The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Poroshell 120 sb c18

Manufactured by Agilent Technologies
Sourced in United States, Italy

The Poroshell 120 SB-C18 is a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) column designed for the separation and analysis of a wide range of organic compounds. It features a 120 Å porous shell particle structure with a C18 stationary phase, providing efficient and high-resolution separations.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

34 protocols using poroshell 120 sb c18

1

LCMS Analysis of Compounds in Positive and Negative Modes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The positive ion mode is adjusted as follows: Agilent Poroshell 120 SB-C18 (100 mm × 4.6 mm, 2.7 μm) is used; the mobile phase consists of 0.1% formic acid water (A)–acetonitrile (B); gradient elution conditions are 0–25 min, 5–40% B; 25–35 min, 40–75% B; 35–40 min, and 75–100% B; the flow rate is 0.8 ml min−1; the column temperature is 30°C; the injection volume is 1 μl; the electrospray ion source (ESI) is detected in the positive ion mode; the drying gas flow is 13 L/min; the drying gas temperature is 350°C; the capillary voltage (Vcap) is 4,000 V; the neutralizer pressure is 45 psig; the fragmentor voltage is 125 V; the skimmer voltage is 65 V; the mass scanning range is 50–1,000 m/z; and the secondary MS collision voltage is 40 eV.
The negative ion mode is set as follows: Agilent Poroshell 120 SB-C18 (100 mm × 4.6 mm, 2.7 μm) is used; the mobile phase consists of water (A)–acetonitrile (B); gradient elution conditions are 0–30 min, 5–100% B; the flow rate is 0.8 ml min−1; the column temperature is 30°C; the injection volume is 5 μl; the drying gas flow is 11 L/min; the drying gas temperature is 250°C; the Vcap is 3,500 V; the neutralizer pressure is 45 psig; the fragmentor voltage is 125 V; the skimmer voltage is 65 V; the mass scanning range is 50–1,000 m/z; and the secondary MS collision voltage is 40 eV (Wang et al., 2021 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

HPLC-ESI-TOF-MS Analysis of GCE, eGCE and Tannic Acid

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
GCE, eGCE and tannic acid were analyzed by high performance liquid chromatography coupled to electrospray ionization-time of flight-mass spectrometry (HPLC-ESI-TOF-MS) [19 (link)], a tandem system. The Agilent 1200 series HPLC consisted of a model G1315D diode array detector (DAD), a G1312B binary Pump, a G1379B vacuum degasser, a G1367C auto-sampler and a G1316B column heater. The concentration of the testing solution was 1mg/mL, and the injection volume was 5 μL. Gradient elution HPLC was applied at a flow rate of 0.4 mL/min with detection at 270 nm. Two solvents were used for the mobile phase: (A) 0.1% formic acid and 10 mM ammonium formate (pH3.0), (B) acetonitrile. Compounds were separated using the following gradient: 0-5 min, 5% B; 5-8 min, 20% B; 20-30 min, 30% B; 30-40 min, 20% B; 40.0-40.1 min, 5% B. The separation of components in GCE was performed on an Agilent column (Poroshell 120 SB-C18, 150mm × 4.6mm, particle size 2.7μm) at 40 °C.
The time of flight (TOF) mass detector (G1969A, Agilent, US) was equipped with electrospray ionization (ESI) interface. The ESI voltage was 3.5 kV, and a mass range of 50-3000 m/z was scanned in negative full scan mode. Data processing was performed on Agilent Mass Hunter (v.B.01.04) software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative Analysis of Phytohormones

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ABA and JA concentrations were determined according to the method described by You et al. [52 (link)] with little modification. First, 2 mL of extracted sap sample were placed into a microcentrifuge tube containing 5 mL extraction buffer composed of isopropanol/hydrochloric acid and 8 μL 1 μg mL−1 deuterated internal standard solutions. Then, 10 mL dichloromethane were added and sap samples were shaken at 4 °C for 30 min and then centrifuged at 13,000× g for 5 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was carefully removed and the lower organic phase was dried by N2 in shade conditions and dissolved in 400 μL methanol (containing 0.1% methane acid), then filtered with a 0.22-mm filter membrane. The purified sample was then subjected to high-performance liquid chromatography‒tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS), fitted with a POROSHELL120 SB-C18 (Agilent Technologies Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) column (2.1 mm × 150 mm; 2.7 mm), at 30 °C. The solvent gradient used was 100% A (99.9% methanol: 0.1% CHOOH) to 100% B (99.9% H2O: 0.1% CHOOH) over 15 min. The injection volume was 2 μL. MS conditions were as follows: the spray voltage was 4500 V; the pressure of the air curtain, nebulizer, and aux gas were 15, 65, and 70 psi, respectively; and the atomizing temperature was 400 °C. The ABA and JA concentrations were calculated with reference to the peak area of the deuterated internal standard.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Metabolomic Analysis of EMT Dynamics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sample preparation: Treatment times of 2, 6, and 12 hours were chosen for the reasons of matching with the RNAseq conditions (2 and 6 hr) and including a condition for later phase of EMT (12hr). A549 cells were treated as follows: no treatment/control,.5 mM eATP, and 10 ng/mL TGF-β. Cell culture metabolism was stopped by briefly incubating in ddH2O, metabolites were extracted by 80% ice cold methanol, and samples were sonicated and centrifuged at 4°C. Metabolites are present in the supernatant, which was removed and freeze dried (44 (link)). Samples were stored in -80°C and analyzed at the Ohio State University Campus chemical instrumentation center (CCIC).
Metabolomics data analysis: Metabolomics study was completed by quantitative untargeted LC-MS utilizing Q-TOF 6545 mass spectrometer connected to an Agilent 1290 UHPLC system with a Poroshell 120 SB-C18 (2 × 100 mm, 2.7-μm particle size) column. Metabolomics data was generated and received from CCIC. Masshunter software (Agilent Technology) was used for acquiring data and peaks were integrated using Progenesis (Agilent Technology). Compounds were identified with XCMS as well as Metaboanalyst 5.0 software. Peak areas were normalized using internal standards and were subjected to relative quantification analyses with control (no treatment).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

HPLC Analysis of Metabolites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The concentrations of L-phenylalanine and 2-phenylethanol were measured by HPLC (HP 1200, Agilent, USA) equipped with a reversed phase column of Poroshell 120 SB-C18 (4.6 × 150 mm, 2.7 micron, Agilent, USA) and a UV absorbance detector (Agilent, USA) at 258 nm with the mobile phase of 70% water and 30% acetonitrile containing 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid at the flow rate of 0.6 mL/min. Organic acids and sugars were measured by HPLC (HP 1200, Agilent, USA) equipped with a cation-exchange column of Aminex HPX-87H (7.8 × 300 mm, BioRad, USA), a refractive index (RI) detector (Agilent, USA), and a UV absorbance detector (Agilent, USA) with the mobile phase of 3 mM sulfuric acid solution at the flow rate of 0.5 mL/min. Acetate, lactate, and shikimate were detected by the UV detector at 210 nm, while the RI detector was used to measure glucose and xylose. Cell growth was monitored by measuring the optical density of cultures at 600 nm (OD600), and one unit of optical density corresponded to 0.31 dry cell weight (DCW) (g/L) [27 (link)]. The determination of reductive activity of AdhA was performed as described previously [16 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantifying Gibberellic Acid in Plant Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Independent duplicate samples of shoot tips from ‘FHSXT’ and ‘QMH’ were analysed for GA content. Approximately 1 g of tissue was ground in liquid nitrogen and then added to 10 mL of extraction solution (Isopropanol/hydrochloric acid mixture). The mixture was shaken for 30 min at 4 °C. Dichloromethane (20 mL) was added to the mixture before shaking for 30 min at 4 °C. The mixture was separated to two layers after centrifugation at 10 000 g for 5 min at 4 °C. The lower layer was collected and dried under N2, then dissolved in 400 μL methanol containing 0.1% formic acid. The extracts were filtered through a 0.22 μm Millipore membranes, and analysed using a HPLC ESI‐MS/MS system (Agilent, America).
The analytical column was a poroshell 120 SB‐C18, 2.1 × 150 mm, with a particle size of 2.7 μm (Agilent, America). The analytical column was sequentially eluted using mobile phase A (methanol containing 0.1% formic acid) and mobile phase B (water containing 0.1% formic acid). The linear gradient for phase A was as follows: 0–2 min, 20%; 2–14 min, 20%–80%; 14–15 min, 80%; 15.1 min, 20%; and 15.1–20 min, 20%. Mass spectra were acquired in positive ion mode. The settings of the mass spectrometer were as follows: Curtain gas 15 psi; ionspray voltage, 4500 V; ionspray temperature, 400 °C. The GA components were quantified according to the standards of GA1, GA3 and GA4.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

UPLC-MS Analysis of Phenolic Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Free and bound phenolic compounds were determined using an ACQUITY UPLC M-Class liquid chromatograph from Waters (Waters Corp., Milford, MA, USA) that included a degasser, a binary pump, an oven and an automatic liquid sampler, and it was coupled with mass spectrometry. Phenolic compounds were separated on HPLC column Poroshell 120, SB-C18 (3.0 mm × 100 mm, 2.7 µm) from Agilent Technologies (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA). Oven temperature was set at 25 °C and separation was conducted according to the conditions previously proposed by Gómez-Caravaca et al. [23 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Metabolite Profiling by LC-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The metabolites were resuspended in 100 μL methanol–water solution (v/v, 50:50), and the supernatant was analyzed using a U3000 chromatography system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, CA, USA) coupled with Orbitrap Fusion Lumos apparatus. Two replicates were used for each sample. The resuspended sample (1 μL) was injected into an Agilent Poroshell 120 SB-C18 chromatographic column (2.1 × 100 mm, 2.7 μm) using an autosampler for separation at 30 °C. Separation was performed with 0.2 % formic acid eluent A and acetonitrile mobile phase B at 0.2 mL/min. Gradient elution was set and performed within 2 min with 100 % solution A, 2–12 min at 100–0 % A, and maintenance for 4 min, which was followed by return to the starting conditions in 1 min.
Mass spectrometry analysis was performed in the positive ion mode. The following conditions were used: spray voltage, 3.5 kV; sheath gas flow rate, 35 arb; auxiliary gas flow rate, 10 arb; purge gas flow rate, 2 arb; ion transfer tube temperature, 320 °C. Parent ion full-scan mass spectrum acquisition was performed in the range of 100–1000 mass/charge (m/z).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantifying Endogenous Plant Hormones in Arabidopsis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Transgenic plants and wild plants of Arabidopsis at the flowering stages were used for quantification of the plant endogenous hormone with 1 g/plant. Leaves of Arabidopsis were ground with 10 mL isopropanol/hydrochloric acid and shaken at 4°C for 30 min (You et al., 2016 (link)). There were 9 transgenic plants and 9 wild plants. Subsequently, 20 mL dichloromethane was added. The mixture was shaken at 4°C for 30 min and centrifuged at 13,000 rpm at 4°C for 5 min. The organic fraction was separated and then dried under nitrogen in darkness. The solid residue was re-suspended in 400 μL methanol/0.1% methanoic acid. The sample was filtered with a 0.22 μm filter membrane before HPLC-MS/MS analysis.
HPLC analysis was performed using a poroshell 120 SB-C18 (Agilent, United States) column (150 × 2.1 mm × 2.7 μm). The mobile phase A solvents consisted of methanol + 0.1% methanoic acid and the mobile phase B solvents consisted of ultrapure water + 0.1% methanoic acid. The injection volume was 2 μL. MS conditions were as follows: the spray voltage was 4,500 V; the pressure of the air curtain, nebulizer, and aux gas were 15, 65, and 70 psi, respectively, and the atomizing temperature was 400°C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

HPLC analysis of OP and GEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A 1260 Infinity high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and a Poroshell 120 SB-C18 threaded column (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) 4.6×50 mm (2.7 μm) were used. OP (Hangzhou Dayang Chem Co., Ltd) and GEM were dissolved in HPLC grade methanol. The mobile phase was 60% HPLC grade methanol and 40% 0.04 M ammonium acetate buffer (pH 5.2) at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. The column temperature was 25°C, the injection volume was 20 μL, and OP and GEM were detected at 230 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!