcam, ab203896) or mouse (Santa Cruz, SC-376296) antibody, 1:100 anti-VPS35 goat antibody (Abcam, ab10099), or 1:120 anti-VARP rabbit antibody (Abcam, ab108216). Cells were then incubated at room temperature for 1 h with 1:200 AlexaFluor-conjugated secondary antibodies (Life Technologies). The slides were mounted as above, and images were captured using a Leica SP5 confocal microscope. In most experiments, a single Z-plane is shown. In Figure 5C, right panels, sequential Z-planes spaced by ~0.2 micron were recorded for three-dimensional reconstruction with the Imaris software package.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Investigating HPV16 Infection in HeLa Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
2.5 × 104 HeLa S3 cells were seeded on glass coverslips in 24-well plates and transfected 16 h later with 10 nM VPS35 or control siRNA. Forty-eight hours after transfection, cells were mock-infected or infected with wild-type HPV16 PsV at MOI of 150 or with DM mutant PsV containing the same number of encapsidated HcRed reporter plasmids. At 12 h.p.i., cells were fixed for 15 min at room temperature with 4% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized with 1% saponin for 30 min, and incubated with 1:400 anti-FLAG mouse antibody (Sigma, F3165), 1:100 anti-EEA1 mouse (BD, 610457) or rabbit (CST, 2411) antibody, 1:75 anti-TBC1D5 rabbit (Abcam, ab203896) or mouse (Santa Cruz, SC-376296) antibody, 1:100 anti-VPS35 goat antibody (Abcam, ab10099), or 1:120 anti-VARP rabbit antibody (Abcam, ab108216). Cells were then incubated at room temperature for 1 h with 1:200 AlexaFluor-conjugated secondary antibodies (Life Technologies). The slides were mounted as above, and images were captured using a Leica SP5 confocal microscope. In most experiments, a single Z-plane is shown. In Figure 5C, right panels, sequential Z-planes spaced by ~0.2 micron were recorded for three-dimensional reconstruction with the Imaris software package.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Intracellular Organelle Staining Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
AlexaFluor 647
mouse-anti-hLAMP1
(1:500, Biolegend, Carlsbad, CA; #328611), AlexaFluor 647 mouse-anti-hLAMP2
(1:500, Biolegend, Carlsbad, CA; #354311), mouse-anti-EEA1 (1:1000,
BD Biosciences; Franklin Lakes, NJ; #610457), AlexaFluor 647 goat
antimouse (1:500, Life Technologies; #A21206). Western blot. hLAMP1
(1:1000, DSHB, University of Iowa, #2296838). Reagents. LysoTracker
Deep Red (Life Technologies; #L12492), MitoTracker Deep Red FM (Invitrogen;
Carlsbad, CA, #M22426), monensin solution 1000× (Invitrogen;
#501129057), nigericin solution (Sigma-Aldrich, #SML1779), paraformaldehyde
(PFA) solution (Fisher Scientific; #50980494), glycine (Sigma-Aldrich;
#G7126), bovine serum albumin (BSA) (Fisher Scientific; #BP1605100),
D-PBS (Sigma-Aldrich; #D8662), and Saponin (Sigma-Aldrich; #S7900).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunostaining of Cellular Compartments

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following antibodies were used: mouse anti-EEA1 (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, 610456), sheep anti-GFP [12 (link)], rabbit anti-GORAB (Proteintech, Manchester, UK, 17798), sheep anti-GST [13 (link)], sheep anti-Pacsin 2 [14 (link)], and sheep anti-TGN46 (Vas Ponnambalam, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK). Cy3- and Cy5-conjugated secondary antibodies were from Jackson ImmunoLabs (West Grove, PA). Horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibodies were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Clara, CA) or Tago Immunochemicals (Camarillo, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunofluorescence Staining of Tight Junctions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell culture reagents were obtained from Mediatech Inc, Manassas, VA. The following antibodies were used: rabbit anti-GOPC (Millipore, Billerica, MA), anti-E-Cadherin (Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA), mouse anti-EEA1 (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA), mouse anti-TGN38 (ABR Affinity Bioreagents, Golden, CO). Rat anti-E-Cadherin, mouse anti-G58K, mouse anti-GM130 and mouse anti-β-actin were from Sigma (Saint Louis, MO). Rabbit and mouse anti-claudin-1, rabbit and mouse anti-claudin-2, rabbit and mouse anti-occludin, mouse anti-claudin-4, mouse anti-ZO-1 were from Invitrogen (Grand Island, NY). Mouse anti-JAM-A was a gift from Dr. Charles Parkos, Emory University. AlexaFluor secondary antibodies were also from Invitrogen. All other chemicals and reagents were from Sigma-Aldrich unless otherwise specified.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunofluorescence Staining of Autophagy-Related Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protocols have been extensively described recently (Lucocq et al., 2001 (link), Karanasios and Ktistakis, 2015 (link)). In brief, cells on coverslips were fixed in 3.7% Formaldehyde, permeabilized in 0.1% NP40 and stained in a blocking solution containing fish gelation and 0.05% NP40. Antibodies used and their final dilution are as follows: rabbit anti-OPTN (Cayman Chemicals), 1:100; mouse anti-WIPI2 (Bio-Rad), 1:200; rabbit anti-phospho(S172)TBK1 (Cell Signalling), 1:50; mouse anti-Ubiquitin FK2 (Enzo), 1:100; rabbit anti-FIP200 (ProteinTech), 1:100; rabbit anti-ATG9 (Cell Signalling), 1:100; mouse anti-TOMM20 (Abcam), 1:100; rabbit anti-ATG13 (Sigma), 1:100; rabbit anti-LC3 (Sigma), 1:150; rabbit anti-NDP52 (GeneTex), 1:100; rabbit anti-Tax1BP1 (ProteinTech), 1:100; rabbit anti-VAPA (Sigma), 1:200; rabbit anti-VAPB (Sigma), 1:200; mouse anti-EEA1 (BD Biosciences), 1:70; mouse anti-LAMP2 (Developmental Studies Hybridoma Data Bank), 1:200; mouse anti-TUBULIN (Sigma), 1:300; mouse anti-cytochrome C (Abcam), 1:200; rabbit anti-phospho(S351)p62 (kind gift from Dr Masaaki Komatsu), 1:100; rabbit anti-TRAF2 (Abcam) 1:100.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Generation of Molecular Reagents for Cell Biology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The sources of cDNAs were as follows: pEGFPC-Sac2 and pSNAP-human CLC were generated in our laboratory, and pFUGW-GFP-Sac2 was generated from pEGFPC-Sac2 by Janelia Research Campus/HHMI. The following primary antibodies used in this study were generated in our laboratory: rabbit anti-SJ1 and rabbit anti-auxilin. Antibodies obtained from commercial sources were as follows: mouse anti-EEA1 from BD Biosciences; mouse anti-amphiphysin 2, rabbit anti-CLC, guinea pig anti-vGluT1 (AB5905), rabbit anti-TH (AB152), and rat anti-DAT (MAB369) from Millipore Sigma; rabbit anti-synaptophysin (101 002) and rabbit anti-vGAT (131 002) from Synaptic Systems; rat anti-LAMP1 (ID4) from Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank; rabbit anti-BAG3 (10599-1-AP) from Proteintech, mouse anti-tubulin (T5168) from Millipore Sigma; rabbit anti-tubulin (PA1-21153) from Invitrogen; mouse anti-parkin (4211) from Cell Signaling Technology; and Alexa Fluor 488-, 594- and 647-conjugated secondary antibodies from Invitrogen. The rabbit anti-Sac2 antibody was a kind gift from Yuxin Mao, Cornell University.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantifying Intracellular Bacterial Trafficking

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HeLa cells were infected with either mCherry-expressing WT or Δstmp1 mutant bacteria in a 6-well plate for 2 h, washed extensively with PBS, and incubated in 10% RPMI. At 2 dpi, the infected cells were replated onto coverslips placed in a 24-well plate (5 × 104 cells per well). The next day, cells were fixed in 2.5% PFA for 15 min and blocked/permeabilized for 20 min in 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) and 0.1% saponin in PBS. Cells were then incubated with mouse anti-EEA1 (1:500; BD Biosciences) and rabbit anti-LAMP1 (1:1,000; Abcam) for 1 h followed by Alexa Fluor secondary antibodies (1:1,000) for 1 h. Following washing with PBS, coverslips were mounted using ProLong gold with DAPI and visualized on a Leica inverted DMI6000B microscope using a 63× oil immersion objective. Images were captured and processed identically, and the fluorescence intensity of EEA1 and LAMP1 was measured (ImageJ) and normalized to cell area, excluding the CCV from intensity measurements. At least 20 cells were measured per condition for each of three independent experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Immunofluorescence Analysis of HEPG2 and H1581 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For immunofluorescence (IF) of HEPG2 cells, 100,000 cells were grown on coverslips in 12-well plates and incubated with RSPO2-flag conditioned media for 1.5 h. For H1581 cells, 150,000 cells were grown on coverslips in 12-well plates and transfected with 50 nM siRNA for 48 h. HEPG2 and H1581 cells were fixed in 4% PFA for 15 min, blocked and permeabilized with 5% BSA in PBSTB for 1 h and treated with 1:250 diluted rabbit anti-FGFR4 (Cell Signaling Technology 8562 S), mouse anti-EEA1 (BD 610457), mouse anti-clathrin (BD 610499), rabbit anti-FGFR1 (Cell Signaling Technology 9740 S), mouse anti-Flag (Sigma F3156) and mouse anti-Lamp1 (Cell Signaling Technology 15665 S) overnight at 4 °C. 1:500 diluted donkey anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 647 (Invitrogen A31571), donkey anti-rat Alexa Fluor 488 (Invitrogen A21208), donkey anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 546 (Invitrogen A10036) and goat anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 488 (Invitrogen A11029) and Hoechst dye (1:500) were applied for 2 h at room temperature. Quantification of IF was performed using FIJI (Image J) v1.51k software. Tyramide Signal Amplification to detect RSPO2-HRP was executed as previously described32 (link). Representative images were obtained using LSM 700 (Zeiss) and processed with Zeiss ZEN 2012 (black edition) version 2.5.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Antibody Characterization for Cellular Localization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mouse anti-FLAG (M2) and anti-α-tubulin monoclonal antibodies and rabbit anti-HA and anti-FLAG polyclonal antibodies were purchased from Sigma. Mouse anti-EEA1, anti-GM130, and anti-Rab11 monoclonal antibodies were purchased from BD Biosciences (Bedford, MA). Rabbit anti-TGN46 polyclonal antibody was purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, UK). Mouse anti-LAMP-1 monoclonal and Rabbit anti-Rab5 polyclonal antibodies were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). Mouse anti-HA (12CA5) and anti-FLNa monoclonal antibodies were purchased from Roche Applied Science (Indianapolis, IN) and Millipore (Billerica, MA), respectively. Secondary antibodies conjugated to Alexa Fluor 488 or 568, Alexa Fluor 568-phalloidin (Invitrogen), hoechst 33258 (Dojido laboratories, Kumamoto, Japan) were also purchased from commercial sources. Rabbit anti-FilGAP polyclonal antibody was prepared as described previously [9] (link). Rabbit anti-ARHGAP22 polyclonal antibody was directed against amino acid residues 469–485 (RGHRRASSGDRLKDSGS) of human ARHGAP22. The peptide was coupled through cysteine at the NH2-terminal residue to keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) and was used to raise the antiserum. The antiserum specific to ARHGAP22 was affinity-purified with the immobilized peptide.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!