The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Genetools software

Manufactured by Syngene
Sourced in United Kingdom, United States, Spain

GeneTools software is a powerful bioinformatics tool used in molecular biology and genetics research. It provides a comprehensive suite of analysis and visualization capabilities for DNA, RNA, and protein sequences. The software enables researchers to perform tasks such as sequence alignment, primer design, and gene expression analysis. GeneTools software is a versatile tool that can be utilized across various applications in the life sciences industry.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

262 protocols using genetools software

1

Quantitative Western Blot Analysis of MYCN in Tumors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tumors were lysed in radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer [1% NP-40, 0.1% SDS, 50 mM tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, and 1 mM EDTA] supplemented with 1× or 2× Halt protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Primary antibodies included anti-MYCN (1:1000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-53993) and anti-actin (1:1000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-47778). Secondary antibodies included horseradish peroxidase–conjugated anti-mouse or anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G (1:2000 or 1:5000; Thermo Fisher Scientific, 31430 or 31460). Proteins were detected by enhanced chemiluminescence detection kits (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and autoradiographs were obtained with a G:BOX Chemi XT4 (Syngene) and a charge-coupled device camera. Quantification analysis was performed using Syngene GeneTools software (Syngene).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantitative Gyrase Inhibition Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
One unit (the amount of enzyme required to fully supercoil the substrate) of M. tuberculosis gyrase was incubated with 0.5 μg of relaxed pBR322 DNA in a 30-μL reaction mixture at 37°C for 30 min under the following conditions: 50 mM HEPES, KOH (pH 7.9), 6 mM magnesium acetate (MgOAc), 4 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), 1 mM ATP, 100 mM potassium glutamate, 2 mM spermidine, and 0.05 mg/mL BSA. Each reaction was stopped by the addition of 30 μL chloroform–iso-amyl alcohol (24:1) and 20 μL stop dye (40% sucrose, 100 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 10 mM EDTA, 0.5 μg/mL bromophenol blue) before being loaded on a 1.0% TAE (0.04 mM Tris-acetate, 0.002 mM EDTA) gel run at 80 V for 3 h. Bands were visualized by ethidium staining for 10 min, destained for 10 min in water, analyzed by gel documentation equipment (Syngene, Cambridge, UK), and quantitated using Syngene GeneTools software. Raw gel data (fluorescent band volumes) collected from Syngene GeneTools gel analysis software were calculated as a percentage of the 100% control (the fully supercoiled DNA band) and converted to percent inhibition. The raw gel data were analyzed using SigmaPlot version 13 (2015). The global curve fit nonlinear regression tool was used to calculate IC50 data using the following equation: exponential decay, single, two-parameter f = a × exp(−b × x).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Western Blot Analysis of Cellular Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were lysed on ice in 1× RIPA buffer and centrifuged at 10,000 g for 15 min. The supernatants were boiled with LDS sample buffer and proteins separated using 4–12% NuPage gels (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY). Antibodies used in the current study: CREB, FLCN, phospho‐ACC (S79), pS6 (Ser 235/Ser236), phospho‐MAPK p44/42 (T202/Y204), cofilin, and phospho‐cofilin (Ser 3) antibodies (Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA); p62, actin and p120 catenin (Sigma); PKP4 (Progen Biotechnik, Heidelberg, Germany); GAPDH (Abcam, Cambridge, MA). Chemiluminescent signals were captured using a Syngene G‐BOX iChemi XT imager and quantified with Syngene GeneTools software (Syngene, Cambridge, U.K.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Western Blotting of SREBP Isoforms

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For Western blotting of precursor and nuclear SREBP-1 and SREBP-2 and NIS, MCF-7 cells were seeded in 6-well plates and incubated as indicated. To prevent degradation of SREBP, MCF-7 cells were treated with 25 μg/mL of the calpain inhibitor N-acetyl-Leu-Leu-Norleucinal 3 h before cell harvesting according to Hua et al. (1996) . Cytosolic and nuclear fractions from et al., 1997) ] and anti-mouse β-actin (1:10,000; Abcam, Cambridge, UK) as a reference protein to control for adequate normalization at room temperature (RT) for 2 h. The membranes were washed and then incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies anti-rabbit IgG (1:10,000; Sigma-Aldrich, Taufkirchen, Germany) for SREBP-1, SREBP-2 and NIS, and anti-mouse IgG (1:10,000; Abcam) for β-actin at RT for 2 h. Afterward, blots were developed using enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) Plus (GE Healthcare, München, Germany). The signal intensities of specific bands were detected with a Bio-Imaging system (Syngene, Cambridge, UK) and quantified using Syngene GeneTools software (nonlinear dynamics; Syngene).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Examining Protein Levels and Cytochrome c Release

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The protein levels in cells were examined using Western blot analysis as described for immunoblotting for LC3. To detect cytochrome c release, the mitochondria-free cytosolic protein fraction was isolated using a mitochondria isolation kit obtained from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Rockford, IL, USA). Antibodies against cytochrome c, mTOR, phospho-mTOR (Ser2481), phospho-mTOR (Ser2448), PARP, Bcl-xL, Bad and Bax were obtained from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA, USA). Antibodies against Bcl-2 and β-actin were obtained from Sigma. The intensity of the immunoreactive bands was determined using GeneTools software (Syngene, Frederick, MD, USA) after scanning the developed films. The results are expressed as the means ± standard deviation (SD) of three independent experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Ubiquitination Assay for Protein Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The protein was isolated using cell lysis buffer (Cell Signaling, Beverly, MA, USA) and the concentrations were measured using the Bradford Protein Assay Kit (AMRESCO, Radnor, PA, USA). Protein lysates were prepared and Western blot analyses were performed as described previously [48 (link)]. For ubiquitination assay, cells were washed three times and then lysed with lysis buffer for 30 min. The cell lysate was centrifuged for 10 min at 12,000 rpm and the rest of homogenates were incubated with ubiquitin antibodies overnight at 4 °C. Protein A/G plus agarose beads (Santa Cruz) were added for another 2 h. The immunoprecipitation beads were washed with cold PBS five times, followed by Western blotting analysis. The levels of expression of β-actin and GAPDH were used as a gel loading control. Densitometric analyses of scanned immunoblotting images were performed using GeneTools software (Syngene version 6.05, Cambridge, UK). Results shown are representative of three separate experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Vaspin-KLK7 Complex Formation Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Complex formation of vaspin and KLK7 was performed as previously described [20 (link)]. Vaspin was incubated with 3 µM recombinant KLK7 (molar ratio protease/serpin 3:1) in the presence or absence of PtdInsPs (molar ratio PtdInsPs/vaspin 0.1, 1 or 10), ufh (molar ratio ufh/vaspin 10) or polyP (polyP3 or polyP45 1−200 molar excess) for 1 min.
Proteins were separated using SDS-PAGE and gels were stained using Coomassie Brilliant Blue. Band intensities were determined by densitometric quantification (Gene tools software, Syngene) and were normalized to the reaction without PtdIns, ufh or polyP. Stoichiometry of inhibition (SI) was estimated from band intensities as previously described [20 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Western Blot Analysis of iNOS in L. monocytogenes-Infected BMDMs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
BMDMs were infected with L. monocytogenes as described above and lysed in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 1 mM EDTA, 5 mM NaF, 2 mM sodium orthovanadate, 1 mM PMSF, 1X complete protease inhibitors). The whole cell lysates were mixed with Laemmli buffer (50 mm Tris–Cl, pH 6.8, 10% glycerol, 2% SDS, 0.1% bromophenol blue, 5% 2-mercaptoethanol), boiled for 5 min, separated on 4–20% polyacrylamide gels (BioRad), transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Bio-Rad), blocked, and probed with the following primary antibodies: monoclonal Ab to iNOS (clone D6B6S, Cell Signaling) and polyclonal Ab to β-actin (Sigma). Membranes were developed using an ECL plus chemiluminescence kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and protein quantification on the Western blots was performed using GeneTools software (Syngene).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

NF-κB Modulation in Insulin-Resistant HepG2 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Insulin resistance was induced in HepG2 cells as previously described. Cells were washed with ice-cold PBS and lysed with a RIPA lysis buffer. For Western blotting, protein samples (20 μg) of sodium oleate induced insulin-resistant HepG2 cells were separated via 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). The proteins were transferred to a PVDF membrane and incubated with primary antibody (anti-NF-κB, anti-IRS1, anti-GLUT4, or anti-GAPDH), followed by a secondary antibody (horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG). The intensity of the immunoblot signal was assayed using Western Bright ECL spray and analyzed quantitatively using GeneTools software from Syngene (Syngene, Cambridge, UK).
To choose the most effective concentration of PDTC, the cells were incubated for 26 h in serum-free DMEM at the different dosages of PDTC or 0.2% BSA and 200 μmol/L sodium oleate. The protein samples were prepared for Western blot experiments and incubated with anti-NF-κB.
Then, the cells were incubated for 2 h in serum-free DMEM and PDTC with the most effective concentration (all PDTC groups). After that, 0.2% BSA and 200 μmol/L sodium oleate and three dosages of OA were added. Next, the cells were incubated for an additional 24 h after preparing the protein samples in Western blot experiments and incubated with anti-IRS1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Fecal Microbiome Profiling via Pyrosequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA extraction from fecal pellets and pyrosequencing analyses were performed as previously described [10 (link),57 (link)]. Composition of the microbiota was assessed by deep pyrosequencing of PCR products originating from the V1-V2 region of the 16S rRNA gene with bar-coded fusion primers containing Roche-454 A or B Titanium sequencing, followed by a unique 8-base barcode sequence (B) and, finally, the 5′ ends of primer A-8FM (5′-CCATCTCATCCCTGCGTGTCTCCGACTCAGBBBBBBBBAGAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG) and of primer B-357R (5′-CCTATCCCCTGTGTGCCTT-GGCAGTCTCAGBBBBBBBBCTGCTGCCTYCCGTA-3′). All PCR reactions were quality controlled for amplicon saturation by quantifying and comparing band intensities of the PCR products after gel electrophoresis with standards using GeneTools software (Syngene). Amplicons from 48 individual samples were pooled in equal amounts, gel-purified, quantified by Pico Green analysis, and used for emulsion PCR (emPCR). After recovery and enrichment for DNA-containing beads, the emPCR products from the 48-sample pools were sequenced on individual regions of 2-region Picotitre plates on a Roche-GS-FLX machine using Titanium sequencing chemistry.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!