The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Microcal peaq itc analysis

Manufactured by Malvern Panalytical
Sourced in United Kingdom

The MicroCal PEAQ-ITC analysis system is a laboratory instrument designed for isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) measurements. It is used to characterize the thermodynamics of biomolecular interactions, including binding affinities, stoichiometry, and enthalpy changes.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

15 protocols using microcal peaq itc analysis

1

Biophysical Characterization of BabA-IgG Binding

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ITC was performed on an Auto-ITC200 from Malvern Panalytical (Malvern, UK). Recombinant BabA from H. pylori 17875/Leb was stabilized by adding hexa-lysine and myc-tag to the BabA protein C-terminus as described previously 25 (link). Experiments were performed at 25°C in PBS with 10 µM of BabA and injection of 50 µM ABbA-IgG. The titrations were repeated three times with high feedback and a filter period of 5 s. For each experiment, 19 automated injections of 2 μL each were performed (duration 0.8 s) with 300 s intervals between each injection with a stirring speed of 1000 rpm. Calorimetric data were plotted and fitted using a single-site binding model with MicroCal PEAQ-ITC Analysis from Malvern Panalytical (Malvern, UK).
SPR experiments were performed on a Biacore 3000 system (GE Healthcare, Uppsala, Sweden). ABbA-IgG was immobilized on a CM5 chip at around 50 RU levels by standard amine coupling at pH 5. Recombinant BabA from H. pylori 17875/Leb was injected for 2 min over the surface at concentrations of 66 nM or 40 nM at two- or three-fold dilutions in PBS + 0.005% Tween-20 at 25°C. Regeneration was done by injection of 10 mM glycine (pH 1.7) for 18 s. Dissociation and rate constants were determined by global fitting with Scrubber2 software (Biological Software, Australia). The experiment was repeated three times and presented as the average value.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Thermodynamic Analysis of ApoE Isoform Interactions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ApoE isoforms, as well as truncated ApoE4 (ApoE41-191 were dialyzed against PBS + 0.01% (v/v) Triton X-100 overnight at 4 °C using 3.5 K Slide-A-LyzerTM dialysis cassettes (ThermoFisher Scientific, Loughborough, UK). ApoE, as well as ApoE41-191 at 300 μM was injected into the cell containing compound at 25–50 μM in PBS + 0.01% (v/v) Triton X-100 + 2% (v/v) DMSO. Titration experiments were carried out on a Microcal PEAQ-ITC (Malvern Panalytical, Malvern, UK) at 25 °C and 750 rpm, and consisted of an initial (1 μL) injection followed by additional 18 (2 μL) injections. Injection of the protein into PBS + 0.01% (v/v) Triton X-100 + 2% (v/v) DMSO was used as control experiment and integrated control heats were subtracted from the reaction heats. Data were analyzed on Microcal PEAQ-ITC analysis software (Malvern, version 1.1.0.1262) and data-fitted for one set of sites. Binding affinities as presented in Table 1 are the average of two independent experiments (±SD).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Thermodynamic analysis of FOXO1-ETS1-DNA complexes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Titrations were carried out using either a MicroCal PEAQ-ITC or a MicroCal iTC200 calorimeter at 25 °C. All protein and DNA samples were dialyzed overnight at 4 °C against the same buffer containing 50 mM Bis–Tris, pH 6.5, and 150 mM NaCl. Concentrations used in each experiment are listed in Supplementary Data 3. For the FOXO1 titrations against the DNAs with or without ETS1 20 injections of titrant were made at 120 s intervals, while stirring at 750 rpm. The first injection was 0.4 µl, and 2 µl for the remaining nineteen. For the ETS1 titrations against the different DNAs 13 injections of 3 µl were done. While ETS1 was kept in the cell and DNA was added from the syringe, FOXO1 was always titrated from the syringe into the cell filled with DNA or DNA and ETS1 in equimolar ratios. Data were reduced with heat spikes from control and baseline corrected. The raw data integration, normalization and titration curve fitting was done using the MicroCal PEAQ-ITC analysis software provided by Malvern.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Isothermal Titration Calorimetry of Chitohexaose and N-plug Binding to VhChiP

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ITC experiments were carried out at least three times using the MicroCal PEAQ-ITC (Malvern Instruments Ltd) at 25 ± 1 °C with a stirring speed of 500 rpm. For titration experiments, 40 μl of chitohexaose or the N-plug was titrated from a syringe into the 300 μl-calorimeter cells containing 0.05% (v/v) LDAO, 20 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.5, and protein solution. The optimized concentration ratios of chitohexaose and N-plug to VhChiP variants are shown in Table 3. Injections (2 μl per injection) were repeated 19 times over 150-s intervals. The background was measured by injecting the corresponding ligand into the cell containing only the buffer. The ITC data were collected and analyzed using the MicroCal PEAQ-ITC analysis software (https://www.malvernpanalytical.com/en/support/product-support/software/microcal-peaq-itc-analysis-software-v141). The ITC profile obtained by injecting the corresponding ligand into the reaction cell containing buffer without VhChiP was subtracted from the control dataset. The resultant data were fitted by a single-site binding model with the nonlinear least square algorithm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantifying HMGB1-F1,6P Interactions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ITC experiments were carried out using a Malvern‐PEAQ apparatus. Typical titration experiment consisted of 19 or 13 consecutive injections at 150 s intervals into the titration cell. The F1,6P, peptide, and protein (HMGB1∖HMGB1‐A box) were dissolved in the same buffer (100 mm Hepes, 50 mm NaCl) and degassed for 10 min under vacuum in each experiment. Controls included F1,6P injected into buffer, peptide injected into buffer and F1,6P‐peptide injected into buffer solutions, respectively. Data were analyzed by using nonlinear regression with a single site binding model in Malvern MicroCal PEAQ ITC Analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Thermodynamic Analysis of Protein-Ligand Interactions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Experiments were performed using a Microcal PEAQ-ITC (Malvern Instrument GmbH). The protein was dialyzed overnight at 4°C against the ITC buffer (20 mM HEPES at pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM TCEP). The Tm1 WT protein in the syringe, at a concentration of 1 mM, was injected into the cell containing the buffer. Titrations were performed at 20°C or 25°C and consisted of 13 or 25 injections. The data were fitted using the dissociation fitting model of the Microcal PEAQ-ITC analysis software (Malvern).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Determining Binding Constants via ITC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Binding constants were determined by means of ITC measurements with a MicroCal PEAQ‐ITC system (Malvern). Solutions of protein (50–100 μm) and 4 e (1.0 mm) were prepared by using the same buffer stock (≈300 mm TrisHCl, pH 8.0). Three control experiments, namely the titration of buffer with buffer, the titration of protein solution with buffer, and the titration of buffer with ligand, were performed. Each titration experiment was baseline corrected and the signal peaks of each injection were integrated by MicroCal PEAQ‐ITC analysis (version 1.22, Malvern Panalytical). Then, each protein–ligand titration experiment was corrected for each control experiment and processed by using the built‐in functions of MicroCal PEAQ‐ITC analysis with the “single set of identical sites” option. Thus, a ΔH versus molar ratio (ligand:protein) plot and fit values for the binding constant KD, the number of binding sites n, and the molar heat of ligand binding ΔH were obtained. The fitted number of binding sites in initial analyses was close to one. For better comparability, the number of binding sites was then set to one for all experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Thermodynamic Characterization of P450cam

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All experiments were performed with the MicroCal PEAQ-ITC instrument from Malvern. Phosphate buffer (50 mM at pH 7.4) was used for all experiments. For experiments in the presence of camphor, a final concentration of 1 mM D-camphor was used. DTT or any other reducing agents were removed from both protein preparations before experiments. All experiments were performed at 25 °C. For camphor and Pdx binding experiments, the reaction cell contained either 300 μL of 30 to 60 μM wild-type P450cam or R186A mutant, and the injection syringe was filled with 1 mM D-camphor or 2.4 mM Pdx (for Pdx binding experiment). Each titration experiment was performed by using 18 injections of 2 μL with 4 s duration and a 150 s interval between injections. Reference power of 5, high-feedback mode, and a stirring speed of 750 rpm were used for all experiments. All data were analyzed by using the MicroCal PEAQ-ITC analysis software. To obtain the binding enthalpies, the observed enthalpy values were corrected for the enthalpy of dilution obtained under identical conditions with the sample cell containing buffer alone.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Calorimetric Analysis of MAO-A Interactions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A MicroCal PEAQ-ITC200 calorimeter (Malvern, Worcestershire, UK) was used to study the interactions of MAO-A with the compounds. The enzyme and compounds were prepared in 1% DMSO with methanol. The measurements were performed at 36.6 °C. The stirring speed was set to 307 rpm, and a total of 19 injections were performed within 50 min, with the reference power set to 10.00 μcal/s. All sample solutions were thoroughly degassed before use. The calorimetric cell was filled with a 20 μM (350 µL) MAO-A sample, and the syringe (2 µL of injection volume) was loaded with a 1 mM/L solution or/and 5-HT (1 mM/L). The ITC data were processed using MicroCal PEAQ-ITC analysis software with calorimetric routines. The following parameters were determined: the standard interaction Gibbs energy (ΔG), standard interaction enthalpy (ΔH), entropy (ΔS), equilibrium constant (KD), and stoichiometry of reaction (N) [59 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Thermodynamic Analysis of LgnA-LgnD Binding

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Thermodynamic data of interaction measurements between LgnA and LgnD or truncated LgnDs were generated using a Malvern MicroCal PEAQ-ITC instrument controlled by MicroCal PEAQ-ITC Control Software. Calorimetric titrations were performed with thirteen 3 µL injections with injection duration of 6.0 s, a spacing of 150 s, a reference power of 5 µcal/s, and constant temperature at 25 °C. The concentrations used for titration experiment were LgnA (125 µM) and LgnD (25 µM) or truncated proteins, LgnD-C1-T1 or LgnD-C1-T1-C2 or LgnD-C1 or LgnD-T1, and LgnB (250 µM) with LgnD or truncated LgnD (25 µM). Every set of measurements was repeated in duplicate. Data were analyzed with the “one set binding model” of the software (MicroCal PEAQ-ITC Analysis) provided by the manufacturer. The software calculates the calorimetric binding enthalpy, adsorption constant, number of adsorption sites, and changes in entropy. Enthalpy of dilution effects for solute was considered during ITC measurements.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!