The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Double beam uv vis spectrophotometer

Manufactured by Shimadzu
Sourced in Japan

The Shimadzu double-beam UV-VIS spectrophotometer is a laboratory instrument that measures the absorption or transmission of light by a sample over the ultraviolet and visible regions of the electromagnetic spectrum. It is designed to provide accurate and reliable measurements of the absorbance or transmittance of light through a sample, which can be used to determine the concentration of various substances in a sample.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

21 protocols using double beam uv vis spectrophotometer

1

DPPH Antioxidant Activity Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antioxidant activity of the isolated compounds was determined by a 2,2-diphenyl-1-picryl-hydrazyl (DPPH) assay [48 (link)]. A 0.5 mM DPPH solution was prepared by dissolving 19.7 mg of DPPH in 100 ml of distilled methanol and kept in the dark for 45 min at room temperature. Methanoic solution of the isolated compounds and of ascorbic acid as a standard were prepared (2.0 mg/ml each) and diluted to lower concentrations (1000, 500, 250, 125, 62.5 µg/ml). The prepared solutions and DPPH (2000 µl each) were mixed in a cuvette and kept in the dark for 15 min to stabilize. The absorbance of the mixture was measured at 517 nm on a Shimadzu UV–VIS double-beam spectrophotometer against a blank. The concentration of the compound (antioxidant) required to decrease the initial DPPH concentration by 50% (IC50) was calculated using Logit regression analysis. A lower IC50 value corresponded to a larger scavenging power. All experiments were performed in triplicate and values were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Spectrophotometric Quantification of Drug Content

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Three randomly selected films of each optimized formula were separately transferred to 250 mL stoppered conical flask and 100 mL methanol was added.32 Solutions were shaken for 24 hours followed by sonication for 15 minutes. The drug absorbance was spectrophotometrically measured at λmax 281 nm (Shimadzu UV/Vis double beam spectrophotometer) after filtration on 0.45 membrane filter and the drug content was calculated using an equation obtained from previously constructed standard calibration curve in methanol. Average value of drug content in the three tested samples was recorded with standard deviation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Spectrophotometric Determination of Peanut Extract

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
6 tablets from each batch were individually crushed in a mortar and transferred into 100 ml volumetric flask and the volume was made up with phosphate buffer (pH 6.8) and sonicated for 10 min. Then 1 ml from the above solution was pipetted out and filtered through a 0.45um filter paper. The absorbance of the solution was determined spectrophotometrically using a UV/Vis double beam spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan) at 276.5 nm and the drug content was determined from the calibration graph of the peanut extract.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Spectrophotometric Determination of Sun Protection Factor

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The sun protection factor was determined using a modified method reported by Dutra et al. [12 ]. Each crude extract (0.1 g) was dissolved in 50 ml of ethanol to make a solution of concentration 2 mg/ml without ultra-sonication. The absorption data of each sample was measured using Shimadzu UV-VIS double beam spectrophotometer against ethanol as a blank. The absorption data were obtained for every 5 nm interval between the range of 290 to 320 nm, and four determinations were made at each point and the sun protection factor was determined using the Mansur equation.
SPFspectrophotometric=CF×λ=290λ=320EEλ×Iλ×Abse¨
Where CF is the correction factor (=10), EE is the erythemal effect spectrum, I is the solar intensity, and Abs is the absorbance.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

In Vitro Drug Release of Sublingual Tablets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The drug release rate from the prepared sublingual tablet formulations was investigated in the USP XXIV dissolution testing apparatus II (paddle method) in 500 mL phosphate buffer (pH 6.8) as the dissolution medium maintained at 37°C±0.5°C at 50 rpm. At predetermined time intervals (2, 5, 7.5, 10, 15, and 20 minutes), 5 mL of dissolution medium was withdrawn with replacement. The absorbance of the drug in each sample was measured spectrophotometrically at λmax 272 nm using a Shimadzu UV/Vis double beam spectrophotometer, after filtration on 0.45 membrane filter. The cumulative percentage of drug release was calculated using an equation obtained from previously constructed standard calibration curve. The mean of six determinations was considered.22
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantitative Determination of Drug Content

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Five tablets samples of each formula were separately crushed in a mortar and transferred to 100-mL volumetric flask. The flasks were brought to volume by phosphate buffer with pH 6.8 and sonicated for 10 minutes. A 1 mL of the prepared solution was filtered through a 0.45-µm filter and diluted to 25 mL with phosphate buffer. The absorbance of the solution was then measured spectrophotometrically at λmax 272 nm using a UV/Vis double beam spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan) and the drug content was calculated using K obtained from the slope of the constructed calibration curve of the drug in phosphate buffer with pH 6.8.20
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Liquisolid Formulation Drug Release

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The drug release rate from the prepared liquisolid formulations was investigated in the USP XXIV dissolution testing apparatus II (UDT-804 paddle dissolution apparatus, Logan, UT) in 900 ml of phosphate buffer (pH 6.8) as the dissolution medium maintained at 37 ± 0.5 °C at 50 rpm. At pre-determined time intervals (5, 10, 15, 25, 30, 45, 60 and 90 min) 5 ml sample was withdrawn with replacement. The absorbance of the drug was spectrophotometrically measured at λmax 235 nm (Shimadzu UV/Vis double beam spectrophotometer) after filtration on 0.45 membrane filter. The cumulative percentage of drug release was calculated using an equation obtained from previously constructed standard calibration curve. For comparison, the dissolution rate of drug from conventional tablets prepared using the same excipients without adding the liquid vehicle by direct compression were also determined. The mean of six determinations was considered.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Dissolution Profiling of Oral Films

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The drug release rate from the prepared oral films was studied in the United States Pharmacopeia XXIV dissolution testing apparatus II (UDT-804 paddle dissolution apparatus; United States Pharmacopeia, North Bethesda, MD, USA). For that, film sample (2×2 cm) of each formula was added to 250 mL of phosphate buffer (pH 6.8) dissolution medium maintained at 37°C±0.5°C and stirred at 50 rpm. At predetermined time intervals (0, 5, 10, 15, 20, and 30 minutes), 5 mL sample was withdrawn with replacement. The absorbance of the drug was spectrophotometrically measured at 281 nm which was experimentally determined as the drug λmax (Shimadzu UV/Vis double beam spectrophotometer) after filtration on 0.45 μm membrane filter. The cumulative percentage of drug release was calculated using an equation obtained from previously constructed standard calibration curve.32 For comparison, the dissolution rate of plain drug and its release rate from conventional alginate films (prepared using the same excipients) were also determined. The mean of six determinations was considered.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Antioxidant Activity via DPPH Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antioxidant activity was evaluated by the DPPH radical scavenging activity [13 (link), 14 (link)]. DPPH radical solution (0.002%, w/v) in methanol was prepared, and a volume of 1800 μL was added to 200 μL of the sample diluted with phosphate buffer (0.1 M), well vortexed, and incubated for 60 min in dark room at room temperature. The absorbance of each sample at 520 nm was measured using Shimadzu UV-VIS double-beam spectrophotometer. Methanol was used as a blank, while DPPH solution in methanol served as control. The antioxidant activity was expressed as the percentage inhibition of DPPH radical. The experiments were conducted in triplicate, and the mean values were used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Comparative Transcorneal Permeation of Bromfenac

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Comparative in vitro transcorneal permeation of bromfenac through marketed eyedrops and ChS-CS-NPs was performed in goat cornea according to a previous report.[14 35 ] The goat cornea was mounted between donor and receiver compartments of Franz diffusion cell keeping epithelial surface toward donor side. 100 μL of marketed eyedrops (0.09%) or an equivalent amount of NPs suspended in 100 μL STF was poured into the donor compartment while receiver compartment was filled with STF (5 mL). All of the study was conducted at 32 ± 0.5°C; samples were withdrawn periodically (1 mL) up to 3 h and quantitatively analyzed at absorption maxima (λmax) 270 nm by using UV-VIS spectrophotometer (double beam, Shimadzu, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!