The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Spss software for windows version 27

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States

SPSS Software for Windows, version 27, is a statistical analysis software package designed for data management, analysis, and reporting. It provides a comprehensive set of tools for conducting a wide range of statistical analyses, including descriptive statistics, regression analysis, and multivariate techniques. The software is widely used in various fields, including business, research, and academia, to help users gain insights from their data.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

9 protocols using spss software for windows version 27

1

Anti-Xa Levels: Comprehensive Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were evaluated by SPSS software for Windows version 27.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Univariate statistics included t test for independent groups to compare between the two studies. One-way ANOVA was used to compare between the three groups of anti-Xa (LOW, NORMAL, HIGH) for continuous variables. Pearson’s Chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables. Values were reported as mean ± SEM. Pearson’s correlation test was used to assess correlations. Significance level was set at p<0.05. Multiple regression was used as multivariate analysis. The dependent variable was the level of anti-Xa and the independent variables were the significant variables from the univariate analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Dermal Thickening Evaluation in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS software for Windows, version 27.0 (Statistical Package for Social Sciences Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Data are expressed as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). After assessing the normality of data by Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, a one-way ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey’s test or unpaired Student’s t-test was used for statistical analyses, as appropriate. Values of p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Sample size was calculated with a priori power analysis (G*Power Version 3.1.9.2 for Windows; www.gpower.hhu.de, accessed on 12 May 2014), considering dermal thickening as endpoint. A sample size of six mice per group was determined sufficient to have a power > 0.80 at a significance level of p < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Predictors of Clinical Outcomes in Patients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Continuous data with normal distribution are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD), and non-normally distributed data are presented as median and interquartile range (IQR). All dichotomous data are presented as numbers and percentages [n (%)]. For group comparisons, Student’s t-test or one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for normally distributed continuous variables, Mann-Whitney U-test or Kruskal-Wallis H-test was used for non-normally distributed continuous variables, and the Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test was used for dichotomous variables. To test the correlations between two continuous variables, we used Pearson’s correlation for normally distributed data and Spearman’s rank correlation for non-normally distributed data. To investigate the risk factors, independent variables were included in a binary logistic regression model using the enter method. The odd ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) obtained in the regression analysis were calculated. The optimal cut-off points were determined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Comparing the area under the curve (AUC) of ROC was performed using the Delong test. Data were analysed using SPSS software for Windows (version 27) and the R programming language, and two-tailed p-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Statistical Analysis of Therapy Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were analysed using SPSS Software for Windows, version 27 (SPSS, Inc., Cary, N.C., USA). Data are reported as mean ± SD, unless otherwise specified. The comparison between the numerical data before and after treatment was made by non-parametric Wilcoxon test for continuous variables. Non-parametric Mann–Whitney U test has been used for the comparison of numerical data between two different groups of patients as patients undergoing monotherapy vs combined therapy. The comparison between prevalence was performed by chi-squared test corrected by Fisher exact test when necessary. The correlation study was done by calculating Spearman’s correlation coefficients. Significance was set at 5%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Assessing Predictors of Psychological Impairment in Growth Hormone Disorder

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were analysed using SPSS Software for Windows, version 27 (SPSS, Inc.). Data are reported as mean ± s.d., median, or IQR according to their distribution, unless otherwise specified. The comparison between the numerical data was made by one-way ANOVA, followed by the Bonferroni test for the adjustment of multiple comparisons. The comparison between controlled and uncontrolled patients, as well as between surgically and medically treated patients, was performed by independent-samples t-test. The comparison between prevalence was performed by χ2 test corrected by Fisher exact test, when necessary. The correlation study was done by calculating Pearson’s correlation coefficients. Regression analysis was done to identify the best predictors of psychological impairment among GH at diagnosis (expression of baseline disease activity), IGF1 at evaluation (expression of disease control at the time of the study), age, sex, and disease duration. Significance was set at 5%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Statistical Analysis of Research Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The data were analyzed using IBM SPSS software for Windows version 27.0 (IBM SPSS Corp. Armonk, NY, USA). Descriptive statistics, t-tests, chi-squared tests, Fisher’s exact tests and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to evaluate the patients’ demographic data and the characteristics of the research variables. To identify the relationship between changes of the outcome variables, Pearson’s correlations were performed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Analyzing Sleep Duration and Cardiometabolic Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were graphically assessed for normality using analysis of mean, median, skewness, kurtosis and Kolmogorov–Smirnoff test. Skewed data were log10‐transformed prior to analysis. Independent sample t‐tests were used to compare continuous data between the intervention and control study groups, and between moderately and severely restricted sleep groups. Using epi.2by2 library in R software, RR and 95% CI were calculated between categorical variables. Chi‐square tests were used to compare categorical data between the study groups. Associations between sleep duration and pregnancy outcomes (GDM, pre‐eclampsia, breastfeeding) and metabolic parameters were compared using Pearson’s correlation. Where significant differences were found, these were further analysed using multivariate regression analysis and the standardised Beta coefficients were reported. The linear regressions were controlled for known confounders for cardiometabolic health including maternal age, ethnicity, education, BMI, and control group status. A two‐tailed p‐value of <0.05 was considered significant. All statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS software for Windows version 27.0 (SPSS Inc.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Factors Associated with Multidrug-Resistant Bacteremia

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Values are presented in the form of median (interquartile range) or frequency (percentage). The baseline characteristics of patients with MDR and non MDR bacteremia were compared using the Mann–Whitney U tests for continuous variables or the χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables. Logistic regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with MDR. Multivariable analyses were performed for variables that showed p values < 0.2 in the univariable analyses. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software version 27 for Windows (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). A two-tailed p < 0.05 was considered to reflect a statistically significant result.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Statistical Analysis of Incision Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data management and statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS software version 27 for Windows (IBM Corporation, New York, USA). The primary and secondary outcomes were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis and presented per incision. The primary outcome was presented as frequencies and odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Uni and bilateral incisions were analyzed separately. For frequencies of descriptive data, Fisher’s exact test was used in unilateral incisions while McNemar’s test was used in bilateral incisions. The obtained p-values of the separate analyses for unilateral and bilateral incisions were then combined using Fisher’s method of combining p-values [16 ]. P-values of < 0.05 were considered significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!