The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Precision plus protein all blue standard

Manufactured by Bio-Rad
Sourced in United States, France, Italy

Precision Plus Protein All Blue Standards is a pre-stained protein standard used for molecular weight determination in SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) applications. The standards contain ten recombinant proteins with molecular weights ranging from 10 to 250 kDa and are pre-stained with a blue dye for easy visualization.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

72 protocols using precision plus protein all blue standard

1

Reagents and Analytical Techniques

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All reagents were used directly as obtained from the commercial sources. Analytical thin layer chromatography (TLC) was carried out on pre-coated TLC aluminum plate (silica gel, grade 60, F254, 0.25 mm layer thickness) acquired from EMD Chemicals (Gibbstown, NJ). Flash column chromatography was performed using silica gel (230–400 mesh, grade 60) obtained from Sorbent Technologies. NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker 500 MHz spectrometers. Chemical shifts (in ppm) are referenced using solvent (CHCl3, DMSO, water) peaks, with coupling constants reported in Hertz (Hz). The relative molecular mass and purity of enzyme samples were determined using SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). The protein molecular weight marker used was purchased from Bio-Rad Laboratories (Precision Plus ProteinTM All Blue Standards).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

SDS-PAGE Protein Separation and Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fifteen microgram of protein extracts from muffin and milk samples, were separated, under reducing conditions, by means of sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) on an 8–16% polyacrylamide pre-cast gels (8.6 cm × 6.7 cm × 1 mm) using a Mini-Protean Tetra Cell equipment (Bio-rad Laboratories, Segrate, Milano, Italy). Samples were dissolved in a Laemmli buffer (62.5 mM TrisHCl, pH 6.8, 25% glycerol, 2% SDS, 0.01% Bromophenol Blue, 100 mM DTT) (1:1 ratio) and denatured for 5 min at 95 °C. As running buffer, a TGS (25 mM Tris, 192 mM Glycine, 0.1% SDS) solution was employed while electrophoretic separation was performed at 100 V. Gels were stained by using a Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250 solution and the bands were detected on a ChemiDOCTM MP Imaging system (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Segrate, Milano, Italy) and analyzed by using the software ImageLab 4.1. Precision Plus ProteinTM all blue standards (10–250 kDa, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) was used as protein molecular weight referencing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Characterization of Calcium Phosphate Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Calcium phosphate dibasic anhydrous powder was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis, MO, USA). The sodium hydroxide (NaOH) used for the preparation of 0.1, 1.0, 2.0 and 5.0 M solutions was from Fisher Chemical (Ottawa, ON, Canada). All of the following were purchased from the company Bio-Rad (Hercules, CA, USA): Mini-PROTEAN TGX Stain-Free Gels (12%, 15-well comb, 15 μL), 2× Laemmli sample buffer, Precision Plus Protein TM All Blue Standards, 10× Tris/glycine buffer, 10× Tris/glycine/sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), Coomassie blue solution. Acetic acid and nitric acid were purchased from Anachemia (Radnor, PA, USA), and methanol from Fisher Chemical (Ottawa, ON, Canada). Potassium bromide and 2-mercaptoethanol were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis, MO, USA). Ethyl alcohol was purchased from Commercial Alcohols (Brampton, ON, Canada). Lastly, a 0.1 M CaCl2 calcium calibration standard was provided by Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Milk-based Protein Characterization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Whole raw milk and raw cream were provided by a local supplier (Quebec City, QC, Canada) and skim milk powder (SMP) was obtained from Agropur (Quebec City, QC, Canada). The thermophilic yogurt culture YC-X11 Yo-Flex® (Chr. Hansen A/S, Hørsholm, Denmark) was composed of Streptococcus thermophilus and Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. Bulgaricus. Analytical-grade sodium hydroxide for the preparation of 0.1 M of NaOH was obtained from Fisher Chemical (Ottawa, ON, Canada). Mini-PROTEAN TGX Stain-Free Gels (12%, 15-well comb, 15 µL), 2× Laemmli sample buffer, native sample buffer, Precision Plus ProteinTM All Blue Standards, 10× Tris/glycine/sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) buffer, and 10× Tris/glycine buffer were all obtained from BioRad (Hercules, CA, USA). 2-Mercaptoethanol was provided by Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Methanol was obtained from Fisher Chemical (Ottawa, ON, Canada) and glacial acetic acid from Anachemia (Radnor, PA, USA). Fast Green FCF and Nile Red were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Oakville, ON, Canada).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Dystrophin Protein Analysis by Western Blotting

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Proteins were analyzed by Western blotting. Each protein extract was mixed with one volume of Laemmli sample buffer (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA) and boiled for 5 min. Precision Plus ProteinTM All Blue Standards (Bio-Rad Laboratories) were used as protein size markers. Equal amounts of protein (3 µg) were separated on 4-20% SDS-PAGE gels (Criterion TGX precast Gels, Bio-Rad) and electrotransferred to PVDF membrane using an iBlot2 transfer system (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The membranes were blocked with StartingBlock T20 blocking reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and incubated overnight at 4 ℃ with 1:100 dilutions of antibodies to the N-terminal of dystrophin (NCL-DYSB, Leica Biosystems, Wetzler, Germany), the C-terminal of dystrophin (ab15277, abcam, Cambridge, UK) and a 1:1000 dilution of antibody to vinculin (ab129002, abcam) as a loading control. After washing, the membranes were incubated with a 1:20,000 dilution of secondary HRP-coupled antibody to rabbit for ab15277 and ab129002 (GE Healthcare Life Sciences) and to mouse for NCL-DYSB (GE Healthcare Life Sciences). After washing, the membranes were processed for enhanced chemiluminescence detection using Luminata Forte Western HRP substrate (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). Immunoreactive proteins were visualized by Amersham Imager 680RGB (GE Healthcare Life Sciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Molecular Profiling of Protein Structures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The molecular structure of untreated and ultrasound treated WhPI and SPI was determined by sodium dodecyl sulphate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), using a Mini-Protean 3 Electrophoresis System (Bio-Rad, UK). 100 µL of protein solution at 1 wt. % concentration were added to 1 mL of native sample buffer (Bio-Rad, UK) in 2 mL micro tubes and sealed. A 10 µL aliquot was taken from each sample and loaded onto a Trisacrylamide gel (Bio-Rad, UK; 4-20% Mini Protean TGX Gel, 10 wells). A protein standard (Bio-Rad, UK; Precision Plus Protein TM All Blue Standards) was used to determine the molecular weight of the samples. Gel electrophoresis was carried out initially at 55 V (I > 20 mA) for 10 min, then at 155 V (I > 55 mA) for 45 min in a running buffer (Bio-Rad, UK; 10x Tris/Glycine/SDS Buffer). The gels were removed from the gel cassette and stained with
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Western Blot Protein Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein in sample buffer was denatured under reducing conditions at 57°C for 15 min. Samples and prestained molecular weight marker (Precision Plus Protein All Blue Standards, Biorad) were separated on polyacryamide gels (5, 12% gels; or 4-15% gradient gels) in 25 mM Tris Base, 192 mM glycine, 0.1% SDS. Separated proteins were blotted on polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane [Immobilon-P Transfer membrane, Millipore; transfer buffer: 25 mM Tris base, 192 mM glycine, 20% (v/v) methanol, with or without 0.1% (w/v) SDS]. Coomassie staining of gels was performed to check for efficiency of the transfer. Immunostained bands were visualized using Pierce ECL Western Blotting Substrate (Thermo Scientific) and a Fusion Fx7 Peqlab bioimager. Quantitation of band intensity was performed with Image J 1.46 (National Institute of Health). For quantification integrated density of specific bands was normalized against loading control. Unspecific bands and Coomassie-stained membranes were used as loading control. Quantification of gel or blot intensities was performed with data obtained within a linear range of exposure.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Western Blot Protein Quantification Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Western blot analysis was performed to visualize the protein and quantify its relative expression in our samples. Protein was isolated, sample loading mix was added and samples were heated as described in the section ‘Protein isolation’. Samples and a protein marker (Precision Plus Protein™ All Blue Standards; Bio-Rad) were run on a 16.5% Criterion pre-cast Tris-Tricine Peptide gel (Bio-Rad) using Tris/Tricine/SDS (TTS) running buffer (Bio-Rad) at 100–150 V. Next, protein was transferred to a 0.2 μm nitrocellulose trans-blot membrane (Bio-Rad) using a Trans-Blot Turbo Transfer System (Bio-Rad). After transfer, the blot was washed briefly with 0.1% Tween 20 in PBS (PBST) and was then blocked for 30′ with 5% milk (Protifar, Nutricia) in PBST. The blot was incubated with primary antibodies diluted in 5% milk/PBST overnight at 4°C. The next day, the blot was rinsed with PBST before incubation with the secondary antibodies. Secondary antibodies were diluted in PBST and were incubated for 60 min at RT. Next, the blot was rinsed with PBST and placed in dH2O. Blots were scanned using a LI-COR Odyssey Imaging System and analysis was performed using LI-COR Odyssey 3.0 software. Antibodies used are listed in Supplementary Material, Table S1B.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

SDS-PAGE Analysis and Antibacterial Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Twenty microliters of the protein sample was mixed with 5 μL of loading buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 6.8, 100 mM DTT, 2% (w/v) SDS, 0.1% bromophenol blue, 10% (v/v) glycerol). The mixture was incubated at room temperature for 30–60 min, and then loaded on polyacrylamide gel (with 15% w/v acrylamide) in duplicates. After electrophoresis, the gel was cut into two halves, each with a lane of the sample and molecular weight standard (Precision Plus Protein All Blue standards, Biorad, Hercules, CA, USA); one half was stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue R 250 while the other was tested for antibacterial activity by the method described earlier [53 (link)]. For the latter, the gel was fixed immediately in a solution of 20% isopropanol and 10% acetic acid for 2 h, washed in distilled water for 6 h, placed in a sterile Petri dish and overlaid with 15 mL of soft MH agar (0.5×) seeded with the test strain (G. stearothermophilus strain 10), and incubated at 60 °C for 12 h for development of the inhibition zone (Scheme 1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Muscle Protein Identification by Mass Spectrometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Aliquots of muscle homogenate (25 μg per sample) were solubilized in Laemmli sample buffer (BioRad Laboratories, Inc., CA, USA), denatured by boiling at 100°C for 5 min and separated by SDS-PAGE. Molecular weight standards (Precision Plus Protein All Blue Standards, BioRad) were also run on each gel to identify the proteins molecular weights. One-dimensional gels were stained by Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250 (BioRad), and the stained gel images were semiquantitatively analyzed using the Image Studio Lite 3.1.4 software for Macintosh (LI-COR Biosciences, NE, USA).
Bands of interest were manually excised and sent for identification by peptide mass fingerprint to the Inbiotec S.L. (León, Spain) proteomics laboratory, where the samples were processed and analyzed with a 4800 Proteomics Analyzer matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF/TOF) mass spectrometer (ABSciex, MA, USA) according to the previously described methods of Oliván et al [25 ]. A database search on Mascot Generic Files combining MS and MS/MS spectra was performed using Mascot v 2.2 from Matrix Science through the Global Protein Server v 3.6 (ABSciex). When the Mascot score was greater than 85 points, the identified protein was considered a valid candidate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!