The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Calcusyn software program

Manufactured by Biosoft
Sourced in United Kingdom, United States, Macao

Calcusyn is a software program designed for data analysis and calculations related to cell growth, drug interactions, and dose-effect relationships. The software provides tools for quantitative analysis of combined drug effects, including the determination of synergy or antagonism between multiple compounds.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

17 protocols using calcusyn software program

1

Synergistic Drug Combination Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The effect of the combined drugs was analyzed using the Calcusyn software program (Biosoft, Cambridge, UK) and CI methods derived from the median effect principle of Chou and Talalay [30 (link)] to determine whether the combined treatment of two compounds was additive or synergistic. The CI was calculated by the formula [31 (link)]; a CI of 1 indicated an additive effect between the two compounds, whereas a CI > 1 or CI < 1 indicated antagonism or synergism, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Cell Viability Assay and Combination Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cell counting kit-8 assay (Dojindo Molecular Technologies) was carried out according to the manufacturer's guidelines and as previously described [37 (link)]. IC50s were calculated from sigmoidal dose-response curves utilizing Prism. The combination effect was determined by the combination index (CI) method [27 (link)] using the Calcusyn software program (Biosoft). Data from cell viability assays were expressed as the fraction of growth inhibition by the individual drugs or the combination in drug-treated cells. Synergism was indicated by a CI values less than 1 and antagonism by a CI value more than 1 at 50% effect (Fraction Affected = 0.5).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Evaluating Peptide Antiviral Activity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Inhibitory activities of peptides on infection by laboratory-adapted HIV-1 X4 strain IIIB and HIV-1 R5 strain Bal, and HIV-1 clinical strains, as well as T20-, T2635- and HP23-resistant strains, were determined as described previously [52 (link)]. For each well of the 96-well plate, 104 MT-2 cells or CEMx174 5.25 M7 cells with graded concentrations of peptide were infected by 100 μL TCID50 of the HIV-1 virus X4 or R5 strains, respectively. After overnight culture, the medium was replaced with fresh RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% FBS. Fifty microliters of culture supernatant were collected from each well on the fourth day for MT-2 cells and the seventh day for CEMx174 5.25 M7 cells. The supernatant was mixed with equal volumes of 5% Triton X-100. The p24 antigen was detected by ELISA as previously described [53 (link)]. IC50 values were calculated using the Calcusyn software program (Biosoft, Ferguson, MO, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Synergistic Anticancer Effects of MLN8237 and Nutlin-3

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CAL-51 cells were plated in 96-well plates, allowed to adhere overnight then exposed to increasing doses of MLN8237 (0 – 200 nmol/L), Nutlin-3 (0 – 20.0 µmol/L) or the combination for 96 hours. Proliferation was assessed using the SRB method as described above and synergy was determined using the Chou and Talalay method using the Calcusyn software program (Biosoft) (21 (link)). For each combination, the combination index (CI) was calculated with synergy indicated by a CI < 1, additivity by a CI = 1, and antagonism by a CI > 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

MTT Cell Viability and Synergy Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The viability of the cells was measured with the TACS™ MTT cell proliferation assay (TREVIGEN systems) in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, cells were plated in 96-well plates at a concentration of 2000-20000 cells/100 μl/well. The next day, drugs were added at different concentrations; all experiments were performed in triplicate. The plates were incubated for six days at 37°C. Then, 10 μl of the MTT solution was added to each well and the plates were incubated for an additional four hours at 37°C. Then, a detergent solution (200 μl/well) was added and mixed thoroughly to dissolve the dark-blue crystals. The absorbance of the converted dye was measured spectrophotometrically with a microplate reader (Vmax, Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) at 570 nm (test) and 650 nm (reference). Cell survival was calculated as the percentage of MTT inhibition as follows: % survival = (mean experimental absorbance/mean control absorbance) × 100 [46 (link)].
The possible synergistic effect of MLN8237 and IM was analyzed with the CalcuSyn software program (Biosoft, Ferguson, MO, USA), which is based on the Chou and Talalay method [24 (link)]. The combination index (CI) was calculated with CalcuSyn software. For the CI, a value >1 is defined as antagonism, equal to 1 as additivity, and <1 as synergy. The experiment was performed in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Cell Viability and Combination Effects

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell viability was evaluated by the Cell Counting Kit-8 assay (Dojindo Molecular Technologies), according to the manufacturer’s guidelines and as previously described [23 (link)]. The half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values were calculated from dose-response curves utilizing Prism. The combination effect was determined by the combination index (CI) method [24 (link)] using the Calcusyn software program (Biosoft). Data from cell viability assays were expressed as the fraction of growth inhibition by the individual drugs or the combination in drug-treated cells. Synergism was indicated by a CI values less than 1 and antagonism by a CI value more than 1 at 50% effect (Fraction Affected = 0.5).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Cytotoxicity Evaluation of Test Compound

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cytotoxicity of a test compound was determined, as previously described (Furuta et al., 2002 (link); Han et al., 2011 (link)) by measuring cell viability in the presence of various compound concentrations. Briefly, 100 μl MDCK cells (0.5 × 105 cells/ml) were dispensed into wells of a 96-well plate and incubated at 37°C/5% CO2 for 24 h. The test compound at the serial dilution in 100 μL of DMEM without serum was added to the cells. After culture for 72 h, cell viability was measured using the Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8), which was purchased from Dojindo Laboratory (Kumamoto, Japan), and using a spectrophotometer (Ultra 384, Tecan, NC, United States). The percent cytotoxicity (=100% – % cell viability) was calculated, and CC50 (half-maximal cytotoxic concentration) of the test compound was determined using the Calcusyn software program (Biosoft, Ferguson, MO, United States) (Chou and Talalay, 1984 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Synergistic Drug Combination Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Combination analysis of treatment with foretinib and lapatinib was performed using the Calcusyn software program (Biosoft, Cambridge, UK), which calculates a combination index, according to Chou and Talalay-derived equations [36 (link)]. CI <1, =1, and >1 represent synergistic, additive, and antagonist effects, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Cytotoxic Drug Combination Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Student’s t-test was applied to derive statistical significance. Mice survival was calculated with GraphPad Prism software (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). Cytotoxic activity of drug combinations was calculated using isobologram analysis and CalcuSyn software program (Biosoft, Great Shelford, Cambridge, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Evaluating Synergistic Drug Combinations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical significance of differences observed in drug-treated vs. control culture was determined using the Student’s t test. Statistical significance of differences observed in tumour volumes in marizomib-, pomalidomide- or marizomib plus pomalidomide-treated mice was determined using a Student’s t test. P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. Survival of mice was determined by GraphPad Prism software (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA). Isobologram analysis(Chou and Talalay 1984 (link)) was performed by using the CalcuSyn software program (Biosoft, Ferguson, MO, and Cambridge, United Kingdom). A combination index value < 1.0 indicates synergism, and values > 1.0 indicate antagonism.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!