The largest database of trusted experimental protocols
Sourced in United States

The EA1112 is a laboratory instrument manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific. It is designed to perform elemental analysis, specifically the determination of carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, and sulfur content in a variety of sample types. The EA1112 uses combustion and gas chromatography techniques to provide accurate and reliable analytical results.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

14 protocols using ea1112

1

Seston and Microplankton Sampling Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The six large mesocosms and the 12 microcosms were sampled (1 L) for sestonic C, N, and P and for the microplankton abundance, Chl a concentration, and PP. Samples for C, N, P, and Chl a, were immediately transported to the laboratory in cold, dark, and thermally insulated containers. In the laboratory, a volume of 300 mL from each sample was filtered onto pre-combusted GF/F Whatman filters (450 °C for 1.5 h) for seston elemental analysis, filters were dried at 60 °C for 48 h and stored at −20 °C until analysed. C and N were analysed on a Perkin Elmer 2400 (Perkin Elmer, USA) (La Caldera) and Thermo Finnigan EA1112 (Thermo Finnigan, Italy) CHN (Los Cántaros) elemental analyzers and P was analysed with persulfate digestion followed by molybdate reaction60 . Chl a was measured by filtering a volume of 300 mL at <100 mm Hg onto Whatman GF/F glass microfibre filters (25 mm in diameter) and extracting in a 90% acetone solution (at 4 °C for 24 h in the dark). Determinations were made in a Turner AU 10 fluorometer in Los Cántaros and LS 55 Perkin Elmer fluorometer in La Caldera60 . To quantify abundance of phytoplankton, heterotrophic nanoflagellates (HNF), and small ciliates, we followed the procedures described in Medina-Sánchez et al.12 (link) (Supplementary text S4).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Measuring Aboveground Plant Nitrogen Uptake

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The aboveground plant uptake of N in each treatment replicate was measured prior to each irrigation and prior to defoliation at the end of the season for the 1 m (linear) of plants that were removed prior to each soil sampling event. The main plant stalk was cut at the soil surface and the aboveground biomass placed in a bag. Immediately after cutting, the plants were returned to the site laboratory, weighed and the samples were dried in a dehydrator for 1 week at 70°C. The samples were re-weighed and then chopped and coarsely ground. Sub-samples were finely ground and total N concentration (N%) was measured by combustion analyser (EA1112, Thermo Finnigan, San Jose, CA, USA). The plant uptake N represents the apparent net soil mineralised and residual inorganic N left in the system (PlantN) and is the amount of N that the plant accumulates during the cropping season (Villar et al. 2014) (link).
where biomass is the total dried mass of the sampled plant and N% is the N content of the plant sample. An estimate of plant N uptake can be calculated from lint yield (Rochester and Bange 2016) using Eqn 8:
where x is the lint yield harvested from plots that have not received N fertiliser.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Aldehyde Content Determination in DAC and c-DAC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The aldehyde content on DAC and c-DAC samples was determined using
the hydroxylamine hydrochloride titration method.29 (link) The nitrogen content of c-DAC was determined using the
CNS (carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur) elemental analysis technique (Thermo
Scientific, EA1112). Detailed calculation methods of the aldehyde
content and GT’s degree of substitution are described in the Supporting Information (sections S1 and S2).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comprehensive Sorbent Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Brunauer–Emmett–Teller technique (3Flex, Micrometrics, Norcross, GA, USA) was used to measure the specific surface area of each sorbent with N2 adsorption isotherms. X-ray diffraction (XRD; D8 Discover, Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) measurements were used to identify the crystalline and non-crystalline properties of each sorbent. To analyze the surface structure and microphotography of each sorbent, field emission scanning electron microscopy (Merlin compact, Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) measurements were performed. An X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis was conducted with a spectrophotometer (K-Alpha+, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) using an Al Kα source (1486.6 eV of photons).
For the chemical analysis, pH and electric conductivity (EC) were measured using a pH meter (MP220, Mettler Toledo, Worthington, OH, USA) and an EC meter (S230, Mettler Toledo), respectively, after mixing each sorbent with deionized water at a 1:5 (w/v) ratio for 1 h. The total nitrogen and total carbon were measured using an elemental analyzer (EA1112, Thermo Fisher Scientific). The temperature in the EA reactor was set to 1000 °C, and the flow rate of the carrier gas (He, O2, and air) was maintained at 0.12 L/min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Characterization of Waste Soot Microstructure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The shape and microstructure of the waste soot was observed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEM-2100F, JEOL, Akishima, Tokyo, Japan) at an accelerating voltage of 200 kV. The specific surface area of soot was determined from the N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms obtained using a Quantachrome sorption analyzer (Autosorb-1, Boynton Beach, FL, USA) by the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) method. Before the N2 adsorption-desorption experiments, all samples were heated under N2 at 200 °C for 2 h to remove moisture. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was performed using a TGA Q500 device (TA Instrument, New Castle, DE, USA) to analyze the weight of the soot residue. To obtain the elemental composition, a carbon-hydrogen-nitrogen-sulfur (CHNS) analyzer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, EA1112, Waltham, MA, USA) was used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Organic Carbon Analysis of Rock Core Clay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The portions of rock cores examined as described above were powdered using a mortar and pestle. Clay-sized fractions in powdered samples were suspended in distilled and deionised water, centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 5 min, and then the supernatant was collected. Next, the clay fraction was collected from the supernatant by centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 10 min and dried at 50 °C and then subjected to organic carbon characterizations. KBr pellets made of the clay fractions were analyzed with Fourier transformed infrared-ray (FT-IR) spectrometry (Perkin Elmer Spectrum 2000, Tokyo, Japan) to clarify lipids in extant microorganisms. The pellets in the specimen chamber filled by N2 gas were analyzed by infrared rays through KBr beam-splitter with the MCT detector. Representatvive FT-IR spectra were obtained by averaging 100 individual spectra. The contents of organic carbon in the clay fractions were measured using a mass spectrometer (Thermo Electron DELTAplus Advantage; Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA) connected to an elemental analyzer (EA1112, Thermo Electron DELTAplus Advantage) through a Conflo III interface. The clay fractions were heated at 100 °C in 3% HCl to eliminate carbonate minerals, washed twice with distilled, deionized water, and dried.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Characterization of Annealed Nanomaterials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An elemental analysis (EA) was performed before and after annealing using a Thermo Fisher Scientific EA1112. X-Ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were recorded on a Rigaku SmartLab X-ray diffractometer equipped with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5418 Å). Raman spectra were obtained using a Lambda Ray P-1 Raman spectrometer with 532 nm laser excitation. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images were acquired on a JEOL 2010 at an acceleration voltage of 200 kV. Nitrogen sorption isotherms were measured on a MicrotracBEL Corp Belsorp-max. All samples were degassed at 200 °C for 3 h prior to the measurement. The specific surface area was calculated by the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) method. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was performed using mono Al Kα radiation with a Thermo Fisher Scientific ESCALAB 250 spectrometer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Organic Carbon Quantification in Clay Fractions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The powdered core sample was suspended in sterilized deionized water. The supernatant after centrifugation at 3,000 rpm for 5 min contained the clay fraction. The clay fraction was collected by centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 10 min. We measured the organic carbon contents of the powdered core sample and the clay fraction using a mass spectrometer (Thermo Electron DELTAplus Advantage; Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA) connected to an elemental analyzer (EA1112, Thermo Electron DELTAplus Advantage) through a Conflo III interface. Before the measurement, the sample was heated at 100°C in 3% HCl to eliminate carbonate minerals, washed twice with distilled, deionized water, and dried.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Characterization of Organic Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Melting points were determined on a Büchi melting point B-540 apparatus (BÜCHI Labortechnik AG, Flawil, Switzerland) and are uncorrected. Element analyses were performed on a Thermo Finnigan EA1112 (San Jose, CA, USA) at the spectropole of the Aix-Marseille University. Both 1H- and 13C-NMR spectra were determined on a Bruker Avance 250 spectrometer (Wissembourg, France) at the Service de RMN de la Faculté de Pharmacie de Marseille of the Aix-Marseille University and on a Bruker Avance III NanoBay 300 MHz spectrometer at the spectropole of Aix-Marseille University. The 1H- and the 13C-chemical shifts are reported from CDCl3 peaks: 1H (7.26 ppm) and 13C (77 ppm) or Me2SO-d6 (39.6 ppm). Multiplicities are represented by the following notations: s, singlet; d, doublet; t, triplet; q, quartet; m, a more complex multiplet, or overlapping multiplets. The following adsorbents were used for column chromatography: silica gel 60 (Merck, particle size 0.063–0.200 mm, 70–230 mesh ASTM, (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC) was performed on 5 cm × 10 cm aluminum plates coated with silica gel 60 F254 (Merck) in an appropriate solvent.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Precise Determination of Sediment Carbon

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
600 samples were desalinated and powdered prior to compositional measurements. Total Inorganic Carbon (TIC) was determined by carbon coulometer (UIC-CM5130). The accuracy of TIC content of standard reference material (Ultrapure CaCO3 from Sigma-Aldrich) was 12.0 ± 0.25 wt%. Total carbon (TC) content was measured by the elemental analyzer (Thermo EA1112). Total organic Carbon (TOC) content was calculated by subtracting TIC from TC. 2, 4-DNP was used as a calibration standard for TC. Reproducibility for TC in NIST-SRM1944 sediment standard was found to be 4.4 ± 0.2 wt%. Carbon isotope measurement of total organic carbon (δ13CTOC) was carried out on decarbonated sediments. A Thermo-Finnegan Delta-V-Plus continuous flow isotope ratio mass spectrometer coupled to an elemental analyzer (Thermo EA1112) was used for C isotope ratio measurements. The external standard reproducibility calculated for δ13CTOC using IAEA-C3 cellulose standard was −24.7 ± 0.1‰ (VPDB). The results are presented in Supplementary Table 2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!