The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Epr3947

Manufactured by Roche
Sourced in United Kingdom

EPR3947 is a laboratory equipment product manufactured by Roche. It is designed for the detection and analysis of various biological samples. The core function of EPR3947 is to provide accurate and reliable data for research and scientific applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

6 protocols using epr3947

1

Hereditary Cancer Screening Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pedigree analyses were done for all the families within the study. For those fulfilling clinical criteria for potential presence of Lynch syndrome according to Bethesda Guidelines [24 (link)], we proceeded with immunohistochemistry to evaluate the expression of mismatch repair proteins. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed on 3-μm-thick tissue sections from paraffin-embedded, formalin-fixed tumour. The OptiView DAB IHC Detection kit on the Benchmark ULTRA staining module (Ventana) was used according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Staining with four antibodies MLH1 (M1, Ventana), MSH2 (G219–1129, Ventana), MSH6 (SP93, Ventana) and PMS2 (EPR3947, Ventana) were evaluated. A case was reported as MMR-deficient (dMMR) when displaying total or partial nuclear loss of expression in tumour cells, with retained expression in adjacent normal tissue as a positive control. Expression was reported as MMR proficient (pMMR) when nuclear staining was retained both in tumour cells and positive internal controls. In case of loss of expression of one or more of these proteins, we did further a DNA sequencing analysis on the genes of interest. For those who fulfilled criteria for HDGC according to The International Gastric Cancer Linkage Consortium [13 (link)], CDH1genetic screening was performed using DNA sequencing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunohistochemical Analysis of MMR Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Four 3‐μm‐thick sections of FFPE samples were made for IHC analysis and stored at 37°C overnight. We used two auto‐staining systems. Protein expression was evaluated with mutL homolog 1 (MLH1) (M1; Ventana Medical Systems; Roche Group), mutS homolog 2 (MSH2) (G219‐1129; Ventana Medical Systems), mutS homolog 6 (MSH6) (44; Ventana Medical Systems), and postmeiotic segregation 1 homolog 2 (PMS2) (EPR3947; Ventana Medical Systems) antibodies using the Ventana BenchMark XT system (Roche). Protein expression was evaluated with MLH1 (ES05; Agilent), MSH2 (FE11; Agilent), MSH6 (EP49; Agilent), and PMS2 (EP51; Agilent) antibodies using the Autostainer Link48 (Agilent).27, 28 All sections were evaluated by a medical technologist (K.A.) and a pathologist (T.O). Tumors with completely absent nuclear staining of at least one of MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, or PMS2 were classified as dMMR.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comprehensive Multi-Platform MSI/MMR Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A combination of multiple test platforms was used to determine the MSI or MMR status of the profiled samples, including fragment analysis (FA, Promega, Madison, WI), IHC (MLH1, M1 antibody; MSH2, G2191129 antibody; MSH6, 44 antibodies; and PMS2, EPR3947 antibody (Ventana Medical Systems, Inc., Tucson, AZ) and NGS (7000 target microsatellite loci were examined and compared to the reference genome hg19 from the University of California). The three platforms generated highly concordant results as previously reported41 (link) and in the rare cases of discordant results, the MSI or MMR status of the tumor was determined in the order of IHC, FA, and NGS.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunostaining of FFPE Tumor Specimens

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor specimens were prepared by the standard procedures in Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Kyoto University Hospital. A board-certificated pathologist selected multiple and separate cancer lesions from a single tumor. Specimens of FFPE cancer spheroids were prepared as previously reported [14 (link)]. These specimens were sectioned at 4-μm thickness, and stained with H&E or immunostained for MLH-1 (M1, Ventana, Tucson, AZ, USA), MSH2 (G219-1129, Ventana), MSH6 (EPR3945, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), or PMS2 (EPR 3947, Ventana) followed by hematoxylin counterstaining for nuclei.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunohistochemical Analysis of MMR and PD-L1

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
FFPE tissue sections were cut in 5-μm-thick slices, deparaffinized and rehydrated. All slides were sectioned within 2 months of staining. Immunohistochemistry analysis was performed on tumor samples using commercially available detection kits, automated staining techniques (Ventana Benchmark ULTRA system; Roche, Tucson, AZ), and antibodies against MLH1 (M1; Ventana), MSH2 (G219-1129; Ventana), MSH6 (44; Ventana), PMS2 (EPR3947; Ventana) and PD-L1 [8 (link)–28 (link)] (ab205921;Abcam, at 1/250 dilution). Microsatellite instability was assessed using immunostaining patterns for the four genes involved in MMR (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2). In the normal state, the four proteins are supposed to be diffusely expressed; however, in the presence of abnormalities, the expression of these proteins is abolished. Immunohistochemistry is reported to provide a rapid, cost-effective, sensitive (92.3%) and extremely specific (100%) method for the screening of DNA mismatch repair defects [50 (link)]. Samples were dichotomized as having positive or negative staining for each MMR protein. For PD-L1, the expression was evaluated on a quantitative scale, from 0% to 100%, by two pathologists.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Gastric Cancer Tissue Classification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
GC tissues were classified by an anatomical pathologist (C.M.) into intestinal, diffuse, and mixed types3 (link). In situ hybridization was used to determine EBV burden (EBV Early RNA, Roche). MSI cases were identified using IHC for MLH1 (Leica, ES05, 1:50), PMS2 (Ventana, EPR3947), MSH2 (Ventana, G219-1129), and MSH6 (BD Biosciences, 44, 1:800). Tumors showing loss of MLH1 and PMS2 expression, with retention for MSH2 and MSH6 were regarded as microsatellite unstable. Patients classified as diffuse but non-EBV and non-MSI were assumed as GS. The remaining patients were termed “others” and not CIN due to lacking supporting evidence. Degree of inflammation of each GC tissue was scored by a pathologist (C.M.) based on the infiltration of immune cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!